<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cully Hamner Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bredbånd test</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-490808</link>
		<dc:creator>Bredbånd test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-490808</guid>
		<description>I asked my self det same thing:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked my self det same thing:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mac</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-478297</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-478297</guid>
		<description>Why does &#039;Tot&#039; look like the British Chancellor of the Exchequer alistair darling?  Well Tot has a personality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does &#8216;Tot&#8217; look like the British Chancellor of the Exchequer alistair darling?  Well Tot has a personality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack of Spades</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack of Spades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461776</guid>
		<description>One of the things I&#039;ve always loved about the Question is that you can wear that mask with *anything* and be recognizably the Question.  It gives the artist enormous flexibility and the Question the ability to show up anywhere, blending in while standing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I&#8217;ve always loved about the Question is that you can wear that mask with *anything* and be recognizably the Question.  It gives the artist enormous flexibility and the Question the ability to show up anywhere, blending in while standing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461190</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461190</guid>
		<description>Cully Hamner exclusive? Someone at DC really knows talent. This guy is one of the best and most under-rated. He&#039;s so talented. His artwork is deceptively simple and so beautifully elegant. His Blue Beetle was so much fun. It&#039;s going to be a HUGE treat to have him on The Question. It&#039;s a great idea to have Renee wearing different clothes rather than a set costume. Cully&#039;s notes make good sense, especially that she&#039;s &quot;low-maintenance&quot; yet stylish.  I love when a great artist meets a great character. I hope DC works Cully hard and we see a lot of his work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cully Hamner exclusive? Someone at DC really knows talent. This guy is one of the best and most under-rated. He&#8217;s so talented. His artwork is deceptively simple and so beautifully elegant. His Blue Beetle was so much fun. It&#8217;s going to be a HUGE treat to have him on The Question. It&#8217;s a great idea to have Renee wearing different clothes rather than a set costume. Cully&#8217;s notes make good sense, especially that she&#8217;s &#8220;low-maintenance&#8221; yet stylish.  I love when a great artist meets a great character. I hope DC works Cully hard and we see a lot of his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Bartilucci</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461143</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Bartilucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461143</guid>
		<description>&quot;They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica’s outfits in the old Archie books.&quot;

The Question Paper-Doll cut-out book.

This is money just waiting to be made.  

And I gotta say again, this is some beautiful.  Like Alex Toth good.  Clean lines, expressive characters...this is gonna be entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica’s outfits in the old Archie books.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Question Paper-Doll cut-out book.</p>
<p>This is money just waiting to be made.  </p>
<p>And I gotta say again, this is some beautiful.  Like Alex Toth good.  Clean lines, expressive characters&#8230;this is gonna be entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Government</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461142</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461142</guid>
		<description>I really liked Vic as the Question, but the transition was so well-handled and part of such an enjoyable story that I can&#039;t help but appreciate Renee now.  And if I really start to miss Vic, I can always just go back and read my O&#039;Neil Question issues.

I didn&#039;t think that &#039;Tec could be made into a more appealing package than it already was, but this has certainly got me pumped.  Can&#039;t wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked Vic as the Question, but the transition was so well-handled and part of such an enjoyable story that I can&#8217;t help but appreciate Renee now.  And if I really start to miss Vic, I can always just go back and read my O&#8217;Neil Question issues.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think that &#8216;Tec could be made into a more appealing package than it already was, but this has certainly got me pumped.  Can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyQuick</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461133</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyQuick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461133</guid>
		<description>I dislike the idea of Renee using nunchuks, they seem really dangerous and unsafe. Why not give her brass knuckles? 

But the art. ASDLYGRAW3YLG. I would so pay 4$ for 8 pages of Renee looking like that. Practical hair! Awesome clothing! References to Vic (and there had BETTER BE A LOT OF THEM D:&lt;)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dislike the idea of Renee using nunchuks, they seem really dangerous and unsafe. Why not give her brass knuckles? </p>
<p>But the art. ASDLYGRAW3YLG. I would so pay 4$ for 8 pages of Renee looking like that. Practical hair! Awesome clothing! References to Vic (and there had BETTER BE A LOT OF THEM D:&lt;)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan N</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-2/#comment-461127</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461127</guid>
		<description>D. Peace, I could care less whether or not top tier titles have female characters. I only care about good story-telling and good characters, period. Brubaker&#039;s Catwoman was great. But lets face it, we would error in saying that it was a financially top tier title by any stretch of the imagination. Andreyko&#039;s Manhunter was great too, a character with a valid back-story and narrative I quite enjoyed. 

