Sunday, November 22

Comcast Reportedly in Talks with NBC Universal

October 1st, 2009
Author Henry Chamberlain

Comcast

It’s possible that you’ll be seeing a change of ownership of your favorite NBC Universal shows like “Heroes,” “Battlestar Galactica,” and the whole SyFy channel because it’s possible that Comcast Corp is going to make a play for the whole shooting match: a major network and movie studio and powerful cable channels like MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo. That would be a huge leap in content for Comcast which currently owns such channels as E! Entertainment Television and G4.

According to The Los Angeles Times, Comcast Corp, the nation’s biggest cable company, is in talks to buy NBC Universal. While there has been speculation over the future of NBC Universal, it is far from certain what will happen next.

This isn’t the first time that Comcast has made such a bid. Five years ago it attempted to buy Disney for $54 billion. The article states that “While NBC Universal is valued at up to $35 billion, Comcast has a market cap of $48 billion and about $4 billion in cash. This would make it a highly leveraged buyout of NBC Universal.”

In a story full of scenarios, The Times makes a very interesting comics-related point. It may turn out that Time Warner, owner of DC Comics, could be in the best position to be the ultimate buyer of NBC Universal.

For the complete story, visit The Los Angeles Times here.

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Battle of the Supermaxes?

September 30th, 2009
Author David Pepose

Super Max…. meet Supermax.

Reuters has reported that Columbia Pictures has picked up the script for a film called Supermax.

This is not to get confused with the long-in-development feature “Super Max” by Warner Bros. and David Goyer, which forces Green Arrow to team up with inmates to survive a metahuman prison riot. Instead, Columbia’s film forces a prison guard to team up with inmates to survive… a supernatural prison riot?

Hoo boy. That’s a lot of coincidinks here. Good thing this sort of thing isn’t anything like David Goyer’s earlier film, Death Warrant. That movie is about Jean-Claude Van Damme as a cop teaming up with inmates in a prison riot. Er… never mind.

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Wednesday Linkblogging

September 23rd, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

The internet loves you, and it brings you fun things. Today:

Twilight-haters will no doubt have even more to complain about, but I don’t care: Stephenie Meyer’s The Host to be made into a movie.

From Wired: Get to know the Surrogates comic before the movie hits.

Fun little comic page by Matthew Sheret and Julia Scheele.

Jason Aaron has some thoughts on Scalped. You know, the best comic that comes out each month. (He didn’t say that. I did.)

Another story from Wired. I don’t know why I’m linking it, really. Those illustrations are sort of cool, I guess. Who’s the artist? Oh, some guy named Ryan Kelly

One of the only reviews of Jennifer’s Body that I’ve seen that doesn’t spend half its time complaining about Diablo Cody (see comments on Stephenie Meyer).

I’ll repost this under events, but I found it interesting: from Johanna Draper Carlson, a lecture by Noah Berlatsky, whose blog examines classic Wonder Woman comics.

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Documentary powers ACT-I-VATE!!!!

September 23rd, 2009
Author David Pepose

The webcomics collective ACT-I-VATE has their own documentary!

activateexperience

Seth Kushner and Carlos Molina announced that they are almost finished their film on the group called “The ACT-I-VATE Experience,” and will premiere it at the Baltimore Comic-Con on October 11th. It will also be shown at Brooklyn’s King Con on November 6th.

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Nic Cage Superman Costume Test Burns Eye Sockets

September 22nd, 2009
Author David Pepose

Nic Cage, one-time Ghost Rider and star of the Wicker Man remake, once asked “how’d it get burned??” Well, this is the answer.

niccagesupermanhurl

That’s right, a costume test of a bemulleted Cage wearing a shiny Superman suit, presumably from the aborted Tim Burton reboot of the series. Cinematical inflicted this upon us, but you want to see more, check it out at the source at TimBurton.jp. There are sketches there, too. I feel bad, since it’s not really Cage’s fault — and I’ll bet that if you had the chance to be Superman, you’d probably rub the Vasoline on yourself.

But seriously, you’ve been warned. I feel like Nic Cage at the end of the Wicker Man.

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

The Next X-Film: X4 or New Mutants?

September 22nd, 2009
Author David Pepose

Slashfilm has an interesting interview up with Lauren Shuler Donner, the producer who has backed the X-Men movies since the first film with Bryan Singer.

newmutants2

According to the post, Donner took a moment to dismiss rumors about X-Men: First Class being filmed anytime soon — despite a tweet from Tim Pocock, who played the Young Cyclops in the Wolverine film, who said the film would start shooting by March of next year — but said that the two properties that were being kicked around at this point were X-Men 4 as well as the New Mutants.

