With mega events such as Blackest Night, Avengers: Disassemble, Secret Invasion, etc always having an effect on books, Marvel’s current big event is no different. Calling Siege a shake-up is an understatement because as it reaches it’s conclusion in April, Marvel will be cancelling all four of their Avengers books.
New Avengers
Mighty Avengers
Dark Avengers
Avengers: The Initiative
That’s right. Some of the biggest Marvel books out there are scheduled for a drastic overhaul in just a few short months, so let the guessing games begin on what will happen now.
So, ‘Rama readers, what are your thoughts on this? I know that Dark Avengers was never supposed to last long, but do you think it will just go back to a singular Avengers title, or just a revamp on the other Avengers books?
[Source: IGN]
January 16th, 2010 at 9:48 am
What is the Dark Avengers replacement book called? Avengers Force? Led by Nick Fury? Don’t think Logan, Parker, Cage, Rogers or Murdock will be working with him anytime soon. I suppose thats where all his Secret Warriors alumni will jump to next.
January 16th, 2010 at 9:52 am
It’ll probably lead into the next event. “Avengers Assembled” or something like that is my guess. Playing off Avengers Disassmebled, of course.
January 16th, 2010 at 11:25 am
I’m guessing one Avengers title coming multiple times per month like Amazing Spiderman and an additional Avengers-related title telling individual stories.
January 16th, 2010 at 11:41 am
Knowing Marvel, they will replace these four Avengers series with eight new Avengers series and 23 Avengers-related mini-series. And that’s just the next six months.
January 16th, 2010 at 12:59 pm
I’d look for New Avengers to be replaced with Avengers, possibly picking back up the original numbering (Cap/Thor/Iron Man/Spider-man/Wolverine/???/???)
and Christos Gage somewhere on the CBR forums made mention he was writing Avengers Academy, which is safe to assume is an A: The Initiative replacement…
January 16th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
Wow, I’m surprised by this. I can’t imagine that an ‘Amazing Spider-man’ scenario would work as the teams are all different, though I guess New Avengers and Mighty Avengers have become pretty close to merging as of late. However, Avengers: The Initiative is unlike anything else out there – idiosyncratic, funny and so diverse – that it couldn’t possibly work in the above scenario. Damn, that’s one title I’ll miss.
January 16th, 2010 at 1:36 pm
@Josh….good one.
Chances are that all Marvel’s gonna do relaunch the “Avengers” title and drop all those New, Mighty, Initiative, and Dark titles. Boo hoo…only one Avengers book a month instead of 4. And of this will lead Marvel back to it’s honky dory STATUS QUO. Bad enough that Siege began the SAME EXACT WAY that Civil War did. What’s next…Marvel revisiting the Spider Clone thing…oh wait that’s happening now.
January 16th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
I look for a hot mess. Marvel is the NBC of the comic book world, they both refuse to give the public what they want: simple entertainment….
January 16th, 2010 at 1:42 pm
OK,on the old boards I posted an idea called Justice League Academy based on a concept I had a decade ago,can I sue Marvel if this new Avengers Academy looks anything like my original concept?
January 16th, 2010 at 1:43 pm
doesn’t anybody remember the original siege trailer shown to comic book industry types at some trade show a few months back? The end of the trailer showed that statue of cap, iron man and thor that we’re all used to seeing, but under it it said something like 1963 – 2010. I think the shake-up is, there won’t be the big 3 anymore. At least not in the marvel universe proper.
They might retry a heroes reborn thing, or somehow take them off the board, and give them several months worth of stories where they have to relearn how to be the avengers while the rest of the MU picks up the slack. Granted, this is basically EXACTLY what New Avengers has been about for the past couple years, but still, that memorial statue had to mean something, right?
January 16th, 2010 at 1:49 pm
Hopefully whatever replaces them will be $2.99 (or at least not $3.99 for no particular reason).
January 16th, 2010 at 1:51 pm
I’m glad to see Dark Avengers ending as it was always intended. Nice to see that regardless of sales it’s going away for the greater good of the Avengers. For me Mighty Avengers just never really worked and while I loved the attention/characterization given to Pym I cringed over the “Jonah” BS they’re with Vision and his cold/lifeless “romance” with Cassie (who doesn’t belong on this team, yet).
Avengers: The Initiative is my concern because I absolutely LOVE the attention/spotlight/characterization given to old B/C/D level characters like Diamondback, Ultra Girl, Taskmaster and newer characters like The Gauntlet. I’m sure Marvel has a plan but I think there’s value in this military/superhero training concept….Next Avengers?
I’m hoping to hear launches of:
Avengers
Avengers West Coast
Young Avengers (they NEED a monthly)
Earth’s Mightiest Heroes (the new version of The Initiative)
…and of course I would LOVE to see New Warriors launched with the original cast or as many as possible.
January 16th, 2010 at 1:52 pm
This is exciting. I hope its something none of us expect.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:10 pm
These will be released in 4 titles and retailers will be able to get a mini Cap Shield, mini Thor hammer, mini Iron Man helmet and Mini Hawkeye bow with the purchase of these titles. Then Marvel will ask that you rip off the covers of 50 of these to recieve a free Deadpool NFL Superpro variant.
