Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Review: Superman: New Krypton vol. 1 & 2

Review: Superman: New Krypton vol. 1 & 2

November 12th, 2009
Author Michael C. Lorah

Superman: New Krypton vol. 1

Superman: New Krypton vol. 1 & 2
Written by James Robinson, Geoff Johns and Sterling Gates
Illustrated by Jesus Merino, Leno Carvahlo, Steve Scott, Nelson Pereira, Kevin Stokes, Lee Loughridge, Sal Cipriano, Pere Pérez, David Baron, John J. Hill, Pete Woods, Gary Frank, Renato Guedes, Jon Sibal, José Wilson Magalhães, Hi-Fi
(I assume that’s his real name), Steve Wands, David Curiel, Brad Anderson, Rob Leigh, Jamal Igle, Keith Champagne, Nei Ruffino, Jared K. Fletcher, Tom Chu and Jorgé Correa Jr.

Yeah, I dig Superman. I sit here reviewing Jason and classic strips and relevant prose books and intriguing literary-minded independent comics, but at my core, I totally dig Superman. Of course, I have more conflicted feelings toward the Superman comics themselves and many of the extraneous elements of the Superman mythos, and Kandor is no exception. The possibility of Superman being reunited with his people is one of potential; yet I’ve never – in any incarnation – cared much about Krypton or Kandor. It’s all just an excuse to justify powers beyond those of mortal men, to me.

Despite a large indifference (meaning, they were okay, but nothing that affirmed by love of the character) the few volumes leading into New Krypton, I did my best to give the books a fair shake. Geoff Johns’ lead-in, Brainiac, was solidly plotted, but trended toward predictable, and Robinson’s Coming of Atlas managed a few sharp lines, but padded an issue and a half of story out across five full issues.

Things get off to a pretty intriguing start, with two special issues, one focused on Jimmy Olsen, and a direct sequel to Jimmy’s story, this time starring the Guardian. Channeling a noir atmosphere, Robinson builds a conspiracy involving government cloning projects (which, unfortunately for this Kirby Jimmy Olsen and Karl Kesel-era Superboy fan, required slaughtering huge swaths of the classic Cadmus cast), shadowy military figures, a super-powered assassin (an old character, I think, but it’s not important here) and a very clear plan to exterminate our Man of Steel. The characterization of Olsen and Guardian is solid throughout, tinged with an appropriate darkness. I look forward to seeing more of the Guardian if Robinson can keep up this level of work.

The New Krypton saga hits full stride next, and ironically, the story’s emotional high point hits in the first few pages – a largely silent sequence drawn superbly by Gary Frank that shows Clark Kent mourning the recent (see Brainiac) death of his adoptive father Jonathan Kent.

Superman: New Krypton vol. 2

My initial trepidation over the return of Kandor was misplaced, fortunately. Typically, when I see a “classic” concept reintroduced, my reaction is “seen it, must be something fresher to spend limited comics funds on”, but the immediate restoration of Kandor to full-size proportions allows us to explore an aspect of Superman we’ve witnessed in a few alternate realities, but never truly explored in the way we have the potential to see here.

With Krypton restored, we get to see the full effect of Krypton society, and unlike a certain Clark Kent, they are set in their ways and not terribly interested in acclimating with human society.

The opening salvo is essentially dedicated to introducing Supergirl’s parents, Allura and Zor-El, acclimating Superman and Supergirl to their fellow survivors, and allowing Jimmy to bring Lois up to date with what he’s uncovered regarding the conspiracy against Superman. It’s all nicely set up, but it’s also the high point of the storyline, as New Krypton quickly descends into standardness. Some other superheroes show up to express concern about the sudden increase in the world’s Kryptonian population, Agent Liberty is rescued from the dustbins of 90s obscurity to become obvious cannon fodder, a handful of Kryptonian soldiers behave predictably poorly, and Doomsday is used, again, to show how badass this new threat – thousands of Kryptonians – can possibly be.

As the second volume opens – and honestly, why was this even split into two books? Neither edition is particularly heavy on pages, and putting both under a single cover would certainly make for a more convenient and sensible package for casual readers to pick up – though admittedly, even vol. 2 doesn’t have what one would charitably call an “ending.” Anyway, volume two opens by wasting several pages explaining away some inconsistencies in Supergirl’s behavior and history, none of which I realize existed because the horrid reviews of Supergirl to this point kept me from reading the title, and frankly, none of these “problems” seem sufficiently important to bother with at this point.

