<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Columbia, Emmerich Get Asimov&#8217;s Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stych</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-744198</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-744198</guid>
		<description>Hi there,  You&#039;ve done an excellent job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they&#039;ll be benefited from this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,  You&#8217;ve done an excellent job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they&#8217;ll be benefited from this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foundation movie FAN !!</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-481436</link>
		<dc:creator>Foundation movie FAN !!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-481436</guid>
		<description>@all,

Robert Rodat has been selected by Emmerich to write a coherent screenable story on the main Foundation trilogy material.

This choice might be good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@all,</p>
<p>Robert Rodat has been selected by Emmerich to write a coherent screenable story on the main Foundation trilogy material.</p>
<p>This choice might be good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457500</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457500</guid>
		<description>Actually, while I believe strongly in the &quot;movies can&#039;t ruin a book, there it is on the shelf&quot;* idea, Alan Moore is NOT always saying it. In fact, I remember being (unusually for me) kind of annoyed with him a couple of years back for arguing against the idea and claiming that crappy movies had a true negative impact on his work. 

*My earlier post was what&#039;s known to Earth humans as a &quot;joke.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, while I believe strongly in the &#8220;movies can&#8217;t ruin a book, there it is on the shelf&#8221;* idea, Alan Moore is NOT always saying it. In fact, I remember being (unusually for me) kind of annoyed with him a couple of years back for arguing against the idea and claiming that crappy movies had a true negative impact on his work. </p>
<p>*My earlier post was what&#8217;s known to Earth humans as a &#8220;joke.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457494</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457494</guid>
		<description>Kimota94 said: &quot;As Alan Moore always points out: TV and movie adaptations don’t affect the original source material in the least. They’re all still right there, on your bookshelf, untainted by the fact that some moron tried to adapt them into another medium and failed spectacularly.&quot;

Philip Pullman said the same thing when people asked him about the adaptation of The Golden Compass before it came out. That film had its moments, and the casting was top-notch, but for the most part it was a colossal disappointment (changing the ending sure didn&#039;t help). That&#039;s OK though, because I&#039;ll have the books to go back to. Same thing if Foundation doesn&#039;t work out. 

&quot;...then the only result that’s at all interesting is the rare case where the other version works out (like, say, Frank Miller’s 300).&quot;

Or Moore&#039;s own V For Vendetta, for instance, which was great. I think Watchmen might turn out to be really good too (even if we won&#039;t get everything that was in the book).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimota94 said: &#8220;As Alan Moore always points out: TV and movie adaptations don’t affect the original source material in the least. They’re all still right there, on your bookshelf, untainted by the fact that some moron tried to adapt them into another medium and failed spectacularly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Philip Pullman said the same thing when people asked him about the adaptation of The Golden Compass before it came out. That film had its moments, and the casting was top-notch, but for the most part it was a colossal disappointment (changing the ending sure didn&#8217;t help). That&#8217;s OK though, because I&#8217;ll have the books to go back to. Same thing if Foundation doesn&#8217;t work out. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;then the only result that’s at all interesting is the rare case where the other version works out (like, say, Frank Miller’s 300).&#8221;</p>
<p>Or Moore&#8217;s own V For Vendetta, for instance, which was great. I think Watchmen might turn out to be really good too (even if we won&#8217;t get everything that was in the book).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimota94</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457484</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimota94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457484</guid>
		<description>As Alan Moore always points out: TV and movie adaptations don&#039;t affect the original source material in the least.  They&#039;re all still right there, on your bookshelf, untainted by the fact that some moron tried to adapt them into another medium and failed spectacularly.

So look at it this way: It&#039;s a crap shoot as to whether an adaptation of your favourite book or comic will be any good, with the odds generally being against that outcome.  But since it&#039;s a non-losing proposition - you still get to keep enjoying your beloved story in its original form - then the only result that&#039;s at all interesting is the rare case where the other version works out (like, say, Frank Miller&#039;s 300).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Alan Moore always points out: TV and movie adaptations don&#8217;t affect the original source material in the least.  They&#8217;re all still right there, on your bookshelf, untainted by the fact that some moron tried to adapt them into another medium and failed spectacularly.</p>
<p>So look at it this way: It&#8217;s a crap shoot as to whether an adaptation of your favourite book or comic will be any good, with the odds generally being against that outcome.  But since it&#8217;s a non-losing proposition &#8211; you still get to keep enjoying your beloved story in its original form &#8211; then the only result that&#8217;s at all interesting is the rare case where the other version works out (like, say, Frank Miller&#8217;s 300).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457447</guid>
		<description>The Onion&#039;s AV Club had the perfect headline for this story with &quot;Director lined up to ruin Asimov&#039;s Foundation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Onion&#8217;s AV Club had the perfect headline for this story with &#8220;Director lined up to ruin Asimov&#8217;s Foundation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbrady</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457444</link>
		<dc:creator>mbrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457444</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;I have this strange feeling of dread similar to what some Watchmen fans are feeling about that movie. I question whether Foundation will really work as film.&lt;&lt;

I almost put a line in the report about how this, like Watchmen, is seen as some by being &quot;unfilmable.&quot; I LOVE the Foundation series with an unholy passion, but it&#039;s not because I close my eyes and can see giant action set pieces in my head (that&#039;s John Scalzi&#039;s stuff) - it&#039;s because of the richness of the world and the story. 

So - I&#039;m optimistic, but I&#039;m always optimistic about stuff like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>I have this strange feeling of dread similar to what some Watchmen fans are feeling about that movie. I question whether Foundation will really work as film.<<</p>
<p>I almost put a line in the report about how this, like Watchmen, is seen as some by being &#8220;unfilmable.&#8221; I LOVE the Foundation series with an unholy passion, but it&#8217;s not because I close my eyes and can see giant action set pieces in my head (that&#8217;s John Scalzi&#8217;s stuff) &#8211; it&#8217;s because of the richness of the world and the story. </p>
<p>So &#8211; I&#8217;m optimistic, but I&#8217;m always optimistic about stuff like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Spock</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2009/01/18/columbia-emmerich-get-asimovs-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-457443</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Spock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10688#comment-457443</guid>
		<description>Well... A least goddamned FOX didn&#039;t get their grubby paws on this one. Yeah Rothman, I&#039;m looking at you. Idiot. Funny though, that WB thought they&#039;d be able let it go, then swoop it back up without having to pay FOX for their troubles. Once again, WB drops the ball.

Anyhow, I know little about Emmerich outside of the Stargate film. I didn&#039;t care for that one, so it doesn&#039;t fill me with much hope, but who can say? I certainly hope any adaptation(s) of Foundation turn out better than I, Robot did.

I have this strange feeling of dread similar to what some Watchmen fans are feeling about that movie. I question whether Foundation will really work as film. Either way, it won&#039;t affect the books though. They&#039;ll still be the classics they are, regardless of how a movie fares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; A least goddamned FOX didn&#8217;t get their grubby paws on this one. Yeah Rothman, I&#8217;m looking at you. Idiot. Funny though, that WB thought they&#8217;d be able let it go, then swoop it back up without having to pay FOX for their troubles. Once again, WB drops the ball.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I know little about Emmerich outside of the Stargate film. I didn&#8217;t care for that one, so it doesn&#8217;t fill me with much hope, but who can say? I certainly hope any adaptation(s) of Foundation turn out better than I, Robot did.</p>
<p>I have this strange feeling of dread similar to what some Watchmen fans are feeling about that movie. I question whether Foundation will really work as film. Either way, it won&#8217;t affect the books though. They&#8217;ll still be the classics they are, regardless of how a movie fares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
