DC Comics have long been full of dark and evil gods, constantly making trouble for our heroes and heroines. But as bad as Darkseid, Ares and their ilk might be, you know the comic book gods that really scare me?
The ones some of DC writers seem to worship.
Now, the existence of a secret cult that meets in the basement of 1700 Broadway on the nights of full moons, their identities hidden even from one another by ritual cloaks and hoods, to chant in a secret, blasphemous language and bow before a profane, obscene stone idol of a hideous monster-god is just a theory of mine.
I have no actual proof of it, other than the suggestion that surely there must be some reason so many writers have begun their new series or new story arcs with a blood sacrifice, as if it were part of a ritual beseeching some entity for success.
It’s 2003, and Judd Winick and Geoff Johns are about to launch new volumes of The Outsiders and Teen Titans respectively. Their storyline kicks off in a special miniseries in which several characters are killed.
It’s 2005, and the pair—joined by Greg Rucka—are about to set the DC Universe on a course towards Infinite Crisis, and they kick it all off in a special one-shot in which they kill Blue Beetle II.
In 2008, Winick gets ready to relaunch a new Titans title, and he does so by slaughtering a half-dozen minor characters.
That same year, the Grant Morrison-written Final Crisis opens with the deaths of Orion and Martian Manhunter.
Surely there must be some reason for all this blood, and since it is the blood of fictional comic book characters, I can only imagine it’s a very peculiar, quasi-religious reason.
It can’t possibly be a creative or dramatic reason, because it’s been done so often in such a short span of time, and despite their occasional shortcomings, all of these men—even Judd Winick, whose work I like the very least—are talented, and have certainly read enough comic books to know that seeing a character get killed barely moves the needle of fan interest, let alone excitement.
These same writers have also been simultaneously restoring dead characters to life during that same time, even undoing some of the most “sacred” comic book deaths, like that of Jason Todd and Barry Allen, further making the act of death meaningless within the context of their fictional universe.
So they must worship an evil god that feeds on the imaginary blood of fictional characters—It’s the only thing that makes any sense.
I haven’t mentioned James Robinson yet.
He’s probably best known for his Starman title, which began with the death of the title character, in something of a clever swerve—the real protagonist picked up the mantle within the same issue.
He also helped relaunch a Justice Society book with 1999’s JSA, which began with the death of Golden Age Sandman Wesley Dodds.
Lately he’s been writing Superman and Justice League comics. His Justice League: Cry For Justice is about half over now (in terms of issues, if not months) and it’s been littered with corpses. The premise of the series is that some heroes are so bent out of shape about their allies and/or loved ones getting killed that they’ve teamed up to get revenge. The antagonist has been mowing down minor superheroes in some sort of attempt to impress readers with his badassedness (My God, Prometheus killed Tasmanian Devil! What chance will Green Lantern, Green Arrow, The Atom, Supergirl and a bunch of other people possible have against the man who took down the Tasmanian Devil?).
This week, Robinson took over Justice League of America, a title that’s been without a regular artist for the first three years of existence, and somewhat rudder-less editorially, with the stories either completely disconnected with the rest of the DC Universe, setting up minor miniseries in other corners of the DCU, running to catch up with major events in other corners and sometimes all three in the same issue.
Having Robinson at the helm of what could be (what used to be, what probably should be) DC’s flagship title seems like a good thing, particularly since he is apparently on the same wavelength as DC’s main creative force at the moment—Geoff Johns—and gets along well with editorial, unlike the last writer (Poor Dwayne McDuffie, who probably had a classic JLA run in him somewhere, but got stuck cleaning up after Brad Meltzer’s run).
Naturally, Robinson begins his run by killing off a character, appeasing his dark lord with the fictional life essence of Blue Jay:
And that’s a terrible shame.
Again, seeing characters killed off in a DC superhero comic book isn’t exciting, and it hasn’t been for about a decade now. It isn’t even interesting, it’s just something that one often sees in comics, like a drawing of a building in the background or a computer console in the Justice League headquarters. But I personally find it depressing. Not necessarily in a “Oh, poor Blue Jay” kind of way so much as a “Oh, poor DC Comics, why aren’t you any good” kind of way.
