by Chris Ryall
In my first blog here, I talked about our reasons for relaunching G.I. JOE after being awarded the franchise. Spent nearly 900 words explaining our sound rationale, our respectful feelings toward the fans and toward the comics that had come before, our well-reasoned plan for how to best ensure the comics’ survival in the 21st century…
…and after all that, some of the responses smacked me upside my rational, well-reasoned head.
“Personally I felt the decision to reboot was a lazy, easy way out for IDW.”
“The Reboot is a very cheap cop-out.”
“Is IDW too lazy to create new characters and actually develop old ones that they need to go back to the status quo from the 80s? If you’re that desperate, go on a fanfiction site, but seriously character need to change and develop. Did Tolkien reboot Frodo? Was James Bond rebooted so the 20 movies were non canon?”
Things went onward, or maybe downward, from there, although I’m now intrigued by the idea of seeing Millar and Hitch’s Ultimate Frodo.
I mulled over responding to these complaints, where I could offer up more sound rationale and explanations and win over the accusatory and disgruntled one response at a time. And then I got my wits about me and decided that was a terrible plan. This is the Internet, and I’m no novice to this, having survived the Great (well, Pretty Solid, anyway, according to most) Transformers Relaunch of 2005. And defending too vehemently just makes one come off, well, defensive. So instead, I’ll admit I respectfully (but vehemently) disagree with the sentiments, as there is nothing cheap at all about our approach to the new titles, and I’ll let the relaunch – starting with this week’s G.I. JOE #1 – stand on its own and let the curious decide for themselves after they see where were headed with the books.
So all of that aside, we’re back live this week with JOE #1, which is really only scratching the surface-to-air of what we have planned. I left off last time with a promise to look at new Senior Editor Andy Schmidt’s overall plan for launching the comics, so let’s do it.
Andy hired on last summer, having spent his prior year since leaving Marvel evidently missing deadline crunches and getting tired of having ample time to write and run his Comics Experience classes and be with his family. He came in and was immediately thrown into a brand-new property that needed a big plan if we were going to make a relaunch work at least as well as the idea of Tolkien rebooting Frodo.
Andy scrambled, and I’ll admit we were all helped by a couple of factors: one was Larry Hama’s willingness to jump back into Joe since we offered him a chance to not just hit the ground without restraint but to start over in whatever way he wanted. I met up with Larry and Andy in New York and we talked about JOE, and Larry’s feelings for the property and what he would do if given a blank slate.
Larry admitted that he sort of “Stan Lee’d” the book at the start, making things up as he went along. And as he worked on the series for years and became a better writer and had time to think about the characters more and more, there were naturally things he would’ve changed about his earlier issues. And now he had that chance, to sort of go back and change/tweak/revise as he’d always wanted to. Which is a nice feeling to be able to offer someone, and a rare feeling, too – how many guys get a chance at a do-over at something that was pretty damned solid in the first place?
So Larry was in. As was artist Robert Atkins. But to really launch things right, Andy felt we needed more, and we lucked into some of that “more” in the form of Chuck Dixon. Now, anyone who’s read Chuck’s comics knows that he can write anything well – superhero comics, action-oriented books, fantasy, whatever. But war comics are what really suits his style, and when Chuck suddenly “became available” last year, we dropped him a line the next day. Possibly that same day. Chuck was in. Atkins was moving to Chuck’s book, Larry’s title would pick up Tom Feister and Mike Hawthorne, and… one more book was needed/wanted.
I’d had in mind the idea to do a COBRA book from the start, something that looks at the Joe world through very different eyes. And I kicked around ideas with a couple talented guys, but this was all before the direction was really set, and once Andy joined up, I wanted the books to be well and truly his, so when he presented a different take on a COBRA title, and brought in Chris Gage and Mike Costa to write, along with Italian artist Antonio Fuso to write, I knew it had potential. Potential to fracture the audience, since the things that are being done in that series are not like anything seen in JOE comics before. Issue 3 alone is possibly the most gripping JOE tale I’ve ever read. And I’ve now read juuuust about all of them. It also has the potential to be the wild-card favorite of everything we’re doing. And it will make people think about the character of Chuckles differently than they ever have before. In short, it really justifies the idea of a reboot since it does things that couldn’t have been done before. That HAVEN’T been done before. I’m a bit excited about this one, despite my overall bias and pleasure at the entire line of JOE books coming.