And I say, awesome.

Reuniting the X-Men — preferably without the increasingly manic cameos that I think diluted the second two films — would be a no-brainer cash-cow, considering how popular the franchise has become, and the fallout from the third film with Phoenix and Charles Xavier. Maybe we’d get to see a return of Cyclops, and Matt Fraction’s move to San Francisco?

The New Mutants, in a lot of ways, were the X-Men’s version of the Teen Titans. Cannonball, Sunspot, Moonstar, Wolfsbane, Karma, Warlock, Magik, and Cypher were the newest recruits of Charles Xavier’s School, and for me one of their most interesting elements was the fact that these kids became brothers-at-arms, training under Xavier, Magneto, and eventually Cable himself. If told with the same sort of heart that Singer gave the first film, this could be one hot property. Which would you rather see?

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Jedi accuses store of religious discrimination

September 21st, 2009
Author David Pepose

The Guardian reports that a man who founded the International Church of Jediism has accused a store of religious discrimination.

23-year-old Daniel Jones — or his Jedi name, Morda Hehol — says he was victimized by a Tesco store in Bangor. The crux of the argument? When he entered the store to get some food during his lunch break, store employees told him to take his hood off.

“They said: ‘Take it off’, and I said: ‘No, its part of my religion. It’s part of my religious right.’ I gave them a Jedi church business card,” Jones told the Guardian. “It states in our Jedi doctrination that I can wear headwear. It just covers the back of my head.” Tesco was a little bit more cheeky with its response, saying their main defense is that Luke Skywalker, Obi-Wan Kenobi, and Yoda were all seen without their hoods.

I’ll be honest, I’m kind of torn by this. On the one hand, it’s pretty easy to dismiss the guy as a weirdo for establishing a religion around George Lucas’ film trilogies, but at the same time, if you took out the word “Jedi” there would be some major implications here. What if they told a Jew they couldn’t wear a kippah? If they told a Muslim they would have to remove their hijab? What do you think?

[via Alex Irvine]

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Interview: Robert Venditti

September 21st, 2009
Author Henry Chamberlain

Surrogates

Surrogates, the new Bruce Willis sci-fi action thriller from Disney’s Touchstone Pictures, is set to hit theaters Sept 25. It is based on the graphic novel written by Robert Venditti, illustrated by Brett Weldele and published by Top Shelf Productions. It all began as a script for a graphic novel that, as Robert Venditti says, has gone far “beyond anything that I ever anticipated happening.” Speak with him and you hear a humble guy who knows what he wants. Here is Robert Venditti talking about Surrogates, comics and Disney/Marvel.

As Venditti describes it, the whole idea of Surrogates even getting published was far from a sure thing. He was working in the mail room at Top Shelf Productions and was hoping that maybe Chris Staros, one of the partners, might be able to help him find a small publisher and then he could have a book he could pass around to editors in hopes of landing more work. “So, to have all of this happen: to actually get it optioned and have it made, which is the huge hurdle you have to clear, and then to have it be the size and scope that it is, you don’t even know what to say.”

Ask him what a surrogate is or what the story is about, and Venditti answers with such enthusiasm you’d think it was the first time he was being asked. “Maybe you want to have a surrogate because you want to summit Mt. Everest but you don’t want to go through the turmoil of actually doing that or maybe you are diabetic and you just want to eat chocolate cake — you can do any of these things with your surrogate and experience it as if you are really doing it but it’s all coming to you secondhand through the machine.”  The story about these surrogates, these android duplicates that do all the things its human owners only wish to do from a distance, takes a turn when they start turning up fried out in the real world. Something or someone is destroying them and that is where detective Harvey Greer steps in, played by Bruce Willis in the movie.

Surrogates

Having Bruce Willis on board is something that Venditti sounds like he’ll never grow tired of talking about. He sets up a scene a few years back, just as the trend of movies based on comics is heating up, and it’s him and his wife sitting at the kitchen table. They look at each other. What if, he asks, just for fun, a movie was made from his book? “Who would we cast in the film? And her and I both thought that Bruce Willis would be the perfect guy to play Greer because he is one of the very few actors that can be convincing in tough action sequences but also convincing in the more personal, emotional scenes like Greer has with his wife in the book, which is a very strong undertone of the book, the effect that surrogate technology has had on their marriage. And there aren’t a lot of guys who can do both and he is one of them. So, we thought he would be perfect and then, six years later, they cast him in that very same role, so it’s all pretty surreal.”