Glad I quit reading Marvel
January 16th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
I heard they’re being replaced by Jay Leno.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:15 pm
I like Chris comment about doing an Avengers book more than once a month. That has work well for Spidey, but I kinda doubt it. Too many characters. I’d imagine there will at least be 2/3 new monthly books with one shot and mini-series galore.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I’m hoping for the old fashioned Avengers (with Cap, Thor, Iron Man, etc) in their original book. I also think there should be a Young Avengers ongoing.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:24 pm
Please please please let these books be $2.99. I’m digging what’s going on and would love to read a bunch of Avengers titles, but won’t be able to read many if they’re too expensive.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:25 pm
I would suspect that there will be 3 Avengers titles that launch as a result of the heroic age.
Avengers: The Flagship book that picks up the original numbering. It would have Cap (Steve Rogers), Iron-Man, Thor, SPider-Man, Ms. Marvel, Luke Cage, Jewel and Quicksilver
Secret Avengers:P This would be the underground covert/black-ops team led by Cap (Bucky), Black Widow, War Machine, Spider-Woman, Falcon, Wolverine, Tigra and Doctor Voodoo
Young Avengers/ Avengers Academy(?): This would basically be the initiative led by Hank Pym and Steve Rogers. The Young Avengers would be the “Junior Class” and the New Warriors would be the ‘Senior Class” then a bunch of new recruits would come in to train as heroes
January 16th, 2010 at 2:26 pm
I am surprised by this move. I figured there would be some pretty drastic changes, but this surpasses anything I had in mind. Marvel has never shyed away from big changes to their line or major titles since Quesada took over. I am excited to see where it goes. Hopefully Bendis and Slott stick around to write something.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:44 pm
James Halcomb Says:
January 16th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
“I look for a hot mess. Marvel is the NBC of the comic book world, they both refuse to give the public what they want: simple entertainment….”
Yes, Marvel has refused to give the public what they want, which is why they have close to 50% of the market share.
BTW, didn’t NBC give us back CHUCK? Or was that another network?
January 16th, 2010 at 2:45 pm
@james halcomb.. I was actually surprised that NBC gave us Chuck to enjoy.. and they actually listened … but that can all change :/
I hope Triumph the Insult dog poops on NBC’g logo
January 16th, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Honestly not sure this is a big surprise.
Most if not all of these titles exist in their current form due to events in Dark Reign/Invasion/ Civil War. The post Siege world is likely to bring things back to some sort of normalcy for the MU (good or bad we will see). The whole comic industry uses new title/ new numbering to showcase a fresh start and to indicate good jumping in points for new readers.
I’d be surprised if there aren’t at least as many new titles that come of of Siege that are killed by it.
January 16th, 2010 at 3:10 pm
I think restarting “Avengers” is a definite. I like the name “Secret Avengers” also, so I could also see that being part of a relaunch, perhaps a rebranding of Secret Warriors. I think I remember them saying they were bringing back an ongoing “Young Avengers” title as well, so there’s that. I’d imagine Thunderbolts will be tied into this as well, and a rebranding of the Initiative seems likely.
I think there’s going to have to be 2 teams of main Avengers still though. You figure Cap, Iron Man, Thor, Captain Marvel (Noh-Varr), Hawkeye/Ronin, Mockingbird would be the classic team, and then you’d have the guys left from New/Mighty/Dark Avengers as the other.
January 16th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
I just wanna say, I’m Lovin Blackest Night! lol. Watch Marvel reboot Avengers, then go back to it’s original numbering. What a cop out!
January 16th, 2010 at 3:18 pm
So when they come back the books will then be 6.99 of 20 pages? right? That’s basically the leap that happened last time they overhauled a franchise…
January 16th, 2010 at 3:24 pm
My dream list:
Spidey, Wolverine, Bucky-Cap, Luke Cage, and whovever else Bendis wants on Secret Avengers, drawn by John Romita Jr.
Avengers (#404 and on) starring Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Hawkeye, Black Widow, and Falcon by Ed Brubaher and Steve Epting.
January 16th, 2010 at 3:40 pm
Who wants to bet that they are relaunched as a 3-times a month or weekly Avengers book, ala Amazing Spiderman?
January 16th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
The stupidity shown in V’s post is absolutely astounding.
“Bad enough that Siege began the SAME EXACT WAY that Civil War did.”
You’re not really this dense, are you? You realize that was done purposely, right? Norman purposely wanted to create his own Stamford. That was the point.
Read the books before commenting.
“What’s next…Marvel revisiting the Spider Clone thing…oh wait that’s happening now.”
Uh, it is? How is what amounts to a “What If…?” mini-series revisiting it? You say that as if Marvel is bringing the Clone Saga back into ASM, which they’re not.
Not that there would be anything wrong with that if it was behind the hands of Slott and the gang.
January 16th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Why not cancel these books? That just means Marvel can ship out 4 new #1s at $4.99 a pop.
January 16th, 2010 at 4:04 pm
I believe it will be tied to the new Ironman movie which will give a plug for the Avengers and start the new series from there.
January 16th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
We only need 3 Avenger titles…
THE AVENGERS: EARTH’S MIGHTEST HEROES, featuring Stever Rogers/Captain America, Thor, Tony Stark/Iron-Man, Bruce Banner/Hulk, Noh Vorr/Captain Marvel, Hercules, Clint Barton/Hawkeye, Mockingbird, The Vision, and Doctor Strange.
THE THUNDERBOLTS (Avenger’s black-ops team), featuring James Buchannan, Henry Pym/Wasp, War Machine, Ares, Black Widow, Luke Cage, Iron Fist, Moon Knight, Tigra, and Quicksilver.
