<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;Who Is That Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zanocriminal</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789535</link>
		<dc:creator>zanocriminal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789535</guid>
		<description>Yeah, every criticism I&#039;ve come across for Avengers Now has been pretty lame. Nothing different here.   :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, every criticism I&#8217;ve come across for Avengers Now has been pretty lame. Nothing different here.   :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul V. Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789522</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V. Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789522</guid>
		<description>I agree with those who are saying that Hickman is playing the long game here and that he deserves the space to do that (especially after proving himself well on Fantastic Four). Granted, because comics are serialized he also has the responsibility to make the individual parts compelling. In the case of the first three issues, I felt they were; others obviously didn&#039;t. 

But to call the resolution a deus ex machina is not quite accurate, considering Captain Universe&#039;s authority in this particular situation is based on a yet-to-be-fully revealed mystery about her origins. Plus, to have the crisis mostly resolved in 3 issues, but with certain story threads having long= term, yet-to-be-seen effects is basically the kind of comics storytelling we should be lauding. It&#039;s not decompressed, but it&#039;s still taking advantage of the long form possibilities of serialized comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with those who are saying that Hickman is playing the long game here and that he deserves the space to do that (especially after proving himself well on Fantastic Four). Granted, because comics are serialized he also has the responsibility to make the individual parts compelling. In the case of the first three issues, I felt they were; others obviously didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>But to call the resolution a deus ex machina is not quite accurate, considering Captain Universe&#8217;s authority in this particular situation is based on a yet-to-be-fully revealed mystery about her origins. Plus, to have the crisis mostly resolved in 3 issues, but with certain story threads having long= term, yet-to-be-seen effects is basically the kind of comics storytelling we should be lauding. It&#8217;s not decompressed, but it&#8217;s still taking advantage of the long form possibilities of serialized comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meh</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789294</link>
		<dc:creator>Meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789294</guid>
		<description>My issues here is how people want to take new readers for idiots . New readers arent necessarily kids , and kids arent necessarily idiots neither .

You can&#039;t keep half your books constantly hamming recaps and a who&#039;s who , and sometimes trust that your readership might be smart enough to wait patiently for reveals or dig backstories .
It has been a big deterrent , at least for my friends , to be spoonfed those horrible recap habits and &quot;thoughts or exposure bubbles&quot; , that once served their purpose back in the era it was abused and introduced , but feel so annoying now .

They aint looking forward to &quot; hey my name is Golden wonder XX , this is what i do , this is what i&#039;ve been up to last issue and the 4 issues  before , this is what i think today , and here in this issue we have soldier marshmallow who once did that in that XX story i can&#039;t properly recap in two sentences&quot;  , especially every frickin&#039; issue of a serial book over multiple pages .

I&#039;ve used actully most of Marvel Now as an introduction to regular Marvel series for a few friends actually (along with Avengers vs Xmen , prologues to Superior Spidey , as it does establish the new status quo , and while giving them a a backlog and list of good stuff from the decade like avengers/new avengers , hickman&#039;s FF etc) and they have been less nerveous and miffed so far by the serialized nature of boks like Avengers and New avengers , than nrama folks around here  .


Not necessarily a general thing or a significative study sample , but that&#039;s my experience thus far .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issues here is how people want to take new readers for idiots . New readers arent necessarily kids , and kids arent necessarily idiots neither .</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t keep half your books constantly hamming recaps and a who&#8217;s who , and sometimes trust that your readership might be smart enough to wait patiently for reveals or dig backstories .<br />
It has been a big deterrent , at least for my friends , to be spoonfed those horrible recap habits and &#8220;thoughts or exposure bubbles&#8221; , that once served their purpose back in the era it was abused and introduced , but feel so annoying now .</p>
<p>They aint looking forward to &#8221; hey my name is Golden wonder XX , this is what i do , this is what i&#8217;ve been up to last issue and the 4 issues  before , this is what i think today , and here in this issue we have soldier marshmallow who once did that in that XX story i can&#8217;t properly recap in two sentences&#8221;  , especially every frickin&#8217; issue of a serial book over multiple pages .</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used actully most of Marvel Now as an introduction to regular Marvel series for a few friends actually (along with Avengers vs Xmen , prologues to Superior Spidey , as it does establish the new status quo , and while giving them a a backlog and list of good stuff from the decade like avengers/new avengers , hickman&#8217;s FF etc) and they have been less nerveous and miffed so far by the serialized nature of boks like Avengers and New avengers , than nrama folks around here  .</p>
<p>Not necessarily a general thing or a significative study sample , but that&#8217;s my experience thus far .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789237</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789237</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the thing, though... I&#039;m fine with a long story.  But make it compelling.

