Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: 20 Pages for $3.99? It’s A Scheduling Thing, Apparently, Maybe

20 Pages for $3.99? It’s A Scheduling Thing, Apparently, Maybe

September 23rd, 2011
Author Graeme McMillan

Axel Alonso addresses – or, maybe, avoids – the issue of why so many of Marvel’s $3.99 titles have dropped to 20 pages in recent months. From CBR’s Axel-in-Charge column:

There are occasions when a writer requests additional pages for an issue, and if it doesn’t imperil the ship date, we try to accommodate — though we’re more frugal in soft economic times like these. Conversely, there are occasions when a writer, knowing that his book’s behind schedule and looking to fend off the possibility of a fill-in artist on the arc, shaves down a script a little to help the artist hit their deadline and move on to the next issue. If they do this, they usually balance it out later, with an extra page in a subsequent issue.

On the plus side, if this is true, we can expect some really, really long issues on titles like Ultimate Spider-Man and Moon Knight soon (Alonso also suggests that 20 pages may also be used to help low-selling titles like Deadpool Max).

7 Responses to “20 Pages for $3.99? It’s A Scheduling Thing, Apparently, Maybe”
  1. Jane A Says:

    lol, don’t hold your breath waiting for those extra pages mate!

  2. Martin Gray Says:

    OK, let’s take Axel at his word. The question becomes: ‘why?’ Why can’t Marvel simply assign a certain amount of pages to comics, and be consistent? Then everyone knows where they stand – the writer knows they have a certain amount of pages and no more*, the artist knows to organise their time to accommodate the production of said pages, the reader can make an informed decision about whether to purchase if price is a consideration … as it is, only Marvel seems to be benefiting, by getting an extra dollar for nothing.

    * Are there really decent pro writers who simply can’t write to length?

  3. Supermutant Says:

    BS. Really this sounds and looks like marvel scrambling fora excuse for something that caught doing.

  4. silvanthalas Says:

    “Alonso also suggests that 20 pages may also be used to help low-selling titles like Deadpool Max”

    Or they could, I dunno, drop a low-selling Deadpool title since they flooded the market with all kinds of unnecessary Deadpool comics in the last year.

  5. SKFK Says:

    “Alonso also suggests that 20 pages may also be used to help low-selling titles like Deadpool Max”

    That’s funny, considering that next week’s Deadpool Max #12 is the final issue.

  6. Kevin Huxford Says:

    Over on FormSpring (http://www.formspring.me/TomBrevoort/q/240829839450323429):

    “Tom, if fans don’t want to pay $3.99 for 20 page stories, (and there are at least a few) what comics should they skip?

    The $3.99 ones, obviously.”

    I dunno. I’d tend to believe, at best, the answer is somewhere between Alonso’s and Brevoort’s, meaning that the one quoted in the blog entry is mostly spun tripe.

  7. AAB Says:

    VOTE w/your $PENDING ! ! !

    PEOPLE of the EARTH:
    S T O P $PENDING your LABOR, your TIME, your FUTURE on a flimsy booklet filled w/a bunch of advertisements that interrupt stories…

    GO TO USED BOOK STORES AND FIND GREAT DEALS ON GRAPHIC NOVELS – and guess what, no commercials/advertisements…and pay LESS THAN COVER PRICE!!!!

    Anything over $2.25 for a comic book is L A M E, and an embarrassing use of your LABOR, TIME and FUTURE.

    VOTE w/your $PENDING ! ! !

Leave a Reply »