Today sees the release of Superior Spider-Man #1, but thanks to the wonders of teasers, we already have an idea of what lies in the future of the title… And the combination of the two has me somewhat convinced that what is going on with the new series isn’t the creation of an all-new Spider-Man status quo, but the slow reintroduction of an old one. Spoilers and speculation under the jump.We know, now, that April will see Spider-Man “fired” – and, from the background of the Humberto Ramos image, it looks like he’s getting fired from the Avengers. While that seems like a big deal now – Spidey has, after all, been an Avenger for almost eight years by this point – it’s less of a big deal in the larger picture, considering that the character had, prior to New Avengers, spent the rest of his career as a loner who didn’t join any team. It was that realization – That Spider-Man being “fired” from the Avengers is more of a return to the way things used to be than anything new – that stuck in my head as I read Superior #1, with its equally old-fashioned title, “Hero or Menace?” And then it hit me:
Superior Spider-Man is a long con.
Go with me here. We all know, or think we know at least, that Peter Parker will end up as Spider-Man again before too long. But what if Superior isn’t about trying to convince us that Otto is the real deal, but about the Otto Spidey convincing the Marvel Universe at large that the character is a threat that isn’t to be trusted again? Over the years, the idea that Spider-Man is a morally ambiguous presence in the Marvel U has been almost entirely abandoned as the hero has been embraced by his peers, saved the world multiple times and become appreciated by the man and woman on the street for doing so… All of which is miles away from the original concept of the character as a hard-luck hero who gives his all but never receives the rewards for doing so. But what if Otto Spidey destroys Spider-Man’s good reputation, and undoes all of that?
Marvel has tried to reboot Spider-Man in various ways over the years, from clones to devils to spider-totems (Hey, they weren’t all good ideas, okay?), but this seems like a surprisingly elegant way to bring the character back to basics that stays entirely within what we expect from a Spider-Man story: No overly supernatural elements – superscience, yes, but we’re talking about a guy who got spider-powers from the result of a radioactive spider-bite here – and no “everything you know is wrong!” but the end result could be – is? – the same: When the dust clears, no-one will quite know what to make of Spider-Man again, and only the reader will recognize his true heroism.
Of course, this is all speculation and may be entirely wrong. But if I’m right, I have to admit: It’s a long way for a short cut, but I like where it’s going.
January 9th, 2013 at 11:16 am
I think you nailed it.
The first issue was great, so I can’t wait to see what Dan Slott has in store for us!
January 9th, 2013 at 11:26 am
I had the same thought, just hope they don’t abandon all of the progress Peter Parker has made. It’s one thing to want Spider-Man to be seen as a menace in the public eye, its another to have Peter go back to being photographer for the Daily Bugle.
January 9th, 2013 at 5:15 pm
“Hey, fellow Avengers, Doc Ock took over my body — all that stuff that happened wasn’t me.”
“No sweat, Spidey, that kind of thing has happened to each of us at some point or another. Welcome back to the team!”
And Spider-man is back to saving the world and hanging out with the Avengers and people think he’s a hero.
January 9th, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Great idea Jabba the Brevoort
January 9th, 2013 at 8:18 pm
damn, what a brilliant thought process. I’m sure it’s not as cut and dry as that, but I’m sure when Pete’s back I’m sure Marvel will play up the menace angle much harder
January 9th, 2013 at 8:41 pm
How is Slott’s lengthy story line different from having Spider-Man go temporarily insane for a while, caused by anything you want to conjecture? The end result is the same as the conclusion that you posit: Spider-Man is unstable and can’t be trusted. Temporary insanity would do that in just a few issues, though.
Illusion of change as a policy makes any story line ultimately pointless if the objective is to keep the status quo or return to another trivially different one.
SRS
January 9th, 2013 at 9:48 pm
So first Amazing Spider-Man is cancelled to present a crappy 60′s DC fill in issue ofsuper villain mind swapping, but presented over a year’s time. Now we get Good Cop/Bad Cop version of FIRESTORM???
C’mon, Marvel. Increasing the house ads to more than half the book would be more entertaining than this.
January 10th, 2013 at 3:41 am
But as Kyle Garret so amusingly and astutely noted upthread, it all falls apart if the Avengers acknowledge that every one of them has suffered similar villainous identity thefts.
But that would be expecting characters written by Dan Slott to respond intelligently to circumstances they’ve faced before.
I never thought anyone could beat Mark Millar for letting idiot plots trump characterization, but this is Slott’s forte.
January 10th, 2013 at 3:43 am
Dan Slott’s plots only work when one character is promoted to Mary Sue God Mode and everyone else is reduced to an Epsilon Minus sub-moron.
April 9th, 2013 at 9:19 pm
Nice article, a lot of important information.