But the Renee Montoya Question? Hardly.

When perfectly good characters have been sacrificed in order to develop needless perversions of themselves, that&#039;s when I become angry. Vic Sage had a purity about him, a philosophical edge that was in it&#039;s own way a super-power. Renee Montoya has cop-instincts and a lesbian background? 

A Diomedian swap if I ever heard of one. 

Greg Rucka, if you are reading this, I honestly think your attempts to create female superheroes have been lacking. Sasha Bordeaux, Bat-Woman, and The Question among the list. Sasha and Renee would have been more enjoyable to read had they remained non-superpowered. I don&#039;t feel you had a valid reason to turn them into super-heroes beyond, &quot;Well I love writing these characters...but the only way they can stay around for me to write them is if I gave them super-powers to earn their keep.&quot; And the Kat Kane Bat-Woman is just a bland concept. She&#039;s female bat-man. Check. She&#039;s lesbian. Check. She&#039;s Jewish! Check. I suppose that makes her three-dimensional...?

I agree with the poster above who predicts it will made good sales in the first six months, then drop off into obscurity. At which point they may change up the Detective title again. It&#039;s Dan Didio&#039;s philosophy of, &quot;The great thing about comics is that you can try again if something doesn&#039;t work the first time.&quot; That&#039;s great Dan, but not if you keep screwing things up repeatedly. 

Cully, I loved your work on Blue Beetle and Red. However, aside from my feelings on this Renee Montoya Question, I will be honest about your designs. I don&#039;t get a sense of any femininity in your sketches. In real life I don&#039;t see  women walking around wearing those kind of hats, super-hero or not. The nun chucks are kind of out of left field, and a bit incongruous to the nature of the Question and how he/she would operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Peace, I could care less whether or not top tier titles have female characters. I only care about good story-telling and good characters, period. Brubaker&#8217;s Catwoman was great. But lets face it, we would error in saying that it was a financially top tier title by any stretch of the imagination. Andreyko&#8217;s Manhunter was great too, a character with a valid back-story and narrative I quite enjoyed. </p>
<p>But the Renee Montoya Question? Hardly.</p>
<p>When perfectly good characters have been sacrificed in order to develop needless perversions of themselves, that&#8217;s when I become angry. Vic Sage had a purity about him, a philosophical edge that was in it&#8217;s own way a super-power. Renee Montoya has cop-instincts and a lesbian background? </p>
<p>A Diomedian swap if I ever heard of one. </p>
<p>Greg Rucka, if you are reading this, I honestly think your attempts to create female superheroes have been lacking. Sasha Bordeaux, Bat-Woman, and The Question among the list. Sasha and Renee would have been more enjoyable to read had they remained non-superpowered. I don&#8217;t feel you had a valid reason to turn them into super-heroes beyond, &#8220;Well I love writing these characters&#8230;but the only way they can stay around for me to write them is if I gave them super-powers to earn their keep.&#8221; And the Kat Kane Bat-Woman is just a bland concept. She&#8217;s female bat-man. Check. She&#8217;s lesbian. Check. She&#8217;s Jewish! Check. I suppose that makes her three-dimensional&#8230;?</p>
<p>I agree with the poster above who predicts it will made good sales in the first six months, then drop off into obscurity. At which point they may change up the Detective title again. It&#8217;s Dan Didio&#8217;s philosophy of, &#8220;The great thing about comics is that you can try again if something doesn&#8217;t work the first time.&#8221; That&#8217;s great Dan, but not if you keep screwing things up repeatedly. </p>
<p>Cully, I loved your work on Blue Beetle and Red. However, aside from my feelings on this Renee Montoya Question, I will be honest about your designs. I don&#8217;t get a sense of any femininity in your sketches. In real life I don&#8217;t see  women walking around wearing those kind of hats, super-hero or not. The nun chucks are kind of out of left field, and a bit incongruous to the nature of the Question and how he/she would operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cully Hamner</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461116</link>
		<dc:creator>Cully Hamner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461116</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can’t help it, as much as I normally love Cully’s work, all I can think of when I look at these pictures is Where’s the dotted line?

