Despite the chorus of “no comment” that followed the announcement last week of Chuck Dixon’s abrupt departure from DC Comics, the writer is still commenting.
And although Dixon never mentions him by name, a lot of his remarks seem to point to Dan DiDio, DC’s senior vice president-executive editor.
Dixon posted late Friday on his message board “just to counter some nonsense I’ve seen ‘reported’ on other sites”:
I did not quit.
I do not believe it had anything to do with politics.
My involvement with Robin ends with issue 174.
I think my BATO run is over with #10.
My Booster two-parter will still be appearing.
Barring unforeseen circumstances, Storming Paradise continues on schedule.
For those keep score, yes, I was way ahead on both of my monthlies. Down the road perhaps I’ll offer those scripts and you folks can help out Books for Soldiers as you so generously have before.
(Storming Paradise is Dixon and Butch Guice’s six-issue Wildstorm miniseries set during in World War II. The first issue debuts next month.)
Dixon also appeared in the comments section of a post at Comics Should Be Good that questions DC editorial’s handling of Final Crisis, Countdown, Death of the New Gods, Robin, and Batman and the Outsiders.
Dixon, writer of Robin and Batman and the Outsiders, steps in to say:
Don’t blame my editors.
DC, currently, is run from the top down in a way that makes Jim Shooter’s aegis at Marvel look like a hippie commune.
He follows that a little later with:
Shooter was very dictatorial with strict rules for writing and drawing superheroes.
The difference between his reign at Marvel and the current one at DC is that Shooter was successful at raising circulation and longterm planning.
And then, when another commenter asks, “Taking a shot at Warners? At Levitz? At DiDio?,” Dixon clarifies:
Not at Paul.
Warners? The geniuses who merged with a company that was billions in the red? Trust me, most days they don’t even KNOW they own a comic company much less take an interest in running it.
On the Shooter front—
Though I saw Shooter in full fledge psychotic editorial rage a couple of times, he did provide leadership at Marvel and didn’t change the company’s direction five times in one day. And the company climbed out of the red and became vital again under his stewardship. I disagreed with many of his ideas when it came to continuity but he was at least consistant and you knew where you stood. And merit was rewarded back then. If you sold well and handed the stuff in on time you’d never go without work.
And finally (as of this morning, at least):
I’ve worked under tyrants and I can say that I’d prefer to work under a talented, knowledgeable tyrant with a successful plan than a directionless gladhander with a ouija board any day of the week.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:01 am
He sure sounds bitter!
June 16th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Well, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to see who Chuck is laying this at the feet of. Heck, Larry and John Holmes could have figgured that one out.
Any chance this will start a groundswell against DiDio?
AND BY THE WAY BRADY!!! I WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!!
June 16th, 2008 at 11:13 am
OUCH.
Even tough Dixon’s a great writer. I can’t say that I agree with him. I don’t think there is no need to go around insulting other people on the network. And definitely, if you are gonna take a shot at someone you should at least be direct about it.
What a let down.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:14 am
whoops. I meant to say that THERE IS NO NEED to do this kind of stuff.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:16 am
He sounds very bitter and just spilling over with sour grapes! I’m gonna go ahead and take these rantings of his with a huge grain of salt.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:17 am
I think he is speak from the heart and I applaud him
June 16th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Yow. Chuck doesn’t seem too worried about burning bridges so they must have already been demolished behind him.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:25 am
So, are we going to get the story here, or is it just going to be idle speculation? I hate when good drama comes out, but no one wants to talk about it.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:34 am
I’m getting kinda tired of this, he needs to either stop feeding the fire so high with half explained bits of information, or put up a full explanation somewhere…because, at this point, it almost feels like his reasons for getting fired maybe weren’t all incompetence on DC’s part.
It feels like he’s hiding the real, much simpler reason behind his termination, and letting us imagine it as much bigger (than it is) in our heads. I mean, its not like he’s trying to save professional face by not bad mouthing his ex-employer (cuz he’s not, and has been). Its starting to feel like, with all of Dixon’s vague, gorilla warfare style digs at DC, that he wants us to imagineer all the “horror” of his situation ourself.
I actually mean this post with no venom, I do not care much about DC at all, and have absolutely nothing against Dixon..
I know his story keeps getting bandied around, and Dixon may feel the need to defend himself in comment sections of blogs covering it, but sooner or later he has to come out with the whole truth, because these half comments feel childish, and hurt not only his rep. but everyone’s involved.
WHO are you blaming, WHY did this happen..
I did not have coffee today, please forgive the poor grammar and sentence structure, lol.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Chuck is one of the great, solid storytellers in this business. Dixon, Ostrander, Geoff Johns, Gail Simone are on the money writers. I buy damn near everything these four put out there for consumption.
With budgets being what they are, I won’t be around for those that follow Chuck on Robin and BATO. Unfortunately DC just saved me six bucks a month.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:41 am
Hmmm…the plot thickens.
