<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott McCloud on reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/10/14/scott-mccloud-on-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/10/14/scott-mccloud-on-reviews/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/10/14/scott-mccloud-on-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-476139</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12887#comment-476139</guid>
		<description>Reviewing is a tricky thing. Some people think it should be all about your personal reaction to the work, which can never be walled off from context (creators&#039; espoused political views, etc.). I have sympathy for this view, as long as the personal aspect of the reaction is clearly disclosed by the reviewer.

Even a formalist critique of the art, language, and interactions thereof is going to have that real-world bleed-through, and it can be disingenuous to ignore elephants in the room. Check out this review(?) of Chinatown from Salon written in the context of the Polanski flare-up: http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2009/10/13/chinatown/index.html

Interesting take on a similar issue from the video game world:
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24627</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviewing is a tricky thing. Some people think it should be all about your personal reaction to the work, which can never be walled off from context (creators&#8217; espoused political views, etc.). I have sympathy for this view, as long as the personal aspect of the reaction is clearly disclosed by the reviewer.</p>
<p>Even a formalist critique of the art, language, and interactions thereof is going to have that real-world bleed-through, and it can be disingenuous to ignore elephants in the room. Check out this review(?) of Chinatown from Salon written in the context of the Polanski flare-up: <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2009/10/13/chinatown/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2009/10/13/chinatown/index.html</a></p>
<p>Interesting take on a similar issue from the video game world:<br />
<a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24627" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24627</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