They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica’s outfits in the old Archie books.&quot;

Kplan, these were done for my own reference and consistency in drawing a character I haven&#039;t drawn before.  I routinely do these for myself when starting a new gig.  They aren&#039;t meant to evoke anything other than &quot;here&#039;s what I look like.&quot;  Methinks you&#039;re expecting just a little too much from a peek at my reference turnarounds...!

You&#039;ll get your mystery starting in &#039;TEC #854.  I&#039;m asking you to hang on a little before you judge.  I&#039;m telling you, these scripts I&#039;m getting from Greg are pretty damned good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can’t help it, as much as I normally love Cully’s work, all I can think of when I look at these pictures is Where’s the dotted line?</p>
<p>They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica’s outfits in the old Archie books.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kplan, these were done for my own reference and consistency in drawing a character I haven&#8217;t drawn before.  I routinely do these for myself when starting a new gig.  They aren&#8217;t meant to evoke anything other than &#8220;here&#8217;s what I look like.&#8221;  Methinks you&#8217;re expecting just a little too much from a peek at my reference turnarounds&#8230;!</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll get your mystery starting in &#8216;TEC #854.  I&#8217;m asking you to hang on a little before you judge.  I&#8217;m telling you, these scripts I&#8217;m getting from Greg are pretty damned good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kplan</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461111</link>
		<dc:creator>Kplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461111</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help it, as much as I normally love Cully&#039;s work, all I can think of when I look at these pictures is Where&#039;s the dotted line?

They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica&#039;s outfits in the old Archie books.

It&#039;s got no oomph, and I don&#039;t feel like I&#039;m looking at -- as someone else said -- a &quot;modern day pulp hero.&quot; It has no mystery. At first I thought it was the whole female thing, then perhaps I thought maybe it was that Montoya is, generally, just less interesting and less of an enigma, than Vic Sage was, but then I remembered the old logo for &quot;Where in the World is Carmen San Diego?&quot;...that evoked FAR MORE mystery and wonder for me (and I was in my 20s when that show was around, so I&#039;ve got no emotional connection to it).

In sum: bleh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help it, as much as I normally love Cully&#8217;s work, all I can think of when I look at these pictures is Where&#8217;s the dotted line?</p>
<p>They remind me of the paper doll cut-outs of Betty and Veronica&#8217;s outfits in the old Archie books.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got no oomph, and I don&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;m looking at &#8212; as someone else said &#8212; a &#8220;modern day pulp hero.&#8221; It has no mystery. At first I thought it was the whole female thing, then perhaps I thought maybe it was that Montoya is, generally, just less interesting and less of an enigma, than Vic Sage was, but then I remembered the old logo for &#8220;Where in the World is Carmen San Diego?&#8221;&#8230;that evoked FAR MORE mystery and wonder for me (and I was in my 20s when that show was around, so I&#8217;ve got no emotional connection to it).</p>
<p>In sum: bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Peace</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461106</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461106</guid>
		<description>Cully &amp; Greg - If you&#039;re reading this, feel free to ignore the haters.  They&#039;re just trying their damndest to keep the &quot;fanboys hate it when top-tier titles have female leads&quot; stereotype alive and kicking.

