Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Is Marvel brewing a Dark Fantastic Four?

Is Marvel brewing a Dark Fantastic Four?

March 9th, 2009
Author David Pepose

This is pretty interesting — while it’s been reported that DC and Warner Bros. have been considering a darker take on its currently-defunct Superman film franchise, but now it seems as though Marvel is following suit.

IESB has announced that the “word around town” is that 20th Century Fox is looking at a darker, less “bubble gum” reboot for the Fantastic Four films. According to them:

The two films previously released never really caught on with the fans and the studio is reportedly looking to completely retool, recast and recrew the franchise. This means no Tim Story, no Iaon, no Julian (thank the maker, he never sat well with me as Dr. Doom), no Chris, no Chiklis and no Jessica.

Keep in mind the first film made $330 million over its run, while the second film petered out at $289 million. (This is just over a third of the total amount the first Spider-Man film’s $821 million, but surprisingly more than the first X-Men film, with only $296 million. Granted, that last movie came out in 2000.)

According to IESB, Daredevil may also receive a reboot — not particularly surprising, given the relative success of reboots like the Incredible Hulk, and considering Ol’ Hornhead was flat-tired with a $179 million payoff, and an underachieving $56 million spin-off starring his girlfriend.

56 Responses to “Is Marvel brewing a Dark Fantastic Four?”
  1. Ike Iszany Says:

    Hey! Maybe they’ll do a fourth re-launch of The Punisher too.

  2. Scott Iskow Says:

    Incredible Hulk was successful? I thought it made less money than the previous Hulk film.

  3. BSmithy Says:

    ok, this is hilarious. I didn’t like FF, but I’m not huge on the concept anyway. “Bubblegum” or “Iron Man” style is what this series should be. Dark FF?? My god.

    And I love how someone says that two films that made a combined $629 million dollars “never really caught on”.

    This sounds like the execs think there’s only ONE type of comic book movie, and are basing everything off the excellent Dark Knight. This sounds like the reason the Captain Marvel film is stalled. CM/Shazam! should be lighter, and someone out there in a position of power wants it to be dark.

  4. jason Says:

    it doesn’t have to be “dark”. it just has to be good.

  5. Scott Says:

    I found the FF movies fairly entertaining, but often frustrating. It’s like if they’d just made a few crucial changes, the movies could have been as popular and lauded as the first two Spider-Man movies and Iron Man. But they just strayed too far from the source material, especially visually — where was Kirby? Generally, the closer superhero movies stick to the classic comic version, the better they are and the better they do (of course there are exceptions to this “rule”). If you’re going to make changes, Hollywood, make sure your changes are clearly superior to the original idea.

    Cast-wise, I thought Evans and Chiklis were great. I like Gruffudd generally, but he just couldn’t carry the part. Alba’s a pretty girl, but just totally wrong for Sue. I’d have loved to have seen Charlize Theron in the role.

    I hope Marvel doesn’t go “dark” with a new FF, but rather goes “right” with it. Not all superheroes are Batman.

  6. Shawn Kane Says:

    I wouldn’t have a problem with a reboot of the FF and Daredevil but at the same time, I didn’t hate them. I think the FF miscast Reed, Sue, and Doom and I think that the Daredevil Director’s Cut makes it a better movie than it was at the theatre.

  7. Skrully Says:

    Does anyone remember when ALL the comics went “dark”? Everyone looked like Cable and for a year or so you could not tell the good guys from the bad guys? Iron Man was excellent but it wasn’t dark. DARK Knight, well it’s in the name. Watchmen…dark but well written by Alan Moore. Dark is a genre populated by good writing of a dark nature not just writing everyone as bitter and angry. Let’s put some effort into good writing and effectvie casting. Jessica Alba shouldbe naked on my bed not playing Sue Storm. Plus, in this economy, it’s dark enough.

  8. NeoSamurai Says:

    this is crazy. the movies were bad, but not reboot bad. Heck, all that really is needed is a good story to turn everything around. Heck, even a F4 vs. the Moleman might actually work out if the story is handled with care.