Surrogates

Surrogates can be practical as replacements for humans in dangerous occupations but the real attraction is that they can be the ideal version of their owners. Is this human trait to want to be something other than who you are essentially good or bad? “There is always something about yourself that you wish you could tweak to some extent. I don’t know that that’s a positive or a negative. When I wrote the book, I tried not to make any determinations. I’m trying to just ask questions. Is technology used in this way good or is it bad? It could be good in the sense that it’s what leads us to strive to better ourselves and ultimately make the world better around us. But it could be bad in the sense that it could make us go beyond that and start to lose sight of who we actually are and try to become something that we are not. So, there is no black or white, yes or no, answer to those kinds of questions — it all depends on how they are applied.”

Surrogates

And how are we applying the technology we have today? Where are we headed? “The technology is already so much more near the future than even the story I wrote. I put it about fifty years down the road but it seems like technology is advancing at a much faster rate that it’s going to be here sooner than that.” Venditti recalls a documentary he saw on Wired.com with robotics scientists demonstrating the use of robot arms by wearing a headset you operate with your mind. Then he thinks about things like Second Life and how we’re inching closer and closer to the future in his story with all the activity already in play in a virtual world. And, in this new world, can we hope for a truly level playing field free of prejudice? “I would hope we could reach such a place without having to use technology to get there.” In his story, for instance, the only way people can guarantee advancement is by simply taking on the required identity such as women pretending to be men in order to be airline pilots.

Surrogates

Now, get Venditti to talk about the writer’s craft and his creative journey and you’ll hear him make his way to a life changing discovery. “Through high school, all the way to graduate school, I had the same misconceptions that most people have which is that comics are just children’s literature and not capable of complex ideas and themes — never having read them and it was a completely ignorant stance to take. But a friend of mine was a big comics fan and got me to read an arc of Astro City called ‘Confession’ and it just jumped out at me.” “Confession”, by Kurt Busiek, considered a masterwork in comics comparable to Watchmen, showed Venditti that comics could be more than a plot-driven genre but it could be a character-driven work of literature.  On top of this discovery, Venditti had always harbored a childhood desire to be an animator. “So now, flash forward, and I’m reading these comic books with a literary sensibilty and I realized here’s a medium where I can write the stories and someone else can translate the stories into art and that’s probably as close as I’m ever going to be to that original childhood ambition I had.”

So, there is that wall between academia and commerce that must be overcome. What about another wall, the one that separates fans of mainstream comics from fans of alternative comics? Venditti’s relationship with Top Shelf Productions is a prime example of how these two worlds can mix with excellent results. Surrogates was definitely something new for Top Shelf, known for black and white graphic novels with a more literary style. Surrogates would be their first mainstream full color serialized story. “So, it was a bit of leap for them,” Venditti says, “but I take it as a great source of pride that Top Shelf felt that Surrogates had strong characters and a literary style. I don’t think that a wall should be there. There is a lot of cross-over. I know from working for Top Shelf, among the leading light of their generation of cartoonists, and they all grew up on Marvel and DC and they’ve all got a Spider-Man or a Batman story that they are just dying to tell so I don’t think the wall is as pronounced as maybe some people would think.”

You have to start somewhere and, as Venditti points out, there was a time before the independent comics movement when everyone grew up on Marvel and DC. Only now, can you have readers who have only known indie comics and, for them, it might be easier to cross over to mainstream comics. Whatever the case, Venditti is proud to let you know that Top Shelf has always welcomed all readers. “We do more conventions than anybody in a given year. We have a pretty heavy tour schedule and go to places where we are really the only independent literary style comics publisher in attendance. You know, places like Chicago Comic-Con, MegaCon in Orlando or Dragon*Con in Atlanta, are places where it’s a heavily mainstream audience and we’ve just sort of won people over one at a time. And our fan base, and people that read our books, is very much composed of people that are mainstream comic fans as well.”

The prequel to Surrogates, the graphic novel, recently came out and we can expect a sequel in the future to round out a trilogy. “I’m sort of doing the Star Wars model there where I did the middle first and then the beginning and then I do the end. But since then, I’ve also come up with two additional novels that I would like to do as well so right now, in my head, we’re up to five.”

