
Yeah, my heart’s on my sleeve about this one. According to The Hollywood Reporter’s Risky Business Blog, Universal is setting up a remake of Bride of Frankenstein. I know that I’m frequently a guy that urges you to wait until the work appears to judge it, but remaking one of the greatest horror classics of all time? Remaking a sequel that actually trumped its predecessor in terms of style and effect? And doesn’t anyone else remember the misfire that was the previous remake attempt starring Jennifer Beals and Sting, “The Bride”?
Granted, Universal has really been trying to get back in the monster-business lately. They’ve got “The Wolf Man” and a “Creature from the Black Lagoon” remake in the offing. There’s even been talk of a new Frankenstein, though whether its connected to the “Bride” remake or not, we don’t know. The bright spot here is that Dirk Wittenborn of “The Illusionist” will be at the helm.
So, ultimately, I guess it IS a wait and see proposition. But honestly, does every single film need to be remade? Can’t we just let some classics stay that way? Tell me, readers . . . what great movies should NEVER be remade?
June 17th, 2009 at 8:08 am
fritz lang’s metropolis
Cheers,
B
June 17th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Superman: The Movie. There’s nothing wrong with Chris Reeve’s portrayal of Superman, and having it set in the 1970s doesn’t do a damn thing to diminish its relevance.
Rocky (The original)
The Dirty Dozen
Death Wish
The Godfather
Escape from Alcatraz
Shawshank Redemption
2001 A Space Odyssey
Star Wars A New Hope…um…never mind.
June 17th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
I love this story because the headline could refer to any number of movies made in the last 20 years.
June 18th, 2009 at 7:00 am
Halloween
Night of the Living Dead
The Hitcher
Godzilla
The Day the Earth Stood Still
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Assault on Precinct 13
Wait….dammit…