<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining a Mysterious Return</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmelina Loehner</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-658058</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmelina Loehner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-658058</guid>
		<description>foundfor the most partwillhave the same conceptwith your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foundfor the most partwillhave the same conceptwith your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitter gourd</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-636616</link>
		<dc:creator>bitter gourd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-636616</guid>
		<description>Q. What does CHAOS stand for? A. The Chiefs Have Arrived On Scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. What does CHAOS stand for? A. The Chiefs Have Arrived On Scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadie</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-563966</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-563966</guid>
		<description>Very    wonderful visual appeal on this website  , I&#039;d rate   it 10 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very    wonderful visual appeal on this website  , I&#8217;d rate   it 10 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463412</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463412</guid>
		<description>I liked Conner as a character but i think him, Barry Allen, Bart Allen and yes even Hal jordan and Oliver Queen should have stayed dead.

It&#039;s all Arthur Conan Doyle&#039;s fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Conner as a character but i think him, Barry Allen, Bart Allen and yes even Hal jordan and Oliver Queen should have stayed dead.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463409</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463409</guid>
		<description>I have to say that i think the whole idea of superheroes returning from the dead is a bad idea. Some of these heroes sacrificed themselves so that the universe would be saved. Bringing them back kinda defeats the whole idea of sacrificing yourself for the greater good.

I liked Conner as a character but i think him, Barry Allen, Bart Allen and yes even Hal jordan and Oliver Queen should have stayed dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that i think the whole idea of superheroes returning from the dead is a bad idea. Some of these heroes sacrificed themselves so that the universe would be saved. Bringing them back kinda defeats the whole idea of sacrificing yourself for the greater good.</p>
<p>I liked Conner as a character but i think him, Barry Allen, Bart Allen and yes even Hal jordan and Oliver Queen should have stayed dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463363</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463363</guid>
		<description>&quot;Superboy DID get a shot with the Legion...towards the end of the Abnett-Lanning run about five years ago.&quot;

Yes, but the whole point is that according to DC (based on the whining of Legion fans) that wasn&#039;t the &quot;real&quot; Legion, so anything done in it wasn&#039;t good enough, and should be ignored, except for the specific items Geoff chooses to save.

Oh, wait, they&#039;re not even MENTIONED in Lo3W, so they&#039;re all SOL.

The very fact that you&#039;re the only one to point it out is testament to that.

(Tell me I don&#039;t need Sarcasm tags around that...please...)

Unless the Seigels and DC are FAR closer to a settlement than anyone knows, I still think this is a risky move.  It seems too much like DC couldn&#039;t wait for a settlement, so they went with what they thought would be okay, even though a couple of years ago, they DIDN&#039;T think they could get away with it.  It smacks too much of Vince McMahon deciding the World Wildlife Fund wouldn&#039;t really do anything if he decided to use wwf.com as the website address...and eventually had to change the name of the whole damn company.  It&#039;s DC Shoes all over again.  Until the whole mishegas gets settled (literally and figuratively), ANYTHING DC does can come back and bite them.

I&#039;m happy to see these characters, and hope the whole mess gets settled eventually so we can see &quot;The Adventures of Superman When He Was A Boy&quot; officially get folded back into the continuity.

Pay them off.  Yes, again.  It&#039;s worth it.  Whether or not they &quot;deserve&quot; it legally (or morally), is NEVER going to be settled (as every related comment thread shows).  But the amount of money lost, compared to the amount of money spent to date doesn&#039;t balance.  Get them off your back, at least for another generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Superboy DID get a shot with the Legion&#8230;towards the end of the Abnett-Lanning run about five years ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but the whole point is that according to DC (based on the whining of Legion fans) that wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;real&#8221; Legion, so anything done in it wasn&#8217;t good enough, and should be ignored, except for the specific items Geoff chooses to save.</p>
<p>Oh, wait, they&#8217;re not even MENTIONED in Lo3W, so they&#8217;re all SOL.</p>
<p>The very fact that you&#8217;re the only one to point it out is testament to that.</p>
<p>(Tell me I don&#8217;t need Sarcasm tags around that&#8230;please&#8230;)</p>
<p>Unless the Seigels and DC are FAR closer to a settlement than anyone knows, I still think this is a risky move.  It seems too much like DC couldn&#8217;t wait for a settlement, so they went with what they thought would be okay, even though a couple of years ago, they DIDN&#8217;T think they could get away with it.  It smacks too much of Vince McMahon deciding the World Wildlife Fund wouldn&#8217;t really do anything if he decided to use wwf.com as the website address&#8230;and eventually had to change the name of the whole damn company.  It&#8217;s DC Shoes all over again.  Until the whole mishegas gets settled (literally and figuratively), ANYTHING DC does can come back and bite them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to see these characters, and hope the whole mess gets settled eventually so we can see &#8220;The Adventures of Superman When He Was A Boy&#8221; officially get folded back into the continuity.</p>
<p>Pay them off.  Yes, again.  It&#8217;s worth it.  Whether or not they &#8220;deserve&#8221; it legally (or morally), is NEVER going to be settled (as every related comment thread shows).  But the amount of money lost, compared to the amount of money spent to date doesn&#8217;t balance.  Get them off your back, at least for another generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463361</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463361</guid>
		<description>Siegel claims something like Action 1 to 6, (and submitted documents proving they were written prior to signing with DC) but that still wouldn&#039;t include heat vision or flying.

