I think that you can tell dark, dystopic superhero stories that are full of gloom and ultimately are tragedies. I think you can tell those stories if you’re highly skilled at it. I’m not saying those stories shouldn’t exist, but from my perspective, superheroes were not created to tell those kinds of stories. Superheroes to me are always about hope and always about inspiration, and I think that I never intended for “Irredeemable” to be a book where the end note was just bleak and depressing and not life-affirming in some way. I just don’t think I have it in me to write something like that about superheroes.
That’s Mark Waid, talking about the end of Irredeemable, his Boom! Studios series that I once likened to Battlestar Galactica in terms of the constant tone of “Oh, you think things are bad now…? Just wait.” I completely agree about what superheroes are “about,” but find myself wondering just how out of step that is with current mainstream superhero tastes, especially considering that most superheroes now don’t have an end-point, which means their entire existence can be “Even more things go wrong!” second act…
June 15th, 2012 at 9:59 am
Source of this quote?
June 15th, 2012 at 10:23 am
TC, I think the preferred phrasing is “Whither the source of this quote?”
In any event, here: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=39169
June 16th, 2012 at 11:44 am
That ending was hopeful? I… guess. Incorruptible was hopeful, but Irredeemable once again let Plutonian off the hook, which bothered me quite a bit.
June 16th, 2012 at 3:13 pm
Christ, Dan, we let him DIE. That’s kinda ON the hook. YMMV, but if you had a better ending in mind, you’re welcome to write it.
June 16th, 2012 at 10:13 pm
Er… point out where I said I thought I could do better.
June 17th, 2012 at 6:42 pm
I agree with Dan Coyle. He’s definitely incapable of writing something better.