So, Marvel sent out a press release today announcing that they’ll trade a Deadpool variant cover of Siege #3 for every 50 stripped covers from DC’s Blackest Night tie-ins that retailers send in. Neat idea. But you know what would be an even better idea, Marvel? How about instead of Blackest Night tie-ins, you let retailers send in stripped covers from Dark Reign: Lethal Legion, Dark Reign: Zodiac, and all those other Dark Reign minis you guys published a few months ago? At least the Blackest Night books are selling. No one gave a rat’s ass about Dark Reign.
Blogs:
Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store: A Suggestion For Marvel
Saturday, May 18
Pages
Categories
- Announcements
- digital comics
- Features
- 'Twas The Night Before Wednesday
- Agent of S.T.Y.L.E.
- Brainstorming: Digital Comics
- Christian Beranek's Life of High Adventure
- Comics Grinder
- DC Bullets Softball
- Dial H for History
- Etsy Made Me Do It
- Fan Fandom
- Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store
- Global Freezing
- Heroine Addicts
- Industry Insight
- It Came From the NYPL
- Legion Blogpost
- linkarama
- Listen to Jimmy Palmiotti
- My Opinion is Right
- Newsarama Radio
- Non-Jaded Comics Fan
- Previewed
- Rehab This Character
- Rewatching/Rereading
- Sequential Parts
- Talk Nerdy to Me
- Tell Me What to Read
- This Week's Events
- Twitterama
- Watch This Now
- Welcome to Webcomics
- Your Manga Minute
- media
- News & Views
- Animation
- Archaia
- Archie Comics
- Art and Design
- Books
- BOOM!
- Broadsword Comics
- Casting
- Comic Books
- Comic Strips
- Conventions
- Creators
- Dark Horse
- DC Comics
- Del Rey
- Devil's Due
- Disney
- Dynamite
- Events
- Fandom
- Fangoria Graphix
- Fantagraphics
- First Second
- Graphic Novels
- IDW
- Image
- Independent
- Industry
- International
- Internet
- Interviews
- Kids Comics
- Legal
- Manga
- Marvel
- Movies
- Music
- Oni Press
- Organizations
- political cartoons
- Pop Culture
- Radical Comics
- Retailers
- Reviews
- Site News
- SLG
- Technology
- Television
- Tokyopop
- Top Shelf
- Toys
- Toys & Games
- Twilight
- Valiant
- Vertigo
- Video Games
- Virgin Comics
- Viz
- WDA
- Webcomics
- Women in comics
- Zenescope
- Random
- The Reverend's Show
- top cow
- Version 1.0 Blog@
- 'Rama Rampage
- Amateur Art Appreciation
- Can't Wait for Wednesday
- Comics, Covered
- Everyone's a Critic
- Fenton & Fenton
- Fringe Benefits
- Great Curve Classics
- Grumpy Old Fan
- Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now
- Heroes and Villains
- I ♥ Comics
- Just Past the Horizon
- Meanwhile…
- Point/Counterpoint
- Quote Unquote
- Spin-offs
- Strangeways
- Take That!
- The Fifth Color
- Variations on a Theme
- Week In Review
-
Search this Blog
-
Subscribe
RSS feed Subscribe to Blog@Newsarama
OR
Subscribe to RSS feed via email:
Powered by FeedBlitz
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
-
Contributors
-
Meta
20 Responses to “Fear and Loathing in a Comic Store: A Suggestion For Marvel”
January 14th, 2010 at 12:08 am
Yeah they could do that, but I’m sure in Quesada’s mind that would mean Marvel is admitting those books didn’t sell in the first place while this way they can stick it to DC.
January 14th, 2010 at 12:35 am
Oh snap!!
January 14th, 2010 at 12:39 am
DR: Zodiac was fun to read and I don’t think Dark Reign was a failure, but you are right about the central idea, not only Marvel should do this, also DC, both of them publish a lot of crap in every event.
Peace.
January 14th, 2010 at 1:07 am
Dont worry
DC will probably make an special cover Blackest Night 8 on trade for 100 or 200 stripped covers of Dark Reign and Siege Tie-ins
January 14th, 2010 at 2:29 am
i mean, the shitty minis didn’t sell, but the main titles under dark reign (Dark and New Avengers, Invincible Iron Man, the Hawkeye and Spider-man series, and The List) all sold well. I imagine that DC will retaliate with something similar… but before we call this debate done, shouldn’t we let this all play out?
January 14th, 2010 at 4:04 am
Ever since Civil War #2 I look at Marvel like I would a crazed
guy I see on COPS. I think ‘Man, I hear that guy was a big exec at a multinational corporation and now he’s some babbling idiot in the gutter with torn clothes.’