  9. Hourman1941 Says:

    I saw an early draft of the first FF script and it involved all of them being killed in the space station accident, and then brought back to life with powers. Hopefully this darker approach isn’t that old nightmare pulled out of the drawer.

  10. Shawn Kane Says:

    I actually quit reading comics when everything went dark. Every character has their niche but when the Punisher and Ghost Rider and Venom basically became “heroes” and events like Batman being replaced, Superman dying, Hal Jordan killing people, and Colossus betraying the X-Men, all the pouches and gritted teeth couldn’t bring me back. I hope thats not what the studios want to do with comic book movies. Of course, its just as bad if it goes the opposite way and gives us another Batman and Robin.

  11. David Pepose Says:

    @Scott Iskow: Incredible Hulk did marginally better in both box office earnings ($263 million versus Ang Lee’s $245 million) as well as critical acclaim (66% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes versus its predecessor’s 61%). It also synced up with the upcoming Avengers franchise with the Tony Stark cameo, hence the film being a “relative” success.

  12. Troy Brownfield Says:

    @Hourman1941

    Particularly since being killed and brought back with approximate elemental powers was the premise for “Elementals”. :D

  13. jsf Says:

    They should reboot both the Daredevil and Punisher franchises simultaneously by doing adopting the “Daredevil vs Punisher” tpb from a couple years back (the one by Lapham). Great story, which would be interesting on the big screen.

  14. Matthew Says:

    No sense in rebooting, really. We’re gonna get ANOTHER origin movie then? Why? Just make a third movie…leave Doom out of it, bring in another villain, recast Reed and Sue, keep Chiklis and Evans. Easy to do.

    I think the only movies under Marvel’s belt that would need a reboot would be Ghost Rider and Daredevil. GR wasn’t necessarily bad, but it would have been a lot better if someone other than Nic Cage was playing Johnny Blaze.

  15. D. Peace Says:

    They are very thoroughly missing the point. Much in the way the success of WATCHMEN and THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS in the comic book world lead to a slew of crappy imitation comics that copped a lame “edgier-than-thou” attitude, THE DARK KNIGHT will cause filmmakers to think that every comic book adaptation should feature those same tones.

    Darkness is innate to the modern version of Batman, so it made sense that THE DARK KNIGHT fit that mold. If, however, the shoe doesn’t fit then they’re going about it in the wrong way. The thing that truly made TDK work was that it was a well-written, well-directed and well-acted piece that remained true to the spirit of the character. SPIDER-MAN and IRON MAN were also well-written, well-directed and well-acted movies that remained true to the spirit of their respective characters and they weren’t “dark” at all. They also made a ton of money. The common thread among superhero movies that do well seems to be that they’re GOOD and not necessarily that they’re dark.

    Why don’t they try doing a FF movie with a half-decent script? That would be the best start.

  16. J.M. Giordano Says:

    If it’s darker, then all I can say is….SKRULLS!!!!!

  17. Mechagamera Says:

    Imagine FF directed by Quentin Tarintino.

    Reed Richards, a scientist with an expanding braing and an expanding foot (to put up your #$%)

    Ben Grimm, his body may be rock, but his guns shoot METAL bullets

    Susan Storm, invisible stripper with a heart of gold

    Johnny Storm, race car driver who leaves his rivals in a fire ball of doom.

    Guess stars Samuel L Jackson as the Silver Surfer.

    Okay, that is the best possible “dark” FF, and it sounds terrible.

  18. CameronBrown Says:

    Dark is not the way to go with the FF. I remember reading way back that the original director attached to Fantastic Four was planning on a complete retro 60’s look for the film–setting it in the same era that the FF debuted in comics. THAT I would love to see!

