Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: DAREDEVIL Ending in November, ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN Returns to Original Numbering

DAREDEVIL Ending in November, ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN Returns to Original Numbering

August 17th, 2010
Author Albert Ching

Marvel’s November solicitations, minus most covers, have popped up on Web site Comics Continuum, and it looks to be a newsworthy month for the publisher.

Currently unfolding “street-level” event Shadowland ends in November, and so does long-running ongoing series Daredevil, with issue #512. Says the solicitation:

Years of acting as the Guardian Devil of Hell’s Kitchen have taken their toll on The Man Without Fear. Hell’s Kitchen lies in ruins, and it is up to the people of New York to start anew and begin rebuilding. In this last chapter of his story, will Matt Murdock at last find final redemption for the events of SHADOWLAND?

Also, Ultimate Spider-Man will be returning to its original numbering — and expanding to 104 pages — to celebrate issue #150 and the title’s 10th anniversary:

Not only is this officially the Ultimate Spider-Man 150th issue anniversary, but it is also the 10 year anniversary of the birth of the Ultimate Marvel universe!! Can you believe it?? We can’t either! To celebrate, Eisner award-winning series writer Brian Michael Bendis has created this triple size extravaganza and gathered together a stellar lineup of amazing artists!! A reunion of the greatest artists of not only this historic book but of the the entire line of Ultimate Comics. Poor Peter Parker has made such a mess of his life as Spider-Man that the other super heroes are forced to gather together and decide once and for all what to do with the young wall crawler. Guest starring the New Ultimates, the Storm Siblings, Ben Grimm, Iceman, Kitty Pryde and a slew of surprise stars! Also includes reprinting of Ultimate Spider-Man Super Special #1 featuring an all-star artist line-up!”

Bendis talked about preliminary plans for the issue in our interview with him back in June. Whether or not it’s keeping the old numbering for good or if it’s just for this issue is unclear.

And we now know what Dan Slott was talking about when he said “we’re going to take the Hobgoblin mystery and spin it a whole new way” in our interview with him earlier this month:

THE HOBGOBLIN’S BACK! You wanted him, you got him! And he’s ready to hit the BIG TIME too — with a whole new bag of tricks! Who’s under the mask this time? Is it Roderick Kingsley, Jason Macendale, or somebody else? Ready for another long, unfolding mystery with months of clues, red herrings, and shocking twists? Well tough! We’re showing you who he is in THIS ISSUE!

Also notable: Thunderbolts hits #150 with a 96-page issue, the previously teased Thunderstrike miniseries starts, and a death is hinted for New Avengers #6.

73 Responses to “DAREDEVIL Ending in November, ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN Returns to Original Numbering”
  1. Luca Says:

    So… we finally know that those anniversary issues had always been pointless.
    Daredevil first returned to old numbering with issue 500 and now after a year gets canceled? Did I understand correctly?
    Who’s next? Captain America? Thor?
    And I bet Iron Man will not even reach the anniversary issue, but just get relaunched again, looking at its sales.
    At the same time Ultimate Spidey returns to old numbering just to celebrate the anniversary issue.
    That’s cheating.

  2. Ned McDodd Says:

    yes, but anniversary issue and # 1 of a relaunch mean higher sales. If they could they would only publish anniversary issues and # 1 issues, relaunch a series every second month ;)

  3. smalltropolis Says:

    Marvel don´t like comic collectors!

  4. Titanmatrix Says:

    F you marvel. I devote hundreds of dollars to your omnibus line, buy every variant that comes out for DD and still you are ending it on such a piss-poor run? Part of me is considering dropping every marvel book. Right now.

  5. Nino Says:

    ^ You should do it…. it would teach Marvel a lesson, it would…^

  6. comicslad2814 Says:

    The whole ending of Daredevil feels horribly abrupt. The conceit of putting him in charge of the hand was really cool and started out really cool but the speed with which Matt Murdock became the thing that he hates feels really forced. There should be at least another couple of arcs of him putting his will against the nature of the Hand before he gave in.

    Between this ending (any sign of a relaunch btw?) and the back up in Captain America I’m now only going to be getting S.H.I.E.L.D from Marvel as I cannot see anything in these solicits to fill the void for a street level/ crime book like Daredevil.

  7. Mason Dixon Says:

    Daredevil ending sucks. Ultimate Spider-man going back to it’s original numbering is the most boring news I’ve read today. It’s a bad/meh news day.

