<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problems With Feeling Ownership Of WFH Characters&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: libra113</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-811412</link>
		<dc:creator>libra113</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-811412</guid>
		<description>Oh may we please, please use a character we own and have owned for decades lady we pay a regular salary to. :) 

Just not seeing that happening in the real world with anyone.

Writers are paid to write their little corner of the world and the people who run the company run the entire world they&#039;ve created.   It&#039;s their call what characters show up where, when and how.

Yes, it should all jibe and a little heads up helps that but they are not required or obligated to ask permission.   Something like &quot;hey character X, which you write, is appearing in comic Y in a month here are the details&quot; is in line but even that isn&#039;t law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh may we please, please use a character we own and have owned for decades lady we pay a regular salary to. <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Just not seeing that happening in the real world with anyone.</p>
<p>Writers are paid to write their little corner of the world and the people who run the company run the entire world they&#8217;ve created.   It&#8217;s their call what characters show up where, when and how.</p>
<p>Yes, it should all jibe and a little heads up helps that but they are not required or obligated to ask permission.   Something like &#8220;hey character X, which you write, is appearing in comic Y in a month here are the details&#8221; is in line but even that isn&#8217;t law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-677407</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-677407</guid>
		<description>Charles J. Baserap Says:

&quot;Dominick, Marvel tried a few times and has a She-Hulk mini right now along with Heroes For Hire, did an entire month spotlighting Women of Marvel in which they did one shots for female characters, gave X-23 an ongoing, elevated the heck out of Valeria Richards, just recently had to cancel Spider-Girl, Spider-Woman, and Ms. Marvel due to sales (but at least they gave them a shot), had a female led Young Allies after a female Nomad starring mini, had to cancel Black Widow also due to low sales, but still gave her a shot.&quot;

This is it...if Marvel has been printing these books, but no one&#039;s buying them, and thus Marvel has to cancel them, who&#039;s really to blame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles J. Baserap Says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Dominick, Marvel tried a few times and has a She-Hulk mini right now along with Heroes For Hire, did an entire month spotlighting Women of Marvel in which they did one shots for female characters, gave X-23 an ongoing, elevated the heck out of Valeria Richards, just recently had to cancel Spider-Girl, Spider-Woman, and Ms. Marvel due to sales (but at least they gave them a shot), had a female led Young Allies after a female Nomad starring mini, had to cancel Black Widow also due to low sales, but still gave her a shot.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is it&#8230;if Marvel has been printing these books, but no one&#8217;s buying them, and thus Marvel has to cancel them, who&#8217;s really to blame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonvoice</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-677206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonvoice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-677206</guid>
		<description>If I were writing a solo book, with the empowerment of &quot;sense of ownership&quot; seemingly established by your boss, then find out that &quot;your character&quot; is guest-starring in a book you&#039;re NOT WRITING, that would also raise my hackles.

DC wants to establish a unified continuity with their DCnU, but doesn&#039;t have the forethought to communicate with the character&#039;s writer?  This suggests one of two possibilities: A) the &quot;unified continuity&quot; thing is a bunch of cow pies, or B) they&#039;re going to let the character&#039;s writer go.

Either scenario would piss me off, but I&#039;m hoping the answer is &quot;A&quot;.  (at least, that&#039;s what the mystery chick near the end of Flashpoint #5 implies).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were writing a solo book, with the empowerment of &#8220;sense of ownership&#8221; seemingly established by your boss, then find out that &#8220;your character&#8221; is guest-starring in a book you&#8217;re NOT WRITING, that would also raise my hackles.</p>
<p>DC wants to establish a unified continuity with their DCnU, but doesn&#8217;t have the forethought to communicate with the character&#8217;s writer?  This suggests one of two possibilities: A) the &#8220;unified continuity&#8221; thing is a bunch of cow pies, or B) they&#8217;re going to let the character&#8217;s writer go.</p>
<p>Either scenario would piss me off, but I&#8217;m hoping the answer is &#8220;A&#8221;.  (at least, that&#8217;s what the mystery chick near the end of Flashpoint #5 implies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCrouton</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-676355</link>
		<dc:creator>TheCrouton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-676355</guid>
		<description>With both Gail Simone and Bryan Q Miller both unhappy, and looking at the comments of both and at what the writer of the issue has said, I wonder is this is Stephanie Brown instead of Barbara Gordon, and the &#039;plot twist&#039; that will pull the rug out as claimed by writer Duane Swierczynski, I wonder if they will turn Sthepanie Brown rogue or &#039;bad&#039;, OR kill her off.  I hope I&#039;m completely wrong on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With both Gail Simone and Bryan Q Miller both unhappy, and looking at the comments of both and at what the writer of the issue has said, I wonder is this is Stephanie Brown instead of Barbara Gordon, and the &#8216;plot twist&#8217; that will pull the rug out as claimed by writer Duane Swierczynski, I wonder if they will turn Sthepanie Brown rogue or &#8216;bad&#8217;, OR kill her off.  I hope I&#8217;m completely wrong on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675939</link>
		<dc:creator>meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675939</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not even just about common courtesy , even if important . If you write an ongoing book about such an involved character , you should be at least informed of what&#039;s done to it in other books , for the sake of doing your job well enough .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not even just about common courtesy , even if important . If you write an ongoing book about such an involved character , you should be at least informed of what&#8217;s done to it in other books , for the sake of doing your job well enough .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675517</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675517</guid>
		<description>@Dan - your suggestion to Robert makes no sense. Otherwise it would read:

