Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: The Amazing Consistency of The Walking Dead

The Amazing Consistency of The Walking Dead

March 2nd, 2012
Author Graeme McMillan

There’s something kind of amazing to see in the Beat’s regular month-by-month comparison of Diamond sales estimates, in regards to sales of The Walking Dead:

10/2011: The Walking Dead #89 – 31,351 (-1.5%)
10/2011: The Walking Dead #90 – 31,778 (+1.4%)
11/2011: The Walking Dead #91 – 31,813 (+0.1%)
12/2011: The Walking Dead #92 – 31,496 (-0.1%)
01/2012: The Walking Dead #93 – 31,596 (+0.1%)

The sales seem to have reached a point where they’re essentially self-correcting, with each month’s order numbers undoing whatever change happened the month before. Never mind the fact that a black and white horror book has such impressive order numbers in the first place, the fact that they’re pretty much entirely consistent in such a changable market is genuinely impressive – and more than a little surprising, too.

(As an aside: How much of this title’s sales consistency can be attributed to it being by the same writer/artist team every month, and being a story that’s self-contained in one series without crossovers, tie-ins or the need to read anything else?)

4 Responses to “The Amazing Consistency of The Walking Dead”
  1. Jane A Says:

    I tried two issues but I couldn’t get into it.

  2. maybe Says:

    Could be faked. Would be nice to see if the same correction happened around the shows premier. I would expect new readership after the show premiered or at least a small bump up as the show ramped up its premier advertising.
    Just wondering how consistent it has been.

  3. Brian Hibbs Says:

    The bump happens at the beginning of each new story arc, because that’s the place all the trade readers can jump on. I expect a pretty big leap coming at #97, since #96 will become the last issue in the second Omnibus.

    -B

  4. seamus keane art Says:

    What I also take from that list is that it shipped regular for 5 issues, which is amazing for the walking dead.

Leave a Reply »