Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store: A Suggestion For Marvel

Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store: A Suggestion For Marvel

January 13th, 2010
Author Corey Henson

So, Marvel sent out a press release today announcing that they’ll trade a Deadpool variant cover of Siege #3 for every 50 stripped covers from DC’s Blackest Night tie-ins that retailers send in. Neat idea. But you know what would be an even better idea, Marvel? How about instead of Blackest Night tie-ins, you let retailers send in stripped covers from Dark Reign: Lethal Legion, Dark Reign: Zodiac, and all those other Dark Reign minis you guys published a few months ago? At least the Blackest Night books are selling. No one gave a rat’s ass about Dark Reign.

20 Responses to “Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store: A Suggestion For Marvel”
  1. Henry Says:

    Yeah they could do that, but I’m sure in Quesada’s mind that would mean Marvel is admitting those books didn’t sell in the first place while this way they can stick it to DC.

  2. MariaVosa Says:

    Oh snap!!

  3. Ortiz Says:

    DR: Zodiac was fun to read and I don’t think Dark Reign was a failure, but you are right about the central idea, not only Marvel should do this, also DC, both of them publish a lot of crap in every event.

    Peace.

  4. Ravager Says:

    Dont worry
    DC will probably make an special cover Blackest Night 8 on trade for 100 or 200 stripped covers of Dark Reign and Siege Tie-ins

  5. J. Dinkhouse Says:

    i mean, the shitty minis didn’t sell, but the main titles under dark reign (Dark and New Avengers, Invincible Iron Man, the Hawkeye and Spider-man series, and The List) all sold well. I imagine that DC will retaliate with something similar… but before we call this debate done, shouldn’t we let this all play out?

  6. Alex Says:

    Ever since Civil War #2 I look at Marvel like I would a crazed
    guy I see on COPS. I think ‘Man, I hear that guy was a big exec at a multinational corporation and now he’s some babbling idiot in the gutter with torn clothes.’

    I loved Marvel, but I think some of the stuff they’ve done around that time and since is just really dumb and dishonest.

  7. Lemurion Says:

    They wouldn’t do that: it would be classy.

  8. Kimota94 Says:

    Disney Comics are starting to seem desperate. Must be almost time for Joe Q to make another penis-size comment in reference to the competition, since that’s what any 14-year-old would do.

  9. Rudy Ascott Says:

    Remember when in what the consumers who used to clamor for variant covers in the hopes they would be worth more? All they’ve done is change the model a little so that retailers are the ones clamoring.

  10. Rudy Ascott Says:

    “When IT WAS the consumers”, I meant to say. Now I’m off to school where I’m an English major. Jesus.

  11. David Uzumeri Says:

    That’s be a great idea, Corey, except those Dark Reign titles weren’t ordered very well, while the Blackest Night tie-in titles were ordered in huge amounts to qualify for a plastic ring promotion, copies retailers weren’t able to turn around. Dark Reign: Zodiac was ordered low and sold low. These books were ordered high and sold mediocre. The latter leads to excess product. The two situations aren’t even remotely comparable.

  12. Shawn Kane Says:

    My LCS has trouble keeping Blackest Night stuff on the shelf, I don’t see why a store would want to get rid of a large amount of back issue stock.

  13. Kyle Says:

    Kudos to David Uzumeri for applying logic to this post. I would have expected such a standard to be applied to the blog itself before it was posted, but I suppose kneejerk reactions get the best of all of us at one time or another.

  14. Russ Burlingame Says:

    @Shawn Kane – Most stores won’t go for this, but the big retailers and the online clearinghouse-types, both of which buy in great bulk, will be able to spare some of these books to get a variant that they can overcharge gullible customers for. Smaller and medium-sized stores who bought only the 25 or 50 needed to qualify for the ring deal complained a good deal about being forced to do so, but then didn’t have too hard a time getting rid of the product as far as I can see in my area (3/3 in Syracuse are sold out, either completely or as near as any other November issue).

  15. Corey Henson Says:

    That’s be a great idea, Corey, except those Dark Reign titles weren’t ordered very well, while the Blackest Night tie-in titles were ordered in huge amounts to qualify for a plastic ring promotion, copies retailers weren’t able to turn around. Dark Reign: Zodiac was ordered low and sold low. These books were ordered high and sold mediocre. The latter leads to excess product. The two situations aren’t even remotely comparable.

    Then if Marvel is sooooo concerned with helping out retailers, then why not make the offer good for their books, too? Why single out just Blackest Night?

  16. Kyle Says:

    @Corey — Marvel’s not concerned about helping out retailers, they’re concerned with making DC look bad. No one’s denying that Marvel is pulling a pretty jerk move. But the two sitautionss aren’t comparable, as David pointed out.

  17. David B. Says:

    The most depressing thing is that even though the Dark Reign books didn’t sell, they were actually pretty good. Lethal Legion, Zodiac (ignore the Mr. Negative one…) were pretty solid, in my opinion. Some of the Blackest Night tie-ins have been solid, but others have really been lacking. So you have Marvel with quality and not too much in sales, and DC with increased sales and some good and some bad quality. Depressing.

  18. David Uzumeri Says:

    Shows taste ain’t universal – I was’t a Lethal Legion fan but loved Mr. Negative. All of those minis had their audiences.

  19. David Uzumeri Says:

    Not that the Blackest Night books didn’t have massive audiences too. A lot of those ring books were good titles that probably gained readers from the stunt – but it was still a stunt, and all Marvel’s saying is “if you have some of those left over that you can’t sell, we’ll try to turn that into something you can sell.” If you sold all yours, fine, just don’t take advantage of it. Marvel has nothing to gain except press infamy from this — what are they going to do, re-sell the DC comics? That’s absurd. They’re just trying to help out a few retailers (maybe it is just a few, who knows?) who ordered too many ring books and can’t get rid of them. That’s it. Giving out these variants for any books they send in doesn’t make sense, because then you’re just a recycling operation. Yes, it’s a dig against DC. Yes, it’s ALSO meant to help retailers. It’s a middle finger on one side and a helping hand on the other. It’s competition. It’s business. It’s nothing personal, and I don’t think anyone at DC even is taking it that way. It’s silly as hell, totally, but it’s an entertaining fuck you. I don’t in any way understand why people who aren’t directly affected by this are getting angry over this.

  20. Alvera Dang Says:

    Marvel’s not concerned about helping out retailers, they’re concerned with making DC look bad. No one’s denying that Marvel is pulling a pretty jerk move. But the two sitautionss aren’t comparable, as David pointed out.

Leave a Reply »