The Fawcett case was settled in court. Fawcett lost.  The Judges ruled plagiarism had occurred and remanded it back to lower court to compute the damages.  That was the only issue left when Fawcett capitulated.  DC screwed up by not obtaining the rights to the character right then and there.  They settled simply for prohibiting continued publication which lead to Marvelman, the Myron Fass Captain Marvel and Marvel Comics&#039; eventual capture of the trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siegel claims something like Action 1 to 6, (and submitted documents proving they were written prior to signing with DC) but that still wouldn&#8217;t include heat vision or flying.</p>
<p>The Fawcett case was settled in court. Fawcett lost.  The Judges ruled plagiarism had occurred and remanded it back to lower court to compute the damages.  That was the only issue left when Fawcett capitulated.  DC screwed up by not obtaining the rights to the character right then and there.  They settled simply for prohibiting continued publication which lead to Marvelman, the Myron Fass Captain Marvel and Marvel Comics&#8217; eventual capture of the trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Freeman</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463359</link>
		<dc:creator>James Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463359</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that they just liscensed him? I know that DC has to pay money to use his fellow Titan Static, so I&#039;m wondering if they are paying Siegel&#039;s heirs money to use the character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that they just liscensed him? I know that DC has to pay money to use his fellow Titan Static, so I&#8217;m wondering if they are paying Siegel&#8217;s heirs money to use the character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadarkknight4057</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463358</link>
		<dc:creator>dadarkknight4057</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463358</guid>
		<description>Dc does pretty much own Superman because if the segial get what was in action comics they pretty much will get a limped superman. In action comics number he did not fly, no heat ray vision(or any of the modern powers), and Lex Luther and Krypton was never mentioned. All the Siegels own is Clark Kent, Lois Lane and the old logo. Dc owns the trademark to the modern S symbol. If anything the Siegel and Dc need each other because if the Siegel sell their superman dc will sue them if they give him the current logo and have him fly while blasting heat-ray from his eyes. Its just one big mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dc does pretty much own Superman because if the segial get what was in action comics they pretty much will get a limped superman. In action comics number he did not fly, no heat ray vision(or any of the modern powers), and Lex Luther and Krypton was never mentioned. All the Siegels own is Clark Kent, Lois Lane and the old logo. Dc owns the trademark to the modern S symbol. If anything the Siegel and Dc need each other because if the Siegel sell their superman dc will sue them if they give him the current logo and have him fly while blasting heat-ray from his eyes. Its just one big mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimflint67</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463357</link>
		<dc:creator>jimflint67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463357</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think you’re wrong. I think that idea is outdated. I think that Superman becoming Superboy first is an idea that belongs in the distant past, to be looked at fondly as a memory.&quot;

We are all, of course, entitled to our own opinions.  But, both characters, the Legion as a whole, and the Superman as a boy, suffered without each other.  In both real world and fictional history, there is no legion without Superboy.  And Superboy was defined as the ultimate team player by legion, well before the Justice league in &quot;fictional history&quot;.  It was his basis of interaction with the Legion that allowed him to be such a team player in JLA as opposed to say, Batman.

I think both concepts are better together than apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think you’re wrong. I think that idea is outdated. I think that Superman becoming Superboy first is an idea that belongs in the distant past, to be looked at fondly as a memory.&#8221;</p>
<p>We are all, of course, entitled to our own opinions.  But, both characters, the Legion as a whole, and the Superman as a boy, suffered without each other.  In both real world and fictional history, there is no legion without Superboy.  And Superboy was defined as the ultimate team player by legion, well before the Justice league in &#8220;fictional history&#8221;.  It was his basis of interaction with the Legion that allowed him to be such a team player in JLA as opposed to say, Batman.</p>
<p>I think both concepts are better together than apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463356</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463356</guid>
		<description>Of course he&#039;ll be back. He&#039;s going to be the lead feature in the new Adventure Comics later in the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he&#8217;ll be back. He&#8217;s going to be the lead feature in the new Adventure Comics later in the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Wesley</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463354</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Connor&#039;s back. I thought his death was one of the most unnecessary of the past several years. But are we sure that DC just isn&#039;t circumventing the issue by giving Connor a new working identity?