AVENGERS ACADAMY, featuring The Young Avengers and The Initiative members.
January 16th, 2010 at 4:18 pm
Kinda figured this would happen. Guess i have to let my LCBstore to ad the new books when the old ones finish
January 16th, 2010 at 4:20 pm
I just hope that Brian Micheal Bendis will keep writing them.
January 16th, 2010 at 4:25 pm
@V
“Bad enough that Siege began the SAME EXACT WAY that Civil War did.”
ummm, you do understand that that was a very, very intentional call-back, right?
@James Halcomb:
“I look for a hot mess. Marvel is the NBC of the comic book world, they both refuse to give the public what they want: simple entertainment….”
i can see how you’d make that comparison, since Marvel owns half the market consistently and NBC is bleeding viewers. oh, wait.
@Cameron: I really like your first two titles: I was expecting them to rename New Avengers too Secret Avengers after Civil War…
@Brian: I more see them doing that with X-men than Avengers, Avengers teams have always seemed to have their own “flair” while the different X-teams have usually seemed less ‘distinct’ too me. (especially since members would flow between them and they often operate out of the same HQ)
January 16th, 2010 at 4:30 pm
There is gonna be at least two Avengers titles, the Avengers with the big guns and Avengers Academy, the Secret Avengers thing is possible, but I’m not sure, and, don’t forget this people, there is no word about Thunderbolts, what’s is gonna happen to them? That I want to know.
Peace.
January 16th, 2010 at 4:45 pm
There will be three of four Avengers books released a month, to make it pseudo weekly and to jack up the numbering so that Marvel can catch up to Detective Comics, Batman, Superman and Action Comics.
All of the Avengers books will have the standard page count, but they will all be $3.99 each.
Marvel has lost all credibility with me after the Siege 3 variant shenanigans.
I know Marvel, DC, Dark Horse, Boom!, Image, et. al. are in this to make a profit, but Marvel seems to ONLY care about the bottom line. They have no regard for the fans and the consumers and for some reason that I have yet to figure out, Marvel books are top sellers. It boggles my mind, especially since most of their books are insulting to the readers’ intelligence.
January 16th, 2010 at 5:05 pm
Last I remember, Bendis confirmed he was staying on Avengers. And this was on Wordballoon irrc. He’s also said he’s got big plans post Siege. I wonder how he can top all of his existing body of work on the Avengers?
January 16th, 2010 at 5:32 pm
I will never read any Avenger book in which Spider-Man or Wolverine is a member. Why Marvel decided years ago to throw-away years of established Spidey as loner except for a few team-ups I will never fathom. And send old knuckle blades back to the X-Men where he belongs.
This is type of Spider-Ham hockey is why I only read three Marvel books these days. (The Marvels Project, whichever book this week features Spider-Girl, and The Torch.)
January 16th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
I would expect Mighty, non-adjective, Academy, and Secret with, perhaps, various off shoots as minis featuring different aspects of the team. But, given the team’s popularity, there’s no reason to think that there won’t be at least two “mainstream” teams, plus the training team, plus an undercover team.
I would also hope/expect some of the “new” Avengers to stand side by side with the classic ones to give them more weight.
January 16th, 2010 at 5:51 pm
I’d be willing to give the new Avengers book a chance if they get new writers on it and dump Bendis and not go anywhere near the lot that started and continued the Disassembled mess with Dark Reign (Fraction, Parker, Gage, Slott, Hickman). No offense, but the New Avengers with Spiderwoman run was essentially a red herring for more than half the run. How is that considered successful much less accomplished with a stupid alien being behind all of that mess?
This new series is essentially: Avengers by Bendis (For Reelz this time).
January 16th, 2010 at 6:05 pm
What the…?!? Is Marvel cancelling these titles, just to relaunch them as #1 issues?!?
Come on! Aren’t we done with all the 1990′s comic book scams already?!?
Just another reason why I’m glad that I’ve stopped buying Marvel titles ever since Dark Reign began!
January 16th, 2010 at 6:15 pm
I like Slott and Gage a lot– I would be very happy to see each of them still have a book and be left alone to make their own runs for a while. I think the three book scenario makes the most sense to me, unless they are counting Thunderbolts in this as well, in which case there could be a fourth book. With Bendis doing Spiderwoman, maybe he will only be doing the one Avengers book.
January 16th, 2010 at 6:15 pm
rabble, rabble…. rabble rabble… joe q… .rabble… rabble… blackest night…. rabble rabble… Dc… Marvel…. rabble rabble…. rabbbbbblbblle… satus quo… duh… rabble…. rabble…angry, angry…. blah…. blah… blah… Brian Bendis… Blah blah… Geoff Johns, Geoff Johns… rabble… boring…. angry…. blah… blah..
A Summary of Comic-event Talkbacks.
January 16th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
id probably go back and buy avengers if it had just the one title with cap, thor , iron man etc. i dropped the whole cabbodle when dark reign began cos it got so stupid with all the ‘dark’ titles. fingers crossed.
January 16th, 2010 at 7:12 pm
perfect dropping off point
January 16th, 2010 at 7:46 pm
I said this elsewhere that avengers books will back with new #1s in a month or two (I hope). Of course marvel is so stupid now who knows. It maybe 2012 before we get a new avengers book. I mean hey they bring Kitty Pryde just in time to get over showed by Second Coming.