I&#039;m psyched and I fully look forward to this run joining GOTHAM CENTRAL, Brubaker and Cooke&#039;s CATWOMAN, and Greg&#039;s earlier run on &#039;TEC as one of the best Batman-related series of the modern era.  June can&#039;t come fast enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cully &amp; Greg &#8211; If you&#8217;re reading this, feel free to ignore the haters.  They&#8217;re just trying their damndest to keep the &#8220;fanboys hate it when top-tier titles have female leads&#8221; stereotype alive and kicking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m psyched and I fully look forward to this run joining GOTHAM CENTRAL, Brubaker and Cooke&#8217;s CATWOMAN, and Greg&#8217;s earlier run on &#8216;TEC as one of the best Batman-related series of the modern era.  June can&#8217;t come fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainzero</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461103</link>
		<dc:creator>captainzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461103</guid>
		<description>Dan Didio... do you come with batteries on this one??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Didio&#8230; do you come with batteries on this one??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainzero</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461102</link>
		<dc:creator>captainzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461102</guid>
		<description>I agree with Bryan:

And I&#039;m not buying THIS take on The Question, either.

Nice art... but it should have..and could have ...been used on Vic Sage.!!
I worry a little about Grant&#039;s take on these heroes, too...

Why does DC miss the &quot;core essence&quot; of these heroes... and screw them up so badly.(Will he put some Charlton hero&#039;s head on ice???)

It was &quot;criminal&quot; what they did to Peter Cannon..Thunderbolt and PeaceMaker... and to the other Charlton characters.

DC... Dan... look at the characters...and see who they are..and do them better.
Don&#039;t contort them beyound our ability to &quot;buy&quot; them.!!

Lesbians... how cutting edge progressive of you, Dan.  Just what we want to see.  The Question and Batwoman in bed together!!  NOT!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bryan:</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not buying THIS take on The Question, either.</p>
<p>Nice art&#8230; but it should have..and could have &#8230;been used on Vic Sage.!!<br />
I worry a little about Grant&#8217;s take on these heroes, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Why does DC miss the &#8220;core essence&#8221; of these heroes&#8230; and screw them up so badly.(Will he put some Charlton hero&#8217;s head on ice???)</p>
<p>It was &#8220;criminal&#8221; what they did to Peter Cannon..Thunderbolt and PeaceMaker&#8230; and to the other Charlton characters.</p>
<p>DC&#8230; Dan&#8230; look at the characters&#8230;and see who they are..and do them better.<br />
Don&#8217;t contort them beyound our ability to &#8220;buy&#8221; them.!!</p>
<p>Lesbians&#8230; how cutting edge progressive of you, Dan.  Just what we want to see.  The Question and Batwoman in bed together!!  NOT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainzero</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461101</link>
		<dc:creator>captainzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461101</guid>
		<description>Danny,
That&#039;s great.  Wonderful news!!  Can I ask... where did you read about it??  I would like to see &quot;what&#039;s shakin&#039;&quot;!!

thanks,... more than you know!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,<br />
That&#8217;s great.  Wonderful news!!  Can I ask&#8230; where did you read about it??  I would like to see &#8220;what&#8217;s shakin&#8217;&#8221;!!</p>
<p>thanks,&#8230; more than you know!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Harkness</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461097</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Harkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461097</guid>
		<description>Renee Montoya as the Question is like getting one lousy character for the price of two good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renee Montoya as the Question is like getting one lousy character for the price of two good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cully Hamner</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461092</link>
		<dc:creator>Cully Hamner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461092</guid>
		<description>Steve Bates:  &quot;Is it my imagination, or does Professor Aristotle Rodor look like Denny O’Neil?&quot;

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Bates:  &#8220;Is it my imagination, or does Professor Aristotle Rodor look like Denny O’Neil?&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBear</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461091</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461091</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed Dini&#039;s run on Detective and his leaving was making me plan to drop the title.  Now seeing this I think I will keep getting it after all.  The Question storyline in 52 was a major reason I enjoyed that title and I have enjoyed all of Renee&#039;s appearances since.  This looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed Dini&#8217;s run on Detective and his leaving was making me plan to drop the title.  Now seeing this I think I will keep getting it after all.  The Question storyline in 52 was a major reason I enjoyed that title and I have enjoyed all of Renee&#8217;s appearances since.  This looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461090</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461090</guid>
		<description>should have kept the ponytail thats all I&#039;m saying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should have kept the ponytail thats all I&#8217;m saying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461088</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461088</guid>
		<description>Shame Montoya isn&#039;t the main feature in &#039;tec or I&#039;d be picking it up, Batwoman just doesn&#039;t interest me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame Montoya isn&#8217;t the main feature in &#8216;tec or I&#8217;d be picking it up, Batwoman just doesn&#8217;t interest me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan N</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461086</guid>
		<description>The Renee Montoya version of the Question is just ridiculous. Aside from looking just idiotic in a man&#039;s suit and hat, there is no creative spark in her that would qualify her to be The Question. Where is the paranoia, the relentless drive to find the truth, the eccentricity? That is all replaced by a sense of &quot;upholding the mantle.&quot; How novel.