And, Dan: I also remember reading that part of his agreement to write Infinite Crisis was allowing him to be the one to put away Bart and Connor. I&#039;m 90% sure it was here on Newsarama, but since it was before the Imaginova agreement, I&#039;m having trouble finding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Connor&#8217;s back. I thought his death was one of the most unnecessary of the past several years. But are we sure that DC just isn&#8217;t circumventing the issue by giving Connor a new working identity?</p>
<p>And, Dan: I also remember reading that part of his agreement to write Infinite Crisis was allowing him to be the one to put away Bart and Connor. I&#8217;m 90% sure it was here on Newsarama, but since it was before the Imaginova agreement, I&#8217;m having trouble finding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spymunk</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463352</link>
		<dc:creator>Spymunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463352</guid>
		<description>Connor&#039;s a great character - they did a lot of fun things with him in his own late, lamented title.  

He&#039;s NOT Superman - he&#039;s his own person.  Connor was, curiously, very strongly developed as far as his personality as an independent character in his own book.  They really developed him extensively, to the point where I honestly think he&#039;s one of the most well-rounded and realized DC characters, consistent and comprehensible.

It&#039;s GREAT to see him and Bart back from the &quot;dead.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connor&#8217;s a great character &#8211; they did a lot of fun things with him in his own late, lamented title.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s NOT Superman &#8211; he&#8217;s his own person.  Connor was, curiously, very strongly developed as far as his personality as an independent character in his own book.  They really developed him extensively, to the point where I honestly think he&#8217;s one of the most well-rounded and realized DC characters, consistent and comprehensible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s GREAT to see him and Bart back from the &#8220;dead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipNite</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463351</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipNite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463351</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget this Superboy DID get a shot with the Legion - wearing the traditional Superman costume no less, towards the end of the Abnett-Lanning run about five years ago.  Plus, Waid tried again by inserting Supergirl, and both moves were met with kind of a &#039;meh&#039; response.

But if Geoff Johns wants to try, who am I to argue?  The end result is usually pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget this Superboy DID get a shot with the Legion &#8211; wearing the traditional Superman costume no less, towards the end of the Abnett-Lanning run about five years ago.  Plus, Waid tried again by inserting Supergirl, and both moves were met with kind of a &#8216;meh&#8217; response.</p>
<p>But if Geoff Johns wants to try, who am I to argue?  The end result is usually pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Gertler</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463348</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat Gertler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 12:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463348</guid>
		<description>Kamino: I&#039;m not sure on what basis you claim that &quot;There’s never been an issue with the copyright on Superman - DC owns him free and clear.&quot; There have been repeated issues with the copyright on Superman, and as the article states, the Siegels now own half of the rights in Action 1 -- the material from which much of what we consider to be Superman could be said to have been derived. So while at this point DC still owns significant portions of Superman, it&#039;s hard to describe it as &quot;free and clear&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kamino: I&#8217;m not sure on what basis you claim that &#8220;There’s never been an issue with the copyright on Superman &#8211; DC owns him free and clear.&#8221; There have been repeated issues with the copyright on Superman, and as the article states, the Siegels now own half of the rights in Action 1 &#8212; the material from which much of what we consider to be Superman could be said to have been derived. So while at this point DC still owns significant portions of Superman, it&#8217;s hard to describe it as &#8220;free and clear&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a-newton</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463346</link>
		<dc:creator>a-newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 11:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463346</guid>
		<description>Superboy&#039;s original costume was extremely dated well before his own series ended.  It was way past time to leave it in the past.  I could accept a more superhero-y costume for him, but the jeans and t-shirt are perfectly fine to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superboy&#8217;s original costume was extremely dated well before his own series ended.  It was way past time to leave it in the past.  I could accept a more superhero-y costume for him, but the jeans and t-shirt are perfectly fine to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cornell</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463345</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 09:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463345</guid>
		<description>I am glad that Conner is back in the Dc fold.  Hopefully, Connor and Bart will be back in the 21st century and DC can get their act together with the Teen Titans.