January 16th, 2010 at 8:00 pm
As long as Bendis and Immonen are doing one of the books I’m fine with all of this. I have been very well entertained by Marvel since the beginning of Civil War and thoroughly enjoyed the first issue of Siege. Immonen is doing some of the best work of his career on New Avengers.
January 16th, 2010 at 8:47 pm
I love when Marvel cancels books and brings them back as number 1′s because it means I don’t have to add them to my pull list. Besides multiple covers for 20 pages of original artwork with 8 pages of reprints for 4.99 will be a bit much. Oh, did I mention I’m loving Blackest Night right now.
January 16th, 2010 at 9:04 pm
I have a hard time seeing Marvel doing its readers a favor and scaling back but it would be cool if that’s what they have in mind. I like the avengers but hopfully this will save me some money now if only they could cut the hulk books down to one again.
Marvel is more likely to relaunch Avengers with a dozen new off shoots if the keep Bendis is writing one of them that will be the book I’ll buy
good day
January 16th, 2010 at 9:34 pm
I love the idea about the Deadpool NFL Superpro cover, I’d buy that!
January 16th, 2010 at 9:52 pm
James Halcomb Says:
January 16th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
“I look for a hot mess. Marvel is the NBC of the comic book world, they both refuse to give the public what they want: simple entertainment….”
what does this even mean? That post is the UPN of the Internet: it’s terrible.
the negative posts here are hilarious. Who CARES if they relaunch the books? fans will continue buying it, and the folks complaining about it seem to hate the books already. and if/when they change back to original numbering, they’ll complain about that too. Personally I couldn’t care less about the number on the cover. I’m more concerned with the stories inside. the issue becomes even more irrelevant if you read the trade.
January 16th, 2010 at 10:16 pm
Relaunching The Mighty Avengers right after siege…..they will start at 1…then renumber at 600, prolly by combining all the mighty and new together. Also, relaunching West Coast Avengers, or Avengers West Coast…How do I know? My roommate runs a comic shop in LA and has to make pre orders for his new stock months in advance…one thing that is coming out in April is the West Coast Avengers hardcover vol 1, reprinting the mini series and material from Avengers when they were setting up the west coast team, including the issue where Vision sets its up. Comics have always set up marketing where they release old material that is relevant to new material, so expect to see clint and bobbi set up the wackos out west with the big 3 and the eakos in New York.
January 16th, 2010 at 10:18 pm
Get the Avengers back to their original numbering and put in the line-up every one wants to see: Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Vision (the original, not the lame-o teen-age model), Scarlett Witch, Wonderman, Beast, Ms. Marvel, and alternates, Wasp and Yellowjacket!!! Put Spider-Man with his clones and Wolverine in his other 47 books and be done with it! Let’s see the Avengers go back to the great comic it used to be!!!
If you younger readers want to know what a great run of Avengers was like, check out Avengers, (original series), #158 through #202, the greatest Avengers writers ever, Jim Shooter & David Micheline and the greatest Avengers artist’ ever, George Perez and John Byrne. Do yourselves a favor and go buy the Marvel Essential editions featuring these writers and artist’. If not the best Avengers ever (in my opinion, the best), then some of the best Avengers comics ever!
January 16th, 2010 at 10:36 pm
Marvel is actually popular and makes decisions that keep its popularity growing. How are they like NBC, which has consistently been in last place?
January 16th, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Tony Stark brought the Avengers together and kept funding them all these years. Even if Stark gets all his marbles back, can he rebuilt Stark Enterprises and foot the tab for his super-hero clubhouse before IM2 is released?
Maybe we don’t see any Avengers for awhile. Maybe a series of mini’s with different team-ups – all along a theme that would crescendo with a major need for the kind of super power an Avengers can provide! (And maybe that theme is building right now in Secret Warriors)
And maybe the build-up to this Avengers re-launch coincides with Avengers movie release in ’12 – following IM2, the Thor movie and the Cap movie.
… and maybe Jason’s right that this is a good dropping off point.
January 16th, 2010 at 11:34 pm
This is just a tonal shift a roster shift and relaunch. Not really worth so much talk and certainly not worth the “ALL AVENGERS TITLES DISCONTINUED” sort of talk. That places like io9 have jumped on this is just silly.
http://www.newsarama.com/comics/0910…dis-Siege.html
“Bendis: We’ve been aiming towards this for some time. Siege is part of a larger arc that includes Secret Invasion and Secret War before that.
Here’s what I’ll promise – coming out of Siege, there will be a big change to the Avengers’ books line-ups and rosters; as big as it was after Avengers: Disassembled. I promise at the end of this event, this miniseries will change the entire Avengers franchise. And it’s not something we have to do.
Nrama: How do you mean?
Bendis: Usually, big shifts like this are precipitated by a change in creators or lagging sales or something, but not for this. This status quo change isn’t something we have to do – but it’s something we want to do.”
January 16th, 2010 at 11:48 pm
“Yawn…”
January 17th, 2010 at 12:03 am
Wouldn’t be surprised if we get a retro Avengers book (Cap, Iron Man, Thor, Hawkeye, Ms. Marvel) and a New-ish Avengers book (Luke Cage, Spider-Woman, Spider-Man, Bucky, and Wolverine). Basically there are too many characters for there to be just one book.