  19. Tom Says:

    ugh, just make another one and make it good. evans and chiklis are great, the guy who plays reed is fine. doom and alba are very poorly cast but i can live with it if the films are well done, just as everyone did with mrs. cruise in batman begins.

    i agree with everyone on here, dark does not equal good or even successful, see daredevil, ghost rider, punisher and the other flops everyone here is mentioning. FF should be in the vein of iron man. maybe if they spent some money on a director who’s most notable film ins’t barber shop…

    the same goes for superman. dont make it dark, make it not suck.

    what are they going to say when watchmen peters out at 250? “dark doesnt work anymore, lets move on to teen melodrama, i remember that titanic film made some money”

  20. Tom Hunter Says:

    My take on this?

    I saw the first FF movie and wasn’t impressed at all. The Thing-suit wasn’t much better than Howard the Duck’s costume. The writing was tepid.

    I layed down good cash for the second movie hoping that the Silver Surfer intro would help. It didn’t.

    I don’t see a problem with re-booting the film franchise.

    Can I make a suggestion?

    Can we adapt some material from John Byrne’s run? His work on the F4 was some of the best F4 material in some time. It stands among fans as work that is re-read and enjoyed.

    THAT is were they should look for material to reboot.

  21. Mega Gear X Says:

    How do you make a dark FF? Make it deadly serious? No Johnny and Ben playing around? Everyone wearing black leather?

  22. Michael Says:

    These just prove my point NOT EVERYTHING WORKS ON THE SLIVER SCREEN why do you think the dark knight failed because Batman not a realistic character and Joker does not what to have sex with batman.

    Just stick to making animation movie those are the only way to do these character right

  23. Jack Reichert Says:

    Marvel take note of what they just accomplished with Dr. Manhattan and motion capture the Thing. Chiklis in a rubber suit was shorter than Jessica Alba. I couldn’t believe Tim Story was so lazy he couldn’t even fake it with camera angles ala the Hobbits in LOTR.

  24. Gawain Says:

    One of the best things they did with the recent Hulk reboot was to just gloss over the origin in the opening credits. They basically said, “Look, you know where we’re going with this, let’s just get on with it.”

    If they do reboot the FF, they should do much the same thing and not bog down the whole movie with yet another retelling/retooling of the origin… “These four people went to space, got irradiated, now they have strange powers… aaaand GO!”

    But the FF are first and foremost a family of adventurers and explorers. The tone should reflect that. It should be grand adventure in the tradition of the old Republic serials, fun and dangerous in equal measure, but on a cosmic scale. If they can’t figure out a way to do that, they’re better off leaving it alone.

  25. Lupek Says:

    Does “less bubblegum” necessarily mean dark?

    I am glad they are rebooting the franchise because those two films sucked Hulk Hogans ass.

  26. LikeAPhoenix Says:

    YES, PLEASE DO! The first two movies are atrocious!

    Here are a few suggestions: Get a “bigger” actor to play the Thing, a more talented actress to play Sue, a more appealing actor to play Reed. But keep Chris Evans as the Human Torch. He’s perfect in the role and not to mention that he’s damn HOT!!! Flame on, hottie!!!

  27. R2-C2 Says:

    Is a reboot necessary? I was entertained by the 2 FF movies. My problems were with Jessica Alba and elements from the 2nd movie. While hot, Jessica Alba just never worked for me even with colored contact lenses. I thought Maggie Grace (LOST) should have played Sue. Ioan Gruffold and Julian McMahon were ok. Chris Evans and Michael Chiklis were good IMHO.

    The things I disliked with the 2nd movie. I would not have used Dr. Doom and I would have completely showed Galactus.

    Just recast a little and try again with FF III.

  28. LikeAPhoenix Says:

    … Also, have Sue start out as the Invisible Girl, but have her earn the Invisible Woman name by putting her through the ringer, just what John Byrne did in the comics. This progression should take time, possible have her change her name to the Invisible Woman by the second or preferrably third installment. ‘NUF SAID!!!

  29. Shawn Kane Says:

    They made Reed a bumbling genius. You didn’t get the feeling that he was the leader of the Fantastic Four. Making Sue a scientist defeated the purpose of Reed as the brains of the group.