I didn&#039;t feel the first two issues were.  It&#039;s that simple.  I tried.  I paid for it.  By the time issue #3 came out, I was already disinterested.  Trying to win me over at issue #4 on isn&#039;t going to play when I&#039;ve paid $8-12 just to get there with no return.

For those of you enjoying it... excellent.  Please do.  But my biggest complaint is how I think a new reader would react to it.  I can handle this not being my cup of tea.  I&#039;ve got plenty of other comics that suit me fine.  But this should be THE BOOK that new readers are coming in for, and maybe I&#039;ll be able to recommend the trade to them somewhere down the road, but I can&#039;t put issue&#039;s #1-3 in their hands and expect them to come back into the store for it next week.  I just can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing, though&#8230; I&#8217;m fine with a long story.  But make it compelling.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t feel the first two issues were.  It&#8217;s that simple.  I tried.  I paid for it.  By the time issue #3 came out, I was already disinterested.  Trying to win me over at issue #4 on isn&#8217;t going to play when I&#8217;ve paid $8-12 just to get there with no return.</p>
<p>For those of you enjoying it&#8230; excellent.  Please do.  But my biggest complaint is how I think a new reader would react to it.  I can handle this not being my cup of tea.  I&#8217;ve got plenty of other comics that suit me fine.  But this should be THE BOOK that new readers are coming in for, and maybe I&#8217;ll be able to recommend the trade to them somewhere down the road, but I can&#8217;t put issue&#8217;s #1-3 in their hands and expect them to come back into the store for it next week.  I just can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meh</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789217</link>
		<dc:creator>Meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789217</guid>
		<description>Am i even supposed to be surprised ? In a while bloggers will be complaining about the lack of serialization and long ongoing story arcs in comics ... and when it&#039;s there , they&#039;ll instead complain about too much of it and not enough instant gratifications .

Is is any wonder many just ignore their opinions and just feed themselves with the news and spoilers ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am i even supposed to be surprised ? In a while bloggers will be complaining about the lack of serialization and long ongoing story arcs in comics &#8230; and when it&#8217;s there , they&#8217;ll instead complain about too much of it and not enough instant gratifications .</p>
<p>Is is any wonder many just ignore their opinions and just feed themselves with the news and spoilers ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789168</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789168</guid>
		<description>The Newsarama piece about readers wanting instant gratification applies here.

I really don&#039;t know when so much hand holding was required in comics.

Avengers is an on-going story and you need to keep reading (which as said a lot of people simply can&#039;t do these days) to find out everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Newsarama piece about readers wanting instant gratification applies here.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t know when so much hand holding was required in comics.</p>
<p>Avengers is an on-going story and you need to keep reading (which as said a lot of people simply can&#8217;t do these days) to find out everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin Tremor</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789156</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwin Tremor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 03:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789156</guid>
		<description>@Fred

It&#039;s not the same, really. This article is a legitimate critcism of the percieved use of deus ex machina. Siegel&#039;s piece was adressing a bunch of idiotic, trolling ragemonkeys who started frothing at the mouth over some imagined depiction of rape that was never written or published and exists only inside their own twisted imaginations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the same, really. This article is a legitimate critcism of the percieved use of deus ex machina. Siegel&#8217;s piece was adressing a bunch of idiotic, trolling ragemonkeys who started frothing at the mouth over some imagined depiction of rape that was never written or published and exists only inside their own twisted imaginations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789125</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789125</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the idea that people don&#039;t know how to read. 

Check this out.  The three &quot;mystery characters&quot; (Smasher, Hyperion, and Captain Universe) all show up on the last page of #1. We call that &quot;a tease&quot;.

In issue 2, they are identified by name on the screens as Cap and Tony recruit the team.  No more is divulged there; they&#039;re supposed to be mysterious.  If you have the background and know a bit about them, great; if not, it&#039;s coming.  But they WERE labelled, at least.

In #3, there&#039;s that first bit of resolution.  This is an ONGOING story.  Why do people wet their pants if they don&#039;t get the answer in the first issue?  Didn&#039;t your editor just opine about this kind of bellyaching yesterday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the idea that people don&#8217;t know how to read. </p>
<p>Check this out.  The three &#8220;mystery characters&#8221; (Smasher, Hyperion, and Captain Universe) all show up on the last page of #1. We call that &#8220;a tease&#8221;.</p>
<p>In issue 2, they are identified by name on the screens as Cap and Tony recruit the team.  No more is divulged there; they&#8217;re supposed to be mysterious.  If you have the background and know a bit about them, great; if not, it&#8217;s coming.  But they WERE labelled, at least.</p>
<p>In #3, there&#8217;s that first bit of resolution.  This is an ONGOING story.  Why do people wet their pants if they don&#8217;t get the answer in the first issue?  Didn&#8217;t your editor just opine about this kind of bellyaching yesterday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Garret</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789120</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Garret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789120</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Opena&#039;s art is crazy great.

