Comments on: Could Nathan Fillion buy Firefly?

By: Buy social fans, followers and Views

Buy social fans, followers and Views — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:59:23 +0000

It’s appropriate time to make a few plans for the long run and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this submit and if I could I wish to counsel you few fascinating issues or tips. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more issues about it!

By: W.L.Smith

W.L.Smith — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:16:46 +0000

Silly is running around with a lamp shade on your head… and this is not a silly idea. How about for the first time in history, the very VERY dedicated fans of a great series and dictate what happens? I think that is a great idea. First we get a tv series.. and then.. we start on our goverment… maybe? Crazier things have happened.
What is silly, is sitting idly by, while the few (very few) decent shows on tv get cancelled by people who haven’t a clue what real thinking people enjoy veiwing.
There are no better shows worth reserection.. possibly 1 or 2? but you can count them on one hand.

By: Lan Pitts

Lan Pitts — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:24:54 +0000

There are better shows that could have used a revival.

Though, I think it’s cool that Fillion wants to do something like this for the fans. It’s not like he needs the show.

By: Scott Reed

Scott Reed — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:31:18 +0000

Not really silly. Star Trek fans from the early 70′s are directly responsible for the revival of that franchise, which had all the appeal of a dead bird, as far as Paramount was concerned.

By: Simon DelMonte

Simon DelMonte — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:31 +0000

I thought Universal owned the rights since the movie.

No matter. This is pie in the sky. And kind of silly.

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:13:03 +0000

That would be awesome – but can we pretend the movie didnt happen so Wash isnt dead….