  30. Alex Holt Says:

    Chilkis was great, and Evans, though incredibly irritating was at least accurate. As far as Doom, Reed and Sue went they just didn’t have the presence… Doom particularly just seemed slimy rather than imposing.

  31. Mega Gear X Says:

    @Shawn Kane
    I think they got that idea from Warren Ellis and Mark Millar’s Ultimate FF.

    @Jack Reichert
    Peter Jackson and Zack Snyder aren’t normal directors, or else every director would have similar attention to detail. Those two were driven to make those movies right, to everyone else, it’s a paycheck.

  32. villainous Says:

    I was very disappointed by the FF films. To me an FF movie is a chance to pull out out a lot of great Jack Kirby stuff and put it on the big screen. I mean who wouldn’t want to see the real Galactus or the Inhumans or a trip to Wakanda. All that stuff came out of the FF comic, so it should be the best superhero film out there.

  33. Darrell Says:

    @ jsf

    I agree that a Daredevil vs Punisher movie would have been a great way to reboot both movies.

  34. Alexa Says:

    Um, the first two FF films weren’t terrible. They weren’t, well, fantastic, but you don’t need anything more than a soft reboot to make them better. Recast Sue, and maybe Reed too. Keep Evans and Chiklis– they’re great as Johnny and Ben. Don’t make them “dark”, just make them REAL. Aim for “The Incredibles” not “The Dark Knight”

  35. Jack Kirby Says:

    The good Fantastic Four movie has already been done. It’s called “The Incredibles”.

  36. TedKordLives Says:

    I don’t think it’ll be “darker,” just less goofy.

    I want a more sci-fi type of film, and less “Woopsy, Sue took off her clothes but she’s not really invisible!” moments. Keep Johnny and Ben picking on each other, but make Sue more emotionally viable. Also, less of Reed as an insufferable nerd and more of Reed as a driven autocrat. I never saw him as the kind of socially awkward poindexter the first two movies made him out to be, but more like a guy who knows how to act with people, he’s just too wrapped up in his own bullcrap to care. The kind of guy whose brain moves so much faster than everyone else that he assumes he already had a conversation that didn’t really take place.

    I always kind of saw George Clooney in the Mr. Fantastic role. He’s got that salt and pepper hair.

  37. Mega Gear X Says:

    Yes, but The Incredibles isn’t the Fantastic Four itself. That’s like the imitation or homage beating the actual source material, although it can happen.

    You gotta imagine how that looks.

  38. Uncle Jawa Says:

    The report doesn’t actually say they are going to make a “dark” FF. It says “darker”, as in darker than the previous FF movies. Why automatically assume that means it’s gonna be WATCHMEN? I think what they mean is (and this is actually stated in the report…people would see it if they bothered to take the time to look, instead of just making assumptions) they want to go with a tone that matches up more with IRON MAN. IRON MAN was certainly not a “dark” movie. It was just mature. It was also a lot of fun at the same time. I don’t think it would be hard to tell an FF story in that vein. They do it in the comics all the time. The John Byrne run, for example, was certainly a lot of fun but it also had a very serious tone in the majority of the stories.

    Personally, I liked the two FF movies, but even I agree they didn’t catch on with audiences like they should have and Fox/Marvel should go back to the drawing board.

  39. Pauul Says:

    No way should they reboot the Fantastic Four. Yeah, Daredevil needs a reboot but redoing the FF would be taking a giant step backwards when what the frachise needs is to move forwards. The cast works, and yeah, Doom is portrayed in completely the wrong way but this is down to the story most of all. I mean, the Fantastic Four are meant to be “bubblegum”. The thing the previous movies have gotten wrong is that they’ve made the villains “bubblegum” too. What they need to do is bring in a new villain or reinvent Doom (yeah, reinvent, not reboot). The first two movies weren’t great but they still create a good platform for a fantastic sequel. They just need to get the story and the writing right.

