by Bon Alimagno
Several years ago I was talking with an acquaintance that used to work with Wizard. He told me this story of someone who waited for hours outside of a WizardWorld Philly show so that he could be the first one inside. As soon as the doors opened he made his way to the Wizard booth – not to see what they had to offer, but to complain. He had received a premium comic through a mail-order special offer and he thought it was damaged. The staple that bound the comic’s extra thick plastic cover to its guts warped the plastic around the staple far more than he wanted and he thought it damaged the comic’s value.
What struck me immediately about that story was that someone had generated the emotion necessary to take time out of his life and complain about the positioning of a staple. It didn’t matter whether the writer had sacrificed his nights and weekends to work on the issue’s script. It didn’t matter whether the artists canceled vacation time with their families to get the book done on time. It didn’t matter whether the colorist had discovered a better way to make a character pop against a busy background, or a letterer had just crafted an exciting new typeface. All that mattered was a staple. It’s sad how much care and attention is paid to the maintenance of paper and staples instead of the living, breathing people who give all that paper and all those staples meaning.
Are we in the collectibles business or are we in the publishing business? I ask this because most people who frequent comic book shops would never give it a second thought: comics is a publishing industry. They are wrong. In the publishing business you wouldn’t have had the situation that we had this past week with the Barack Obama variant of Amazing Spider-Man where it wasn’t even available to many retailers. Two weeks ago in the last Ignition column I called for the killing of the monthly comic as an option for new publishers, primarily because sales inevitably fell by about 10% an issue. One of the ways existing publishers prevent that is incentives like the Obama variant cover: maintain your sales instead of letting them erode. Then get the opportunity to order a comic that you can sell for many times above face value, even if you had to eat other regular editions you never would’ve ordered in the first place. For some retailers this may have looked like a punishment for doing what they have always done, letting sales erode at their natural pace, a pace that years of evidence have proven appropriate. For others it was a reward for bucking the trend. Really though it was business, it was what Marvel had to do, especially for a book that shipped weekly, the sales of which would be expected to erode at a faster rate than a regular monthly.
If this were the publishing business, the industry would’ve done everything it could to see that supply for the Obama comic met demand instead of creating a situation where it became, yes, a collectible. Thing is the stores able to receive it I’m sure were especially grateful for it.
Many comic store goers don’t realize how much of a store’s profit comes from comics such as these, ones that manage to exceed cover value by any amount at all, for any reason whatsoever. In an industry where profit margins are often so thin you often need an electron microscope to find them, books like the Obama variant are a gift. Of course it shouldn’t be this way, yet it is.
Many smaller, so called “independent” publishers can’t really compete with a system like this. Why would a retailer order their book when they could order one that could appreciate in value, when collectibility trumps quality? What does it matter how good the story or the art is if just the mere presence of a famous figure on a cover generates so much more buzz regardless of the comic’s content?
That is the real goal of any collectible incentive comic: to not just make one seem collectible but give the illusion that an entire series, maybe even an entire line has attained a level of collectibility desirable to your local comic book shop. This kind of buzz acts as a brake against the natural erosion of a monthly series’ sales. It may even make some stores consider upping their order to take advantage of the added buzz. (You may be tired to seeing all the press releases about comic books selling out, but until those stop generating the desired buzz and the afterglow of collectibility they’ll continue.)
What has this done to the medium though? Does it encourage innovation, spur creativity? Or does this force some publishers to surrender quality in favor of gimmicks and shortcuts that stir up buzz? What stories, what wonders have been sacrificed on the altar of collectibility?
Till next time…
Bon Alimagno is Director - Publishing & Editorial for Harris Comics, publishers of Vampirella.
January 20th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
In the publishing industry, when demand outstrips supply, what they do is go back to press for additional printings… which is what Marvel is doing with the Spider-Man issue.
January 20th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
The second and third printings will have nowhere near the value of the first.
Whether demand outstripped supply did not matter in regards to the Obama comic since many retailers could not even get it for reasons that had nothing to do with supply.
January 20th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Yeah, Nat, but the real “collectible” here is the first printing of course. What Troy’s saying is that if the industry wasn’t so geared towards the collectible mentality, there would’ve been a lot more first printings out there, printings that pretty much everyone could’ve gotten last Wednesday.
My LCS (which has four locations) never had it at all, supposedly. I wasn’t really interested anyhow, not because I don’t like Obama (I voted for him), but because I saw it as a fun, but ultimately crass marketing ploy by Marvel. Not to mention I swore off Spidey after OMD and I’m sticking to it. Not to mention it was only a 5-page bonus story featuring Obama.
If you really just want the book that badly, what printing it is shouldn’t matter. But that doesn’t dismiss the fact that Marvel chose to do this initial printing in really limited quantities that were hard to get, and that in turn will drive up demand for that second (and perhaps third?) printing.
Look at it this way… Could you imagine Scholastic having limited copies of the final Harry Potter book to a mere fraction of what they actually printed, and pulling a similar stunt as Marvel? Of course not.
January 21st, 2009 at 12:46 pm
Interesting article. not to be contraversial but isn’t Harris/Vampirella a publisher that caters to the collectors? Back in the day a buddy of mine as a member of the scarlet legion. I don’t point that out like a bad thing, i just don’t think there’s anything wrong with collecting part of comics
January 21st, 2009 at 2:14 pm
They used to cater like crazy back in the 90’s. I found this out when a comic shop employee got hollered at for selling me a copy of Vengeance of Vampirella #1 at cover price…apparently the color of the “blood” on the cover enhancement determined its collectibility.
January 21st, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Yes we do. In fact that’s how we continue to stay in business, with our collectibles. I wrote this piece because the necessity to create collectibles is not something I’m particularly proud of, but it’s something we have to continue to do. It’s the hand that we have been dealt and we’re forced to play it that way. I just wish it was otherwise and we could afford to only do one cover per comic book. Part of my motivation about writing these pieces is to point out that we all prisoners of a system that frankly dulls creativity and encourages things like “blood” cover variants.
January 21st, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Hey in fairness I thought the blood enhancement was cool. It was just bizarre to me that the color somehow determined the value.