Dave, i don’t think we’ll get the full story because it really seems like it deals in some way with the fallout of either Batman RIP or Final Crisis or both. Dixon could be a dick and reveal it, and that would REALLY screw DC, but i doubt he’d want to do that. It seems like he is a professional, and doing that would just screw everybody at DC, not just the tyrant in question.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:57 am
Hate to say it, but I’ve heard the same thing from quite a few DC writers the past few months. That and the falling DC sales point in one direction…the head man ain’t doin’ the job.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Let’s be honest his current Robin run along with Chris Bastia hasn’t been that great. Is he a talented writer? Heck Yeah! I enjoyed so much of his work. But sometimes you can’t go back home. Hopefully Adam Beechem can return, he was doing some really cool stuff with Robin. Also Chuck isn’t the only writer to have problems with the editors/higher ups at DC recently . Everyone should listen To Mark Waid’s current WordBalloon interview.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
This is sad, I wish Chuck the best. I am sad that Chuck won’t be apart of future story telling at DC.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
If he was REALLY being professional he would leave it at No COMMENT
Right now he is half feeding information - leading people to0 believe half the story and extrapolate BASED on his side alone what the story was.
As an employer if DC let Dixon go they cannot comment (either Way) thus making Dixon’s comments highly unprofessional.
And can anyone tell me what titles Dixon wrote under Shooters editorial at Marvel?
If Dixon has a personal or professional problem he need to keep it to himself and just say NO COMMENT. That is the only was anyone would be professional.
Anyone?
June 16th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Man this sucks, welp i know that I will still pick up his stuff until it runs out at dc. He is a great writer and I wish him the very best.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
So I guess this means the solicited issues of Robin for the past two months will be written by someone other than Chuck Dixon? That is mighty sucky. I’d like to get proper solicits on this sometime soon so I can know what I’ll be reading. For that matter, this better not be another Bart Allen swerve, where they release false solicits and then kill the character or make him something else (Batman), because Tim as Robin is, in my opinion, one of the best things DC has going right now.
Real damn shame.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
I want the very best for Chuck Dixon, I really do, and I’ll support every book he writes from now on as I have been for the past couple of years, but I know I’ll be really, really sad when I see that there will be no more great Batbooks penned by him.
I’m also scared to death that Robin will be cancelled soon due to low sales and possibly this uproar between CD and DC. My only hope for Tim Drake is if DC could rename Dick Grayson’s book to “Nightwing and Robin,” so I can still have my two favorite birds in one solid book.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I do want to point one thing out–Chuck Dixon is not a first time, novice writer–He is a sesoned author with more years in the business that some of us have been on this green earth. He has worked on many titles and is dedicated to a run and not fancy free, I’m only going to do 2 issues and run away like alot of other writers. I can guarantee that he is not being bitter but just frustrated to see the incredible potential of this medium continously horse fu%$ed by guys who should not be in charge.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Chuck Dixon is my hero!
June 16th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
I know “seasoned” is spelled incorrectly, but let’s not loose sight of the point.
Thanks.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
BG: “If Dixon has a personal or professional problem he need to keep it to himself and just say NO COMMENT. That is the only was anyone would be professional.”
Look at it from Dixon’s point of view. What we know is he was ahead of schedule, as he usually is. DC should’ve known what his stories were going to be before he wrote them, so there shouldn’t have been any problem. But then, for some reason that was not his own, he was terminated from DC. He was writing a character that he helped create (Tim Drake) and probably has a great affinity for, but was yanked off of it.
I think he’s justified in telling us he didn’t quit because of the shock of it. He probably isn’t very happy with the situation. If he feels there’s a real problem with the way DC is run, i don’t think he should have to hide that. If he loves the characters, which he definitely seems to, i think he has every right to say what he wants.
Being professional doesn’t have to mean keeping your yap shut.
Ian Levenstein:”Tim as Robin is, in my opinion, one of the best things DC has going right now.”
Besides Dixon’s current run on Robin, i actually haven’t read any of his work on the title. But Tim Drake is one of my top 5 DC characters, and i know Dixon helped to shape him into who he is. DC just really really needs to get its act together, especially with Marvel seemingly firing on all cylinders lately.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
–”Dave, i don’t think we’ll get the full story because it really seems like it deals in some way with the fallout of either Batman RIP or Final Crisis or both. Dixon could be a dick and reveal it, and that would REALLY screw DC, but i doubt he’d want to do that.”–
He doesn’t have to release plot points, just make it clear that they didn’t give him heads up on what Morrison was doing to change the status quo (I’m assuming), and that he wrote issues way ahead (I’ve heard and am assuming), and that there was irreconcilable differences in their visions for the books (after he had so much of Robin and BATO layed out in advance), and that he was why he was let go.
I think its probably that simple, and is reasonable if a writer’s vision conflicts with editorial, and the main books (of that particular line [Batman]) that he be let go. Unfortunately this is commercial art, that stuff happens when protecting the brand.
All these vague comments he’s posting, seem like he’s trying to make the situation seem much larger than it is (and maybe it is).
Needless to say, I’m looking forward to Lying in the Gutters later today, lol.
