Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: On Underorders, Reorders and Direct Market Distribution

On Underorders, Reorders and Direct Market Distribution

April 3rd, 2012
Author Graeme McMillan

If the news yesterday that Boom! Studios was going exclusive with Diamond Distributors wasn’t particularly interesting to you, maybe there’s one wrinkle in the press release that could be worth a closer look. Ross Richie is quoted as explaining that the exclusive deal not only gives retailers a higher ordering discount, but also offers “better fill rates on comic book reorders; and our entire graphic novel backlist inventory will now be available for immediate ordering.” Reorders seem to be a big deal for Boom!; back when they partnered with Haven in 2009, it was to ensure faster reorder shipments (Haven closed last year, which also leaves me wondering if Boom!’s exclusivity announcement is a weird PR opportunity that doesn’t exactly make sense; without Haven, did Boom! even have another direct market distributor for the last six months? Weren’t they exclusive by default?), which leaves me to wonder if Boom! is suffering from the kind of systematic, repetitive under-ordering that Image Publisher Eric Stephenson wrote about last week. Marvel and DC aside, is any publisher in the direct market getting enough copies ordered in the first round of ordering…? And if not, how easily can that kind of thing be course-corrected?

3 Responses to “On Underorders, Reorders and Direct Market Distribution”
  1. Jonathan @ Comic Toast Says:

    Stephenson makes a very legitimate argument that retailers need to be willing to support books that have a reasonable expectation of being solid sellers. I own a small store in a college town, and I can usually expect interest in a new series to be light, no matter how much I promote it or recommend it. People are picky with their dollars, and you have to give them a reason to try new things that may or may not be worth their $3.99. I’ve recently started doing regular 1/2 off sales on #1 issues, and I have seen a noticeable rise in the subscription numbers of those books. I have taken risk and I am now seeing the reward.

    On the flip side, the publishers need to be willing to cut us a little more slack. DC does a great job with its return policy, allowing you to pretty much return any book that you order at some point. I think DC is being exceedingly generous with that policy, and I think retailers would get excited about even a percentage return policy – some sort of flat rate, 20%. A return policy from ALL publishers would show that they are willing to share more of the risk with us. It gives us the leverage to order a few extra copies of Saga #1 or Avengers vs. X-Men #0 (which I thought I over ordered, and just had to order 2nd printings of).

    The direct market, specialty store market is the best way for people to discover comics, a place where the medium is loved. For that to survive, retailers are going to need to show a little more solidarity than is shown by some publishers who often seem more interested in selling you extra services than they do their books. For the market to survive, for the medium to survive with the same vitality and creativity it now possesses, publishers and retailers are in this together.

  2. Rich Johnston Says:

    Non exclusive publishers can use book distributors to supply comic stores.

  3. http:www.ereleases.com http://www.ereleases.com/submit.html www.ereleases.com/submit.html Says:

    Thank You for this post. Just found it on google and i have to say that i;m really really surprised :) Thanks again and cheers dude!

Leave a Reply »