Just as James Robinson begins to pull the story back on track, with a well executed chapter detailing how the Kryptonians preemptively capture all of Superman’s foes and exile them to the Phantom Zone, it all goes a little wobbly again. Johns does some solid work building the conspiracy of General Sam (father of Lois) Lane and setting up the slaying of Supergirl’s pop, but he also hamstrings himself with some unnecessary secondary characters (the Creature Commandos?!) and begins a continuing depiction of Superman as inept and unable to provide any authority or leadership to Kandor’s refugees. The repetitive conversation between Allura and Superman about turning Kryptonian murderers over to human justice is plausible and realistic, and you can readily identify with the concerns of all the parties, but it still presents Clark as weak.

Then a new Superwoman appears, but doesn’t get enough page time to make much of an impression, and then it descents in a mediocre slugfest. A slew of superheroes, many of whom I’m sure most of you are excited to see, but frankly, I’d be just as happy if they were all disemboweled (except for Steel, to a one, actually), duke it out with a few dozen Kryptonians. I don’t quite buy how a few of the heroes held their own – Guardian hit a guy with Superman’s powers on the head with a shield! – and I’m pretty numb to this sort of superhero all-in meleeing, so it all kind of left me indifferent. I mean, even in the dubious realm of superhero logic, how does Zatanna saying “Shazam” backwards rob Kryptonians of their powers makes any sense at all?

Finally, the Kryptonians dig up Kandor, fly it into space, and somehow the clump of rock that it’s located on magically spins a new planet, which they park in orbit on the opposite side of the sun. Okay, taking their city and putting it on the other side of the sun is cool, I’ll give you that.

So, yeah, not sure what to say at this point. The last few Superman books have been right at, or slightly below, justification level – that is, the minimum level of enjoyment required to justify subsequent purchases, and for me, justification level for a Superman title is much more liberal than with any other Marvel or DC character. And these two books, right about the same – a few solid moments, some intrigue, a couple tré cool scenes, but New Krypton still wallows in the DCU superhero fraternity, exercises too-casual violence, is plagued by inconsistent art (the line art itself ranges from solid to plus – Sirs Frank and Igle, take a bow – but the shifting from artist to artist, and the generally mediocre over-coloring, does the book no favors), and suffers retro/nostaglia aspects that just leaves me cold. The addition of writer Greg Rucka to subsequent Superman/New Krypton issues does give me hope, however.

Finally, while both covers are very striking (Vol. 1 by Gary Frank, Vol. 2 by Alex Ross), does anybody besides me find it bizarre that DC opted to have different artists provide the cover for each volume? Doesn’t a serialized storyline such as this benefit from having a consistent cover design (check) and art style (umm…, no check)?

Superman: New Krypton vol. 1 and 2, they’re okay. Not great, but not terrible. If you dig Supes like I do, it might be enough, but just barely. We’ll have to see how the wallet feels when it comes time to invest in another round of the Metropolis Ace’s adventures.

 
10 Responses to “Review: Superman: New Krypton vol. 1 & 2”
  1. Lemurion Says:

    I’m not sure if I am going to get these - but together they highlight my biggest issue with DC’s trade policy. The books are too thin.

    I think anything up to about 12 issues should be collected in one volume. Twelve issues make less than 300 pages and should easily be doable in a single volume. DC did Long Halloween and Our Worlds at War in single volume editions, so why don’t they do the thick ones more often?

  2. Michael C. Lorah Says:

    Lemurion, I tend to agree.

    I understand “price resistance” and wanting to keep the cost down, but anytime I know I have to buy multiple volumes to get a single story, I get wary of how quickly the price will add up.
    I still haven’t read NEW FRONTIER because of the cumulative cost of only two books, and a general disdain for milking readers for the cost of an extra book.

  3. Wesley Smith Says:

    I’ve avoided picking up World of New Krypton in monthly issues because even as a miniseries, the story doesn’t stand on its own. I may pick these up in a year or two used, but I haven’t been this disinterested in Superman since they rebooted the character back in the 80s.

  4. Daryll B Says:

    Michael, I got both New Frontier books together off of Amazon for 18.00 plus shipping…making it 22 bucks.

    I dunno about New Krypton…I guess when I didn’t like Supes/Brainiac, it turned me cold to this. Just in the same vein of Batman RIP and Daredevil’s Kingpin of Hell’s Kitchen storylines did…once that switch of disappointment is flipped..it cannot be unflipped quickly..

  5. Michael C Lorah Says:

    Daryll, SUPERMAN: BRAINIAC was underwhelming. I gave NEW KRYPTON some extra rope mostly due to James Robinson’s involvement, but he’s not really knocking it out of the park either.