Also from Top Shelf, there is Venditti’s upcoming Homeland Directive which explores how, in a post 9/11 world, we reconcile public safety with personal privacy. “When the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written, the worst thing you had to worry about was maybe a cannon ball coming through your window. We live in a much scarier world now.”

As for Disney’s acquisition of Marvel, Venditti’s view is framed by the fact he already works for both companies. Of course, Surrogates is a Disney movie. Venditi is also working with Hyperion Books, a division of Disney, where he is working on a graphic novel adaptation of Percy Jackson & The Olympians series. For Marvel, he did a Captain America story for Marvel Comics Presents in April of last year. And, among other upcoming projects, he has an Iron Man One Shot entitled, “Iron Protocol,” that comes out in October. “So I have a foot in both camps. If the acquisition now means that both feet are in one camp, then so much the better.” As for any concerns of change over at Marvel, Venditti doesn’t think there’s reason to worry. “Disney already has other, non-superhero comics publishing divisions, so as long as those continue with their output, I don’t see why Marvel wouldn’t remain primarily a superhero imprint.”

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Kirby Heirs Seek to Reclaim Rights

September 20th, 2009
Author David Pepose

Just when you thought the comicsphere could rest easy after the past few weeks — the heirs of Jack “King” Kirby have something to say.

xmen1cover

The heirs of one of the architects of the House of Ideas have sent 45 notices of copyright termination to Marvel, Disney, Paramount, Sony, Fox, and Universal, the New York Times has reported.

There’s no word about what characters are involved with this — or if the rights being discussed are for comics, film, television, licensing, or all of the above — but considering Kirby has helped create characters ranging from the (original) X-Men to the Fantastic Four, it could be big. Any change-up would occur around 2014, which would be years after Paramount’s Avengers films, Sony’s Spider-Man 4, or Fox’s X-Men Origins: Wolverine sequel would hit theatres.

On the legal side of things, this is more or less bleeding edge copyright and intellectual property war being waged here. DC has seen similar issues with the Siegel estate’s legal dealings regarding the Superman franchise — and in this case, both the Siegels and the Kirbys have the same lawyer, Marc Toberoff. The phrase “work for hire” will almost certainly come into play here, as the creation of these characters in the early 1960s didn’t typically come with the most ironclad of creator contracts.

But what about that Disney deal? Will this spoil that? Not according to Disney reps, who told the NY Times, “the notices involved are an attempt to terminate rights seven to 10 years from now, and involve claims that were fully considered in the acquisition.” Stay tuned to Blog@ and the mothership for more info…

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Saturday Linkblogging

September 19th, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

I am off to Bergen Street Comics’ release party for Beasts of Burden tonight, so I’ll save my thoughts on the comic for tomorrow. For now, have some linkage:

Johanna Draper Carlson did not much like the Whiteout movie.

Warren Ellis asked artists to Remake/Remodel Black Orchid. He must’ve asked VERY nicely…

Some thoughts on comics and race in an interesting discussion thread on Racialicious.

The Rumpus brings you a review of Shane Acker’s 9.

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

The Marvel/Disney Spider…King?

September 14th, 2009
Author David Pepose

I was wondering when this would finally happen.

It’sJustSomeRandomGuy, famous for I’m A Marvel/I’m A DC, has put in his two cents on the Marvel/Disney deal. And it’s a musical!

Ironic that it’s Batman giving the words of wisdom on this deal. Also, what Punisher does to Wolverine in the first part of the movie is hilarious and wrong.

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

The Power of 9

August 31st, 2009
Author Henry Chamberlain

I thought I’d share a few pages from a Focus Features promotional book for, 9, the major motion picture debut of director Shane Acker’s beautiful animation. Based on his Academy Award-nominated short film, this full length movie is co-produced by Tim Burton and stars Elijah Wood as the plucky little hero who is determined to bring back humanity to a world without humans. 9 arrives in the US, Sept 9 or 9-9-09.

First, here’s a nice Shane Acker quote:

“Steampunk” is a celebration of mechanisms and an idolization or faith in machines as a future, which emphasizes analog over digital. But in 9, since the world has fallen to pieces it’s become all analog. “Stitchpunk” — a term which I first heard coined from a fan of the short film — fittingly describes the 9 characters’ aesthetic, in what they physically are and in that they have been designed not as toys but to survive in a barren landscape.