But three issues of a huge cast and brand new villains with mysterious origins had no emotional context at all.  The greatest moments were the recruiting scenes, which made up less than 5% of the entire story.

Really, not knowing who these characters are is secondary to having a reason to care about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Opena&#8217;s art is crazy great.</p>
<p>But three issues of a huge cast and brand new villains with mysterious origins had no emotional context at all.  The greatest moments were the recruiting scenes, which made up less than 5% of the entire story.</p>
<p>Really, not knowing who these characters are is secondary to having a reason to care about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Clay Moore</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789102</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Clay Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789102</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a thing: Jerome Opena is a superhero comic super ninja. It&#039;s ridiculous how good he&#039;s gotten.

-BCM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a thing: Jerome Opena is a superhero comic super ninja. It&#8217;s ridiculous how good he&#8217;s gotten.</p>
<p>-BCM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bottleHeD</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789075</link>
		<dc:creator>bottleHeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789075</guid>
		<description>I have to agree. The first two issues were great, the villains threatening and fairly interesting; and then issue 3 happens. I had no idea who those new characters were, and the ending pretty much seemed like a cop-out. Very disappointing, coming from Hickman. I think this is the first time I&#039;m disappointed with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree. The first two issues were great, the villains threatening and fairly interesting; and then issue 3 happens. I had no idea who those new characters were, and the ending pretty much seemed like a cop-out. Very disappointing, coming from Hickman. I think this is the first time I&#8217;m disappointed with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789057</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789057</guid>
		<description>Good story telling typically jumps in to the thick of things then back fills. Give it time. Sheesh.

It&#039;s easy to re-read Hickman&#039;s FF and say how brilliant it is but a lot of the concepts he introduced there were handled the same way. And it all turned out ok, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good story telling typically jumps in to the thick of things then back fills. Give it time. Sheesh.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to re-read Hickman&#8217;s FF and say how brilliant it is but a lot of the concepts he introduced there were handled the same way. And it all turned out ok, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789036</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789036</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading comics since the 70s and I had to ask around who that was supposed to be. The story itself was pretty awful anyway, but if this is how they&#039;re gonna relaunch the Avengers, I&#039;m gonna go back to not reading the Avengers. 

Ironically, the previously incomprehensible X-Men books have gotten easier to follow and enjoy lately. Bendis is right at home here with heroes that already do sit around a table a chat all day. I loved Jason Aaron&#039;s Thor (a character I never really cared for before even under Simonson) so I picked up Wolverine and the X-Men as well. Easy to follow. Extremely entertaining. Even the AvsX tie ins were easy enough to follow without my needing to actually read that book. Just knowing the basics was enough. 

Kudos for the books that Marvel is getting right. Shame that the Avengers aren&#039;t on that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading comics since the 70s and I had to ask around who that was supposed to be. The story itself was pretty awful anyway, but if this is how they&#8217;re gonna relaunch the Avengers, I&#8217;m gonna go back to not reading the Avengers. </p>
<p>Ironically, the previously incomprehensible X-Men books have gotten easier to follow and enjoy lately. Bendis is right at home here with heroes that already do sit around a table a chat all day. I loved Jason Aaron&#8217;s Thor (a character I never really cared for before even under Simonson) so I picked up Wolverine and the X-Men as well. Easy to follow. Extremely entertaining. Even the AvsX tie ins were easy enough to follow without my needing to actually read that book. Just knowing the basics was enough. </p>
<p>Kudos for the books that Marvel is getting right. Shame that the Avengers aren&#8217;t on that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789024</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789024</guid>
		<description>I felt the storytelling, both art and writing, was so muddy in the first two issues, I didn&#039;t even come back for issue three.  But it&#039;s for the same reasons as everyone else is complaining, it seems.  I&#039;m a long (LONG) time comics reader, and I have an awareness of pretty much all these characters, but when you&#039;re launching a book, especially a flagship title like this, you do some actual storytelling and explain who is who and what is happening clearly.  If this is just a fan-service book, that&#039;s fine, but why do a whole relaunch for that?  &quot;Marvel Now&quot; seems like such a failure because it&#039;s essentially a continuation of so much that came before it instead of giving new readers the open invitation I thought they were being offered.