  8. Ken Says:

    Wow… nice job, Marvel. Cancel this title after non-stop great creative runs just because Andy Diggle can’t get the job done. Should’ve just stuck him on the book as a filler until you good throw Greg Rucka on it. Seriously… what a s#!tty day to be a Daredevil fan.

  9. Dork-Man Says:

    Use block quotes next time! Geez!

  10. Matt Lazorwitz Says:

    Does anyone seriously think that Daredevil is CANCELLED versus just cancelled. Marvel kept resurrecting Spider-Girl, for God’s sake. This is yet another example of the Marvel hype machine cancelling a book to resurrect it with a new #1, I guarentee. The whole “Who Is The New Man Without Fear?” teaser series will probably lead into either a mini dealing with the absense of DD, or a one-shot, and New Daredevil #1 something similar will launch in the next six months. The thing I find annoying if renumbering the book just to cancel it to bring it back with another #1 that will be renumbered to 600 in another half dozen years.

  11. Ken Says:

    Right on… a New Daredevil #1! Because that will last! Anyone else remember how the new Black Panther series lasted? Geez. Just ridiculous. I read Daredevil for Matt Murdock more than his costumed persona. Reading about some other douche in his costume will do nothing for me.

  12. Simon DelMonte Says:

    And thus Marvel tacitly admits that “cancelling” Ult-Spidey was a pointless decision. Luckily for BMB and for us, the numbering has not and should not affect the quality of the comic.

  13. Shaun Says:

    “I read Daredevil for Matt Murdock more than his costumed persona. Reading about some other douche in his costume will do nothing for me.”

    I agree with that completely. Of course, I feel the same way about Bruce Wayne and Batman, yet everyone here seems to not want him back. Go figure.

  14. E. Hobbs Says:

    DD was my last Marvel book. Just sad to take Matt down this road.I do not know if I can watch or read. I will try. I am amazed how sad I really feel.

  15. Brightest Day Says:

    Actually, no where in the actual solicit does it say the book is canceled (see below). You’re reading too much into Newsarama’s interpretation. Matt Murdock sounds like he’ll be out of commission, but that doesn’t mean they are canceling the book. Even if it is disappearing off shelves for a while, you know it’s just going on hiatus.

    “Years of acting as the Guardian Devil of Hell’s Kitchen have taken their toll on The Man Without Fear. Hell’s Kitchen lies in ruins, and it is up to the people of New York to start anew and begin rebuilding. In this last chapter of his story, will Matt Murdock at last find final redemption for the events of SHADOWLAND?”

  16. Dhaise Says:

    Meh.

  17. KET Says:

    Looks like someone is in denial: “Actually, no where in the actual solicit does it say the book is canceled (see below). You’re reading too much into Newsarama’s interpretation.”

    Yeah, so I guess that Marvel’s blatant art tease of “The End” with Daredevil prominantly depicted still hasn’t settled in for you yet. Seems everyone else gets what it means.

  18. Paul P Says:

    THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END SAY IT AIN’T SO!?!?

  19. Robert Says:

    Uh, actually it does say the book is canceled “Currently unfolding “street-level” event Shadowland ends in November, and so does long-running ongoing series Daredevil, with issue #512.”

    My prediction is Marvel is ripping off DC again. Daredevil will end. There will be a miniseries with the “New Man WIthout Fear” garbage that we’ve been hearing about. There will be another miniseries soon afterward possibly titled “The Return of Matt Murdock”. Marvel will then re-launch Daredevil with a new #1, which of course is bull since they just changed the numbering back to 500. The new DD #1 will very likely have a new $3.99 price tag as well.

  20. Anxy Says:

    Ugh. So basically, Daredevil reboot? More grit, more grime – darker and knightier? Whee. I’ll be reading Tiny Titans.

  21. ANTHONY Says:

    WAHHHHHH!!!!! QUIT EFFING CRYING YOU BABIES

  22. Brian Says:

    The Ultimate Spiderman news is really non-news. The covers have always said Ultimate Spiderman. NEVER, not even once have they said Ultimate Comics Spiderman (thank goodness, what a stupid ass name, I’m guessing Jeph Loeb came up with that gem).

    Also, remember back when, when Marvel announced they were cancelling their entire X-Men line? Turns out it was Age of Apocolypse! Also, remember, this is Marvel were talking about. They cancel series, and relaunch them more frequently than some fanboys change underwear….