January 17th, 2010 at 12:52 am
I stopped reading New Avengers during Civil War because I realized they were putting forth overly large promises, some of which they would never pay off. It was called Civil War and then they act shocked when somebody dies. I think Marvel became more premise than actual story with that new era and that’s what turned me off the most, big concepts that they don’t have the ability to pay off. People seem to think that it will be back to the big three Avengers. Why would a Thor (in his bland new costume) want to work with the war-monger Tony Stark that created a mockery of his self while he was away? Why would Cap want to work with that guy who the guy he was so at odds with and got him killed… or didn’t get him killed. Obviously, I haven’t read Reborn.
I think Bendis is a good writer, just not at big event team books. Which is why I won’t read them, it’s still Bendis writing them. I see Norman OSborne is in the books for some reason and Spider-man (whomever he is now I can’t tell) isn’t. Why?
Ofcourse they will still be more than one Avengers books, aren’t they still selling well?
January 17th, 2010 at 12:54 am
Well I will consider this good news if they slim the Avengers line down to one book. If they can do that and be successful, then they should slim down the X-men line to one book. Heaven only knows the X-Men line could really benefit a massive trimming. Maybe then I’ll finally consider buying an Avenger and X-Men book.
But knowing Marvel, they are only canceling these books to put out number ones again with unreasonable high cover prices, which fans who don’t know the meaning of no will buy anyway. Another words…it will be more of the same.
January 17th, 2010 at 1:19 am
Get ready for 4 new Avengers #1 issues in May.
January 17th, 2010 at 2:03 am
Well, not a very suprising move.
Since Beast has left the X-Men, or didn´t he (?), and there is always a possibility to bring back old Charakters, i hope for some good stuff near the classic moments of the 80s and 90s.
Just two Books (normal an west coast) and that´s it. No Acadamy or so. Just leave the last years behind an start all over gain.
January 17th, 2010 at 3:48 am
As cool as all of those books are, ‘Initiative’ will be well and truly done after Seige. It’s lasted a long time, considering it stemmed from ‘Civil War’. ‘Dark Avengers’ is an obvious title to stop printing when Osborne gets killed/imprisoned/whatever’d. I think there will still be two Avengers titles after this whole business, but the team line-ups may change. Maybe we’ll get an Avengers book, and also a Young Avengers book??? I hope so.
January 17th, 2010 at 4:52 am
I’m with @jason: perfect dropping off point
January 17th, 2010 at 7:53 am
We all know Dark Avengers would end, all the characters will appear elsewhere again, just a fact.
Mighty and New will get a simple mix-up and renamed. But there will still be to team books.
The real bummer is Avengers: The Initiative being cancelled. It’s such a unique concept! There we saw a trainingcamp for new heroes, a great black-ops team for special missions (Shadow Initiative) and some of the 50 state teams every now and then. This was the book where you could find your favorite non-A-list characters on a regular basis. With it being canned, where the —- are wqe gonna see the state teams now? I am really disappointed guys!
January 17th, 2010 at 8:20 am
Have just two titles, akin to Amazing Spider-Man and Web of Spider-Man.
Have the main Avengers’ title have a rotating cast, with 6 or so members “assembled” on a mission-by-mission basis.
And please, get rid of the Infinite Mansion. Pym has an infinitely huge mansion but the other teams have to resort to using stolen jets and changing bases regularly?
January 17th, 2010 at 9:03 am
I’m gutted to lose Mighty Avengers, but after all the Blackest Night/Siege#3 crap Quesada recently pulled, at least this gives me a nice jumping off point.
If they end all these books just to launch another Bendis Avengers, then they’ve lost a reader for good.
HOWEVER – If they launch a couple of ‘real’ Avengers books by Fraction and Slott, then I’m in.
Give Bendis an Alias relaunch, or a new Heroes for Hire team – he could actually work somethin like that.
January 17th, 2010 at 9:18 am
I’ll trust MArvel on this, but darn it if I won’t miss initiative, never the greatest book but it was ALWAYS a dependable read.
January 17th, 2010 at 9:40 am
lol…Send all your unsold copies of
New Avengers
Mighty Avengers
Dark Avengers
Avengers: The Initiative
to DC and they will be more than happy to flush them down the toilet.
January 17th, 2010 at 10:46 am
Marvel lost all credibility with me so here’s what I think they’ll do to make them sound bad. They’ll make a weekly title that ships 7 times a month (they’ll find a way) and charge them all 9.99 a piece. Then they’ll come to your house and rape your mother and set your DC comics on fire. Then Joe Q will slap you with his dick across your face.
That will fulfill the Dark Prophesies and the Apocalypse will begin. Gee, thanks a lot Marvel. What a douchey move.
January 17th, 2010 at 11:20 am
What whining by you DC comic fans, I know that’s who’s doing most of the bitching and whining.If you don’t want to read the Avengers books or have a problem with it, here’s a suggestion…DON’T BUY IT!! It’s like DC has maybe 5 books that I read faithfully, but quite frankly, the rest are pure garbage in my opinion, but opinions are like assholes, everybody has one or is one! I like Blackest Night too, but is anyone kidding anyone to say it’s a direct response to the mega popular Marvel Zombie franchise? The way so many of you post your comments are like you’re so personally offended by Marvel moves of any kind! As a supporter of any and all good books (Chew from Image is the best, most original book out at the moment, so don’t think I’m just taking sides, as I said I like good books!!)just disregard anything that you are not interested in or don’t support,and your life and health and social life will work out much better!! BTW, I can’t stand Marvel’s policy of charging 3.99 for a 22 page comic either.Maybe if enough of us stop buying them we can send a message that the economy is in a down slope and this is not a good time to be raising prices on a comfort item like comics without increasing the page count.
