Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Marvel’s anti-hippie agenda

Marvel’s anti-hippie agenda

December 26th, 2008
Author J. Caleb Mozzocco

I often wonder about what’s going through the heads of the everyday average non-superpowered crowd member in Marvel’s New York City, particularly the ones with very strong political beliefs.

Wait, that’s not quite right. I do wonder about that, but Marvel has published series dedicated at least in part to providing a bystander’s-eye-view of things like superhero wars and alien invasions. I guess I’m more interested in what Marvel’s editors and creators think of what’s going through these characters’ heads, and what they’re trying to say about the world we live in when depicting crowds on Marvel main street, holding signs and shouting about this or that.

I think I know the answer already, and it’s that the comics-makers aren’t actually ruminating on how depicting a crowd of people doing and saying this or that about a Marvel plot event reflects on our world.

The crowds are either just window-dressing, details to either simply add a touch of realism, or employed as a storytelling shortcut to symbolize the political mood in the Marvel version of the city or country during a particular story. Take the angry crowds in Civil War, calling Johnny Storm a baby-killer after the Stamford incident: Mechanically, it was simply a way to make clear that public opinion had shifted against the superheroes.

But given that the event that that crowd (and those that other crowds) was demonstrating about was based on a real-world event, than it’s hardly unreasonable to wonder what Marvel is saying—consciously or unconsciously—about those events and our reactions to them.

Examples, conjecture and swear words, after the jump…

I’ve always had a hard time trying to wrap my head around the precise politics of Marvel, especially as expressed through Civil War, which offered an extremely dismal view of the American people. Were writer Mark Millar and Marvel holding up a funhouse mirror and saying, “Look how you’ve all overreacted to 9/11 and swallowed this ‘War on Terror’ nonsense, you fools!”…?

Because, you know, that’s pretty ballsy.

It wasn’t until I read one of Abhay Khosla’s indispensable Secret Invasion essays that I started groping toward a solid answer though.

In his review of Secret Invasion #6, Khosla took some time to ridicule a scene in which some New Yorkers are marching around with signs chanting “Embrace Change,” having evidently been won over by those creepy Marvel house ads showing Skrulls Photoshopped into stock photos.

Wrote Khosla:

Finally! Finally, we get page after page attacking the true enemy: LIBERAL PROTESTERS.

protest


Where the fuck did that shit come from??

Page after page, not of the first or second or even third issue, page after page of the SIXTH ISSUE– it wasn’t spent escalating the stakes of the comic, it wasn’t spent dealing with characters we care about, it wasn’t spent paying off earlier scenes. The fucking SIXTH ISSUE was spent introducing an entirely new cast of straw-men liberal characters, and then attacking them for being naive about the nature of evil.

First, let me just say, on a political level, this comic can go fuck itself. You know– one pretty easy way a person could read this comic if they were so inclined is that it equates protesting wars with supporting terrorism. I don’t think the people who made the comic think that. I don’t think they were thinking at all. I don’t think they made a big priority of thinking.

And that’s why I guess it’s best to let Millar, Marvel, Bendis and everyone else that goes to these summits and kicks these ideas around off the hook when it comes to the politics being expressed in these things.

Even when there’s a very, very clear one-to-one relationship between a Marvel Universe element and a real world issue—Civil War’s Stamford as our 9/11, World War Hulk’s Hulk invasion as military hubris coming back to bite you in the ass Iraq War-style, Secret Invasion’s holy warrior Skrulls on suicide missions as Muslim jihadists—the story gets so diluted as it gets bigger and bigger that the symbolism is essentially more of a suggested-by-the-headlines kind of flavoring than a coherent statement.

And, of course, since these things never really end-end, just stop so the build-up for the next one can begin, whatever Marvel might have been trying to say about these events never reaches a conclusion; if there’s a political statement to be made, it always ends in an ellipsis rather than a period.