So the plan was set: G.I. JOE (launching Jan. 14) by Dixon and Atkins – along with variant cover artist Dave “100 Bullets” Johnson – would be the “main” title, in that it would be action-oriented and exciting; G.I. JOE: ORIGINS (February) by Hama and Hawthorne and cover artist Andrea Di Vito will be more subtle than full of wide-screen action, more character-driven, and more personal. And COBRA (March) by Gage/Costa, Fuso and cover artist Howard Chaykin would be something else entirely, offering the reinvention of a character, the new exploration of the COBRA organization, and the most gripping tale you’ve ever seen from a guy who wears a Hawaiian shirt as his uniform.
We kicked all of this off in October ’08 with our #0 issue, which featured new 5-page standalone tales from each creative team, just as a way to not only whet peoples’ appetites but to also show that this new Joe would be just that, a new JOE and not just a backwards step to the past.
And now? Now we’re on the cusp of finding out if our Ultimate Frodo-ish plan works. And Andy Schmidt’s restful days are, like the old G.I. JOE continuity, well and truly a thing of the past…
Chris Ryall is the Publisher/Editor-in-Chief of IDW Publishing. And he’s at Blogspot, on Twitter, on Facebook, now on year 7 of writing a weekly TV column at Comics101.com, probably still on MySpace, at LinkedIn, figuring out what Plaxo’s Pulse is, trying to bury an old Friendster page, scrawls graffiti in public restrooms, writes his feelings down on Post-It notes to plaster them on cars, and broadcasts his thoughts through the fillings of mental patients. His GROOM LAKE comic will look great thanks to Ben Templesmith, and the book he co-wrote for Impact Books, COMIC BOOKS 101, will read nicely thanks to Scott Tipton. His wife is eyeing him warily as he types this.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:28 am
I have to say that IDW did a great job in hand picking the creative teams for the G.I. Joe line. Each issue is like a lesson in GOOD comic book story telling. Looking forward to even more.
Beau Smith
The Flying Fist Ranch
January 12th, 2009 at 10:41 am
James Bond was rebooted after 20 films.
Golden Key Star Trek isn’t in continuity either, is it?
Reboots–especially for licensed material–are fine, preferable even. It gives the creators a lot more freedom in an already constrained terrain.
January 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
I’ve no problem with the reboot. Been a Joe fan since I was a wee little kid. Most of the mythos of G.I. Joe come from my own imagination… the comics and cartoons were just a supplement for that. I didn’t follow much of DDP’s run after Marvel’s, but with the 25th Anniversary just a year or so past, I’m on board for a new, fresh, and modern take on the G.I. Joe storyline.
January 12th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
I could not be more excited for the G.I. Joe relaunch! The plans IDW seems to have will expand on all the characters, ideas and adventures that have made us so thrilled with the Joe Universe anyway.
I orginally thought IDW was going to pick up from the end of Marvel’s run. When I learned they were starting from Ground Zero and running with it, it sounded brilliant! What a great way to retcon out the space troops, monsters, and eco warriors but keep all the cool characters that are G.I. Joe.
January 12th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
I’ll wait to hear how good word of mouth is on these books, then pick them in trade’s if they sound good…
any word on when the Marvel series will be reprinted?
January 12th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
I’m one for reboots. It’s hard to continue off of somebody else’s vision to create your own from the pieces you’ve been given. It forces creators to be McGuyvers with access ranging from a tool shed to a ziplock bag of junk, depending on what was done previously. Look at the last X-Men movie. I can’t imagine anybody would want to touch that without a reboot.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
I trust Chris Ryall!
I hadn’t read G.I. Joe since the Marvel days, but after reading the 0 issue, I’m really looking forward to these books.
-D
January 12th, 2009 at 10:01 pm
OK
The biggest BIGGEST difference between a GI JOE and Transformers relaunch is this: Transformers already had NUMEROUS universes that can rival DC’s multiverse: 80’s American TV, Japanese post Headmasters, MArvel Comics, UK comics, Beat wars, etc etc
GI JOE has had one…ONE continuity from 1983, and when there was a reboot ala` GI JOE extreme, we got 8 issues of Dark Horse crap
Sorry, IM not in it for thsi run. The deaths of the Joes in issues 109-111 suddenly seem trivial. Sneak Peek’s sacrifice, in vain, and Cool Breeze…. most likely never coming back
Sorry IDW you “nuked the fridge” in this fan’s opinion. I am not one of those internet trolls you seem to allude to in the beginning of the article, nor a fat ass fanboy who has nothing better to do than gripe. I am just a loyal fan from the days of ARAH (A Real American Hero, in case you didn’t know) who remembers his first figures (Duke and Grunt), picking up the all silent issue, seeign Fred become Cobra Commander, the Cobra Civil War in the 70s issues, seeing the REAL GI Joe in issue 86, seeing SNake-eyes unmasked in the early 90 issues, seeing Commander come back in 100, and the abov ementioned sacrifices of characters, BAttleForce 2000 included.
