Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: It Came From the NYPL: Wild Worlds

It Came From the NYPL: Wild Worlds

March 11th, 2009
Author Michael C. Lorah

The Library is a great place for readers to discover comics, and it’s a great place for comics readers to check out things that they want to try without spending their hard-earned cash.  I’m looking at comics that I find in the New York Public Library system.

I have a few other NYPL articles in queue at the moment, but with this Watchmen film out (I haven’t seen it yet, so don’t ask what I thought) and the library having finally delivered a copy of this collection odds and ends from his Wildstorm stint in the late 90s, I thought I’m bump up this selection of less renowned Alan Moore comics.

One can only hope that fans of the Watchmen movie don’t find a copy of this book lying around their local library or bookstore. It’s simply not a good comic. Not good by any standard, but it’s particularly bad when you consider the name splashed across the top of the cover is the “greatest comics writer of all time.”

I like Alan Moore’s work a lot, and he’s typically worth the praise he receives, but the Spawn/WildC.A.T.S. crossover miniseries included in this book is practically a document of all the shortcomings of its era. The irony is that it’s everything Moore seems to hate about post-Watchmen superhero comics. Terrible, clichéd dialogue, abysmal art by Scott Clark, and a story with no worthwhile point at all. The entire plot seems to hinge on the thin, and short-of-brilliant, concept that by traveling into the token Sucky Future, the WildC.A.T.S. and Spawn are at a disadvantage facing the future (and evil) Spawn because – y’know, he remembers the battle from the perspective of his younger (not evil) self. It’s dreadfully thin stuff, and the ending comes from out of nowhere. Maybe regular Spawn readers found it compelling, but with nary a Spawn issue in my entire comics reading collection, I found it lacked set-up, emotional context or believability.  I can’t imagine any neophyte reader will feel any differently; there’s not a redeeming moment in the entire storyline.

There’s a Voodoo miniseries here, as well, that just lies there on the page, lifeless, pointless, utterly boring.  Moore seems to hint (very, very slightly) at certain mystical themes that he’d later explore in greater detail and to great effect in Promethea, but the Voodoo serial seems to exist largely for the sake of showing its protagonist’s pole dancing skills, literally.

Travis Charest does a superb job drawing a WildC.A.T.S. short story, one I suppose might’ve made some sense if I’d read Alan’s WildC.A.T.S. run. But I haven’t, so it didn’t. The Deathblow three-parter seems to function only as a loose framework on which Jim Baikie can draw pulp sci-fi imagery (the fun Baikie had is at least a minor virtue). The one-off Mr. Majestic story isn’t too bad, casting the hero as a wanderer and scientist at the end of time, traveling with the pitiful band of survivors still left to face the End of Everything. It’s sad, quiet and reflective, and has a bang of an ending, but it’s nothing essential and it’s certainly not worth paging through the rest of his drek to read.

So, Watchmen film fans, if you’re looking to explore the world of comics and you come across Wild Worlds at your local library, please find another place to start your searching.

 
3 Responses to “It Came From the NYPL: Wild Worlds”
  1. Jason Says:

    Worse is that the Chicago Tribune printed a list of “Five Other Alan Moore Classics” after a story about the author & watchmen. they included Wild Worlds instead of LoEG or V for Vendetta. Just broke my heart.

    They also included Miracleman, which is a classic, but they neglected to say that the book is epically out of print.

  2. D. Peace Says:

    Moore has said something along the lines of his wanting to see if he could incorporate his talents into the era’s Image zeitgeist. He saw the trend toward SPAWN and those books as a chance to see if he could communicate with the current generation on its own terms (I’m very loosely paraphrasing).

    The problem isn’t so much that Moore’s post-WATCHMEN superhero comics were terrible, it’s that the results were a bit mixed and this book just so happens to collect the miscellaneous detritus that wasn’t collected elsewhere.

    Although you’re probably not too interested at this point, VOODOO having so recently left a bad taste in your mouth, I do recommend Moore’s WildC.A.T.S. While it’s not as brilliant as WATCHMEN or V or SWAMP THING, it’s a really solid, well-written superhero story that gives more depth to Lee’s existing WildC.A.T.S team by incorporating social and political allegory. True, it’s not Shakespeare but it’s an entertaining and sometimes clever read that would have been a MUCH better choice than the reviewed “grab bag” book.

  3. Michael C Lorah Says:

    Jason, I hadn’t seen that article, but I looked it up just now and you are correct. In their very thin defense, the only story that they actually cite is the Mr. Majestic issue that was pretty decent. So if you’ll overlook the other 200 pages…. ;)

    D. Peace, the NYPL doesn’t have Complete WildCATS last I checked. I am curious about it (I have the Joe Casey trades, which is all the ‘Cats I’ve read), but not $30 curious.

Leave a Reply »