<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC leaves the Comics Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/01/20/dc-leaves-the-comics-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/01/20/dc-leaves-the-comics-code/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfire</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/01/20/dc-leaves-the-comics-code/comment-page-1/#comment-569191</link>
		<dc:creator>jfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=21111#comment-569191</guid>
		<description>I think this is smart if DC is smart about how it uses the ratings. Wrote a post about it here:

http://popculturesafari.blogspot.com/2011/01/dc-dumps-comics-code.html

I think publishers should offer clear guidance on comic book covers as to what age the title is appropriate for. There shouldn&#039;t be any wondering necessary by the parent.

Better yet, I wish DC and Marvel would just ensure that all their mainstream superhero titles -- those featuring Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, the Hulk, Fantastic Four, Thor, Captain America and the like -- are rated for the same audience. Right now, there are &quot;all ages&quot; Spider-Man, etc., titles and &quot;teen-plus&quot; or even &quot;mature&quot; Spider-Man, etc. titles. This makes no sense to me and likely just turns parents off comics entirely.

In movie terms, I think these titles should be in the &quot;PG&quot; category: edgy enough to interest teens and adults, but appropriate enough for kids around age 12. There&#039;s no sane, or for that matter, commercial,reason that comics featuring such characters should be essentially rated &quot;R&quot; -- at least not if you&#039;re going to continue marketing toys featuring that character to young children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is smart if DC is smart about how it uses the ratings. Wrote a post about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://popculturesafari.blogspot.com/2011/01/dc-dumps-comics-code.html" rel="nofollow">http://popculturesafari.blogspot.com/2011/01/dc-dumps-comics-code.html</a></p>
<p>I think publishers should offer clear guidance on comic book covers as to what age the title is appropriate for. There shouldn&#8217;t be any wondering necessary by the parent.</p>
<p>Better yet, I wish DC and Marvel would just ensure that all their mainstream superhero titles &#8212; those featuring Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, the Hulk, Fantastic Four, Thor, Captain America and the like &#8212; are rated for the same audience. Right now, there are &#8220;all ages&#8221; Spider-Man, etc., titles and &#8220;teen-plus&#8221; or even &#8220;mature&#8221; Spider-Man, etc. titles. This makes no sense to me and likely just turns parents off comics entirely.</p>
<p>In movie terms, I think these titles should be in the &#8220;PG&#8221; category: edgy enough to interest teens and adults, but appropriate enough for kids around age 12. There&#8217;s no sane, or for that matter, commercial,reason that comics featuring such characters should be essentially rated &#8220;R&#8221; &#8212; at least not if you&#8217;re going to continue marketing toys featuring that character to young children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon DelMonte</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2011/01/20/dc-leaves-the-comics-code/comment-page-1/#comment-569183</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon DelMonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=21111#comment-569183</guid>
		<description>Hard to feel bad about the demise of the Comics Code, given that it stopped being really useful a long time ago.  But at the same time, it pretty much saved the industry once upon a time.  Self-censorship has never been pretty, but has always beaten censorship by others.

In any case, this is the end.  I expect even Archie to kiss it goodbye, but then to proudly proclaim that all its books are suitable for everyone.

I just find myself recalling the brouhaha back in the late 80s when DC announced it was doing age labels like this, and how a small number of creators took offense and left DC.  Today this is the norm, so I guess DC was ahead of the curve back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to feel bad about the demise of the Comics Code, given that it stopped being really useful a long time ago.  But at the same time, it pretty much saved the industry once upon a time.  Self-censorship has never been pretty, but has always beaten censorship by others.</p>
<p>In any case, this is the end.  I expect even Archie to kiss it goodbye, but then to proudly proclaim that all its books are suitable for everyone.</p>
<p>I just find myself recalling the brouhaha back in the late 80s when DC announced it was doing age labels like this, and how a small number of creators took offense and left DC.  Today this is the norm, so I guess DC was ahead of the curve back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