  40. Bryan Says:

    They really don’t have to make FF dark. I didn’t like Alba, and Julian in their roles, but this doesn’t need to be darker. It just needs to be good. The FF movies were like a bad comic with good art. a lot of stuff looked right(except for DOOM, and Galactus) but the writing wasn’t there. I hope they don’t make more movies so Marvel can get the rights back. it kinda sucks now that marvel has their own studio they don’t have the rights to X-men, FF, and Daredevil or Spider-man(Sony). the best thing that could work for reboots is if FOX works with Marvel Studios but that will never never happen. you know why? Cause if they worked with Marvel studios they wouldn’t get 100% of the profits and thats what making these movies are really about. the studios want everything to be “dark” now cause TDK was “dark” and it made money. news flash TDK didn’t make money cause it was “dark” it made money cause it was good. did FOX go for the “bubble gum” approach with FF cause Spider-man was kinda “bubble gum”? and thats the problem you can’t base the tone of your movie off of another successful movie in the same genre. FF doesn’t need a dark reboot it needs to be its own movie and stand out to be successful, that is what Spider-man did, that is what TDK did, thats what Incredible Hulk did, and Iron Man did, but it sounds like FOX just wants to make a copy cat again. FOX thinks with their wallets, yet they can’t figure out that making copy cat movies hurts their wallets far more that an actual vision to bring the comics to life on film.
    I hope if they do reboot FF they don’t make it “dark” they just make it good. for some reason “dark” is the new Super-Hero Movie buzzword lets stop using that and use the word ORIGINAL cause thats what studios should being looking for not DARK. But Studios will never listen to fans. Why do you think all the Punisher movies have come out so bad. Punisher is a laughing stock of Super Hero movies and its not the characters fault. There aren’t bad characters just bad movies. I just hope we can get good movies in the future for all comic properties so everyone wins. I’d take good over dark any day.

  41. Zenstrive Says:

    I think this is hollywood way of saying “we are greedy and we have run out of ideas”

  42. silvanthalas Says:

    Sounds like Fox is actually serious about hanging on to the rights to both - iirc, they need to do something with the FF and DD rights now and then to keep them, or they revert back to Marvel.

  43. Scott Says:

    Hollywood could do a lot worse than read through this thread. Some good and accurate comments about the FF movies and their shortcomings. The movies weren’t total train wrecks, but with more Kirby-esque visuals, a clever plot, better dialog, genuinely funny humor (first movie’s jokes mostly worked, second movie’s jokes mostly failed), some recasting, and a better director, they could have a viable franchise on their hands.

    However, I’m not sure Daredevil could ever be huge at the box office. As much as I like the character and have enjoyed the comic at different times over the years — and think that the movie was mostly good, he’s just not that mainstream a character. He’s the kind of character who could work perfectly in a TV series format, though.

  44. satrunmda Says:

    i think that Hollywood has forgotten the market of post-theatre. I run a movie rental place and FF does relatively well renting, especially the pre-teen/family crowds that want superhero movies that aren’t always dark and scary for the 6-12 year olds. And on a sidenote, the straight-to dvd/blurays of such recent films as HUlk vs. , Next Avengers, and now Wonder Woman are renting and selling well here. Not everything has to be box office or dark to make $

  45. Scott Says:

    Good point, satrunmda. I had wondered if maybe the studios weren’t keen on the FF movies BECAUSE of low DVD sales and rentals.

  46. James Faye Says:

    Ok, the Fantastic Four movies should be rebooted, but not right now. I’m thinking 2014 or something. That way, there would be a lot of time to write a new script and make it work, like the Dark Knight, just not dark at all. I liked the fact that the Fantastic Four was a happy family, but it was a little TOO happy for me.

    It think Evans should stay and they should keep Chikalis as a voice for a CGI Ben Grimm, because a costume doesn’t cut it. Now Dr. Doom, Sue and Reed should all be recast. Sue was acting like a dumb blonde, Reed wasn’t the way he’s supposed to be, and Dr. Doom wasn’t really evil enough. It hink the Mole Man or Annihilus should be in the next movie.