I feel for Mrs. Siegel who has been screwed by DC Comicss, but I am not so sure his kids, grandkids, and relatives are entitled to the Superman profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that Conner is back in the Dc fold.  Hopefully, Connor and Bart will be back in the 21st century and DC can get their act together with the Teen Titans.</p>
<p>I feel for Mrs. Siegel who has been screwed by DC Comicss, but I am not so sure his kids, grandkids, and relatives are entitled to the Superman profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamino Neko</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463344</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamino Neko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 08:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463344</guid>
		<description>Matthew - 

There&#039;s never been an issue with the copyright on Superman - DC owns him free and clear. Say what you want about how they got him, but they own him.

This whole froofroora is about SuperBOY.

The problem with Superboy is Siegel was cannier at the time than he and Shuster were when they sold the Superman rights - which is why whether Superboy is completely a derivative work of Superman, or a sufficiently original character in his own right is the issue at the heart of the matter.

Clearly DC believes that either he is a simple Superman derivative, or that the two current itterations of Superboy (Prime and Connor) are sufficiently different from HIM as to not be considered derivatives, and therefor not considered to belong to Siegel&#039;s heirs, if they&#039;re given the rights to the original Superboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew &#8211; </p>
<p>There&#8217;s never been an issue with the copyright on Superman &#8211; DC owns him free and clear. Say what you want about how they got him, but they own him.</p>
<p>This whole froofroora is about SuperBOY.</p>
<p>The problem with Superboy is Siegel was cannier at the time than he and Shuster were when they sold the Superman rights &#8211; which is why whether Superboy is completely a derivative work of Superman, or a sufficiently original character in his own right is the issue at the heart of the matter.</p>
<p>Clearly DC believes that either he is a simple Superman derivative, or that the two current itterations of Superboy (Prime and Connor) are sufficiently different from HIM as to not be considered derivatives, and therefor not considered to belong to Siegel&#8217;s heirs, if they&#8217;re given the rights to the original Superboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloodmage</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463343</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloodmage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 07:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463343</guid>
		<description>Well, I for one, LOVE Conner&#039;s current costume. Why on Earth people feel the need for him to wear some ridiculous outfit is beyond me. Giving him a costume similar to Superman&#039;s just makes him feel like a sidekick, so that&#039;s a bad route. He doesn&#039;t need a costume for armor or to focus his powers, he uses the same disguise as Superman to protect his identity, and he&#039;s instantly relatable to any reader in his age group. It&#039;s the sort of costume he could make for himself that doesn&#039;t look goofy. Why change it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I for one, LOVE Conner&#8217;s current costume. Why on Earth people feel the need for him to wear some ridiculous outfit is beyond me. Giving him a costume similar to Superman&#8217;s just makes him feel like a sidekick, so that&#8217;s a bad route. He doesn&#8217;t need a costume for armor or to focus his powers, he uses the same disguise as Superman to protect his identity, and he&#8217;s instantly relatable to any reader in his age group. It&#8217;s the sort of costume he could make for himself that doesn&#8217;t look goofy. Why change it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fahad Arman</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463340</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahad Arman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 06:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463340</guid>
		<description>I LITERALLY squealed when I read this! I have been waiting and waiting for this moment with JUST as much anticipation as I have for the (imminent) return of Steve Rogers. Connor Kent is one of those characters, like Dick Grayson and Guy Gardner, that has the ability to be one of the Greats. One of those characters that scream every time they are on the page &quot;I NEED A DEFINING STORY!&quot; &quot;I NEED A DEFINING MOMENT!&quot; and now that he is back in the DCU (or soon to be) there&#039;s a better chance in that happening. 

I believe in Connor Kent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LITERALLY squealed when I read this! I have been waiting and waiting for this moment with JUST as much anticipation as I have for the (imminent) return of Steve Rogers. Connor Kent is one of those characters, like Dick Grayson and Guy Gardner, that has the ability to be one of the Greats. One of those characters that scream every time they are on the page &#8220;I NEED A DEFINING STORY!&#8221; &#8220;I NEED A DEFINING MOMENT!&#8221; and now that he is back in the DCU (or soon to be) there&#8217;s a better chance in that happening. </p>
<p>I believe in Connor Kent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Feighery</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463339</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Feighery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463339</guid>
		<description>So people actually want Superboy back in that god awful 80&#039;s  work out leotard of a costume with the loose off the hip belt? 

Why not add Leg warmers to complete the look?