I loved Marvel, but I think some of the stuff they’ve done around that time and since is just really dumb and dishonest.
January 14th, 2010 at 6:01 am
They wouldn’t do that: it would be classy.
January 14th, 2010 at 8:40 am
Disney Comics are starting to seem desperate. Must be almost time for Joe Q to make another penis-size comment in reference to the competition, since that’s what any 14-year-old would do.
January 14th, 2010 at 9:18 am
Remember when in what the consumers who used to clamor for variant covers in the hopes they would be worth more? All they’ve done is change the model a little so that retailers are the ones clamoring.
January 14th, 2010 at 9:21 am
“When IT WAS the consumers”, I meant to say. Now I’m off to school where I’m an English major. Jesus.
January 14th, 2010 at 11:23 am
That’s be a great idea, Corey, except those Dark Reign titles weren’t ordered very well, while the Blackest Night tie-in titles were ordered in huge amounts to qualify for a plastic ring promotion, copies retailers weren’t able to turn around. Dark Reign: Zodiac was ordered low and sold low. These books were ordered high and sold mediocre. The latter leads to excess product. The two situations aren’t even remotely comparable.
January 14th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
My LCS has trouble keeping Blackest Night stuff on the shelf, I don’t see why a store would want to get rid of a large amount of back issue stock.
January 14th, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Kudos to David Uzumeri for applying logic to this post. I would have expected such a standard to be applied to the blog itself before it was posted, but I suppose kneejerk reactions get the best of all of us at one time or another.
January 14th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
@Shawn Kane – Most stores won’t go for this, but the big retailers and the online clearinghouse-types, both of which buy in great bulk, will be able to spare some of these books to get a variant that they can overcharge gullible customers for. Smaller and medium-sized stores who bought only the 25 or 50 needed to qualify for the ring deal complained a good deal about being forced to do so, but then didn’t have too hard a time getting rid of the product as far as I can see in my area (3/3 in Syracuse are sold out, either completely or as near as any other November issue).
January 14th, 2010 at 4:27 pm
That’s be a great idea, Corey, except those Dark Reign titles weren’t ordered very well, while the Blackest Night tie-in titles were ordered in huge amounts to qualify for a plastic ring promotion, copies retailers weren’t able to turn around. Dark Reign: Zodiac was ordered low and sold low. These books were ordered high and sold mediocre. The latter leads to excess product. The two situations aren’t even remotely comparable.
Then if Marvel is sooooo concerned with helping out retailers, then why not make the offer good for their books, too? Why single out just Blackest Night?
January 14th, 2010 at 6:19 pm
@Corey — Marvel’s not concerned about helping out retailers, they’re concerned with making DC look bad. No one’s denying that Marvel is pulling a pretty jerk move. But the two sitautionss aren’t comparable, as David pointed out.
January 15th, 2010 at 12:40 am
The most depressing thing is that even though the Dark Reign books didn’t sell, they were actually pretty good. Lethal Legion, Zodiac (ignore the Mr. Negative one…) were pretty solid, in my opinion. Some of the Blackest Night tie-ins have been solid, but others have really been lacking. So you have Marvel with quality and not too much in sales, and DC with increased sales and some good and some bad quality. Depressing.
January 15th, 2010 at 7:53 pm
Shows taste ain’t universal – I was’t a Lethal Legion fan but loved Mr. Negative. All of those minis had their audiences.
January 15th, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Not that the Blackest Night books didn’t have massive audiences too. A lot of those ring books were good titles that probably gained readers from the stunt – but it was still a stunt, and all Marvel’s saying is “if you have some of those left over that you can’t sell, we’ll try to turn that into something you can sell.” If you sold all yours, fine, just don’t take advantage of it. Marvel has nothing to gain except press infamy from this — what are they going to do, re-sell the DC comics? That’s absurd. They’re just trying to help out a few retailers (maybe it is just a few, who knows?) who ordered too many ring books and can’t get rid of them. That’s it. Giving out these variants for any books they send in doesn’t make sense, because then you’re just a recycling operation. Yes, it’s a dig against DC. Yes, it’s ALSO meant to help retailers. It’s a middle finger on one side and a helping hand on the other. It’s competition. It’s business. It’s nothing personal, and I don’t think anyone at DC even is taking it that way. It’s silly as hell, totally, but it’s an entertaining fuck you. I don’t in any way understand why people who aren’t directly affected by this are getting angry over this.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:37 am
Marvel’s not concerned about helping out retailers, they’re concerned with making DC look bad. No one’s denying that Marvel is pulling a pretty jerk move. But the two sitautionss aren’t comparable, as David pointed out.