And here is a sketch by Shane Acker accompanied by the storyboard art:

Shane Acker's 9
Shane Acker's 9
 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Wednesday Linkblogging!

August 19th, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

It’s an extra-special movie-themed linkblogging day today.  To start things off:

District 9

Reviewed by Spencer Ackerman, we get some thoughts about white anxiety in the film, and also the future of video-game movies. No, District 9 isn’t a video-game film, but Ackerman points out some similarities to video-game structure in the pacing of the movie, and wonders what it means for the future. He also takes on another blogger whose comparison of the movie to US policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, he thinks, is over the line.

At Racialicious, of course, the focus is even more on the racial undertones, with one commentator finding the film uneven and problematic and another writer examines the racist portrayal of black Africans in the movie.

Inglourious Basterds

R.M. Guera of Scalped (the best comic you may not be reading) worked on a comic book from the film, and the results can be seen here.

Splash Page’s Twitter report shows several comics professionals have Tarantino on the brain, too. Glad it’s not just me.

Whiteout

1979SemiFinalist looks at Whiteout’s promo materials and gender issues. Verdict? Looks pretty, who knows if it’ll be any good.

Twilight

Eclipse, the third Twilight movie, started filming today, apparently. And apparently the werewolf pack likes to hang out and eat muffins? (I swear that’s not sexual innuendo.)

Finally, Scott Pilgrim

Splash Page has some video from the Scott Pilgrim set. You know you wanna see it…

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Yo Joes, what did you guys think of the movie?

August 13th, 2009
Author J. Caleb Mozzocco

That's mute super-ninja sign language for "embarassed sigh," also known as "facepalm"

(more…)

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Vampires Suck–Or Do They?

August 7th, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

A friend forwarded me this article on Slate on the new vampire phenomenon, and pointed out a piece of it that I haven’t thought much about: the new sexy vampires don’t actually drink blood. Or if they do, they don’t kill.

Yet, like many people who acquire mega-celebrity, the vampire has developed an eating disorder. Read the books. Watch the movies. You’ll see vampires who manage nightclubs, build computer databases, work as private investigators, go to prep school, lobby Congress, chat with humans, live near humans, have sex with humans, and pine over humans, but the one thing you won’t see them do is suck the blood of humans.

Grady Hendrix snarks on a lot of the most popular vampires of recent pop culture, starting with Anne Rice and moving on to the one that many of my peers grew up crushing on: Angel, from Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Faced with the impact of his diet on humans, Angel accepts a yucky, cruelty-free substitute, then endlessly lectures other vampires about their moral failings because they don’t do the same. He’s not a vampire—he’s a vegan.

I’ve more than once made the comparison of Angel to Edward Cullen in Twilight, but I hadn’t thought about the spiral this way: as one spinning from less and less consumption of human blood. (There are, of course, occasional recurrences of the bloodthirsty, evil vampires like those of 30 Days of Night, but I digress.)

But Hendrix doesn’t seem to actually be that up on the details of Buffy. Witness:

At least Angel, Anita Blake’s vampires, Sookie Stackhouse, and most of the rest of them have a lot of sex.

Well, I haven’t gotten around to Anita Blake or into True Blood yet, but I know my Buffy, and Angel didn’t have a lot of sex–because if and when he did, he lost his soul and turned evil. People love to compare Buffy to Twilight, but the fact is that Angel and Edward Cullen indeed have a lot in common. They can’t get it on with their human lady-loves, because something BAAAD could happen. They don’t drink blood, because they have consciences.

The whole story of both Angel and Edward Cullen, in other words, is that of the monster tamed by the woman he loves. The just-bad-enough boy who’s really a sweetheart on the inside. Sure, Buffy kicks Angel to the curb (after running him through with a sword) but soon enough she’s taken up with a new vampire–this one with a chip in his brain so he can’t, er, drink human blood.

I don’t agree with Hendrix’s faux concern for the way kids might be receiving mixed messages from their media, because I tend to read media for clues about the way we’re already heading, not look at it as something that shapes us. Pop culture as a symptom. So what does it signify to me that out of millions of books, I see more women (yes, grown women) on the subway reading Twilight books than anything else? After all, we’re adults. We’re not adolescent girls having our perception of men shaped by some sensitive emo-boy vampire. We already know that relationships are messy and fraught with danger.