  47. Morrison Says:

    @ David Pepose

    I get mild amusement out of the Incredible Hulk spin… The ‘reboot’ (with a bigger budget by $17 million) made $2.5 million more at the box office. When you adjust for inflation, Hulk out-grossed Incredible Hulk by $23 million. I love that one is a “failure” and one is a “modest success”

    That’s FoxNews/MSNBC type spin….

  48. Rob Says:

    The FF are my favorite superheroes next to Spider-Man, and I’ve refused to see either the FF film or its sequel, as I could already tell they just didn’t get it. And now they need to go dark? They still don’t get it.

  49. David Pepose Says:

    @Morrison

    That’s a good point with the inflation, which I hadn’t considered. But that said, keep in mind that Incredible Hulk came out right as the recession was beginning to hit, and Hulk was out during the comparatively calmer days of 2003. It’s also outgrossed its predecessor in terms of total film gross (that’s including DVD sales), by about a $43 million margin.

    But as I wrote before, the other important element is that critical acclaim was 5 percent better, AND it fit into the new Avengers franchise, which serves Marvel and the general public a lot better than the C-rated Ang Lee film. In other words, this is a franchise that can now potentially grow exponentially as Avengers fever builds up.

    Finally, there’s just the matter of expectation. Ang Lee was a superstar, and was expected to bring out the next Gladiator-level action flick. It obviously didn’t make that bar, whereas Incredible Hulk did pretty much exactly what Marvel wanted it to do — make money and drum up support for more Avengers flicks. Hence me calling it a “relative” success.

  50. akwasi Says:

    ^ but I don’t think the reboot was any more successful than a sequel would have been.

  51. Shawn Kane Says:

    I would actually like to see the rights revert back to Marvel. Same goes for the X-Men franchise.

  52. Shaun Says:

    @ David & Scott Iskow: Does anyone know how 2008’s Hulk movie did on DVD? I have no idea, though I number of people (myself included) who own the new one on DVD but satyed far, far away from Ang Lee’s film. Given the somewhat higher acclaim for the newer film, I wouldn’t be shocked if 2008’s Hulk was a bigger success on DVD.

    Actually, the fact that the 2008 movie did as well as it did given a VERY crowded field of competition last summer (Ang Lee’s film didn’t have stiff competition like Iron Man, Indy Jones, Hancock, Wall*E and Dark Knight, and more to go against, did it?), not to mention the stigma of the Lee movie, is probably enough to call it a success. I’ve talked to people who thought it was a sequel and didn’t go because they “didn’t like the first one.”

  53. Shaun Says:

    @ David: I still think the whole “taking Superman darker” claim is being misrepresented… As I recall that original report, the word was that WB wanted to reboot the Superman franchise and the source was also quoted as saying that they were looking at other DC properties and treating them dark “as the characters allow it.”

    That’s NOT the same thing as saying “We’re doing a dark Superman.” It may not have meant Superman at all. It probably meant not doing stupid ideas like a Green Lantern comedy starring Jack Black, or George Miller’s “JLA 90210″ project. Or, at the very least, it might just mean that WB wants to take Superman a bit more seriously next time, and not do a silly Luthor who’s still trying to pull off real estate scams.

    Of course, one could argue that Superman Returns really was, in fact, a dark Superman. The movie was absolutely joyless, and the hero was dour, sulking, and all abosorbed in self-pity while stalking his ex-girlfriend. The girlfriend he left afer impregnating her (he should’ve known it was a possibility) that is… And after promising the president of the U.S. he’d never leave again (end of Superman II).

  54. AAB Says:

    The last two FF movies were CHEESE, big time (although the banter between Johnny and Ben about Ben and his girlfriend was funny and an over due topic to be humorouly brought into the light) -BUT! Now we have another generation of kids who know who they are. Kids fifteen years from now who will see the comics I want to sell and, thanks to these films, be able to recognize these characters. The movies help new generations know who these character-based assets are and see a security in their investment thanks to consistent reinvestment in modern entertainment, like video games and movies.