  23. DaVeO Says:

    At this rate a new Marvel book will never reach #100 by it’s own accord. How long until The Avengers goes back to its original numbers?
    I’m also wondering if Shadowlands was kept within Daredevil as just an arc with some changes and not subjugated to the Mighty Marvel Hype Machine it would have been a better story. Nah, I’m not wondering, it would have been better, no question.

  24. TheJew27 Says:

    Wow! Another Marvel titel going back to the original numbering? How long before Avengers and New Avengers go back to their orignal numbers? I know that a new #1 means higher sales, but it’s just a shame that Marvel can’t sell a book based on its merit. Instead they have to rely on gimmicks and schemes.

    F you Marvel.

  25. Johnny Blaze DCU Says:

    And when they see a chance for Daredevil to be a cash cow again, he’ll be found in suspended animation in a strange cocoon at the bottom of Jamaica Bay. Or he’ll have been a Skrull prisoner all this time. Or he’ll have been recovered & brainwashed by the Red Skull and be Winter soldier for a period of time. Or Superboy Prime will punch a wall so hard it shakes the MArvel Universe. He’ll be back.

  26. manos_x Says:

    It’s pretty amazing to me that after staying away from message boards for q couple of years I come back and people are still complaining about the same things. And trying to make a comics issue a comics company issue. Both DC and Marvel cancel and relaunch books constantly. How many times has The Flash been relaunched or renumbered recently? How many people have been the Flash in the last 10 years? How about Teen Titans since around 95? Wonder Woman? Both companies know how much money they can make from gimmicks, It’s just the way it is and has been since around 1985 when DC relaunched Superman. Other companies (even indies!) do the same thing.

  27. Alemander Says:

    @Robert

    Uhh, you quoted what Newsarama wrote, not what the actual solicitation says. Brightest Day was absolutely correct.

    But it is great to see the Marvel Haters Club alive and well on the internet.

  28. Mike Says:

    *shakes head*

    Daredevil – That was one of my favorite books for a good long time. Sad to see it end and be restarted, especially so soon after the renumbering to 500.

    Ult Spidey – Also one of my favorite titles, but the new #1 stunt was a brilliant jumping off point for me. See Marvel, you could have kept a reader by not pulling this (pointless) crap. Instead, you lost one.

  29. Eisner Says:

    @luca

    Why even read comics if you dont like what the publisher does? A good story is a good story, no matter what the issue number is. Anniversary issues means more story; I am always okay with more Bendis. I do agree it was, and is, pointless to start titles over with issue #01, and only ads to the confusion when a publisher goes back to the original volume numbering (Marvel Knights anyone?). However, think of being a new reader; coming into a comic at issue #560 can be intimidating, so I do understand where the publisher is coming from.

    Not how I’d handle publishing, but then again, I also would have let JMS end his run on ASM how he wanted to end it.

    –Eisner

  30. tridat516 Says:

    it’s a gimmick so quit crying hell he’ll be back but the whole number thing is a pain relaunch after relaunch it bet if the sells of these book stayed in the top 20-30 all the time the number will never change. like action comics, amazing spider-man, detective comics, batman etc….

  31. Robert Says:

    “Shadowland ENDS in November, and SO DOES LONG-RUNNING ONGOING SERIES Daredevil, with issue #512.””

    also here is official solicitation

    DAREDEVIL #512
    Written by ANDY DIGGLE
    Pencils & Cover by ROBERTO DE LA TORRE
    A SHADOWLAND TIE-IN: FINAL ISSUE! Years of acting as the Guardian Devil of Hell’s Kitchen have taken their toll on The Man Without Fear. Hell’s Kitchen lies in ruins, and it is up to the people of New York to start anew and begin rebuilding. In this last chapter of his story, will Matt Murdock at last find final redemption for the events of SHADOWLAND?
    32 PGS./Rated T+ …$3.99

    FINAL ISSUE

    Reading comprehension: Its not just for 10 year olds

  32. sylar wesker Says:

    Honestly Marvel, this renumbering, relaunching, return to numbering has to stop. Seriously. FOr a guy like me that is away from a LCS can only get issues sporadically through the years, get #12 of a series to find out its volume 2 or 3 and doesnt fit the issues I have is a pain in the ass.

  33. Jon Stump Says:

    I think it’s funny how upset we get about renumbering and such on books. It happens with so often now I don’t even pay attention to it. It’ll be nice to have all of the Daredevil Omnibuses (Omnibi?) that tell a complete story to the end of Shadowland. At least I hope they print all of that in Omnibus form.

