<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Siegel court on Superman VI and the absurdity of fangirls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Machines</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-761955</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Machines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-761955</guid>
		<description>The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful 

information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of 

writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and 

implement the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful </p>
<p>information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of </p>
<p>writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and </p>
<p>implement the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: increase cock size</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-565551</link>
		<dc:creator>increase cock size</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-565551</guid>
		<description>Good way of puttin it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good way of puttin it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-467398</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-467398</guid>
		<description>Man, I saw the headline and thought &quot;Oh boy, someone&#039;s going to mention Smallville slash.&quot;

Then they just went in a completely different direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I saw the headline and thought &#8220;Oh boy, someone&#8217;s going to mention Smallville slash.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then they just went in a completely different direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Trexler</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-467372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Trexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-467372</guid>
		<description>Just to confirm--the last statement is indeed meant to be ironic.  The judge&#039;s reference to &quot;little girls&quot; in connection with &quot;even more incredibly&quot; is a most revealing statement about the perception of Superman &amp; comics as a predominantly male domain.

As for the difficulty in understanding the case, think of it like this:  before the judge can determine how to allocate the value of the Superman copyright between Siegel and DC, he has to determine what that property is worth.  A key element:  the value of the movie &amp; TV licenses.  However, because DC sold the licenses to a related party, Warner Bros., the possibility exists that the price WB paid for it is too low--or as it&#039;s commonly described, a &quot;sweetheart deal.&quot;   In this phase of the case, the judge is deciding whether what WB paid accurately reflects what the licenses are worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to confirm&#8211;the last statement is indeed meant to be ironic.  The judge&#8217;s reference to &#8220;little girls&#8221; in connection with &#8220;even more incredibly&#8221; is a most revealing statement about the perception of Superman &#038; comics as a predominantly male domain.</p>
<p>As for the difficulty in understanding the case, think of it like this:  before the judge can determine how to allocate the value of the Superman copyright between Siegel and DC, he has to determine what that property is worth.  A key element:  the value of the movie &#038; TV licenses.  However, because DC sold the licenses to a related party, Warner Bros., the possibility exists that the price WB paid for it is too low&#8211;or as it&#8217;s commonly described, a &#8220;sweetheart deal.&#8221;   In this phase of the case, the judge is deciding whether what WB paid accurately reflects what the licenses are worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe H</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-467370</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-467370</guid>
		<description>What a weird case. I don&#039;t understand any of the reasoning or anything behind it at all even after reading the articles about it on this blog. @_@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a weird case. I don&#8217;t understand any of the reasoning or anything behind it at all even after reading the articles about it on this blog. @_@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Jaffe</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/07/09/the-siegel-court-on-superman-vi-and-the-absurdity-of-fangirls/comment-page-1/#comment-467368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Jaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=12142#comment-467368</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really hoping that everyone who reads this catches that the last sentence is meant to be ironic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really hoping that everyone who reads this catches that the last sentence is meant to be ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