Also, cosmic, universe-powered characters don&#039;t work in these team books.  How well did The Sentry work?  You have Captain Universe walk around and say &quot;stop it&quot; and the villains do, how is that interesting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the storytelling, both art and writing, was so muddy in the first two issues, I didn&#8217;t even come back for issue three.  But it&#8217;s for the same reasons as everyone else is complaining, it seems.  I&#8217;m a long (LONG) time comics reader, and I have an awareness of pretty much all these characters, but when you&#8217;re launching a book, especially a flagship title like this, you do some actual storytelling and explain who is who and what is happening clearly.  If this is just a fan-service book, that&#8217;s fine, but why do a whole relaunch for that?  &#8220;Marvel Now&#8221; seems like such a failure because it&#8217;s essentially a continuation of so much that came before it instead of giving new readers the open invitation I thought they were being offered.</p>
<p>Also, cosmic, universe-powered characters don&#8217;t work in these team books.  How well did The Sentry work?  You have Captain Universe walk around and say &#8220;stop it&#8221; and the villains do, how is that interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789018</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789018</guid>
		<description>The divide, to me, comes when deciding who is the story for? Is what we are looking at and reading for us, the reader, or is it for the characters? The team is trying to vie for our attention (dollars).I think the presentation should be for the readers but the story should serve the characters. If the presentation fails is that the reader&#039;s fault or the presenter&#039;s fault? 

I personally think the story being told is interesting, but the nuts and bolts, the language, pacing, the device used for the resolution of this brief arc, all of that is off-putting and hindering my reading experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The divide, to me, comes when deciding who is the story for? Is what we are looking at and reading for us, the reader, or is it for the characters? The team is trying to vie for our attention (dollars).I think the presentation should be for the readers but the story should serve the characters. If the presentation fails is that the reader&#8217;s fault or the presenter&#8217;s fault? </p>
<p>I personally think the story being told is interesting, but the nuts and bolts, the language, pacing, the device used for the resolution of this brief arc, all of that is off-putting and hindering my reading experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RF</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789005</link>
		<dc:creator>RF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m perfectly cool waiting a couple weeks to find out who this lady is. Maybe it&#039;s because I&#039;m supermodern and hip and think old comics are dumb, but I appreciate the lack of hand-holding here. I got enough &quot;basic info&quot; to enjoy the story so far, and I look forward to having the spaces filled in in a rather unconventional manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m perfectly cool waiting a couple weeks to find out who this lady is. Maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m supermodern and hip and think old comics are dumb, but I appreciate the lack of hand-holding here. I got enough &#8220;basic info&#8221; to enjoy the story so far, and I look forward to having the spaces filled in in a rather unconventional manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-789004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-789004</guid>
		<description>I agree with Graeme; there should be a balance between providing basic info about a character and doing an &quot;old fashioned introduction&quot;.  I do not have a problem with Hickman&#039;s Legion of Super-Avengers.  However, I would like someone or something to reference a new character in-story.  Not everyone reads creator interviews on Newsarama, CBR, or iFanboy.  I am sure it is easy for a writer to miss this because they are close to the characters.  An editor should have read this with a neutral perspective and pointed this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Graeme; there should be a balance between providing basic info about a character and doing an &#8220;old fashioned introduction&#8221;.  I do not have a problem with Hickman&#8217;s Legion of Super-Avengers.  However, I would like someone or something to reference a new character in-story.  Not everyone reads creator interviews on Newsarama, CBR, or iFanboy.  I am sure it is easy for a writer to miss this because they are close to the characters.  An editor should have read this with a neutral perspective and pointed this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henchman4Hire</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2013/01/30/who-is-that-again/comment-page-1/#comment-788997</link>
		<dc:creator>Henchman4Hire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=35068#comment-788997</guid>
		<description>That Captain Universe thing was my exact same problem with that issue, and a large problem with the series so far. Hickman seems to think he&#039;s writing the greatest Avengers epic of all time. But in the end, all he&#039;s done is put a random team of superheroes together, which I&#039;m pretty sure is the concept behind every Avengers relaunch in history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Captain Universe thing was my exact same problem with that issue, and a large problem with the series so far. Hickman seems to think he&#8217;s writing the greatest Avengers epic of all time. But in the end, all he&#8217;s done is put a random team of superheroes together, which I&#8217;m pretty sure is the concept behind every Avengers relaunch in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