Maybe Mark Millar, in his heart of hearts, started pitching Civil War as a broad criticism of post-9/11 America, and Marvel didn’t want to spend the time, money and goodwill on a political polemic, but thought the security vs. freedom idea was great, and would set-up a bold, new playground for future stories.

Maybe World War Hulk was simply intended to be about the Hulk smashing the Marvel heroes, and it was simply a fluke of the publishing schedule that it didn’t actually happen until after Marvel had transformed Iron Man and his allies into symbols of the Bush Administration worldview.

Maybe Brian Michael Bendis did set up Secret Invasion as a bit of jingoistic War On Terror super-comic catharsis cleverly disguised as your typical aliens invade story itself disguised as a game-changing, status quo realigning Event Comic, but his execution was too poor to realize it. (Or maybe it’s just an alien invasion comic that coincidentally has parallels to current global conflicts and I’m reading too much into it).

One political ideal of Marvel Comics at the moment is perfectly clear, however: They hate hippies.

It was the bottle-throwing, “baby-killer”-shouting demonstrators that attacked Johnny Storm and put the momentum of Marvel America behind Superhero Registration Act, and it was a Cindy Sheehan-like grieving mother who acted as Tony Stark’s conscience, as he embraced his emerging fascism (The trappings of these characters are those of the anti-war left, from the Vietnam war and the Iraq War, but, oddly, they were pushing rightward rather than to the left).

The crowds in World War Hulk who refused to abandon New York City and instead embraced the Hulk’s position that Tony Stark and his fellow heroes really oughta have their asses kicked were presented as your typical mass demonstrators: They had a myriad of causes and points of view, they seemed more of an irritation to the powers that be than a force of change, and they were rather easily dismissed. These folks seemed to run the gamut between people with axes to grind (Tony Stark built a cyborg that killed my uncle, The Hulk saved me and Stark shot him into space, etc.) and loons who thought it would be kinda cool to be ruled over by aliens. Most were presented in a negative light; they were just getting in the way and constantly needed saved from the danger they were putting themselves in by the heroes.

And then there are the “Embrace Changers” of Secret Invasion that Khosla pointed out in the passage I quoted above; rather than rallying behind the superheroes that want to fight off the alien invaders, they want to embrace them and welcome them. Do they want to roll over and let the Skrulls rule us as benevolent masters, or maybe just join us?

These peaceniks are rewarded by being slaughtered by the Skrulls. See, they thought you could live peacefully alongside religious zealots from beyond, but it’s just not so: The only good religious zealot from beyond is a dead one, I guess (This was one of the things I found hardest to understand about SI, just how bloodthirsty all the heroes were. I understand it may be more realistic to kill enemies than arrest and capture them in a war-like situation, but is a Marvel Universe Event Comic any place for realism?)

Those damn hippies were again causing problems for the Marvel heroes in Avengers: The Initiative #19, a story entitled “V-S Day,” dealing with the end of the Skrull threat. A Washington mob was swarming Jocasta and a partially surviving member of the Skrull Kill Krew, stopping them from taking down the Skrulls in their midst.

Peace signs, beads, braids, beards, John Lennon glasses, “Make Love Not War”…there’s nothing subtle about the depiction of the Embrace Changers in the scene. (Two pages later is an angry, apparently conservative anti-Skrull mob, with funny signs like “Embrace This!” and, my personal favorite, “Get ‘Em!” I think those are the same guys who are always throwing bricks at the poor old X-Men).

Why does Marvel Comics have such a blatantly anti-hippie agenda?

I don’t know.

But as strong as their hatred of al things hippie may be, it still pales in comparison to Golden-Age Sentry’s distaste for beatniks:

that's why they call 'em beatniks
 
22 Responses to “Marvel’s anti-hippie agenda”
  1. Tue Sorensen Says:

    As someone who’s stopped reading most new comics because they aren’t worth reading anymore (at least to me), the question foremost in my mind when I read this article is: WHY do you even read these things? Perhaps you get them for free?