True Blood is next on my Netflix list, so until then, I really can’t comment on the symbolism there, but this piece has set me thinking in yet another way about what it might be that we get from these defanged monsters. If you take away the blood drinking and sleeping in coffins (which neither Angel nor Edward do), what do you have but a boyfriend who never grows old?

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Thursday Linkblogging

August 5th, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

No, my linkblogging posts don’t come on any particular day, they just tend to appear when I’ve gathered enough links that I like but don’t really have enough to say about to warrant their own posts. In case you were wondering. Now, onward!

At The Nation (full disclosure: I’m currently a Nation intern), Melissa Harris-Lacewell talks about the conservative campaign to paint President Obama as the Joker, and does an excellent job teasing out some interesting political parallels with The Dark Knight film.

Via When Fangirls Attack, a post on close female friendships in comics. How many female “buddy” or “bromance” pairings can you think of?

A comparison of Marvel Divas and Gotham City Sirens, also via When Fangirls Attack.

Johanna Draper Carlson looks at Huntress: Year One.

From Splash Page, Charlyne Yi of Paper Heart and Knocked Up is doing a comic with Oni Press. Insert random blather about how Yi is actually a geek here, right? Well, because she’s not Megan Fox (read, sexy girl everyone slobbers over) this hasn’t gotten that much attention, but it makes me happy: Charlyne Yi is funny, and from what I’ve seen of Paper Heart, is actually creative as well.

Jezebel looks at my favorite superheroine from childhood: She-Ra.

Finally, Defamer wants to know how gay Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes is going to be. Apparently word leaked out that there was going to be some sexual tension between the leads (Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr.), which was enough to send Michael Medved into a panic. Apparently there’s nothing to offend Medved in the screenplay, at least, and so he can go back to doing what he does best–which certainly isn’t knowing what women would like to see in a film. Or at least, this woman.

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Some More “Alien” Thoughts

August 2nd, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

It should be shocking to absolutely no one that a huge part of my love for Alien is the character of Ripley, played by Sigourney Weaver. I once had a college professor say that the only truly feminist movie she could think of was the original Ridley Scott Alien.

Scott’s history of directing movies with badass women (Thelma & Louise and G.I. Jane among them) got its start with Ripley, and it makes me happy to hear that Scott will be returning to helm an Alien prequel, even if we’re unlikely to see Ripley in it: I have faith that we’ll get some other good, complex female characters.

The first Alien movie is so good precisely because you don’t see Ripley coming as the last woman standing. She’s not your typical horror movie Final Girl. She’s abrasive, effortlessly competent and undersexualized–until the final scene, where she’s let down her guard literally and symbolically, and has to fight the alien with none of her defenses. Each character you get attached to is killed off and you realize, slowly, that Ripley is your hero.

Then, of course, you got her for several more films. But the original horror of Alien can be brought back in a prequel because once again, you won’t know who your hero is. Since Ripley first met the Alien in the original film, even if we catch a glimpse of young Ripley she won’t be our lead, and instead there will be a new cast to deal with new horrors.

I also can’t wait for a Scott-helmed Alien movie with 2009-style special effects. If you watch the bonus features on the original Alien DVD, you’ll learn interesting facts like the alien inside the egg was actually Scott’s own rubber-gloved hands. And since the movie claims one of the most truly horrifying moments I’ve seen in cinema, still–the moment where the alien bursts out of Kane’s chest and skitters off down the hall–with those rudimentary effects, imagine what disgusting moments Scott can create with high-end CGI?

Again, though, the first movie is terrifying because you don’t know what’s going to happen. When the alien erupts out of the insides of a human character you’ve grown to like, in a vicious horror of pregnancy gone wrong (untopped til Breaking Dawn, but I’m so not going there right now), you realize that even bodies are not safe, and this is capitalized upon when you find out that Ash is a robot. A prequel will have a lot to do to top the thrills of a long franchise like Alien, but I’m betting Ridley Scott is the director who can live up to the early films.

And since I started off with a tribute to Sigourney Weaver as Ripley, how about some ideas for a badass heroine for a new Alien age? Entertainment Weekly suggested Ellen Page, but I’m not feeling her. My vote for now goes to Lucy Liu or Eliza Dushku, but I can be persuaded…

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Ridley Scott Back With ‘Alien’ Prequel

August 1st, 2009
Author Henry Chamberlain

Alien Prequel

It’s official: Fox has announced that Ridley Scott, who brought us Alien in 1979, is set to direct the latest entry in the franchise, the yet untitled Alien 5, slated for 2011.