    Reed Richards is like a combination of Harrison Ford’s Fugitive movie’s ultra resourceful and gracefully dignified Dr. Campbell -as a good side, and the self consuming scientist Tyrell from Blade Runner -as a bad side… (Huh, two Ford movie references… any way) Center on a couple of character’s development in each movie, like Reed and Sue say in the first, and leave the other characters as a subplot to be developed in following movies. You have Morrison’s “1234″ which has phenomenal artwork drawn by Lee. “1234″ would tell the story of Marvel’s first fam as a drama amidst sci-fi fantasy adventure. There are NOT too many major characters in this story, and Hollywood should make “1234″ a movie, and it will NOT be disorienting with Namor and Doom, as well as the meditation chamber for Reed -which is the SCI-FI that no other Marvel characters can be used for (Arad: -mutants are NOT sci-fi, they are an excuse to make random and different types of super-powered characters w/out having to think about a new and insightful origin story for a new character-based asset.)

    If audiences can take on a movie like Watchmen ***with characters a non-graphic novel reader will recognize*** then the world can enjoy a high tech drama about Marvel’s first fam, like the graphic novel “1234″.

    Jessica Alba would have made a great ORIGINAL Sue Storm. The reality is, if a woman is as good looking as Sue Storm, she does NOT end up a scientist, she marrys a soon to be rich one, like Reed. ‘Modernizing’ the only female character into a scientist was superficially PC. “Confessions of a Shopacholic” and “The Devil Wears Prada” -look at all of the best actress movies for this year’s Oscars -how many of them had this Marvel version of a ‘modern’ scientist factor tooled in a lead femail role? Sorry folks, but there is no way you can tell me that real life would have it any other way, regardless of the far and few between exceptions. Sue compensates for Reed’s lack of grounded common sense, and this can break down when there is too much of Reed’s selfish devotion to his work at the expense of his family. Everybody has a breaking point, and the dynamic between Sue and Reed is a great drama that can explore this breaking point while set in a sci-fi adventure with Ben and Johnny backing up the action. And throw in Reeds meditation chamber and Namor and Doom from “1234″, and you’ve got entertainment.

  55. Shaun Says:

    >Michael Says:

    >These just prove my point NOT EVERYTHING WORKS ON THE SLIVER >SCREEN why do you think the dark knight failed because Batman >not a realistic character and Joker does not what to have sex >with batman.

    >Just stick to making animation movie those are the only way to >do these character right

    Umm… Michael… What the hell are you talking about??

    First, are you honestly saying TDK wasn’t successful? OK, only the second highest grossing film in U.S. history, and easily last year’s biggest film worldwide not to mention a ton of sales on DVD and also one of last year’s most highly acclaimed films (94% on Rotten Tomatoes, the film made most critics “Best of ‘08″ lists, and there’s the matter of an Oscar win for Best Supporting Actor). Sounds to me like Batman’s doing just fine on film, and better than he’s fared in animation recently.

    Second, what film you were watching where Joker wanted (or is that “whated”?) to have sex with Batman?

  56. Ill Diablo Says:

    Um, perhaps it’s just me, but these reboots done but a few scant years after the original attempt tanked don’t seem to be actually catching on either, eh?

    Give the reboots a rest for a while longer, Hollywood, until the bad taste of the previous movies’ bile has stopped lingering in the average moviegoers’ collective psyche. Sure, the fanboys will go to any old movie with their favorite spandex-clad character running about, but I’d think by now there’d be an understanding that fanboys alone DO NOT EQUAL MASSIVE PROFITS. Creating a good film that EVERYONE wants to see that still remains true to the fans (Iron Man, Spidey 2, Dark Knight) is what earns profit dollars, not hasty slapdash attempts to ride on the coattails of someone else’s creative endeavor (Daredevil, FF).

    Or in other words, quit putting quality properties in the hands of hacks who have no regard for the content!!!

Leave a Reply »

var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));