All these memories just got $#itted on. LIke pre-crisis DC.
Once again, the great Transformers didn’t impact much since there were MULTIPLE hitories and stories to begin with. GI JOE, that’s almost 30 years of continuity….kind of like a CLONE SAGA I recall.
Thanks IDW, thanks for letting me know I can save my money monthly. Clearly you weren’t fans enough. Personally, getting Hama on board is great, but it’s not enough. It would be like Stan Lee coming back in the mid-90s to reboot Spiderman after the clone debacle, also roughly 30 years after his first opinion.
GI JOE should be simple: Main title, a special missions like book to rotate and spotlight the plethora of characters they can rotate and maybe one mroe title
But I am tapping out, I feel tremendously insulted as a lifelong fan to read this article. Especially the allusion to who uses the internet to voice their opinions. Well if you can give me your home number and talk GI JOE philosophy, that would be fine by me, not all of us have the privilege to meet artists, writers, editors and creators personally to discuss issues. Some of us actually use the internet in a non-stereotypical way.
Give me a call, convince me why I should go this route?
Seriously
631 793 408_
-Eric
January 12th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Personally, I’m not the most versed Joe fan though I have some friends who might be in the running for that spot.
I didn’t read much of the Devil’s Due stuff because the status quo never intrigued me. But origins don’t interest me.
I prefer for characters to be established and beyond the point at which I’d become acquainted with them. I’ll read Transformers comics when the main book is set in a world post-Rodimus Prime.
I enjoy Superman now because the character has the history with the Justice League, with the Legion of Super-Heroes as a teenager. It’s not all perfectly as it was originally published but I strongly prefer characters who are well past their origin and who have a long history and gigantic cast to draw upon, even if I’m not familiar with it.
The think any “basics”/”ultimate” approach is a sparse plate to dine from. It doesn’t interest me as a reader.
The way to get me as a reader is by presenting a crowded plate with some things I like on it. The issues with Devil’s Due, IMHO, were largely that it wasn’t playing with enough bold or entertaining elements; when I think G.I.JOE, I want to see what a clever person, very in touch with their inner child, would come up with if you handed them all the toys and file cards. I don’t need highly real, highly modern or even highly military.
But if you’re going to take toys off the table or ground it more, I’m not your target demo.
I’m not opposed to a reboot. But the reboot that would draw me in would probably start with team 300 members strong with personal histories and grudges and would mine obscure and oddball characters alongside the brand staples.
I don’t need the specifics of the Sunbow/DIC history or the Marvel/Devil’s Due history but I’m not interested in a new history unless it’s at least as developed, wrinkled, convoluted, rich and evolved right out of the box. Half the appeal for me is when some random guy shows up who DOES have a history and I get caught up on him, look him up or lean over to a friend and ask who that guy is.
And I think it’s essential to have lame and badly executed characters around because it enriches the world. If every character is well-executed, if nothing is unintentionally bad only to be salvaged later, that takes half the fun out of the show.
If you take things down to basics, you are guaranteeing that readers like me aren’t going to get interested for another ten years, provided the franchise doesn’t reboot again in that time.
January 13th, 2009 at 12:42 am
I don’t plan to pick this up in singles but I hope you get the trades out quickly because I look forward to the new stuff you have coming… in fact I was one of the people hoping for a reboot so I’m thrilled with the decision.
I like that we now have a complete story going from Marvel’s no.1 to the end of the IDW stuff, even if WW3 left me pretty disappointed. That tale’s over and it’s time for a new one.
Man, I’d hate to explain to the person using the Bond example what Casino Royale was.
Some people just take this stuff way too seriously…
Anyway, good luck IDW guys.
January 13th, 2009 at 1:46 am
I have the entire 80s GI JOE run (well, up until the early 90s when they started bringing in Transformers, Neon colored soldiers and whatnot.)
And I SUPPORT a reboot.
A fresh start, new stories. The world has changed a lot since the Joe’s were conceptualized. I think reinventing them would make them relevant again, and letting them develop new stories from the ground up will allow for NEW wrinkles, and twists.
January 13th, 2009 at 2:21 am
i hope everyone prank calls erik.
January 13th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
I never got into the DDP stuff. I have just a few Marvel stuff. I’m looking forward to a JOE series were I can start off fresh.
January 13th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
To one of the commets on his last blog Ryal quoted :
“Was James Bond rebooted so the 20 movies were non canon?”
Yes, yes it was.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Well some DID call and took the time, and I am still 50/50.
BEst argument someone gave me:
Caller: I am all about REBOOT!
Me: So you got no problems with Ripcord being Damon Wayans in the movie? And that it is an INTERNATIONAL force, set 10 years in the future to be P.C. ?
Caller: …..well….