  34. Erwin Michael Green Says:

    Can someone come up with an logical explanation of why cancel a book to only relaunch and renumber it and then a year down the line go back to its original numbering? I wonder if the cover price will be $4.99?

  35. Spike Says:

    Well, as mentioned on other boards, THIS IS NOT issue 150 for ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN its only 149 Marvel screwed up their math!!! hahaha

    Ultimate Spider-Man ran for 133 issues.

    Ultimate Comics Spider-Man publishes its 15th issue in October.

    In November, Ultimate Comics Spider-Man publishes its anniversary issue, renumbering to #150.

  36. Charley359 Says:

    So the SOBs at Marvel finally canceled Daredevil. I have been collecting him since I was a little kid and got all the back issues to #1, April 1964. He has always been my favorite Marvel character, if not my faorite ero period. Well I hope the hell they like it. Because after DD #512 comes out and its over. All my other Marvel titles will be canceled and I’ll become DC only.

    May Marvel go backrupt and stay gone. To hell with them!

  37. John G. Says:

    Thanks for the giant F you to Daredevil fans. I’m not hating Diggle’s run but it should not be the end of Daredevil because I feel no anticipation for the next issues of Daredevil. Its just something coming out with my favorite character but its not something that I feel I need to read. It doesn’t feel important. There’s no intensity.

  38. Richard J. Marcej Says:

    “THE HOBGOBLIN’S BACK! You wanted him, you got him! And he’s ready to hit the BIG TIME too — with a whole new bag of tricks! Who’s under the mask this time? Is it Roderick Kingsley, Jason Macendale, or somebody else? Ready for another long, unfolding mystery with months of clues, red herrings, and shocking twists? Well tough! We’re showing you who he is in THIS ISSUE!”

    Seriously?

    The Hobgoblin?

    Why?

    I mean, sure, a mystery of a who a masked character, especially a villain could be fun to read and follow. But if you’re going to do this, why not create a NEW character. Why not give the readers something NEW.

    Why keep “Beating all these Dead characters, er, I mean, Horses.” ?

  39. orson randal Says:

    i love black panther, but when they turned him into a girl i stopped reading. that’s not black panther. just like whoever replaces DD won’t be DD. why can’t they just get a good writer on a book, not just DD, and an artist that can finish a 6 issue arc? marvel’s push for sales via “shock”, rising prices, and back-up stories that i don’t want to pay for are really insulting to the consitent reader.

  40. woody0023 Says:

    Re-numbering in my opinion is always a bad move, nothing good ever comes of it, and it is disrepectful to the legacy of the company. They should be proud of how many issues they have published, not try to hide it. All they need are good stories and it doesn’t matter if it is #38596, it will sell (anyone remember Hush?). I find it fascinating that in the old days, the publishers tried to avoid having new number ones, because the belief held in the editorial offices was that people would be more likely to buy a comic with a high issue number because it was perceived to have stood the test of time; #1′s were “untried” and readers were perceived to be less likely to take a chance on them. Hilarious, huh?

  41. Phil Says:

    Man. Renumbering Ultimate Spider-Man barely a year after a relaunch has to go down as one of the most cynical book relaunches ever.

  42. AeroRep Says:

    I just started reading Daredevil with the Noir series and the Lady Bullseye trade. It has filled my Batman void since DC, or should I say Morrison, ruined him. I enjoy Diggle and Johnston, who appears to be doing most of the writing. How typical.

  43. Alex H Says:

    Seriously, the way some of you are acting about Daredevil you’d think Marvel had come round your house and kidnapped your family. The implication is very obviously “this is, for now, the end of Daredevil’s story-arc, thus it makes sense to end the book at this point” not “we hate you Daredevil and your fans, we don’t want your money either” as you seem to be implying.

    The end of shadowland is a pretty obvious time to take Daredevil off the board for a while, and regardless of your personal oppinions of the arc, as Marvel (and every other company in the world) is kind of obliged to act as if everything it puts out is good. They are not dropping it out of soem spite, but merely because the story makes sense for that to happen. He’ll be back, if nothing else because that Daredevil film reboot will happen sooner or later.

    Choose the comics you want to read out of what you like and what it good, and don’t base it around a frankly daft boycott of a company based entirely on your dislike of a storyline which effects a single title.