Give him a NEW costume or keep this one but PLEEEEEEEASE do not go back to that awful outfit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So people actually want Superboy back in that god awful 80&#8242;s  work out leotard of a costume with the loose off the hip belt? </p>
<p>Why not add Leg warmers to complete the look?</p>
<p>Give him a NEW costume or keep this one but PLEEEEEEEASE do not go back to that awful outfit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haas</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463338</link>
		<dc:creator>Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463338</guid>
		<description>Connor it&#039;s good to have you back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connor it&#8217;s good to have you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463337</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463337</guid>
		<description>&quot;Geoff Johns wrote the books in which Bart was aged and Conner died, but those were editorial mandates forced on him.&quot;

Link please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Geoff Johns wrote the books in which Bart was aged and Conner died, but those were editorial mandates forced on him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Link please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superfriend</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463336</link>
		<dc:creator>superfriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463336</guid>
		<description>Now if they would only go back to having him wear a costume.  Tshirt and jeans is not a super hero outfit.
They need to put him back in the costume he originally wore.
It worked for 100 issues of his own comic and 50+ issues of Young Justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if they would only go back to having him wear a costume.  Tshirt and jeans is not a super hero outfit.<br />
They need to put him back in the costume he originally wore.<br />
It worked for 100 issues of his own comic and 50+ issues of Young Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Shipman</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463334</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal Shipman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463334</guid>
		<description>In regards to the first poster - I thought the Fawcett issue was that the issue wasn&#039;t really resolved, more that Fawcett when broke from all the litigation and DC scooped up the assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the first poster &#8211; I thought the Fawcett issue was that the issue wasn&#8217;t really resolved, more that Fawcett when broke from all the litigation and DC scooped up the assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 22:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463333</guid>
		<description>It would be really interesting to see DC without Superman. That would break the DC trinity? Maybe they would add Captain Marvel (Shazam!)in his place. I doubt DC would ever lose him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be really interesting to see DC without Superman. That would break the DC trinity? Maybe they would add Captain Marvel (Shazam!)in his place. I doubt DC would ever lose him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Amaral</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Amaral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 22:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463332</guid>
		<description>I really care nothing about both characters, and I like even less the new mess Johns had created for the Legion of Super-Heroes, which has become even more convoluted. Hopefully, he will go back to Teen Titans and leave LSH in more capable hands, one that recognized LSH is the star of its own book, not a bunch of colorful costumes serving as cannon fodder for whatever fixation he has at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really care nothing about both characters, and I like even less the new mess Johns had created for the Legion of Super-Heroes, which has become even more convoluted. Hopefully, he will go back to Teen Titans and leave LSH in more capable hands, one that recognized LSH is the star of its own book, not a bunch of colorful costumes serving as cannon fodder for whatever fixation he has at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hondo</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463329</link>
		<dc:creator>hondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463329</guid>
		<description>Are you insane ?  Rewriting DC continuity without Superman ?

I&#039;m glad to see Conner come back and prefer having this Superboy in the Legion.  When Superboy was part of the group it felt like the other members didn&#039;t get enough attention or character development.  This Superboy, not young Superman, feels like he&#039;s not as invincible as the original Superboy.  

It&#039;s also good that the Siegel family is getting something due to Jerry Siegel&#039;s creation of both Superboy and Superman, and other characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you insane ?  Rewriting DC continuity without Superman ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see Conner come back and prefer having this Superboy in the Legion.  When Superboy was part of the group it felt like the other members didn&#8217;t get enough attention or character development.  This Superboy, not young Superman, feels like he&#8217;s not as invincible as the original Superboy.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also good that the Siegel family is getting something due to Jerry Siegel&#8217;s creation of both Superboy and Superman, and other characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassius335</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463327</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassius335</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463327</guid>
		<description>Are we SURE that it was Conner that came back and not Match (who is likely to be dead long before Legion-time)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we SURE that it was Conner that came back and not Match (who is likely to be dead long before Legion-time)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Raleighaikenbaconburgerfarley</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/05/01/explaining-a-mysterious-return/comment-page-1/#comment-463323</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Raleighaikenbaconburgerfarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11609#comment-463323</guid>
		<description>Never thought, I&#039;d actually care about the Superman court trials but DC has mount a solid defense to keep the copyright and the character. I can just see it now though. A DC Crisis style event that totally writes Superman (well they probably couldn&#039;t even use the trademark then)..S-Man(?) totally out of continuity! This might trump even Final Crisis in terms of overall stupidity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never thought, I&#8217;d actually care about the Superman court trials but DC has mount a solid defense to keep the copyright and the character. I can just see it now though. A DC Crisis style event that totally writes Superman (well they probably couldn&#8217;t even use the trademark then)..S-Man(?) totally out of continuity! This might trump even Final Crisis in terms of overall stupidity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
