A local ABC news affiliate in Utah is reporting that mother Linda Hurst bought a repackaged two-pack of comics from a dollar store to put in her ten-year-old son’s Easter basket, and one of them was, in the the TV station’s words, “naughty comic book” The Spectre. She was mad about it, and, two weeks after Easter, this is a story!
No details about the book are given, other than that the first two pages contain large drawings of a naked woman, and that the rest of the book also contains nudity and violence. The cover shown on the station’s website is, three seconds on Comics.org reveals, that of The Spectre #9, from the 1987 “New Format” series by Doug Moench and Gray Morrow. That issue guest-starred Madame Xanadu, so maybe she was the naked lady.
I haven’t read the series (I was only ten myself at the time it came out), so I can’t be sure if there actually is nudity in it, but man, it would be awfully weird if DC comics from 23 years ago, back when they used to sell ‘em on newsstands and drugstores to kids and everything, had actual nudity in them, whereas today nudity remains a no-no, no matter how graphic the violence is or how mature the rest of the content is.
I suspect the nudity is what’s sometimes referred to as “TV nudity,” with the bits that would earn a movie an R-rating (nipples, genitals) obscured by smoke or magic sparkles or wisps of hair or whatever, but I’m just making guesses about a 23-year-old comic book. They video version of the report, which you can watch at the same link above, shows the offending pages, but they’re blurred out. (Any of you guys read that issue? How nude is the nudity? How naughty is the comic book?)
This is a pretty weird case in that the folks selling the comic book (the dollar stores) are almost certainly unaware of the content, although the crusading journalists at ABC 4 still “went to the Dollar Tree for answers.”
Likewise, the person buying the comic book wouldn’t have been able to even give it a looksee first (as it was wrapped in plastic) and, no matter how mad anyone actually was about it, it would be pretty fruitless for anyone to try and hold the people who published the comic responsible, since almost a whole generation has passed since it was published, and DC corporate and editorial structure has changed repeatedly since then (Hell, that Spectre woulda been Jim Corrigan…that was two Spectres ago!)
So who’s to blame? I guess whoever sticks two random comic books in a plastic wrapper and seals ‘em before sending them off to dollar stores, but jeez, how much oversight could you reasonably expect in that sort of situation?
It’s pretty cool that a comic book about the personification of the wrath of the Old Testament God, a ghost who fights crime by killing the guilty with elaborate ironic punishments, was given as a present to celebrate Easter though, a holiday celebrating the climax of the New Testament and its message of a kinder, gentler, mercy and forgiveness-focused God.
Also, there are a lot more skulls and scythes on that cover than one generally sees on Easter gifts.
So what’s the lesson here? Always buy your comic books from a local brick-and-mortar comic book shop, where you can look ‘em over and talk to someone who (hopefully) knows a thing or two about comics before you buy ‘em. And when looking for Easter gifts for kids, steer clear of the ones with corpses on the cover.
April 20th, 2010 at 8:39 am
From what I’ve seen, it’s a nude female with her “naughty” bits being strategically covered by smoke/fog/dry ice machine. The comic doesn’t appear to have a CCA stamp on it, so not really “mature readers” territory, but not appropriate for a 10 year old either.
April 20th, 2010 at 8:46 am
New Format comics were never sold on newsstands, so they had different content standards.
April 20th, 2010 at 9:01 am
That series was a direct market only title. It wasn’t available on the newsstands. Just like with The Question title that ran at the same time.
April 20th, 2010 at 9:21 am
I swear that this happened when this issue came out in the late ’80s. I think it was covered by the Comics Journal.
April 20th, 2010 at 9:41 am
From reading this, I thought maybe a bit of discretion on the parent’s part was in order, but after I read the actual article, I agreed with the parent, and was confused as to why they would even put the following on a random selection of comics: “All comic books inserted in the “Superhero Comic Book Spectacular” are family friendly and will bring hours of enjoyable reading.”
April 20th, 2010 at 9:56 am
This was actually the first issue of the Spectre I had ever seen. The comic was indeed direct sales only, and the nudity wasn’t blatant, nor was it gratuitous. Let the hand wringing begin.
April 20th, 2010 at 10:32 am
Ridiculous. Funny how the “nudity” was objected to but the violence and vengeance was ok. *sigh* You know the more you hide form kids the more they seek out and in the wrong context. How about having a conversation with your kid about what’s real and what’s fiction.
April 20th, 2010 at 12:49 pm
Just imagine if this were an issue of the Ostrander/Mandrake Spectre, which was as mature a book as you will ever see under the DCU banner.
April 20th, 2010 at 4:42 pm
When I found nudity in my Conan comics as a kid, only thing I told my mum was “buy more Conan comics”. This kids a nerd.
April 21st, 2010 at 7:14 am
I had a mail subscription to this series when I was in high school. I remember needing parental permission to have this particular issue shipped to me. I didn’t get it.
I did get a hold of it years later, just to see what the fuss was about. Most of Madame Xanadu’s nakedness is obscured with mist, but there are at least a couple panels where her breasts are fully visible.
April 22nd, 2010 at 10:36 am
Oh no. GOD NO. The child… saw something… NATURAL!?! Quick! Send him off to the psych wards immediately! I mean violence is no problem, but partial nudity? My god man! He’s obviously in danger of becoming a serial killer now. There is nothing in this world worse to a child’s mind than something natural! Things such as polio, tuberculosis, even FAS must stand in awe of the power of the exposed nipples effect on the child! What is this world coming too when the natural is… acceptable (I just gagged a little typing that sentence)??
April 22nd, 2010 at 11:21 am
Gotta hand it to the kid for having the moral decency to know that it wasn’t a kids comic and told his mom. So many kids today have parents that don’t care. Obviously, this is a child that has a loving mother.
January 17th, 2011 at 9:28 pm
Wow, that was a very informative piece! Thank you so much for doing such a fantastic job with this, i’ll be reading regularly from now on.