  44. Supermutant Says:

    Not surprised that Daredevil is canceled since they are probably going to kill him off. This whole thing with the hand has been lame and first time I stopped reading daredevil when that started.
    By the way it isn’t just Daredevil that would make me want to boycott marvel. It’s also OMD/BND/OMIT, to many hulks, wolverine and deadpool overkill. What have they have done to avengers and x-men. Killing characters off and bringing them back and giving lame reason why.

  45. Kev Says:

    @Spike
    Counting has never been Marvel’s strong suit, they constantly fudge numbers to get these landmark issues.

  46. Charley359 Says:

    Hey Alex H. For a roughly 8-9 years Daredevil was the only Marvel title I was reading. Any other books, Daredevil guest starred in them. What does this mean, Right now you compare a DC book to a Marvel title and the artwork is 100% better then anything Marvel is putting out Their whole art department is a bunch of rookies. Very little is any skill from any of them.

    Also, why is the hell do we have to have 20 F’in Wolverine or Deadpool books? I also think there possible is close to a dozen Spiderman titles. Why?

    Can’t they think of something new? For Daredevil they rushed fiinsihing off the storyline he was in and then BANG he was evil in Shadowland. No leadup, No hints in earlier issues.

    I’ll finish getting the story and put them up. Fron 1964 to today I have all of his books. They need to recind this statement and FIRE all the A’holes running the show as far as Daredevil is concerned. Bring back Frank Miller.

  47. Dan Didio Says:

    Funny think is I just saw they were releasing a 2nd printing for DD #508. Also, doesn’t it make more sense to realease this way after your DD Masterworks TPB new line volumes were released?

  48. webweasel Says:

    I think Moon Knight should be the new “Man without fear” for awhile.Or Iron Fist.

  49. davidh Says:

    I wonder if the current series will simply be renamed to something else (and still starring Matt Murdock)… and that the new Daredevil #1 will be there to feature the new Daredevil.

    This is silly. It just got it’s old numbering back. I thought we were past all this short-term gain for long-term nuthin’ nonsense.

    David

  50. silvanthalas Says:

    “How long until The Avengers goes back to its original numbers?”

    Depends on how Marvel wants to fudge the numbers to get it to #600 as quickly as possible.

  51. BrianMarr Says:

    Actually, in the old days editorial avoided new number ones because it was easier to retain first class mail status if a book kept up the numbering of an older series.

    Who seriously cares about the *numbers* on an issue?

    You people are completely insane.

  52. manos_x Says:

    Did someone just say “Can’t they think of something new” AND “Bring back Frank Miller” in the same post? That’s pretty awesome.
    Also, they noted all the different Spidey and Wolvie titles. I’m sure all the Bat/Supes/Lanter/JLwhatever/Titan books are drawing the same complaints?

  53. Gokitalo Says:

    Wow, looks like Marvel is taking all this “end of Matt Murdock/Daredevil” stuff pretty seriously. I wonder if this means Brian Michael Bendis, David Mack and Klaus Janson’s Daredevil: End of Days is really going to be in continuity, as Bendis once said and others have speculated.

    As for renumbering Ultimate Spider-Man for #150, it does seem pretty premature, but on the other hand, the anniversary issue sounds like it’s going to be a whole lot of fun. Kudos to that series for lasting so long.

  54. jay Says:

    It’s all about relaunching DD later at $3.99 an issue. They know they can’t get away with going to $3.99 on this title right now. But if they make us ‘go without’ for a while, they know we’ll pay the $3.99 at relaunch because we’ll just be so happy to have DD back again.

    Don’t forget Marvel are first and foremost businessmen who have been at this for a long time. And who I am liking less and less as time goes on.

  55. Al Says:

    Nino @ 4:17 wrote:
    “^ You should do it…. it would teach Marvel a lesson, it would…^”

    Actually, if more people start voting with their wallets, it will. One fan will go unnoticed, but if everyone not happy with a decision would do so, Marvel (and DC) might actually rethink some of their decisions.

  56. Darrell C Says:

    Stop gouging people!