    To my mind, the current Marvel administration don’t understand good stories, good writing nor good universe-building. They produce fragmented and incoherent ideas which make sense neither on an artistic level or in terms of continuity. They no longer deserve my money, and certainly not my time. I’m pretty amazed that there’s even still an active fan community out there supporting these things. Lord, the things collectors will put up with…! I should know; I put up with them for far too long. Well, no longer. I’m past caring what goes on now.

    Ta.

  2. pulse768 Says:

    I think what Bendis was pointing with the “liberal protesters” was that in a freaking alien invasion, complete with explosions and giant space monsters, there will still be morons who will welcome them with open arms. Even a liberal like me would be itching to fight when the Skrulls attack New York. This is OUR planet, dammit!

    Oh, and it’s a comic. Don’t read too much into it.

  3. Sallyp Says:

    And this is why I finally left Marvel for good. I prefer my heroes…um…heroic. The mob mentality of the average Marvel Universe citizen is ugly.

  4. SO'D Says:

    This is simply the worst possible hippie, the college-know-it-all hippie. These iphone using douche bags are worse than the giggling stoner or the drum-circle hippie, and the only portrayal is a negative portrayal. Here’s how to spot them: Covered in their Obamaflage, arguing from sentiment, and complaining about how Middle America clings to guns and religion. They also smell.

    It’s simple science. Look: When hippies start to nest in a new area, it draws other hippies in. With the right weather conditions and topography, it can lead to a music festival. One that last for days, even weeks. Reggae on the River, Woodstock, Burning Man, they will all pale in comparison to what we’re looking at now. Could you imagine? A Skrullapolooza Jamfest? Worse than Secret Invasion.

    Just don’t eat their brownies. God, hippies suck.

  5. Aqualad Says:

    Yeah, don’t eat the brownies. More for me.

  6. Rich Johnston Says:

    pulse:

    An alien species announce an invasion. They offer world peace, a solution to the environment, free energy, healthcare and fulfilling jobs for all, sex on tap, free drugs (and the care that needs to accompany it), and an innner sense of satisfaction, well being, creative stimuli and opportunity and the chance for a happy family.

    Would you still fight?

  7. Grandjester Says:

    “Hippie? There haven’t been hippies in centuries. Are you freeze-dried or doing hard time?”

  8. Brian Hancock Says:

    So all protesters are hippies? Someone is a bit into stereotypes here, I would say.

  9. Tim S Says:

    Cool write up. It makes me wonder if Marvel really has a lefty hero comparable to Green Arrow. Would Luke Cage count leading his damn-the-man Avengers?

  10. Evan Waters Says:

    Thank you, SO’D, for commentary that was clearly your own well thought-out logic and not cutting and pasting dialogue from SOUTH PARK.

    What’s wrong with being pro-Obama and thinking that there is in fact a place in America called “the Bible Belt” when the state of Arkansas just voted overwhelmingly to ban gay adoptions?

  11. Ruby Spears Superman Says:

    I think Marvel in general has a very dismal view of Super-Heroes. Mutants are hated, characters like Spider-Man are not trusted, even the legit guys turn to facism like Iron Man. The only ones how are trusted are the Fantastic Four and Captian America and they killed him off. Sentry is supposed to be an ironic view of Superman. All thier characters have to have some kind of flaw. It’s the Marvel gimmick. Why super-hero fans continue to put up with this is beyond me. Back in the sixties it was unique, today it’s just depressing.

    JLA/Avengers hinted that the DC heroes had it better because the ywere more trusted by the people they protect.

  12. Daniel Says:

    Marvel = Fox News
    DC = CNN

  13. Alexa Says:

    Daniel, who is MSNBC?

  14. Joe Says:

    What an ass-backward argument. Marvel had one event with hippies protesting and another one where some maybe-possibly-but-not-quite-sure hippies attacked a superhero and all of a sudden Marvel is the anti-hippie anti-liberal comic version of Fox News? WTF? Seriously it seems like you’re reading WAAAAAY too much into this.

  15. Fred Says:

    Evan Waters wrote:

    “Thank you, SO’D, for commentary that was clearly your own well thought-out logic and not cutting and pasting dialogue from SOUTH PARK.