Please give charles david haskell A JOB WRITING ONE OF BOOK. IT WILL BE INTERESTED TO SEE WHAT HE DOES WITH ONE OF CHARACTER.

Um, no. Robert is correct. Although it should be &#039;INTERESTING&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan &#8211; your suggestion to Robert makes no sense. Otherwise it would read:</p>
<p>Please give charles david haskell A JOB WRITING ONE OF BOOK. IT WILL BE INTERESTED TO SEE WHAT HE DOES WITH ONE OF CHARACTER.</p>
<p>Um, no. Robert is correct. Although it should be &#8216;INTERESTING&#8217; <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675515</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675515</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think editors should have to &#039;check&#039; with creators about using a character. They are DC&#039;s property.

But they should at least have the common courtesy to let them know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think editors should have to &#8216;check&#8217; with creators about using a character. They are DC&#8217;s property.</p>
<p>But they should at least have the common courtesy to let them know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herald</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675419</link>
		<dc:creator>Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675419</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl, Birds of Prey, Catwoman, Supergirl, Voodoo...&quot;

Most of whom have been mishandled in recent years in one way or another, some more horribly than others. *points to Cass Cain Batgirl*

I, for one, am not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl, Birds of Prey, Catwoman, Supergirl, Voodoo&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of whom have been mishandled in recent years in one way or another, some more horribly than others. *points to Cass Cain Batgirl*</p>
<p>I, for one, am not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J. Baserap</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675400</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J. Baserap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675400</guid>
		<description>Dominick, Marvel tried a few times and has a She-Hulk mini right now along with Heroes For Hire, did an entire month spotlighting Women of Marvel in which they did one shots for female characters, gave X-23 an ongoing, elevated the heck out of Valeria Richards, just recently had to cancel Spider-Girl, Spider-Woman, and Ms. Marvel due to sales (but at least they gave them a shot), had a female led Young Allies after a female Nomad starring mini, had to cancel Black Widow also due to low sales, but still gave her a shot.

In other words, I&#039;ll see your Straw Man, and raise you facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominick, Marvel tried a few times and has a She-Hulk mini right now along with Heroes For Hire, did an entire month spotlighting Women of Marvel in which they did one shots for female characters, gave X-23 an ongoing, elevated the heck out of Valeria Richards, just recently had to cancel Spider-Girl, Spider-Woman, and Ms. Marvel due to sales (but at least they gave them a shot), had a female led Young Allies after a female Nomad starring mini, had to cancel Black Widow also due to low sales, but still gave her a shot.</p>
<p>In other words, I&#8217;ll see your Straw Man, and raise you facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick Glespen</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick Glespen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675297</guid>
		<description>DC doesn&#039;t care about female characters? Let&#039;s see - there&#039;s Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl, Birds of Prey, Catwoman, Supergirl, Voodoo...

