“Thor Walks Across America”: God bless Bully. Odin too.
“I believe strongly in the axiom that you never learn how to write; you only learn to write the book you’re writing, by writing it”: (Mostly) prose author Sara Ryan, responsible for 2001′s Empress of the World and 2007′s Rules For Hearts, is currently scripting a graphic novel, and talks a bit about the differences between writing a novel-novel and writing a graphic novel on her blog. It’s a pretty interesting process piece, and gets at the heart of something fairly unique to comics—there isn’t really a standard, right and wrong way to make them.
The kid in the graphic novel: Scott Thompson from comedy troupe The Kids in The Hall is working on a graphic novel featuring his Kids character Danny Husk. I’m not sure if that headline, from a Montreal Gazette article announcing the project, is a great headline, or a terrible headline. Either way it got me to contemplate it—and link to it!—so I guess it’s a headline that gets the job done okay.
“Whether anchoring autobiographies, fighting crime in capes, or cracking mysteries in an old-school noir thriller, LGBT protagonists appear in three distinct graphic novels this summer”: Well I’m sure there’s more than just three, but that’s the lede from a Bay Area Reporter book review column focusing on graphic novels. The three it’s referring to are are DC’s Batwoman: Elegy, DC/Vertigo’s Stuck Rubber Baby and their upcoming Fogtown. Also covered are Pedro & Me and Fun Home for reasons I’m not quite clear on (Maybe they have new editions out?). The article, by Web Behrens, marks the first time I’ve heard Batwoman Kate Kane referred to as “The Dyke Knight.” Something tells me we won’t be seeing that nickname appearing on any future Batwoman comics.
“Mostly I want to know who’s idea it was to take Superman, make his comics really fun and interesting and then spend two years sapping all of the joy and punching out of them. If it is one person then they are a monster”: I haven’t read any of JMS’s Superman Walks Around story yet—If he isn’t walking through Ohio, I’ll wait for a trade—but I have been enjoying the various Internet reactions to it (Interestingly, more people seem to object to Superman’s characterization and behavior than the whole walking-around-instead-of-flying-faster-than-a-speeding-bullet thing). The above is from a regular Living Between Wednesdays review column.
And if anyone’s wondering why DC is doing the Superman/”Grounded” thing…: Here’s why. Well, J. Michael Straczynski may have wanted to tell that story for artistic reasons too, but at least part of the motivation has to be that it’s a guaranteed mainstream press generator. That’s the AP article about his first stop; I’m certain lots of local media will cover Superman’s various stops to their towns along the way.
I approve of this: The Cool Kids Table suggests some vocabular–er, some brocabulary words to use when talking about Comic-Con. At the same blog, praise was sung for the original run on the nineties volume of Superboy. That character has been through so many attempts to fix him, with just about every succeeding writer seeking to radically reinvent his origin, status quo, setting, supporting cast and/or costume that it’s easy to forget that, at the outset anyway, those were really quite solid super-comics.
Well, Hal Jordan looks good, anyway: Here are some more images form Entertainment Weekly‘s Green Lantern movie coverage. I’m going to need to see a lot more of that superhero costume before I can get used to it I think (and I’m sure I will see a lot more of it before the thing even opens, given how much hype is likely to exist between now and opening weekend), but Ryan Reynolds looks okay in a t shirt and leather jacket with a ring on his finger. Carol Ferris sure looks…little, though, doesn’t she?
Is Marvel headed for their own implosion?: At ICV2.com, Kansas retailer Chris Walsh explains why he thinks Marvel’s increasing number of titles and their higher price point may make that an inevitability. “Marvel’s line has gone from about 30% at $3.99 to about 70% or more at $3.99 (and many books at MORE than $3.99!), all while constantly out-publishing DC some 100 titles to DC’s approximate 75-80 offerings,” Evans writes. ” In that same time, DC’s pricing has gone from about 15% of all titles line wide at $3.99 to just about 30%. If DC is able to hold form for another 6-18 months, then my employer’s prediction of a Marvel implosion may not be so far fetched after all.” I’m all for DC holding the $2.99 line for as long as possible—I don’t know if it will help them make more money in the long run or how it will help them fare against Marvel in market-share, but I’m all for comics being priced as cheaply as possible. (Via Journalista)




Our friend Jess Peacock comes up from 


