First, a disclaimer — I don’t believe this, considering there’s absolutely no primary sources on any of this. But maybe you’ll enjoy the lulz or something. Then again, I thought the same thing when I heard about Sony rebooting this franchise, so you never know, right?
A couple of gossip sites, including Daily Fill, are reporting that Twilight heartthrob Robert Pattinson could be on the short list to play the all-new, all-younger Peter Parker in the 2012 Spider-Man film. I think that even if they could surgically remove Pattinson’s evocative haircut, it might be a tough sell — but then again, check out these clips from the Bad Mother’s Handbook, in which he played quite the geek:
Other names that Daily Fill used were Michael Cera (I just felt a great disturbance in the Force typing that, as if millions of fans suddenly cried out in terror, and then were suddenly silenced) or Chace Crawford (a name I’ve seen pop up a couple of times in regards to this, actually). What say you, Rama readers? Who would you pick to play your friendly neighborhood webslinger?
January 14th, 2010 at 10:38 am
Zack Ephron! Yeah I said! lol
January 14th, 2010 at 10:46 am
I know I am going to catch a lot of heat for this but they should actually cast someone between 16 and 18 for the role. Then each sequal could catch Peter at the different stages of his life without the audience suspending their belief too much during the later movies.
January 14th, 2010 at 10:48 am
Well, seeing as how the plan is for a teen-aged Peter Parker, I wouldn’t cast any of the mentioned actors, all obviously in their mid twenties. Just a thought.
January 14th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
Michael Cera ruins every movie he’s in.
January 14th, 2010 at 12:47 pm
He’s too old, but I’d love to see Joseph Gordon-Levitt try on the booties. (What do you call them?)
January 14th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Spiderman would be so hot.
January 14th, 2010 at 2:23 pm
Somebody new who can be funny! Dammit!
January 14th, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Anton Yelchin.
January 14th, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Wow, that made my eyeballs throw up.
January 14th, 2010 at 5:25 pm
CAUGHT IN A WEB REMOVED FROM THIS WORLD.
January 14th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
I’d be happy with him in the role, after watching the video he could certainly pull off Peter in high school, and he’d bring the Twilight fans with him. But he is a little bit too old, and I’m not sure if he’d want to join another franchise after Harry Potter and Twilight.
January 14th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
Here are my fave replacements for Tobey Maguire:
1. Mark McGwire
2. Mark Ruffalo
3. Barney Rubble
4. Recently deceased performance poet Bingo Gazingo (plot would obv have to derive from “Marvel Zombies”)
5. Jay Reatard (ibid.)
January 15th, 2010 at 12:13 am
Leavitt might work, as he can play young… But Yelchin? Honestly? I know I’m one of the few who didn’t like the Abrams Star Trek movie(I finally saw it awhile back), but even so Yelchin was dreadful. No way I’d go see him play Spidey.
January 15th, 2010 at 12:13 am
Sorry, Levitt. Gordon-Levitt, that is.
January 15th, 2010 at 9:25 pm
If sony pictures would like to waste money on a movie that quite obviously will flop then i say replace with anyone. As it won’t really matter spiderman fans have obviously became comfortable with Toby Mcguire as the main star. And any other actor will bring the franchise down. Sony i urge you to rethink your actions or can the 4th installment all together.
January 18th, 2010 at 12:11 am
They should cast Mitchel Musso as Parker, I think he could pull it off well.
January 20th, 2010 at 1:56 pm
I’m not trying to be negative here, but…
(in my opinion)
…regardless of the lead actor (new director or even the selection of the next villain), the Spiderman movie franchise reached its peak with Spiderman 3 and (IMO) it’s highly unlikely that any new Spiderman movie will break or even reach box office records it achieved previously. Despite unprecedented box office success, (due largely in part to the quality of the advertisement and hype, more than the movie itself), Spiderman 3 was a colossal failure, as far as content and substance are concerned and personally, I just don’t believe that the franchise will EVER see the stellar box office numbers it experienced [with Spiderman 3]. Even if Robert Pattinson gets the lead role for Spiderman 4, the tweenie-boppers (IMO) aren’t going to be AS anxious or excited to see their heartthrob as the nerdy Peter Parker or the spandex wearing Spiderman, as they were when seeing him in Twilight.