January 17th, 2010 at 11:27 am
And they’re doing this so Bendis can have all the big players in one book to do with as he please.
Complete rubbish.
January 17th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
I think I may be done with Marvel depending on what happens after Siege. I’m really sick of all this stuff Bendis is doing. Can we go one year without a mega-company crossover please? I mean DC has even gotten slightly better about pacing out their events
January 17th, 2010 at 12:20 pm
As long as Bendis isn’t involved in any way, shape or form, it may be worth a look.
Let’s hope the multi-year BMB nightmare is drawing to a close and sanity will prevail once more at Marvel.
January 17th, 2010 at 1:31 pm
@Anthony Murray – Not sure if your bit was directed at me, but for the record it’s easy for people to say ‘don’t buy it’ but the real problem is that people WANT to read a decent Avengers book, they want to follow stories about those characters in-particular. They want to read about Cap, Thor and Iron Man – in one book – and Marvel know this, So they’ve been holding out on it for the past 5 years, perhaps worrying that once it’s done they will have blown their load? I dunno. But people want to read ‘that’ book – it’s been so damn long! They just don’t want it written by Bendis. There are so many brilliant writers at Marvel; Fraction, Slott, Brubaker, Diggle, Gage, Pak, Van Lente just to name a few… Why is it always Bendis?
What I personally can’t stand is how he gets “the keys to the kingdom” (zing) just because he can write post-modern ‘chatty’ dialogue…Which isn’t anything new or different anymore. Given, with Alias and Daredevil he basically started that whole thing, and that is the whole reason he’s where he’s at now. But the fact is he’s been resting on his laurels and has consistently produced the worst work of his career for the past two years.
All I’m suggesting to Marvel is – move him on! Any of the writers I mentioned before could helm a successful couple of Avengers titles, and not polarize fans as much as BMB does. He’s just old news, move him along to pastures new!
January 17th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
“opinions are like assholes, everybody has one or is one”
Everybody is an opinion?
Also, nice move on making a story about Marvel about how DC books are “garbage.” Discuss the issue at hand, the Avengers books.
January 17th, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Last word on Young Avengers was Heinberg coming back for a YA mini called “Children’s Crusade” or something like that. A YA ongoing doesn’t seem to be in the cards anytime soon. Would members of YA show up in Avengers Academy? More than likely.
January 17th, 2010 at 3:52 pm
@Bluespider:
I personally have loved the Avengers under Bendis. He has a way of making every threat seem major, and there’s a real sense of danger to the books. Contrast that to Slott over on Mighty Avengers who has brought some big guns against his team (Chthon, Loki, The Unspeakable) and yet I’ve never felt I was reading anything epic. Meanwhile Bendis can make 3rd stringers like Molecule Man, the U-Foes, and The Hood seem like credible threats.
I also like that Bendis keeps the focus on superheroes and villains. There’s no blatant socio-political commentary in his books the way there is with pretty much every Fraction book. He keeps things subtle, and I never feel I’m being preached to. Brubaker seems to work better on solo books, just read his X-Men work. Gage and Diggle do some great character work, so I wouldn’t mind seeing them come in on some issues. Pak could be alright. I think Van Lente would be the best choice on your list.
January 17th, 2010 at 3:59 pm
I only read the Initiative and hope to see it continue in some form. I am by no means a big fan of Bendis, and do not ready anything by him, with the exception of Siege. It’s pretty obvious why they give Bendis the keys to the kingdom, and I know allot of Bendis haters on this board will not like this, but he sells, thats that. It’s the same thing with reality television, people watch the Bachelor, Survivor, America’s Got Talent, etc. and so the networks produce them. Regardless if the work has any true artistic merit is secondary. People buy Bendis so they will give Bendis whatever he wants to write. The fact that people are on here complaining about something that hasn’t happend yet, nor do we actually know what Marvel has planned, creates a dialog on boards like this, now granted some of it isn’t dialogue, and would fall into the category of rants, but its a reaction nonetheless. I will definately try out the titles, and then I might be making a few rants of my own! But I will wait to see what is the end result before making snap judgements.
On a lighter note, these boards are entertaining to read.
January 17th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
# Moun10dew Says:
January 17th, 2010 at 9:40 am
“lol…Send all your unsold copies of
New Avengers
Mighty Avengers
Dark Avengers
Avengers: The Initiative
to DC and they will be more than happy to flush them down the toilet.”
Yeah, good luck finding those
January 17th, 2010 at 5:24 pm
“Marvel lost all credibility with me so here’s what I think they’ll do to make them sound bad. They’ll make a weekly title that ships 7 times a month (they’ll find a way) and charge them all 9.99 a piece. Then they’ll come to your house and rape your mother and set your DC comics on fire. Then Joe Q will slap you with his dick across your face.
That will fulfill the Dark Prophesies and the Apocalypse will begin. Gee, thanks a lot Marvel. What a douchey move.”
WTF!? Did you just say Marvel was going to rape my mother?! I can understand that some of you don’t like the way Marvel has been operating for the last few years (personally I think marvel comics are more fun than they’ve been since the 1980s) and that maybe you don’t approve of their business practices, but come on! Even for an obviously hyperbolic and fictional statement that is outrageous! That reminds me of the person the other day who posted that Marvel’s siege variant/DC comics return promotion was just like the holocaust. Get your act together people! Don’t you realize that when you post things like this you are not effectively protesting the things you dislike about comics, but instead belittling and marginalizing the importance of the very serious issues of rape and genocide! God some of you make my head spin sometimes.