Now quick - name all the Marvel books with female leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC doesn&#8217;t care about female characters? Let&#8217;s see &#8211; there&#8217;s Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl, Birds of Prey, Catwoman, Supergirl, Voodoo&#8230;</p>
<p>Now quick &#8211; name all the Marvel books with female leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675239</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675239</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s Misfit. Gail did create her after all and would be more entitled to feelings of ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s Misfit. Gail did create her after all and would be more entitled to feelings of ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XavierDust</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-675035</link>
		<dc:creator>XavierDust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-675035</guid>
		<description>I love how Gail saying she was &quot;angry&quot; turned into Gail is &quot;outraged&quot;! You guys are such drama queens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Gail saying she was &#8220;angry&#8221; turned into Gail is &#8220;outraged&#8221;! You guys are such drama queens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gokitalo</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674940</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokitalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674940</guid>
		<description>WHAT

I&#039;VE BEEN PETTING A LIE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT</p>
<p>I&#8217;VE BEEN PETTING A LIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674885</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674885</guid>
		<description>Also, the bunnies were imaginary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the bunnies were imaginary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674881</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674881</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, I totally agree that I&#039;m annoying and need to shut my mouth and all that stuff. WELL OBSERVED!  :)

DC has every right to use their characters the way they wish and in the books they want, that was never in question. There&#039;s a lot more to this story, but in general as a matter of common sense and common courtesy, the writer of a solo book is informed when that character appears in another book. It&#039;s good for everyone to coordinate.

These things happen, it&#039;s just a drag to find it out on Twitter, that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, I totally agree that I&#8217;m annoying and need to shut my mouth and all that stuff. WELL OBSERVED!  <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>DC has every right to use their characters the way they wish and in the books they want, that was never in question. There&#8217;s a lot more to this story, but in general as a matter of common sense and common courtesy, the writer of a solo book is informed when that character appears in another book. It&#8217;s good for everyone to coordinate.</p>
<p>These things happen, it&#8217;s just a drag to find it out on Twitter, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gokitalo</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674840</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokitalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674840</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t entirely agree, The Question. Yes, Gail didn&#039;t create Barbara/Batgirl/Oracle, but if she&#039;s writing an ongoing series starring the character, then it only makes sense for DC to tell her when things like this are going to happen.

I&#039;m seeing a growing contrast between DC&#039;s and Marvel&#039;s handling of creators these days. Marvel creators (writers and editors alike) seem to have a more open and collaborative relationship, while DC appears to be moving in the opposite direction. That lack of communication and collaboration could end up hurting DC in the long run. 

@Realist- true, but the circumstances there are a little different. If you&#039;re doing a team book like JLA, it makes sense that most of the big character developments are going to occur in the characters&#039; individual titles. Here, it sounds like we&#039;re going to see the reverse; Barbara&#039;s doing something huge in a title that isn&#039;t her own AND the person writing the Batgirl solo book didn&#039;t even know about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t entirely agree, The Question. Yes, Gail didn&#8217;t create Barbara/Batgirl/Oracle, but if she&#8217;s writing an ongoing series starring the character, then it only makes sense for DC to tell her when things like this are going to happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing a growing contrast between DC&#8217;s and Marvel&#8217;s handling of creators these days. Marvel creators (writers and editors alike) seem to have a more open and collaborative relationship, while DC appears to be moving in the opposite direction. That lack of communication and collaboration could end up hurting DC in the long run. </p>
<p>@Realist- true, but the circumstances there are a little different. If you&#8217;re doing a team book like JLA, it makes sense that most of the big character developments are going to occur in the characters&#8217; individual titles. Here, it sounds like we&#8217;re going to see the reverse; Barbara&#8217;s doing something huge in a title that isn&#8217;t her own AND the person writing the Batgirl solo book didn&#8217;t even know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filthy McMonkey</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674816</link>
		<dc:creator>Filthy McMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674816</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Work For Hire, Vichus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Work For Hire, Vichus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VichusSmith</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674811</link>
		<dc:creator>VichusSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674811</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m the only one who doesn&#039;t know what WFH means?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m the only one who doesn&#8217;t know what WFH means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell D</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674804</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674804</guid>
		<description>I can understand writers feeling some sort of ownership of corporate characters, but if you are gonna play in someone else&#039;s sandbox, you have to expect this kind of thing.  
Best to simply create and own a sandbox, where this wouldn&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand writers feeling some sort of ownership of corporate characters, but if you are gonna play in someone else&#8217;s sandbox, you have to expect this kind of thing.<br />
Best to simply create and own a sandbox, where this wouldn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reliant</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674797</link>
		<dc:creator>Reliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674797</guid>
		<description>I must be getting ready for the fanboy retirement home, because this doesn&#039;t bother me in the slightest. I like the idea of Batgirl popping up in Birds of Prey and like the idea it took Simone and Miller by surprise even more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be getting ready for the fanboy retirement home, because this doesn&#8217;t bother me in the slightest. I like the idea of Batgirl popping up in Birds of Prey and like the idea it took Simone and Miller by surprise even more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Parish</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674672</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Parish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674672</guid>
		<description>This incident is just another piece of evidence in the file of how DC slapped this relaunch together at the last minute. Who needs to think? Just print the stuff and they&#039;ll buy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This incident is just another piece of evidence in the file of how DC slapped this relaunch together at the last minute. Who needs to think? Just print the stuff and they&#8217;ll buy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Question</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674665</link>
		<dc:creator>The Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674665</guid>
		<description>Gail Simone is freaking annoying.

