Comments on: Review: Doctor Who: The Complete Specials on DVD and Blu-Ray http://blog.newsarama.com/2010/02/03/review-doctor-who-the-complete-specials-on-dvd-and-blu-ray/ The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:26:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: silvanthalas http://blog.newsarama.com/2010/02/03/review-doctor-who-the-complete-specials-on-dvd-and-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-485463 silvanthalas Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:20:31 +0000 http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=13607#comment-485463 "and obviously the series finale (“The End of the World”) would be a decent enough lead-in to what’s currently a great jumping-on point for them" Sure, if they wanted to watch the 2nd episode of the first season of the rebooted series, they *could* watch the episode "The End of the World". Or they could watch "The End of Time", which is actually part of this DVD/Blu-Ray set. "The show itself isn’t for everyone; the continuation of the old show is not only story-wise, but technically as well; it looks just like it did in the ‘60s, and has the very analog special effects and costuming of that era." This is one of the most incredibly nonsensical sentences I've ever read. Story-wise what?; technically what?; why was the ; used more than once? And I'd have to agree with Ed: if you think the show now 'looks just like it did in the '60s', then you're quite literally brain damaged. “and obviously the series finale (“The End of the World”) would be a decent enough lead-in to what’s currently a great jumping-on point for them”

Sure, if they wanted to watch the 2nd episode of the first season of the rebooted series, they *could* watch the episode “The End of the World”.

Or they could watch “The End of Time”, which is actually part of this DVD/Blu-Ray set.

“The show itself isn’t for everyone; the continuation of the old show is not only story-wise, but technically as well; it looks just like it did in the ‘60s, and has the very analog special effects and costuming of that era.”

This is one of the most incredibly nonsensical sentences I’ve ever read. Story-wise what?; technically what?; why was the ; used more than once?

And I’d have to agree with Ed: if you think the show now ‘looks just like it did in the ’60s’, then you’re quite literally brain damaged.

]]> By: Ed http://blog.newsarama.com/2010/02/03/review-doctor-who-the-complete-specials-on-dvd-and-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-485393 Ed Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:12:30 +0000 http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=13607#comment-485393 "The show itself isn’t for everyone; the continuation of the old show is not only story-wise, but technically as well; it looks just like it did in the ‘60s, and has the very analog special effects and costuming of that era." So... either you're joking, or you're lying about ever having actually either incarnation of this show? That or some kind of impairment... “The show itself isn’t for everyone; the continuation of the old show is not only story-wise, but technically as well; it looks just like it did in the ‘60s, and has the very analog special effects and costuming of that era.”

So… either you’re joking, or you’re lying about ever having actually either incarnation of this show?
That or some kind of impairment…

]]>