January 17th, 2010 at 6:24 pm
Actually, Anthony, I see a lot of ‘whining’ by pissed off Marvel readers, myself included. I’m VERY concerned about what’s going to replace these books and am half expecting them to repeat what they’ve done with Amazing Spider-Man and have a 3x a month Avengers title (plus this Avengers Academy title we know about).
I hope not, because I just want one good Avengers book a month and that kind of move will get me to drop what’s looking more and more like my last remaining Marvel title. And as much as I’m fed up with their constant dickbaggery, that would be a shame.
January 17th, 2010 at 6:29 pm
I’m not surprised. With the big 3 coming back together, there really won’t be a need for multiple avengers teams. It will totally invalidate all of the dark reign/secret invasion changes, though. Ah well.
January 17th, 2010 at 7:03 pm
The only one I’m interested in is the team with Cage, Spider Woman and Ronin.
January 17th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
BTW I have NO desire to see Cap, Thor and Ironman together.
January 17th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
Did anyone else just get priced out of Marvel?
January 17th, 2010 at 7:54 pm
Whats up with no one caring about Echo DYING in Secret Invasion. No one even mentioned it!
January 17th, 2010 at 8:43 pm
I think the new avengers title from its beginning to the present is the strongest marvel book there is. I’ve been a x-fan for a long time and was never really interested in the avengers franchise. Bendis really renewed it and i dont give a crap about wolverine being in it or not. I think Bendis made a very good team book, TEAM book, can’t say this about the 100 x-men running around in fraction’s book. Before avengers dissasembled it was ok but I really think Bendis gave it more depth. I hope after the relaunche(s) it will stay as strong as it is now.
January 17th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
dan slott better keep writing Pym + Jocasta + Hercules when this latest crap event is over…
January 17th, 2010 at 9:45 pm
No surprise. All these books broke out because every Avengers had a unique purpose and vision. If Siege gets everyone buddy buddy again,there’s no need for so many books unless they have that many stories to tell.
Since I haven’t guessed one of these events right yet, I’ll guess that we’ll probably get something very unexpected. Or maybe now that I expect Bendis to screw with my brain, he’ll do the obvious thing and bring things back to a level of normalcy.
DArk dies with Norman.
New and Mighty become one book.
Initiative, probably canceled, but it might be nice to see this turni into a new (and better) crack at the New Warriors (How often do former Warriors show up in that book?)
Or go the Justice League Unlimited route with a weekly book, but as one big team that can focus on whomever they want at the time.
January 17th, 2010 at 11:06 pm
I don’t care about dark and new avengers (as a matter of fact I hope when they relaunch them they replace bendis) but I hope the other 2 get relaunched.
January 18th, 2010 at 2:36 am
I hope the team from The New Avenger will continue their work on new avenger title because really like the art and the story line.Really enjoy read the comic and I never miss the issue untill now.kudos and Good work Brian Micheal Bendis ,Stuart Immonen and the team.
P/S:Enjoy see Norman Osborn face really Piss off when one of his mansion blew off in the latest issue.Don’t forget about bulleye laughed at the back..
January 18th, 2010 at 3:27 am
How about a return to a single title with good stories? Return the Vision to his original self, this teen romance novel thing is silly.
Have not enjoyed The Avengers since Busiek and Perez left the series.
January 18th, 2010 at 3:54 am
To me it’s easy. Unlike DC Marvel accepts that it has created one big mess that readers aren’t interested in buying and they are ending it and restoring their universe to something their fans want to read.
January 18th, 2010 at 4:12 am
Seems like Marvel just puts out these New Avengers related crossovers and buries everything else. If you don’t like Bendis and his direction, I doubt you’d like the new stuff because it’s going to be the same guys behind it all. That’s why Spider-man doesn’t work, sure it sells well, but it’s a whole lot of nothing with a souless version of what the character was before the current Marvel regime. It’s the same guy(s) behind it all no matter who ‘writes’ the thing.
Begins with ‘Q’. Get me?
January 18th, 2010 at 4:51 am
I see that Marvel has reverted to their same habbits. They “end” a Comicbook title or titles (The Product)only to restart it one or two months after ending it. They do it story-wise Spider-Man. They do it with X-Titles. I really really Marvel they it was. I miss the time when they actually tried to make good comics with great stories
January 18th, 2010 at 9:17 am
This just paves the way for Deadpool to become an Avenger!
January 18th, 2010 at 9:40 am
Back to basics, I like it!!!!
January 18th, 2010 at 10:33 am
Really. No left overs on Avengers? I visit 3 middle size comic shop on a monthly search of my comics and they are always there about three months back.
I wait for 50% off box.
January 18th, 2010 at 11:12 am
I would really like to see an Avengers book with the big three that Bendis wouldn’t write.
January 18th, 2010 at 11:25 am
Yay pointless relaunches and meaningless #1 issues, it’s like the 90s are back!@!!
January 18th, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Just an excuse for new #1 issues.
January 18th, 2010 at 12:34 pm
Well, the obvious, it seems to me, is that there will be simply an Avengers book.
I would not be surprised by a resurrection of Avengers West Coast as a spillover Avengers book.
I’d also not be surprised by a Young/New/Training Avengers book, a street-level Avengers book, or an Avengers International book.
