She doesn’t look like a relic, Graeme me old mucker – she looks like Wonder Woman, which is more than the current version does.

She DOES look like Wonder Woman, or certainly the Wonder Woman that most people are accustomed to seeing. You know, the one who is on the T-shirts and lunch boxes, and stuff. The one that most people will recognize.

Maybe Ms. Magazine didn’t want to promote a Wonder Woman whose entire story is highly misogynistic like the current one? Maybe Ms. Magazine didn’t want a rage fiend that cuts off heads and arms with the greatest of ease (and pleasure) to represent their magazine? Maybe Ms. Magazine wanted to use a POSITIVE female image like the original Wonder Woman was and like Wonder Woman always was intended to be instead of this highly negative view DC is touting. After all, Ms. Magazine is a feminist magazine and using this current WW would undermine their entire concept? So yeah.. let’s use the CURRENT Wonder Woman, who mind you NO ONE outside of comic fans (who DC keeps reminding us is white men 18-30), would recognize as Wonder Woman? Maybe because there is nothing remotely iconic about this current Wonder Woman in anyway, not in story, concept, or costume? Ms. Magazine made the 100% right move and they knew what they were doing.

Does anyone else have a problem with him shitting on Mike Allred’s art?

Whether or not the current WW is misogynist (and I do think it is), it’s certainly horrible garbage that attacks the very concept of Wonder Woman.