    I have not bought in to the new #1 issue relaunches for a long time. I have felt that it is a poor excuse to take an extra $1 out of the pockets of dedicated readers. Sure it boosts slumping sales of a book for the first 5 or 6 issues and then it tapers of again. Most of the people buying these titles are not new readers, but long time readers of comic books who frequent their local comic book shops. It spurns people like me to drop the habit of picking up a new book, just because it costs more and it is only a gimmick to suck in good people’s hard earned dollars. If they truly wanted to bring in new readers and show appreciation for the old fans, why not make the cover price $1 less for a new first issue relaunch. I.e. Start with the #1 being $2.99, then start with their $3.99 pricing from issue #2 onward. It would even help retailers as well who are certainly going to buy an enormous amount of #1′s to get the variants. It’s basic marketing; if people feel they are getting a deal they are willing to make a purchase.

    I don’t need anyone to point out that this does not make fiscal sense to lower the price. I realize there would be less profit, but maybe more people would be inclined to pick up a new relaunch if it cost less. As I said the retailers will prop the first issue up into the hundreds of thousands in sales by purchasing enough copies to get their variants.

    I can’t justify it to myself to purchase a relaunch for more money, I leave the new book on the shelf because it doesn’t make fiscal sense to me.

  57. Jake W Says:

    Bleeding Cool brings up the complainers from this blog entry.

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/08/17/comic-book-fans-believe-daredevil-is-cancelled-forever/

  58. Darrell C Says:

    Stop gouging people!

    I have not bought in to the new #1 issue relaunches for a long time. I have felt that it is a poor excuse to take an extra $1 out of the pockets of dedicated readers. Sure it boosts slumping sales of a book for the first 5 or 6 issues and then it tapers of again. Most of the people buying these titles are not new readers, but long time readers of comic books who frequent their local comic book shops. It spurns people like me to drop the habit of picking up a new book, just because it costs more and it is only a gimmick to suck in good people’s hard earned dollars. If they truly wanted to bring in new readers and show appreciation for the old fans, why not make the cover price $1 less for a new first issue relaunch. I.e. Start with the new #1 being $2.99, then start with their $3.99 pricing from issue #2 onward. It would even help retailers as well who are certainly going to buy an enormous amount of #1’s to get the variants. It’s basic marketing; if people feel they are getting a deal they are more willing to make a purchase.

    I don’t need anyone to point out that this does not make fiscal sense to lower the price. I realize there would be less profit, but maybe more people would be inclined to pick up a new relaunch if it cost less. As I said the retailers will prop the first issue up into the hundreds of thousands in sales by purchasing enough copies to get their variants.

    I can’t justify it to myself to purchase a relaunch for more money, I leave the new book on the shelf because it doesn’t make fiscal sense to me.

  59. Scott B Says:

    Regardless of what they have planned i will wait to see the DECEMBER solicitations, or until they announce something more solid. I AM angered at the idea of cancelling Marvel’s BEST and most CONSISTENT book, but i will leave my objectivity at the door if this is done with thought and respect. Man, i never thought i’d say this, but i miss Bendis!!

  60. Dave Smith Says:

    Nerdy fanboy anger makes me smile.
    Keep it up, guys.

  61. Alex H Says:

    Charley359 – Really, a lot of those arguements don’t hold a massive amount of water for me.

    On Wolverine and Deadpool prolificness – I hardly see how that arguement works in the favour or DC, I count 11 Batman starring books coming out in the most recent solicits vs about the same number for Wolverine and Deadpool combined. Thats not even counting the 7 Bat-character titles vs the 2 Wolverine character titles. Also, most of Wolverines books are team – New Avengers, X-force, X-men and Uncanny X-men, which don’t necessarily contain much Wolverine anyway, most of Batman is just Batman.

    On DC having better art – Very subjective – sure Greg Land brings the average down, but I can’t think of any artists at DC who I specifically rate as notably better than (as opposed to as good as) say, Alex Maleev, Lenil Yu, Oeming, or David Mack to pick some names off the top of my head of artists who do work for Marvel series. You could possibly argue Alex Ross and Amanda Conner is superb, but really no names come to mind of being an entire “level” above Marvel artists. Generally, I find them pretty much on a par.

    On Daredevil going evil being rushed – Quite possibly, I wasn’t reading Daredevil prior to Shadowland so can’t comment on that. What you seem to be suggesting though is it’s some fundemental thing about Marvel that has made that happen. Really? Writers are fallible, but in the grand scheme of things there are a lot worse bits of writing than that to complain about. Besides, unless you’ve somehow read the entire crossover to make sure nothing is said about it later, there is always the possibility of filling in through flashbacks.