January 18th, 2010 at 1:26 pm
To be honest, the way Bendis writes the Avengers would work well with a rotating cast weekly comic. Spider-Man, the Sentry and Mockingbird are the only Avengers in the mansion this week? Sure, they’ll be the ones to battle Galactus.
I’m sure not many of the Mighty Avengers would actually graduate to main Avengers team. So we’re looking at a slightly enlarged New Avengers team, with Iron Man, Thor and Sentry added, maybe (put probably not) Pym and Jocasta, probably Black Widow. We might finally lose Wolverine (but not Spider-Man), Ms Marvel, and I secretly suspect we’ll lose Luke Cage and Jessica Jones.
Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Sentry, Spider-Man, Ronin, Mockingbird, Black Widow, Spider-Woman.
Bring it on. Avengers should be three times a month, with Avengers Academy as the “Web of Spider-Man” equivelant, as something of a mix between “Solo Avengers” and the Initiative.
Bendis is also one of the only writers that could write three issues a month.
January 18th, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Maybe the plan is to take the characters in graphic novel only territory. Line that format release up with the upcoming Avengers movie and try to pull in the prose-only crowd into comics. That would be a bold move but let’s face it, number one issue haven’t meant anything in the long term for years/decades.
January 18th, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Always find it amusing that people get pissed at #1 issues. It doesn’t devalue your current collection. If someone wants to pay big bucks for Avengers #1, I’m pretty sure they’ll be looking for the 1963 issue, not the one that comes out in 2010. Magazines renumber every year, they just change the volume number. So for you perfectionists, just label this “Avengers, Issue 1, Volume 4″ on your dividers, and voila! Stress relieved, onto the next thing to obsess over.
January 19th, 2010 at 9:40 am
I’m looking forward to reading “Naughty Avengers” “Adventures of the Infinite Avengers Unlimited Forever” “Avengers: SVU” “Conan O’Brien and the Avengers” and “Sregneva: The Reverse Avengers”.
January 19th, 2010 at 4:30 pm
It is marketing ploy as Marvel Comics and comics in genreal are slipping.
Cancel the key avenger titles and come out with another 5 ongoing titles that every marvel Zombie has to have?
The was only one Avengers team title back in the day, The Mighty Avengers/The Avengers so why not make every bloddy Marvel character a Avenger and create a bunch of “Avengers” teams.
A ture MArvel fan use to have some great story-telling in The Mighty Avenger/The Avengers, The Might Thor, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, and Captain America. Now its multiple titles and a bunch just becasue Marvel ahas a movie coming out.
You think its fine or okay now, just think when the Captain America or The Avengers first major motion picture is released, that year will be filled with more Marvel bloat to make up for “cancelling” any series now.
January 19th, 2010 at 6:11 pm
I was found Civil War while moving some boxes last night, read it and thought to myself ‘It just wasn’t me, this is really bad’
I wanted to read Spider-man, not the ‘magical unmasked Spider-man where nothing matters because we don’t Spider-man to be married.’ Which to this day is the worst thing I’ve ever seen in a superhero book. I’ll never read Spider-man again.
I just didn’t buy into these guys just fighting each other all of a sudden. Then caps some bizarre grunt that’s off to war and Tony’s some also war-mongering government official. I didn’t buy into any of it. Seeing as how this is comic books, that’s really saying something. I can’t say this sounds like anything I would want to read even after it’s over.
January 19th, 2010 at 7:24 pm
Interesting dilemma,
If I were tasked to helm the direction of a new Avengers title, what WOULD I do? As much of a Perez/Busiek Avengers fan I am, I must admit to having enjoyed Bendis’ unique run on the franchise, although I was deadset against it initially. I also enjoyed the Ultimates version of the super team and had Millar (and Hitch) not given us the awesome experience they did with volumes 1 and 2…I would suggested a similar take for this new direction for the Avengers. Having said all that…damn, what else IS left? What other original interpretation of MARVEL’s premiere super team remains to be told? “Hats off” to the talented, creative minds behind such ingenious storytelling, because I for one am at a loss. My only hope is that the new direction of the Avengers will include the core members; Cap, Iron Man and Thor. As long as I see those three in the line-up (and they’re still good guys)…then I suspect I’ll be happy with whatever direction, into which they’re taken.
I’m anxiously awaiting to be “WOWed!”
Don’t let me down MARVEL.
March 15th, 2010 at 12:58 am
Joe, you are absolutely correct, it shows that you’re an authority on the subject. I admire someone that takes the pride you have and with your projecton of information. oSo when i actually do sit down to read material, I appreciate well written and organized blogs like this one. I have it bookmarked and will be back. Thanks.
March 15th, 2010 at 6:10 pm
I can’t wait for more of these comic book movies to hit the screen. Damn! If I were only 13 again, how much more fun would these movies be!
November 1st, 2010 at 8:44 pm
Hello, just doing some browsing for my Diamondback site. Amazing the amount of information on the web. Wasn’t exactly what I was looking for, but interesting page. Have a nice day.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:23 pm
Wow – now that’s perspective! I think we often react in agreement or disagreement because of our emotions, but hearing another side, passionately presented, really makes us think!
January 17th, 2011 at 3:36 pm
kinda get tired of it all to be honest. its just irratating. i am tired of trying these paid networks and getting nothing but spam. seriously. but i guess it runs with the territory, i wont be paying for a dating site though.
August 24th, 2011 at 11:29 am
I delight in, result in I discovered exactly what I used to be looking for. You have ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye