<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 48 Hours To Reimagine The DCU (Unless You Knew Bob Harras Back When)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/06/13/48-hours-to-reimagine-the-dcu-unless-you-knew-bob-harras-back-when/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/06/13/48-hours-to-reimagine-the-dcu-unless-you-knew-bob-harras-back-when/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firelight</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/06/13/48-hours-to-reimagine-the-dcu-unless-you-knew-bob-harras-back-when/comment-page-1/#comment-640492</link>
		<dc:creator>Firelight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=26193#comment-640492</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid you&#039;ve nailed it re: well-planned. I think this stinks of throw shlop against the wall and seeing what sticks.

I&#039;m sure DC&#039;s rationale is they had to keep things quiet before the announcements and that meant a lot of sneaky-type planning - but rushing together concepts like this doesn&#039;t bode well.

If anything it reduces the total buy-in creators need to have when taking on a character not of their own making. Editorial edict has been the DC way for a long time now - hence their sales #. Maybe someone should learn to let go of THAT concept instead of just erasing continuity every-now-n-then just so more editors can monkey around with things to prove their usefulness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;ve nailed it re: well-planned. I think this stinks of throw shlop against the wall and seeing what sticks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure DC&#8217;s rationale is they had to keep things quiet before the announcements and that meant a lot of sneaky-type planning &#8211; but rushing together concepts like this doesn&#8217;t bode well.</p>
<p>If anything it reduces the total buy-in creators need to have when taking on a character not of their own making. Editorial edict has been the DC way for a long time now &#8211; hence their sales #. Maybe someone should learn to let go of THAT concept instead of just erasing continuity every-now-n-then just so more editors can monkey around with things to prove their usefulness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