Is it possible that the horrible creatures from Alien can behave themselves? We should get to see how they interact on their own turf as this prequel will visit them on their planet of origin. No doubt, they won’t act civilized for long once the humans arrive.

At 71, Ridley Scott is a very busy man. A look at his IMDb shows he has quite a number of movies in the works including Brave New World, The Forever War, Stones, The Kind One and Child 44.

The screenwriter for the new Alien movie, John Spaihts, made the successful pitch to Fox and Ridley Scott on the strength of his previous space thrillers, featuring Keanu Reeves: Shadow 19 and Passengers. Spaihts’ current writing schedule includes The Darkest Hour, Children of Mars and St. George and the Dragon.

There have been three sequels to Scott’s original, most notably James Cameron’s Aliens, the second movie that came out in 1986. This is the first time that Ridley Scott has returned as director of the franchise. Will he be able to bring this latest movie back to the level of the first two?

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Saturday Linkblogging

August 1st, 2009
Author Sarah Jaffe

Regular readers here know I love Joelle Jones’ art. You’ll also probably know I love Joss Whedon. So Joelle Jones character sketches for Dr. Horrible comics? WIN.

You can get Phonogram vs. The Fans, the limited-edition Phonogram fanzine that I wrote about here, on Etsy for the low, low price of $5. You want this.

Gail Simone, good and pissed about the EA Games “booth babes” debacle.

Racialicious has a review from the first Asian American Comic Con.

Johanna Draper Carlson talks Girlamatic, which I’d somehow missed out on, so read what she has to say.

One of my favorite bloggers, Renegade Evolution, talks about girls and gaming: “Hey baby, why all the aggro?”

Guillermo del Toro and Chuck Hogan have a cool Op-Ed in the New York Times about “why we need vampires.” Lately I’ve been doing a good bit of thinking about why vampire stories seem to appeal to a teen girl demographic in particular, so this fit right in.

And via BUST, Johnny Depp is set to play a vampire in yet another Tim Burton-helmed picture, Dark Shadows.

Stephenie Meyer, author of Twilight, is set to test the theory that fans are really just out for the hot boys at Comic-Con–she’s going to star in her own Female Force comic. (Can I mention yet again that the name “female force” creeps me out? Referring to women as “females” sounds so animalistic to me…)

Finally, on that note, an interview with Francesca Lia Block on her new vampire young adult novel, Pretty Dead. Since one of the things I’m interested in is why the vampire romance always seems to be older male vampire and young mortal girl (Angel/Buffy, Edward/Bella, etc.) I’m especially intrigued with Block’s book since it reverses that dynamic.

If you’ll excuse me, I think I’m off to watch Angel

Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe

Dash Shaw on Film and Comics

July 30th, 2009
Author Henry Chamberlain

Dash Shaw

Dash Shaw (Bottomless Belly Button, Body World) wrote his first essay on comics in a contribution to the comics art mag, Comics Comics, with a look at a book of prep work for an animated movie, Groundwork for Evangelion: 1.0, that turned into a debate over comics and cinema.

It’s interesting to note that Shaw begins his essay with a plea to “go easy” on him, the same plea he used at the start of BBB. A superstar cartoonist, like himself, doesn’t really need to ask that, does he?

So, the overview of the book, which is wonderfully detailed, leads to a discussion on whether or not comics should share any of the vision of film. Quoting from Chris Ware, who comes out completely against comics sharing anything with film, Shaw follows up with his own view.

Here is a Chris Ware quote from Shaw’s piece:

I don’t like to think of my work as “cinematic.” A movie is passive — you’re watching it, taking it in. Where a comic strip, it’s completely active: you have to read it, search it for meaning, for the connection with your entire experience and your memory. Yes, you do have the illusion of watching something happen in a comic strip — but if it’s done well, it comes alive on the page like a novel. A novel is the most interactive thing ever created.

Dash Shaw concludes that “cinematic” comics can be seen in a positive, not passive, way and that cinema is “one of many modern languages that comics can react to.”

I think it’s too much to come out so against film as Ware does but, this is Chris Ware, and I’m happy to “go easy” on him. His vision has gotten him where he is. And of course, his way is only one of so many ways of making comics.

 
Leave a Reply »
  • Add to delicious
  • Digg It!
  • Save to Newsvine
  • Add to reddit
  • Add to Netscape
  • Email to Friend Email
  • Subscribe Subscribe