What Sony is over-estimating and miscalculating by gambling to use Pattinson (or any heartthrob for that matter) in the lead role is that such interest and groupie appeal thereafter are NOT guaranteed solely on the use of THAT type of actor, but that the tweens see him in what they perceive to be an authentic love story. Despite Sam Rami’s best efforts to convey the chemistry and love between Peter Parker and Mary Jane on the big screen, the Spiderman movies are not recognized for their “theme of love”, whereas Twilight is. Twilight is this generation’s Romeo & Juliet and Pattinson’s popularity sky-rocketed as a result of his role in it, primarily because he is a YOUNG, good looking actor in the lead role of a very strong love story. It wasn’t because of his acting abilities, it was because of the movie’s love-theme factor, which the Spiderman franchise failed to portray. Another example of the love factor…Leonardo Dicaprio in Titanic. Dicaprio rose to “Tween Godhood” in Titanic, because his [lead] character was the YOUNG, artistic, hopeless romantic in an endearing love story. Pattinson experienced the same success with Twilight, whose tween-factor will NOT necessarily garner the same results when portraying a character who is, for the most part a “geek” and spends time swinging through New York city as a costumed superhero. I don’t believe that the Pattinson/tween-heartthrob factor is going to work in a superhero-type movie, because typically, action and adventure are the primary themes of these types of movies, not love and it’s the love factor that brings the female tweens to see their heartthrobs in movies, not action and adventure.
All that being said, whether Sony uses Pattinson or not, the Spiderman movies have unfortunately seen their best days. From here on out, the franchise won’t achieve (or surpass) box office numbers like it did with Spiderman 3.
Just my opinion.
I do wish Spiderman 4 the best success though, simply because I enjoy superhero movies. I support the [comic book] character(s) however, more so than I do the studios, directors or actors who bring them to life on the big screen or TV.
Longtime comic book reader/fan.
January 21st, 2010 at 1:31 pm
WTF is this! ridicuolus!
that Everwood kid Gregory Smith should be spider man
April 2nd, 2010 at 12:32 am
Howdy,I love reading through your blog, I preferred to leave a little comment to support you and regard you a great continuation. Wishing you the better of fortune for all your blogging campaigns.
June 13th, 2010 at 4:43 am
I wish they would get unknowns for all the roles, save the money and use it on the special effects instead. after all the hero wears a mask (or he should)
March 18th, 2011 at 9:19 pm
hey sony i agree with the last post,,,,u think replacing an actor whos does 3 movies as spidey with some lackluster bonehead who cant act,,,,stick with tobey,,,otherwise yr lookin at a bigger FLOP than andy dicks career. furthermore we as spidey fans are comfy with tobey as said before he is the “perfect” choice as a young peter parker….so get your act together sony pictures,, i dont care what anyone says if u cant finish a franchise with its main star,,then dont even shoot spidey four cuz i wont go watch it..thank you.
March 18th, 2011 at 9:23 pm
i have two words for you Sony Pictures
“smoke and mirrors” do what u can to get tobey mcquire back in as the timid hero peter parker. you have the responsibility to cater to the fans stick with what u kno,,,didnt spiderman bring in some major pocket change on the first movie? well,,,,,sounds like a winning team in my opinion plus its good business
July 22nd, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Hey this is an awesome post. thanks for sharing.
August 2nd, 2011 at 8:40 pm
You actually make it seem really easy along with your presentation but I to find this matter to be actually something that I feel I would by no means understand. It sort of feels too complex and very large for me. I am having a look ahead to your subsequent put up, I will attempt to get the dangle of it!
August 26th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your web site is so cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this blog. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the info I already searched everywhere and simply couldn’t come across. What a perfect web site.