it&#039;s her right to be annoying, but she did not create Barbara or Oracle so her feelings of outrage are misplaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gail Simone is freaking annoying.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s her right to be annoying, but she did not create Barbara or Oracle so her feelings of outrage are misplaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674662</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674662</guid>
		<description>Gail Simon needs to learn when to shut her mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gail Simon needs to learn when to shut her mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeisterLegion</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674661</link>
		<dc:creator>MeisterLegion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674661</guid>
		<description>The Batgirl on issue #1 of BATGIRL - Bab&#039;s: BLUE eyes
The Batgirl on issue #4 of BIRDS OF PREY - Steph: in Steph&#039;s costume, wearing a red-wig, GREEN eyes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Batgirl on issue #1 of BATGIRL &#8211; Bab&#8217;s: BLUE eyes<br />
The Batgirl on issue #4 of BIRDS OF PREY &#8211; Steph: in Steph&#8217;s costume, wearing a red-wig, GREEN eyes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RunnerX13</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674636</link>
		<dc:creator>RunnerX13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674636</guid>
		<description>No surprised, Dan is all talk, but he&#039;s a dick of a business man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprised, Dan is all talk, but he&#8217;s a dick of a business man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziyad</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziyad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674631</guid>
		<description>i think doing this without the writer bodes badly because she would have helped with the transition. This isnt a good pr move.

plus it might be early to do something like this as we dont really know if the DCnU is a longterm succes and would be better if you did thid next year.

instead of barbara it might be best if spoiler appeared instead just for change of pace and to put fans at rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think doing this without the writer bodes badly because she would have helped with the transition. This isnt a good pr move.</p>
<p>plus it might be early to do something like this as we dont really know if the DCnU is a longterm succes and would be better if you did thid next year.</p>
<p>instead of barbara it might be best if spoiler appeared instead just for change of pace and to put fans at rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herald</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674600</link>
		<dc:creator>Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674600</guid>
		<description>John Smith said:

&quot;Repeat after me:

DC does not care about female characters.

DC does not care about female creators.

DC does not care about female readers.

Anyone who is capable of being surprised by this sort of thing has been living under a rock since at least 2003 or so.&quot;

Amen to that, especially the female characters part. Everyone from Cass Cain to Mary Marvel to Wonder Woman has been utterly obliterated by these people. It&#039;s IDIOCY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Smith said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Repeat after me:</p>
<p>DC does not care about female characters.</p>
<p>DC does not care about female creators.</p>
<p>DC does not care about female readers.</p>
<p>Anyone who is capable of being surprised by this sort of thing has been living under a rock since at least 2003 or so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that, especially the female characters part. Everyone from Cass Cain to Mary Marvel to Wonder Woman has been utterly obliterated by these people. It&#8217;s IDIOCY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olh</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674595</link>
		<dc:creator>olh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674595</guid>
		<description>The beginnings of Simone leaving DC for Marvel ala Harras booting her out of the house of ideas before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beginnings of Simone leaving DC for Marvel ala Harras booting her out of the house of ideas before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674592</link>
		<dc:creator>M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674592</guid>
		<description>Do we know that is Babs, though? I think Steph is still alive and well, and maybe this issue will show Stephanie transition from Batgirl back to Spoiler or something else entirely.

I&#039;ve enjoyed DC&#039;s output this past week and I&#039;m putting a lot of faith in DC for now, so I hope they don&#039;t screw the pooch for this relaunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we know that is Babs, though? I think Steph is still alive and well, and maybe this issue will show Stephanie transition from Batgirl back to Spoiler or something else entirely.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed DC&#8217;s output this past week and I&#8217;m putting a lot of faith in DC for now, so I hope they don&#8217;t screw the pooch for this relaunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catsmeow12</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/09/14/the-problems-with-feeling-ownership-of-wfh-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-674581</link>
		<dc:creator>catsmeow12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=28827#comment-674581</guid>
		<description>First Barbara steals Steph&#039;s book, and now her costume. Another reason why I am not picking up Babs&#039; new series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Barbara steals Steph&#8217;s book, and now her costume. Another reason why I am not picking up Babs&#8217; new series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
