<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My thoughts on the Watchmen movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/12/03/my-thoughts-on-the-watchmen-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/12/03/my-thoughts-on-the-watchmen-movie/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pip</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/12/03/my-thoughts-on-the-watchmen-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-453778</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10165#comment-453778</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll make 2 short and simple points:
1) If it won&#039;t be Watchmen, then it is a marketing ploy.  A title to draw people in, take their money and give them not what they expect.  A lie, a scam, a fraud, a crime.

2) You cannot tell that story in two hours.  Nor in 3 hours.  The traditional movie format cannot possibly ever be enough to tell the tale properly.  Movies as a medium of telling a story are over rated and so constrained by time that I&#039;m surprised it&#039;s still a viable money making venture.  Nothing longer than a short story should ever be made into a movie, unless it is a children&#039;s book or pulp.

I could go on and on, but really I want to stand in front of the theater at midnight opening night, dressed as Kovacs holding a sign that reads &quot;It&#039;s going to suck.  Go home and save $20.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll make 2 short and simple points:<br />
1) If it won&#8217;t be Watchmen, then it is a marketing ploy.  A title to draw people in, take their money and give them not what they expect.  A lie, a scam, a fraud, a crime.</p>
<p>2) You cannot tell that story in two hours.  Nor in 3 hours.  The traditional movie format cannot possibly ever be enough to tell the tale properly.  Movies as a medium of telling a story are over rated and so constrained by time that I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s still a viable money making venture.  Nothing longer than a short story should ever be made into a movie, unless it is a children&#8217;s book or pulp.</p>
<p>I could go on and on, but really I want to stand in front of the theater at midnight opening night, dressed as Kovacs holding a sign that reads &#8220;It&#8217;s going to suck.  Go home and save $20.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimota94</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/12/03/my-thoughts-on-the-watchmen-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-453772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimota94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10165#comment-453772</guid>
		<description>I used to believe that &quot;Watchmen&quot; was filmable, but only if they did it as a series of episodes, ala &quot;Roots&quot; or (more recently) &quot;Band of Brothers&quot;.  That format, where there&#039;d be 12 episodes and each issue would get the full hour (or two) that it deserved, would&#039;ve allowed a screen writer and director to really figure out how to translate what made the 32 pages in each issue work from page to screen.  And I would&#039;ve loved to have seen that happen.

Instead, as much as I admire Zack Snyder&#039;s intention of staying true to the original source, I think we&#039;re going to get a mess that inspires laughs at all the wrong moments.  I hope I&#039;m wrong.  But the trailers to date have filled me with trepidation and a sort of &quot;Oh, God, does Snyder not realize how stupid that looks?&quot; reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to believe that &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; was filmable, but only if they did it as a series of episodes, ala &#8220;Roots&#8221; or (more recently) &#8220;Band of Brothers&#8221;.  That format, where there&#8217;d be 12 episodes and each issue would get the full hour (or two) that it deserved, would&#8217;ve allowed a screen writer and director to really figure out how to translate what made the 32 pages in each issue work from page to screen.  And I would&#8217;ve loved to have seen that happen.</p>
<p>Instead, as much as I admire Zack Snyder&#8217;s intention of staying true to the original source, I think we&#8217;re going to get a mess that inspires laughs at all the wrong moments.  I hope I&#8217;m wrong.  But the trailers to date have filled me with trepidation and a sort of &#8220;Oh, God, does Snyder not realize how stupid that looks?&#8221; reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Yost</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/12/03/my-thoughts-on-the-watchmen-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-453710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Yost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/?p=10165#comment-453710</guid>
		<description>I agree, the movie is not going to be Watchmen as we know it, but then anything that&#039;s not on paper (or a representation of the paper, as in the motion comic I haven&#039;t read)wouldn&#039;t be. I think what we&#039;re likely to get is a pretty faithful adaptation of (The Architects of Fear)+ Superheroes + (Alternate 1985)... Which is not that far off from the STORY of Watchmen. Basically, I think it&#039;s got a shot of being as faithful as the most faithful of novel to movie adaptations - the nuance and depth gets left in the book, but the skeleton and essential look is retained. So, I guess what it comes down to is I think you&#039;re right that it won&#039;t be exactly Watchmen, but it could be Watchmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the movie is not going to be Watchmen as we know it, but then anything that&#8217;s not on paper (or a representation of the paper, as in the motion comic I haven&#8217;t read)wouldn&#8217;t be. I think what we&#8217;re likely to get is a pretty faithful adaptation of (The Architects of Fear)+ Superheroes + (Alternate 1985)&#8230; Which is not that far off from the STORY of Watchmen. Basically, I think it&#8217;s got a shot of being as faithful as the most faithful of novel to movie adaptations &#8211; the nuance and depth gets left in the book, but the skeleton and essential look is retained. So, I guess what it comes down to is I think you&#8217;re right that it won&#8217;t be exactly Watchmen, but it could be Watchmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
