Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Trailer Shows Up in More Permanent Form

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Trailer Shows Up in More Permanent Form

July 20th, 2011
Author Albert Ching

After showing up and disappearing in short order yesterday, the first trailer for 2012′s Amazing Spider-Man looks to be released on board via Movie-List and here for good. Watch below:

43 Responses to “AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Trailer Shows Up in More Permanent Form”
  1. Fluffy6079 Says:

    I really wanted to hate this movie. My hope was that it was terrible and that Marvel and Disney could get the franchise back to do a Marvel Studios version of Spider-Man and maybe even do a New Avengers movie down the line, but man this looks good.

  2. MarkSC Says:

    Man, this looks sooooo good. Had my doubts and just a trailer, but man it looks good.

  3. DX Says:

    Meh. Honestly, the Peter’s parents being spies thing does ABSOLUTELY EFFING NOTHING for me. Nothing. I liked his origin the way it was. I’m not one of those emo, I hate everything different kids either. I’ll give it a shot, but not thrilled with what I see. But, it’s beautifully shot!

  4. DougG Says:

    Yay, ANOTHER origin story. I distinctly remember the excitement of the original Spidey teaser, where he catches the two helicopters between the World Trade Center towers (pre-9/11). This is more dark, morose muck, with none of the brightness and humor that make Peter Parker an enduring character.

    I’m excited about Captain America, because it’s obviously focused on being FUN. The Amazing Spider-Man looks everything but amazing.

  5. What Guy? Says:

    Looks great, very different in tone to the previous series which is a good thing to seperate itself.

    Can’t wait.

  6. Sighguy Says:

    I don’t really know what to say. I was thinking we were going to see promoted a more up beat Spider-man story, but here we get dark and brooding, and a flashback to the horrific POV from the classic movie Doom. Ugh. I’m happy with Raimi’s trilogy, regardless of the 3rd not being all that because that was Sony’s fault for shoving Venom in there at the 11th hour! Thanks Sony!

  7. Devil_Hanzo Says:

    Damn, that does look good.

  8. BarryHerd87 Says:

    I agree that it looks beautifully shot, and I thought the first-person web crawling/swinging was pretty unique. It’s a little darker than I would have preferred, but I still think it works. If the story is strong and the acting is good, the movie will succeed. I hardly think it could be worse than Green Lantern.

  9. DaVeO Says:

    I didn’t know they were re-telling the origin again. I think I just don’t care about Spider-Man in almost any way shape or form now.

  10. spider mit Says:

    I agree that it look good but it is just ultimate spiderman the live action movie and there is no way I am going to watch that. I like the part about the parent since that is also part of the regular marvel comics but the other stuff no way

  11. M. Says:

    That is way moodier than I was expecting, but Spidey has had some dark storylines before. I’ll give it a whirl, but I wish they had kept the part of Peter’s parents being spies out of the movie. Hated it in the comics, so I doubt I’d like it here. I do like Gwen’s look and the web-shooters, though!

    Who knows, maybe Sony will pull an X-Men: First Class level of movie and completely surprise me. Hell, it’s got to be better than Spider-Man 3!

  12. Mavrik Says:

    Ultimate Spider-Man is one of the best written comics in my opinion. What Bendis has done with Spider-Man has been fun and entertaining, more than the original version. Seeing Peter being Spider-Man and dealing with high school issues along with life and death stuff is gold. The fact that they’ve openly said they are taking cues from the Ultimate Spider-Man had me sold from the beginning. Spider-Man was good, Spider-Man 2 was great, but they lost me with Spider-Man 3. I’m ready for a fresh take with a younger Pete.

    You can’t tell much from the trailer, but from what you can see it looks like they’re heading in a good direction. As good as Raimi’s movies were, you never got to see Pete’s great love and great loss of Gwen and how it’s effected him as he grows. Perhaps now they’ll be able to illustrate that.

  13. eugenioabraham Says:

    so this movie pretend to be diferente to the others because is going to explore about Peter Parents and not just his relationship with May and Ben.
    And Is going to be about Gwen and Peter and not Mary Jean, so that family having dinner was Captain Stacy’s family?

    And.. is that supposed to be Doctor Connors?

  14. Michael Says:

    Looks better then those other crape spiderman movie

  15. Freddyfred Says:

    it looks good, very good – and yes it’s only a trailer – but the tone is alot more serious, which is perfect to get us away from Spiderman 3 – Having it be more serious is great because u will feel the danger that much more now when Spidey goes up against the lizard and with him dealing with his powers and the loss of uncle Ben. Peter puts on the mask to become someone different – a smart ass who laughs at danger – as long as they have him do wallcrawling and building hoping mixed in with his comedic one-liners – this movie will be awesome !!!