Blue Jay is and/or was a flying, shrinking superhero from an alternate universe that was meant to be an analogue of the Marvel Universe. He was part of a team originally called The Champions of Angor. Pre-Crisis, when he was introduced, they were set on one of the many alternate Earths the Justice League was always visiting.
Post-Crisis, he appeared early in the Giffen/DeMatteis run on the Justice League titles, along with Silver Sorceress and Wandjina (Each was a DC analogue of a Marvel character, with Blue Jay being a male, bird-themed version of The Wasp; the others were analogues of Scarlet Witch and Thor, respectively).
He reappeared later in the run and ultimately joined the Justice League, but has had few appearances in the last decade or so. The last time I saw him was in a three-part Action Comics story arc by Kurt Busiek, Fabian Nicieza and Pete Woods, where he was part of a ragtag group of superheroes Superman lead against an unusual alien invader.
Obviously there was very little danger of Warner Brothers optioning Blue Jay for a movie any time soon, and it seems unlikely that he would be able to carry his own series or miniseries at any point in the near future.
Of course, I wouldn’t have expected DC to launch Magog and Azrael ongoing series in 2009, nor to devote two $4 ongoings to Red Circle characters. I can’t believe anyone thought a Vigilante ongoing series was going to be a good idea, or that a Warlord or REBELS revival would last very long. They’re currently publishing a Red Tornado miniseries, they published a Metamorpho: Year One not too long ago, and they launched a ten-part series starring The Great Ten, minor characters from the popular event limited series 52…from 2006.
As a comics reader, it’s impossible to say what characters and properties DC really thinks are worthwhile, and to dismiss any of them as completely unmarketable. Hell, a couple months ago a Blue Jay ongoing seemed more likely to me than a Magog one.
One would expect James Robinson to know better than most that there’s nothing to gain from destroying one of the DCU’s many toys, and to know that every character, no matter how minor, has potential.
Robinson’s very best work has been done with the minor, half-forgotten characters of the DCU. Starman wasn’t exactly Superman, or even Aquaman, when Robinson launched that ongoing, and beyond his protagonists Jack and Ted Knight, he filled the book to near-bursting with such characters, with perhaps The Shade getting the biggest bump in his Q-rating.
His recent Superman work seems to be merely an excuse to reintroduce all of the characters from the short-lived, late-seventies DC First Issue Special series. And he’s putting Congorilla in the Justice League, for God’s sake! It’s hard to imagine that a man who sees the value in Congorilla doesn’t also see potential in the likes of Tasmanian Devil or Blue Jay.
Fictional characters are the DC Universe’s greatest resource, just as they are that of DC’s cross-town rivals, who run just about the only viable superhero universe left. Remember how all the mainstream media coverage of the Marvel/Disney deal made a point of mentioning that Disney acquired a catalog of over 5,000 Marvel characters?
I laughed to myself every time I saw it, because I know there are more Razorfists and Ruby Thrusdays and Razorbacks and Pumas in there then there are Iron Men and Thors, but you have to admit, even the lamest character is worth more than no character.
I haven’t counted, but DC’s gotta have more than Marvel, given that over the years they’ve gobbled up so many other comic book companies, eventually adding the Quality, Charlton and Fawcett heroes into their universe.
That’s why it always depresses me when I see something like Blue Jay getting killed. It’s a subtraction from the DC Universe, and, while there are no shortage of superheroes in the DC Universe and maybe no one will really miss one or five or ten, it’s still a lessening of the thing that makes the DC Universe a fun place to live (Well, visit once a week, anyway).
If Robinson were constantly creating new characters to replenish the ones he was killing off, that would be a different matter entirely.
Two of my favorite writers who do regular work for DC are Grant Morrison and Kurt Busiek, and while there’s a lot to like about each, one thing I like about them is how neither ever seems to waste characters, and they constantly add new toys to the DC Universe. Sure, not all of them are great characters—Busiek’s female gorilla character Primat from Trinity isn’t any more likely to get a movie deal than Blue Jay—but they are additions.