And the only reason Vic Sage died of cancer was so that Rucka could easily shoehorn her into his place and make it look like a &quot;valid&quot; sell to the audience. &quot;Oh look, not only did Vic train her, he wanted her to take his place.&quot; Never mind that if the writers didn&#039;t decide to give him cancer, he wouldn&#039;t have needed to do so in the first place!

This just smirks of DC&#039;s stagnant creative storytelling attempts to create &quot;new female heroes.&quot; In this case, she also happens to be lesbian alongside the new Bat-Woman. What a coincidence. I&#039;m looking at you Rucka and Didio.

How quaint. And totally stupid. Watch for this to fail. No way the Renee Montoya Question will ever get her own ongoing series, even with the pathetic ploy to drum up interest with a backup adventure in Detective. Might as well ship her off to Birds of Prey where B-list characters can thrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Renee Montoya version of the Question is just ridiculous. Aside from looking just idiotic in a man&#8217;s suit and hat, there is no creative spark in her that would qualify her to be The Question. Where is the paranoia, the relentless drive to find the truth, the eccentricity? That is all replaced by a sense of &#8220;upholding the mantle.&#8221; How novel.</p>
<p>And the only reason Vic Sage died of cancer was so that Rucka could easily shoehorn her into his place and make it look like a &#8220;valid&#8221; sell to the audience. &#8220;Oh look, not only did Vic train her, he wanted her to take his place.&#8221; Never mind that if the writers didn&#8217;t decide to give him cancer, he wouldn&#8217;t have needed to do so in the first place!</p>
<p>This just smirks of DC&#8217;s stagnant creative storytelling attempts to create &#8220;new female heroes.&#8221; In this case, she also happens to be lesbian alongside the new Bat-Woman. What a coincidence. I&#8217;m looking at you Rucka and Didio.</p>
<p>How quaint. And totally stupid. Watch for this to fail. No way the Renee Montoya Question will ever get her own ongoing series, even with the pathetic ploy to drum up interest with a backup adventure in Detective. Might as well ship her off to Birds of Prey where B-list characters can thrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461083</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Renee as The Question. I refuse to buy any book her character appears in until Vic Sage returns. 

Detective will sell well for the first few issues with the curiosity factor, but will slowly drop off and by six months Batwoman and/or this fake Question will be gone.

And after reading Grant&#039;s horrible take on the DCU in Final Crisis, I fear for his take on E4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Renee as The Question. I refuse to buy any book her character appears in until Vic Sage returns. </p>
<p>Detective will sell well for the first few issues with the curiosity factor, but will slowly drop off and by six months Batwoman and/or this fake Question will be gone.</p>
<p>And after reading Grant&#8217;s horrible take on the DCU in Final Crisis, I fear for his take on E4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herowatcher</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461081</link>
		<dc:creator>Herowatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be spending a little extra on a comic for pages I have no intention of reading (just great). Bette Kane and Batwoman will get me to buy Detective instead of dropping it after the announcement of a Montoya/Question co-feature. 

Vic death was so forced and pushing Rene Montoya into the role just leaves me disinterested in the Question mantle.

I would&#039;ve love to see DC stay true to there &quot;Action Heroes&quot; and find writers that would make them shine instead of giving us &quot;Replacement Characters&quot;. Enough&#039;s enough already. 