  16. Freddyfred Says:

    Oh and why would anyone assume that they would make his parents spies?!?!? waay back in the original comics they did – but don’t u think they would change them to scientists ?!?!? which is where Peter would get the blueprints to build and improve on an invention his father started ?!?!? aka – the web shooters …… just a thought….

  17. Troy Wilson Says:

    I won’t mind the dark tone if they actually have Spidey telling some jokes this time.

  18. Dangersmith Says:

    When this movie hits theaters, I’ll buy my ticket, get me a great seat and gorge myself on oversized popcorn, nachos, hotdogs, a bucket of syruppy soda until I’m a ghastly obese mess at the end of it all.
    Thanks for bringing back the mechanical webshooters (the bio-organics were just stupid and gross), and if you haven’t quite guessed it yet… YES, I plan to enjoy the shit out of this one (with a little wiggle-room for disappointment).
    Whine-on my ppls, whine-on!!!

  19. Dangersmith Says:

    We,ve had ‘light-tone’ Spidey in cartoon form, tv shows and a whole movie franchise for decades! One dark take on the character isn’t that big of an issue.

  20. Dangersmith Says:

    @Freddyfred;
    At least someone isn’t being an old stick in the mud! I’m right there with ya!

  21. Dangersmith Says:

    @DaVeO;
    Y’know what, in addition to what I’ve said previously, I could really do without the origin story yet again. I wish they’d just go straight into the action of a fresh new story, and either thell the origin as a flashback/ recap, or make it an integral part of a sequel, maybe in the 3rd installment, if it does that well.

  22. Batmangorilla Says:

    There are two ways to adapt a concept. The first is being loyal to the source material and making “the movie”. Spider-man, A-team, Star Trek: the Motion Picture. The second way is to take the source material and make a movie from it without really being loyal to anything. Just using some of the ideas. Mario Brothers, Dark Knight, Transformers. In essence, the second way makes it your own rather than pleasing the fanboys. We got one Spidy franchise more or less loyal to the comic and this is a create your own version. Its unclear what it will be like, but from this trailer I can tell you right off the bat it’s not a Spider-man movie but a creative piece. Lets treat it as such rather than saying this is what the others should have been like. This is a fun attempt at playing with the concept. The costume may look dumb but I was successfully teased.

  23. Unit_99 Says:

    YAWNNNN! It is too soon to do another Spidy film. Yes! I know Marvel’s argument “Well it will be 10 years next May 3rd 2012 since the original Spiderman.” This argument works for diehard fans, and those who were either not alive or too young to remember the first two films. But the general movie audience is going to puke at yet another Superhero film. Honestly, Marvel is running their products into the ground. Spidy is a HUGE financial player at Marvel only followed by the X-MEN. But ppl are sick of superheroes!

  24. David Fullam Says:

    The Amazing Emo Man!

  25. Dangersmith Says:

    @Batmangorilla;
    Your perspective on this makes a lot of sense. I for one am interested in this slightly creative take. I’m prob’ in the minority tho’.

  26. Jim8ball Says:

    Liked the music at the end and the first person view swinging through the city. Still not excited about the suit and I’m afraid there will be too much written into the origin with his parents.

  27. Brandon Yates Says:

    Emo Spidey. We just had the origin movie 10 years ago, they could have kept the story going like, I dunno, 007. No need to reference the previous movies, but moving forward with, god forbid, new stories. Message Board Whine!

  28. Mike Says:

    A competent bit of been-there-done-that-already. All the beats of the trailer were things covered in Raimi’s version, making this seem even more utterly useless. A different girl, a different costume, a different villain. Which is more like simply juggling details than telling a vital new story.

    That solemn musical score thing they do as they pan over a tracking shot of a cityscape was cliché twenty years ago.

    Whatever. It’s just a trailer.

  29. zona Says:

    It was too soon for a re-make, besides Raimi’s run was good (except for part 3). The subway scene in part 2 was just amazing. This new one looks… like a mere repetition… However… We are looking at Pete’s parents… We know they are involved with shield… Shield is involved with a certain group of heroes that had their own movies… I think this movie is going to exist in the same universe as the Avengers…That would be the only reason I could see for a re-make this soon

  30. Cameron Says:

    I’m wondering if this will be like that miniseries “With great Power” where they tell the story of Jim after he gets his powers but before uncle Ben dies. I think that would be a better way to go so that we can get a chance to get to know uncle Ben better and make it that much more heart breaking when Peter loses him and gives a better glimpse of why Peter does the thongs he does. I’m also interested to see the parents angle play out. It could be interesting to juxtapose Peter’s father figures which could include curt conner’s depending on how they portray that relationship….