As a frequent visitor to the DC Universe, I’d like it to be a place that’s ever expanding, a place that’s always getting bigger, better, crazier, more complex and more exciting, rather than getting smaller and sadder all the time.
Now, it’s quite possible that Blue Jay isn’t actually dead. In which case, Robinson does know better, I probably wasted almost 2,000 words and did little more than hype up an issue of a comic book that I didn’t even think was very good.
As DC deaths go, this one’s not very gory—the guy still has all his limbs!—and the coloring effect that killed him hit him on the side of his chest where his heart isn’t. But even this implication that he’s died was enough to remind me that DC in general, and Robinson in particular, have been doing far too much subtraction this decade, and precious little addition.
Personally, I blame the evil entities their writers worship.
October 22nd, 2009 at 9:44 am
“I have no actual proof of it” Glenn Beck, is that you?
October 22nd, 2009 at 9:55 am
I’ve heard rumors he’s not dead – but as far as I’m concerned the whole kill characters to start an event or crossover thing has long past worn out its welcome. I make an exception for BN because of the subject matter – but it’s gone on toooooooooo long.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:05 am
Look, I tagged out of most DCU plotlines after Countdown to Final Crisis, but Robinson killed an assload of superhero types in Firearm, his pre-Starman book from Malibu. Only there, since he couldn’t go back and pick D-listers from the company’s history, he had to make the characters from scratch, give them a little backstory and personality, make the reader care or at least interested in them, then kill ‘em. In comparison, killing Blue Jay’s like a freebie: the backstory is already there.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:06 am
It’s lazy storytelling.
Still, like I said yesterday or the day before, I think you ought to check out that Mon-El Around the World issue of Superman where Robinson introduced, revamped, or dusted off a different new character/set of characters on almost every single page.
Also, Blue Jay’s a really bad example considering he’s a Hank Pym clone and at best, he’s an in-joke and at worst he’s a parody.
But in GENERAL, I agree with you: Lazy, lazy writing.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:17 am
Also, for disclosure’s sake, from James’ Twitter.
@TecJohnson I wouldn’t assume you’ve seen the last of Blue Jay. I consider him a little guy with a big future.
1:23 PM Oct 20th from web in reply to TecJohnson
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:39 am
Haven’t read this JLA issue yet, but I’ve seen this complaint before and frankly I think a readers view on comics death is just very subjective.
Death in comics (heck, death in any storytelling format) is a device. It’s one of many types of devices that a writer can choose from. And just like any device, it can be used well or used poorly. But making a blanket statement that killing a character is always bad or is “lazy storytelling” is just a knee jerk reaction that ignores the particulars of each story. You have to look at each writer and each story to determine whether the death was executed well and contributed well.
Robinson has a pretty proven track record of using character deaths as the impetus for a storyline. Jack Knight’s acceptance of the Starman role was significant because his older brother had been killed. Wesley Dodd’s death was the spark that reunited the JSA. I have faith that Robinson will use Blue Jay’s death as a legitimate and necessary plot device to advance his overall storyline.
Apparently Caleb generally dislikes the death of characters in comics, which is fine. But as a comics reader, you have to accept that characters, both major and minor, are going to be killed at some point. Without death, there’s no consequences to the threats the heroes face in the stories.
I’m sure Caleb realizes this, so mabye he just thinks that DC has been killing too many characters lately. But has anyone actually compared the number of deaths between DC and Marvel for a given time period? Is it really fair to say that DC has killed more characters lately? Some argue DC has relied on charater deaths too much, that it’s featured too prominantly in their big event stories. But is Marvel any different? Steve Rogers, the Wasp, Avengers Dissassembled? Do you really think their upcoming Seige storyline won’t include the death of at least one minor, if not major, character?