    What’s wrong with being pro-Obama and thinking that there is in fact a place in America called “the Bible Belt” when the state of Arkansas just voted overwhelmingly to ban gay adoptions?”

    Well, the liberal state of California voted for Prop. 8, which limits marriage to the union of one man and one woman. Moreover, Black voters, including Democrats, overwhelmingly supported Prop. 8. These are the same Black voters who supported Obama.

    You can read more here:

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/18/a-marriage-mandate/

    So, you can’t just say Bible Belt states think homosexuality is wrong.

    This real life example also proves that Marvel’s depiction of American citizens is accurate. To paraphrase Chris Rock, no person is liberal or conservative one every issue.

  16. Bob Says:

    Look almost every story by virtue of representing reality has a political and philosophical bent to it, in that it makes choices about how to show the world. Movies, comics, bestselling novels and other “disposable” forms of pop culture can be highly influential or reflective of a given era’s politics. It is important to understand political implications of such works, so that we are conscious of their effects on our and others’ thinking. Not so we can dismiss them as stupid liberal DC comics or bigoted conservative Marvel comics.

    Caleb’s entry proposes some interesting questions about Marvel events that are explicitly trying to reflect a post-9/11 world and deal with themes of infiltration, invasion, division and disaster. He ought to be congratulated for that, not told “he is reading too much into it.” If comics aren’t worth reading in to, then why in the hell do you people take them time to moan about them on blogs?

  17. Fred Says:

    Tim S wrote:

    “Cool write up. It makes me wonder if Marvel really has a lefty hero comparable to Green Arrow. Would Luke Cage count leading his damn-the-man Avengers?”

    Cage seems unlikely to be as liberal as Green Arrow. Sure, Cage agrees with Arrow on personally defending the little guy instead of just throwing money around. However, unlike Green Arrow, Cage is happily married to the mother of his child. That marks Cage as a social conservative as are many Black people.

  18. Fred Says:

    @ Bob

    Excellent post.

    Like the rest of us, each comic creator has a worldview, a framework of values that affect how he or she views the world. So, we shouldn’t be shocked if a creator’s worldview influences his or her comic work. This truth should makes us more discerning of what we read, including works of creators we like.

  19. Ruby Spears Superman Says:

    “Well, the liberal state of California voted for Prop. 8, which limits marriage to the union of one man and one woman. Moreover, Black voters, including Democrats, overwhelmingly supported Prop. 8. These are the same Black voters who supported Obama.”

    So the people in California are also bigots, whats your point?

  20. Evan Waters Says:

    It’s also worth pointing out that the Pro-Prop-8 campaign had a lot of funding from the Utah-based LDS church and conservative churches across the country, that the Anti-Prop-8 campaign was outspent and poorly run, and it passed by a lesser margin than the Arkansas gay adoption ban that I talked about in the first place. And I think it’s plainly obvious that while not allowing gay people to marry is one level of restriction, not allowing them to adopt children is a near-cartoonish level of bigoted supervillainy.

  21. Shaun Says:

    Umm… Caleb, honestly?

    I think there’s a lot of diversity of opinion amongst comics creators, though I’d venture to guess they’re mostly a more liberal bunch. Anyhow, I just think you’re reading way too much into all of this. I’m not buying that there’s some kind of company-wide agenda or bias.

    Even if there is… Hippies? Aside from the fact that I’m something of a neo-hippie I guess (I used to wear my hair long, smoke a lot of weed, go to Grateful Dead concerts, and I’m still a tree hugging, recycling peacenik), I don’t see a reason for some nefarious anti-hippie agenda in 2008. I read some Marvel comics and I can’t say that they’ve offended me with anything they’ve done lately.

    Except for that shitty OMD storyline, that is.

  22. Vinnie Bartilucci Says:

    I think we’re all overreacting, here.

    I mean, c’mon…EVERYBODY hates hippies. Why single Marvel out?

    What?

Leave a Reply »