  62. BloodyRedHead Says:

    I’m thinking that large price increases (especially for overseas readers) re-launches, re-numbering, re-voluming, obcene art or story on things they charge premium price for (both in variant covers as well as story-line art)and cancellations are all Marvel policy.

    Its amazing how someone who had 98% marvel in his collection has been consistently buying with 95% of the purchases being DC these past four years. Its obviously going to continue into the future, based on all the crap above.

    DC are smart, in that they are(largely) staying with the old status quo.
    They will pick up so much business over the next decade by just sitting back.

  63. Turtle Says:

    I’ve been reading comic books for 22 years and in all that time Matt Murdoch/Daredevil has been my favourite Marvel character and title. The thing is though, I haven’t bought an issue of DD in more than five years (I’ll quite happily just read it in store for free, though).

    Back in the late 90s when Joe Quesada first came to power I got sick of his rebooted/retconned view of the Marvel Universe and, in the space of about two years, went from reading 40 regular monthly Marvel titles to 1 – Daredevil.

    Mind you, I only continued with DD because of my love of the character not because of the story, but eventually I got sick of Bendis’ self involved wankery and finally gave the title the flick with issue 70.

    If there really are comic book fans out there who think that issue 512 of DD will be the last we ever see of Murdoch/DD than you are quite possibly stupid or at the very least niave. Yes, a character can be killed or have their title cancelled, but as for actually staying dead? Or never geting a title again?

    I remeber a quote from a few years back, I can’t remeber who said it, that basically went “Death is a revolving door in superhero comics. The only characters who have ever died and stayed dead are Bucky and Barry Allen and I don’t see that changing anytime soon”. Well, last I checked both Bucky and Barry are now alive and well and running around in their respective universes…

    So for those who complain on boards like this and say “I’m not going to read this anymore” yet seem to still be complaining X number of years later, why don’t you just grow a pair of balls and simply stop giving Marvel (or DC for that matter) your hard earned cash and go buy something else – I did!

  64. Cap Op Says:

    obviously this was hinted at for awhile.

    obviously people wouldn’t be overreacting if they hadn’t paid attention to the Marvel Con news in the months before.

  65. Cap Op Says:

    obviously

  66. Scott B Says:

    Has anyone heard anything since this announcement? December’s solicitatios couldn’t come sooner!

  67. Jovan Says:

    “Paul P Says:
    August 17th, 2010 at 8:26 am

    THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END SAY IT AIN’T SO!?!?”

    Well the world might end but chances are they are going to relaunch a new World and than celebrate it’s anniversary as though it was our world. Just saying is all.

  68. Jovan Says:

    Also might I add. Marvel has really been low-balling us on a lot of things as of late. Prices are to say the least, but the quality of the stories are not the same as they used to be and it seems to me that it’s due to the fact that they are too obsessed with marketing their products that they forget the quality of the products. Amazing Spider-man used to be such a great book but has fallen short due to Quesada’s stupid opinion that he wants to negate 30years of Spidey’s history. Hopefully Hobgoblin’s comeback helps bring it back, and Hulk’s story of the War of Hulks – ugh – and I used to be a big fan of Deadpool but now because of the film he is literally vomited everywhere in Marvel. I thought that would be fun but it’s like being served Pizza for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for the next few years.

    Its just sad that we have to loose another piece of our childhood to another one of Marvel’s marketing schemes. At least I got my darkhorse comics and the last few good DC titles.

    Sorry for the rant!

  69. xanthiss Says:

    Maybe Daredevil will make a deal with Mephisto and recant the last year of comic story. :o P Honestly I don’t know why Marvel just don’t open up their wallets and pay Miller a bunch of cash to write the stories he is good at telling.

  70. Summer Camps Says:

    Best you could edit the blog name Blog@Newsarama » Blog Archive » DAREDEVIL Ending in November, ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN Returns to Original Numbering to something more better for your blog post you write. I enjoyed the the writing still.

  71. Kimberly D. Says:

    O.K. , never thought of it that way but Perhaps you surely could make it work. Cheers ;) .

  72. Angelo Floss Says:

    We have started to consider bankruptcy as my personal onle option at this time. I am just a little puzzled by The difference between chapter 7 and 13 bankruptcy. I have a home in Florida and also own a residence but I have no earnings to generate any type of payments at the moment. I would need some expert advice in the event that anyone might share some insight based on my scenario.

  73. Winfred Wojtanik Says:

    You completed several good points there. I did a search on the matter and found the majority of folks will agree with your blog.

Leave a Reply »