Complaining that all character deaths in comics is bad just seems unfair and ignores the important role that death brings to storytelling. If you don’t like seeing death, then your going to have a hard time reading any comic series for long.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:42 am
I agree with this. All of it. I hate when this happens to any character, major or minor.
To be fair, Marvel does this as lot as well, especially since House of M.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 am
I will add that Robinson just isn’t the same writer he was. Nothing I’ve seen from him of late is remotely close to anything he did in the 90s.
October 22nd, 2009 at 10:55 am
Buy what you like. Walk past that which you don’t.
October 22nd, 2009 at 1:10 pm
So this post got me thinking about who has killed the most heroes in the DCU. Guess who? Geoff Johns. Looking only the heroes from a list of dead characters on Wikipedia he has quite the tally:
Firebrand
Maxi-Man
Ram
Nemesis
Blue Beetle
Air Wave II
Baby Wildebeest
Ballistic
Black Condor II
Breach
Bushido
Dolphin
Geist
Human Bomb
Neptune Perkins
Pantha
Phantom Lady
Superman (Earth-Two)
Elongated Man
Osiris
The Question
Super-Chief
Tim Trench
Waverider
Minute-Man
General Glory II
Mister America
Agent Liberty
Rond Vidar
Laira
Gehenna
Hawk II
Hawkman
Hawkgirl
Tempest
I’m not make a judgment call here of its good or bad but it is interesting. I like Geoff Johns’ books. Some of the books he co-wrote and could have been others’ ideas. Now that he brought them all back as Black Lanterns he better look out. They might want revenge!
October 22nd, 2009 at 1:11 pm
“As a frequent visitor to the DC Universe, I’d like it to be a place that’s ever expanding, a place that’s always getting bigger, better, crazier, more complex and more exciting, rather than getting smaller and sadder all the time.”
The post does not read like it. When the possible death of Blue Jay pushes you over the edge it is hard to see a deep love for “bigger, better, crazier, more complex and more exciting”. The 1# Rule of Fandom is “Fans get to like what they like.” A Fan not liking something 9 times out of 10 does not translate into some “higher meaning” of the state of comics. I get not liking the possible Death of Blue Jay. What I do not get is the “meta” implactions that are read into them. As for “Lazy Writting” to me lazy is what many posters have suggested doing with the JLA over the past few year. JLA with Superman, Batman Wonder Woman and 4 other “big guns” saving the world every issue with lots of action and things blow up but no one gets hurt. To be honest it would sell a lot of book but do not make it high brow entertainment.
Think about it this way, many of the people that are screaming about death in the DC Universe want the Suicide Squad to comeback with all of their favorites but they do not want anyone to die. They feel they are being reasonable. The head scratcher is that there seem to be a lot of people that feel that way. But hey the #1 rule is fans get to like what they like.
October 22nd, 2009 at 1:39 pm
It’s easier to kill a character you already care about than it is to create a new one.
October 23rd, 2009 at 6:30 am
As has been pointed out, beginning a story with a character’s death is a very common device in fiction generally. The trouble with it in superhero comics is that comics have a whole set of specialised conventions which are frankly insane by general standards.
October 23rd, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Where will the future Alan Moores turn to for wacky characters to rescue? Many–me too–voiced this complaint as the original Crisis on Infinite Earths unfolded, and its still true. In practice, though, almost any comic book death can be undone. If Bucky can come back, anyone can.
And to apply Geoff-Johnsian logic, there’s no need to fear for Blue Jay: We saw in a few JSA issues and in 52 that though pre-Crisis Power Girl lives on the regular DC Earth, and pre-crisis Earth II Superman died, their doppelgangers live on, on the recreated version of Earth Two seen in the abovementioned series. Likewise with Montoya-Question “here” and the original Question on “Earth Charleton,” and the Capt. Marvels here and on Earth Fawcett. Presumably the Champions of Angor doppelgangers are alive and well on “Earth Marvel-Parody.”
Whatever. The bloodshed itself is still depressing.
October 30th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
James Robinson is one of the worst things ever to happen to superhero comics. History will prove me right on that one.