On a positive note I like Cully&#039;s art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be spending a little extra on a comic for pages I have no intention of reading (just great). Bette Kane and Batwoman will get me to buy Detective instead of dropping it after the announcement of a Montoya/Question co-feature. </p>
<p>Vic death was so forced and pushing Rene Montoya into the role just leaves me disinterested in the Question mantle.</p>
<p>I would&#8217;ve love to see DC stay true to there &#8220;Action Heroes&#8221; and find writers that would make them shine instead of giving us &#8220;Replacement Characters&#8221;. Enough&#8217;s enough already. </p>
<p>On a positive note I like Cully&#8217;s art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herowatcher</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461082</link>
		<dc:creator>Herowatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be spending a little extra on a comic for pages I have no intention of reading (just great). Bette Kane and Batwoman will get me to buy Detective instead of dropping it after the announcement of a Montoya/Question co-feature. 

Vic death was so forced and pushing Rene Montoya into the role just leaves me disinterested in the Question mantle.

I would&#039;ve love to see DC stay true to there &quot;Action Heroes&quot; and find writers that would make them shine instead of giving us &quot;Replacement Characters&quot;. Enough&#039;s enough already. 

On a positive note I like Cully&#039;s art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be spending a little extra on a comic for pages I have no intention of reading (just great). Bette Kane and Batwoman will get me to buy Detective instead of dropping it after the announcement of a Montoya/Question co-feature. </p>
<p>Vic death was so forced and pushing Rene Montoya into the role just leaves me disinterested in the Question mantle.</p>
<p>I would&#8217;ve love to see DC stay true to there &#8220;Action Heroes&#8221; and find writers that would make them shine instead of giving us &#8220;Replacement Characters&#8221;. Enough&#8217;s enough already. </p>
<p>On a positive note I like Cully&#8217;s art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bates</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461080</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461080</guid>
		<description>Is it my imagination, or does Professor Aristotle Rodor look like Denny O&#039;Neil?

I hope ALL of the Charlton characters get new lives, even if its by passing the torch. A new generation of &quot;Action Heroes&quot; in ongoing roles in the DCU is long overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it my imagination, or does Professor Aristotle Rodor look like Denny O&#8217;Neil?</p>
<p>I hope ALL of the Charlton characters get new lives, even if its by passing the torch. A new generation of &#8220;Action Heroes&#8221; in ongoing roles in the DCU is long overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461075</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461075</guid>
		<description>Captainzero, your prayers have been answered. Grant Morrison is doing a book about Earth-4, which is essentially the Charlton earth before it was bought by DC.

This way, we get to have our cake AND eat it too! Everyone wins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captainzero, your prayers have been answered. Grant Morrison is doing a book about Earth-4, which is essentially the Charlton earth before it was bought by DC.</p>
<p>This way, we get to have our cake AND eat it too! Everyone wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricopang</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461072</link>
		<dc:creator>ricopang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461072</guid>
		<description>They look great. I especially like the &quot;street-level&quot; turtle neck look. Has that modern day pulp hero look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look great. I especially like the &#8220;street-level&#8221; turtle neck look. Has that modern day pulp hero look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brame</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461069</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461069</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that DC is focusing on characters that were once great but because of a constant need for change in the modern medium is causing it to fall flat on it&#039;s face. This is horrible in my opinion(good design but I don&#039;t care about the character) and much like Dini&#039;s boring run on Detective, this has the smell of something that will not progress anything; not even sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that DC is focusing on characters that were once great but because of a constant need for change in the modern medium is causing it to fall flat on it&#8217;s face. This is horrible in my opinion(good design but I don&#8217;t care about the character) and much like Dini&#8217;s boring run on Detective, this has the smell of something that will not progress anything; not even sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akwasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461067</link>
		<dc:creator>akwasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461067</guid>
		<description>&quot;But nunchaku, no matter how effective, are quite a cliché.&quot;

Really? who else uses nun chaku, beyond donatello (i think)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But nunchaku, no matter how effective, are quite a cliché.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? who else uses nun chaku, beyond donatello (i think)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny-Two</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461065</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny-Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461065</guid>
		<description>I still feel this should be in it&#039;s own book and not Detective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still feel this should be in it&#8217;s own book and not Detective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captainzero</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/03/27/the-cully-hamner-question/comment-page-1/#comment-461062</link>
		<dc:creator>captainzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=11306#comment-461062</guid>
		<description>And have Cully do it!!  Geeesh!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And have Cully do it!!  Geeesh!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
