Voice of the Fire
Written by Alan Moore
Photo Plates by Jose Villarubia
Published by Top Shelf
There’s a cliché in the rock world, stating that anytime the guitar player for a successful band goes out on his own, his first solo effort is characterized by noodley overplaying, muddy overdubbing and all-around excess at the expense of the his former group’s songcraft. I hadn’t really thought of how this notion might apply to the creation of comics, but in the case of Alan Moore’s 1995 novel Voice of the Fire (I have the 2003 hardcover reissue from Top Shelf; a softcover edition is currently available), that cliché comes true.
Working in collaboration with talented illustrations such as Stephen Bissette, Dave Gibbons, Chris Sprouse, Kevin O’Neill, J.H. Williams III and others, Moore’s reputation as the most talented of comics writers is nearly unimpeachable. In Voice of the Fire, freed of the shackles of collaboration, able to let his words carry the full weight of his vision, Moore lets loose without restraint.
Voice of the Fire’s reputation as a difficult read is well earned (that I’ve finally finished with it to write this review nearly seven years after buying it from Chris Staros at a Pittsburgh Comicon should tell you something; my most recent and first successful reading of the book took nearly three weeks; I’m not an exceptionally fast reader as these things go, but I’m not slow either: three weeks to finish 284 pages is a long, long time). Tracking the history of Moore’s hometown, Northampton, England, beginning in 4000 BC until the then-present 1995, Voice follows no clear protagonist (except perhaps the notion of the city itself) and individual chapters connect in only oblique ways – hallucinatory visions of other characters sometimes, but more frequently thematically and through mythical references.
Much of the book’s legend stems from the first chapter; set over 6000 years ago, “Hob’s Hog” is narrated by a young boy, cast out from his tribe following his mother’s death, in a preliterate language. The novel’s opening line, “A-hind of hill, ways off to sun-set-down, is sky come like as fire, and walk I up in ways of this, all hard of breath, where is grass codlings on I’s feet and wetting they”, serves notice that surviving Moore’s opening gambit will take incredible resolve. As for the tack of Moore in writing such an inaccessible passage, I think most readers (and writers) will give him credit for tackling the notion of narration from a character older than language; the technical and creative challenge of finding and maintaining the voice is handled with astonishing aplomb. Other readers…, well, they’ll find the assault on their comprehension aggravating, high-handed and insulting. What good is writing if a reader cannot read, they may ask. Neither side is right or wrong; it’s simply a fact of the novel that you should know if you’re to attempt passage between its covers. Consider it noted.
In truth, the book’s success and failure have little to do with “Hob’s Hog.” Eleven chapters and over two hundred pages follow, and though they may not achieve the glamour of the jambling, thorny difficulty of the opener, each installment supports all of the strengths and faults of Moore’s prose writing.
Without an artist to mediate Moore’s language (even his comics scripts are legendarily detailed and lengthy), Voice of the Fire careens wildly from beautifully moving descriptions to over-wrought and over-heated walls of language, and back again. Passages, entire pages, are shown to readers in extravagant detail, while the motivations behind every depraved lust are unearthed. It’s deep, powerful writing. At time, however, Moore’s prose slips into an exceedingly purple variety, using analogies that stretch comprehension and the rhythm of the writing. Also, he likes to compare things to piss. A lot.
Ostensibly about Northamption, a fiction that threads through the town’s history (you’ll recognize many names during the reading, such as Guy Fawkes, and you’ll swear that others are real even when they aren’t), Voice of the Fire is ultimately about myth vs. reality. Frequent references to previous chapters twist and distort the version read earlier in the novel. In the second chapter, a tale is told of a man who, having been told by his god to sacrifice his son, finds a hog and butchers it instead. Suffice to say, if you read “Hob’s Hog,” the hog’s viewpoint on the matter is quite different, yet fitting to the myth.
The final chapter is undoubtedly the book’s high point; continuing the first person narrative theme, Moore finds that he himself must become the narrator (the book is a fiction, not a lie), as he explores his own attempt to bind his hometown within the pages of his novel. Metafictionally, he describes the process of writing the final chapter, while discussing aspects of it with family and friends, and examining the evolving neighborhoods of Northampton.
The lasting durability of myths defines Voice of the Fire, a testament to the “truths” of history and the importance of stories in shaping our world. Moore’s wit and wonder provide lift to most of the novel, yet his indulgences also create sections that drag the book’s flow to a crawl and jar the reader from the world of Moore’s imaging. The end result is a flawed masterpiece, difficult, sometimes unable to clearly make its point, yet showing signs of wisdom and intelligence amidst the muck.
February 23rd, 2010 at 5:37 pm
Excellent, excellent review. I’d wondered how so obviously talented a writer would fare outside comics, tho not enough to tackle his prose work.
February 23rd, 2010 at 6:32 pm
yeah, Moore has his flaws and is nowhere near the untouchable writer comics would like him to be.
On a sidenote: one can also witness his purple weakness in parts of Miracleman and especially V for Vendetta.
February 23rd, 2010 at 10:18 pm
I totally disagree with this review. I thought the book was absolute genius. Especially the first chapter, which was my favorite story in the book.
It was a bit dense and difficult to get through at times, but that made the pay-offs so much more rewarding. Even with the help of artists some of Moore’s work can be difficult to get through (i.e., Swamp Thing #60, it was so disorienting) but so worth it.
I think that the reviewer(s) of this book would change their opinion of this work if they distance themselves from it for a bit and re-read it again once or perhaps two more times. I plan to do the same thing myself in order to obtain a better purchase of this work of art.
February 24th, 2010 at 2:18 am
~o.0~:
Seeing a book’s (or any piece of art’s) flaws doesn’t make it any less great. If any college professor or critic ever tells you that some work is irrevocably genius and presents it as undisputed fact, then it’s best to accept whatever that person has to say with a grain of salt.
February 24th, 2010 at 3:41 pm
Thank you for finishing this book, because after getting a chapter in a few years back, I had to put it down and have felt guilty ever since.
My guess is this book is best experienced by having it read to you by Moore himself as he dances around a fire deep in the woods, for no less than 13 hours.
March 2nd, 2010 at 12:07 am
Personally, I found VOTF difficult but well worth the effort. As one of the characters in the novel puts it, “Here is clever deep enough to drown in.”
August 5th, 2010 at 8:45 am
thank you ver nice wonderful article post good