  31. Keith Says:

    @zona

    I doubt this movie will gel with the Avengers universe since Sony owns the movie rights to Spider-Man, and are probably more inclined to do their own thing. Until the rights revert back to Marvel Studios, Spidey is on his own.

  32. CT Says:

    So what if this is Sony’s version of Batman Begins? They’re taking a serious tone and that’s cool. Let’s wait and then make it a weekend winner because it’ll be good. So what? That’s what I want! A movie that’s very good and a different take on what went before.

  33. m2c2 Says:

    Well, the non-Spidey stuff looks very Twilighty, which I suppose is unavoidable (in the sense that someone from marketing must be involved in making sure this movie is a hit). But the POV stuff beats the pants off of anything Rami managed to do (and he managed to do pretty well).

  34. turkish101 Says:

    Wow, that was… not good at all. I know people pretty much don’t care about this, considering that next summer will see Dark Knight Rises and Avengers, two much more anticipated films. But also… the existence of this movie is so totally unnecessary, and this trailer really drives that point home.

    That first-person stuff… UGH. Looks like a video game, and I’m not talking about the POV. Everything in it just looked…. plastic-y and inauthentic.

    They should have gone ahead with a Spider-man 4, or wait a few more years for the franchise to cool down (or both).

  35. comic_dude Says:

    I don’t mind it. Let’s face it, it can’t be worse than what was done with Venom in Spider-Man 3.

  36. Deep_Shock Says:

    Not impressed!

  37. Jason Says:

    Spider-Man 3 was the epitome of terrible summer movies…hopefully this re-boot succeeds. Looks a little fake, but otherwise an interesting trailer.

  38. marius Says:

    I liked the first-person view part of the trailer. I would love to go see see the movie but I’m not sold yet. I’m not excited about another origin story and I don’t think it is necessary. It’s not been long since the last movie and everybody should be familiar with the character by now(I mean, to have done so well at the box office even ppl who don’t know the comic must have a general idea of him by now). I also think this thing with his parents is too big a topic for an origin flick so maybe it’s an idea they’ll expand on in a trilogy. Lastly but not least, for another time the full Spider-Man image we got here seems so cgi (AGAIN) that I feel disappointed. You’d think that after 10yrs since the fist movie cgi tech has done something to make him seem more real. Probably the Mirror’s Edge-style scene was done digitaly (something that could be used as part of a video-game, at least) but I hope that’s not the final product. The best parts of SM I remember were when the suit was getting torn and Peter’s face was partly shown. That was great ’cause it looked real. I hope It’s still a work in progress we’re seeing here.

  39. Pack Says:

    Someone else mentioned this in passing but I saw the trailer as a mash-up of Nolan’s Batman (The opening music and shot of the city) and Harry Potter. (The young boy forced to cope as his parents leave.) The movie is a year away and I’ll decide what I think of it then but that’s my response to the trailer.
    Oh, and the costume looks hideously, Green-Lantern-level ugly in the pictures published in EW.

  40. Nate Says:

    I could have sworn they said this would be a continuation of the original trilogy sorta a Spider Man 1.5

  41. Set Says:

    Hmmm….I got nothing. Just not digging this take at all. I will give this the benefit of the doubt. I will go see it. But man, Im kinda underwelmed. hope I spelled that right.

  42. M. Says:

    At the end of the day though, this is all about Sony preserving the movie rights to Spider-Man. Same goes for Fox with the X-Men franchise. Having a potential blockbuster would be icing on the cake. If the movies fail they’ll keep making more so they can keep the rights. In a way this is like the Superman situation.

  43. signifyingmnky Says:

    Caught this on the big screen tonight before Captain America, and it still came off underwhelming. In fact, the theater was a full house and only a single kid applauded the trailer. They rebooted this far too soon. And that’s just the beginning of their problems.

    Sure they’ve pulled from the source material, but from the looks of the trailer, they’ve neglected what makes Spider-Man, Spider-Man. He’s not dark. He’s not broody. He’s a guy who got powers, ignored the responsibility that comes with such powers and learned a hard lesson from it that leads him to heroism. He has the same problems many of us run into in their lives, but he escapes to his role of Spider-Man, and loves it. Beyond the friction his heroism inflicts on his love life, there is no reluctance to being Spider-Man, just child like joy.

    That Spider-Man, the unlucky, wisecracking webcrawler is suspiciously absent from this trailer.

Leave a Reply »