    I feel like I’m going to be disappointed, but bringing on a less nostalgic voice like Greg Rucka has probably bought NEW KRYPTON yet another length of rope, but it’s a very, very short piece this time.

  6. matches_malone Says:

    You give the artwork half a sentence in this review, and that is about how much thought DC gave it. The parade of anonymous, style-free, early-career unknowns on the Super-books is a darned shame. I never would have guessed that the Super-books would be the spot for on-the-job training for so many illustrators who have NO idea what the characters are about, or sense of history, or ability to depict the characters consistently with how they’ve been portrayed before (Lois Lane, for instance, has been given about 20 different appearances lately - I don’t mean looks, as in, got a new haircut or different clothes, I mean, completely different visages that have nothing to do with each other, as in, so-and-so who clearly never read any Superman comics before drew her one way this month, and then so and so who cliearly never read any Superman comics before drew her differently this month.

    The Didio age has been DISASTROUS for the Super-books, and for DC in general. Some didn’t care for the Carlin-era books, but they were hellaciously consistent - Jon Bogdonave (sp?), Dan Jurgens, Jerry Ordway, Kerry Gammill, Bob McLeod, Tom Grummett, etc. … all _they_ did was show up almost every month, draw characters consistently, show an awareness of the characters’ sensibilities and history, and tell the story through pictures.

    This latest crop - (excepting of course Gary Frank, the tremendously improved Pete Woods, and Jamal Igle) - is just less-than-average and undeserving of the books they are drawing.

    I think the fans just don’t realize how bad it’s gotten because it’s been kind of gradual. But really, the Superbooks are pretty poor right now. I look forward to Mr. Didio’s replacement, so’s I can read the books again.

    Is it just a page rate thing? Do these new artists just work really cheap? It is inconceivable to me that Mr. Ordway for instance isn’t drawing a Super-book each month, whereas “CAFU” is drawing a bloodless, spiritless, bulge-in-their-crotchless (really, he looks like a woman) Nightwing every month.

    I won’t EVEN get into the fact that probably 2 percent of the audience would rather read about Nightwing and Flamebird than … oh, one of the most recognizable characters in world history.

  7. Michael C. Lorah Says:

    Matches, I actually recently finished a two-and-a-half-year rereading of my Superman comics from Byrne’s MAN OF STEEL through to Dan Jurgens and Steve Epting’s last issue of SUPERMAN. The art is very, very consistent and mostly good throughout that run, I certainly can’t argue with you there. The stories can be uneven, but the majority hold up pretty well too.

  8. Shaun Says:

    “I’m not sure if I am going to get these - but together they highlight my biggest issue with DC’s trade policy. The books are too thin.”

    Superman “For Tomorrow” Vols. 1 & 2, I’m looking at you!!

    I liked that story better than most people did, apparently, but it was criminal how they split that up into two incredibly thin books for the prices they want for each one. Thank goodness Amazon discounts their books pretty deep.

    Batman “Hush” was similary split up, but they finally condensed all of that into one book. Years after I bought the two parts, naturally. I’m not really interested in New Krypton anyhow, but even if I were I wouldn’t buy it needlessly split into two parts like that.

  9. Shaun Says:

    “The Didio age has been DISASTROUS for the Super-books, and for DC in general.”

    “I think the fans just don’t realize how bad it’s gotten because it’s been kind of gradual. But really, the Superbooks are pretty poor right now. I look forward to Mr. Didio’s replacement, so’s I can read the books again.”

    “I won’t EVEN get into the fact that probably 2 percent of the audience would rather read about Nightwing and Flamebird than … oh, one of the most recognizable characters in world history.”

    QFT. All of it! THANK YOU, Matches!!

    It’s refreshing to find someone who’s as unhappy with the Didio as I am. I wish it weren’t the case,as I’d rather be enjoying DC Comics, but it’s true.

  10. Shaun Says:

    “I actually recently finished a two-and-a-half-year rereading of my Superman comics from Byrne’s MAN OF STEEL through to Dan Jurgens and Steve Epting’s last issue of SUPERMAN. The art is very, very consistent and mostly good throughout that run, I certainly can’t argue with you there. The stories can be uneven, but the majority hold up pretty well too.”

    I loved the Byrne reboot and the next several years of books that followed… Not sure when, exactly, I stopped reading Superman (and took a break from comics, period)… Sometime in the mid-90’s? I should go back and read those too. There were some duds, but I seem to recall most of those years being good reads.

    Then again, I enjoyed A LOT of DC books back then… I’m not sure if I’m just not the comics lover I once was, OR if it’s just what DC has become that I dislike so much.

Leave a Reply »

var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));