And my apologies to Dixon if he did get royally screwed by DC, they have been quite the cluster f**k lately.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
–”DC should’ve known what his stories were going to be before he wrote them, so there shouldn’t have been any problem.”–”
Very true, theres an article over at CBR
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2008/06/13/fridays-editorial-conference/#more-17207
It talks about editor responsibilities, and how it effected the continuity between Countdown and Final Crises, and it doesn’t make much of a leap to extend to this (possibly)…how did the editors not know how far Dixon was on his plots? Thats their responsibility to be aware of what he’s doing…that protects all parties involved, thats their job.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Any chance this will start a groundswell against DiDio?
No.
June 16th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Why do I have the feeling this is far from over? What is truly frightening is if Dixon is right on the money… I’m really hoping that he’s just upset and clarity will take hold but what if clarity has already taken hold and everything he states is true?
June 16th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
There should be a groundswell against Dido. He and Joe q are destroying marvel and dc or letting it happen. Left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing at DC. As the morrison interview gave away. If it’s a problem with direction Batman Books is going and the overal DC Universe then welcome to the light side Chuck Dixon. To me DC jumped the shark the moment Blue Beatle was shot and killed. (God I hated the end to last weeks Booster Gold. :()
June 16th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Please, Dan Dido, no more Crisis. The DCU was pretty good going into the Infinite Crisis but has been unbalanced ever since.
June 16th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
I personally think that DiDio has done a good job overall. He’s made a few mistakes this past year and time will tell if he’s starting to lose it. Dixon and DiDio probably have conflicting personalities and perhaps just didn’t get along. Regardless, letting Dixon go was another mistake made by DiDio this year. I have faith that Final Crisis and Batman R.I.P. will turn out to be great because Morrison is writing them, but I’m not sure about the tie-ins and aftermath as there seems to be a lack of communication/coordination between Morrison and the other writers.
June 16th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
another story with some negative suggestions about DC editorial.
June 16th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
From a selfish fan standpoint… the current run on ROBIN is the best that book has been since, well, since Dixon was on the first time around. I was really enjoying it, and enjoying that he brought back… whichever character he recently brought back (not spoiling).
I hear there are more Bat-book related changes coming, including the Robin costume, which I’ve really liked since Infinite Crisis. I also think NIGHTWING is horribly ignored and underrated, when it should be a hit book.
I wish Mr. Dixon best of luck in the future, and I hope whoever takes his place does a good job. I also hope that a new creative team for ROBIN does not mean the book will be cancelled or relaunched before #200.
June 16th, 2008 at 2:58 pm
–”as there seems to be a lack of communication/coordination between Morrison and the other writers.”–
Which is surprising as he was one of four writers on 52.
June 16th, 2008 at 3:00 pm
Oh, hey, does this mean we can stop pretending to care about Spoiler? Because if so, RIGHT ON.
June 16th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
So who’s going to be on Robin and BATO now???
June 16th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
“To me DC jumped the shark the moment Blue Beatle was shot and killed.”
You can’t blame DC Editorial for Mark David Chapman, man.
June 16th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Somebody needs a Hug!
June 16th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
I for one, think that Mr Dixon really does speak the truth, as much as he’s a gentleman to divulge.
And I can’t help but agree with him too, he’s pretty much right on the money in my book.
And this certainly hasn’t hightened my view of AOL/Warner and their puppet Didio.
I might contradict everything I’ve just said with the next part tho… But it would appear as if economically, Didio is doing no true wrong.. because DC is still the #2 publisher, and looks to remain that way for a loong, looong time.
Don’t look to see them as the #1 publisher any time soon tho, because they haven’t been that since the year 1962, and everybody knows why, and what happened then.
June 16th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
What a horrifically tragic loss for all fans of the graphic arts medium. Even for those who do not enjoy Mr. Dixon’s brilliant innovations with the super-hero genre, I’m sure they wouldn’t disagree that this is one of the saddest days since the loss of Jack Kirby in 1994.
Bow your heads, friends.
June 16th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I’m sure they wouldn’t disagree that this is one of the saddest days since the loss of Jack Kirby in 1994.
I would like to register my disagreement in the strongest possible words, but I’m pretty sure the profanity filter wouldn’t allow me to.
June 16th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
“Don’t look to see them as the #1 publisher any time soon tho, because they haven’t been that since the year 1962, and everybody knows why, and what happened then.”
Wikipedia:
“March 2 - Wilt Chamberlain scores 100 points in a single basketball game.”
:O
June 16th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
I guess it’s easy for some DC hardcore fans to easily dismiss Chuck Dixon, but much of what he is saying has been obvious to me for quite some time. The main books have been suffering — due to orchestrating all of these events — most of which have been disappointing.
Too many stories are editorially dictated (not the way editorial traditionally should run).
DC is losing readers — while the main competitor is gaining readers.
It’s time for a change people!
June 16th, 2008 at 4:45 pm
Huh. It’s really easy to criticize someone when they can’t respond. DC legally can’t talk about why Dixon was fired due to privacy and HR laws. It’s pretty classless to be making the comments he is making knowing they can’t respond to them.
Let’s see the number of people complaining like this about DC? Very few (like two people counting Dixon) and they appear to be disgruntled former employees.
Hmm…Dixon has been blacklisted from Marvel and fired from DC. The problem couldn’t be him could it? Nah, that would be too simple.
June 16th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Say what you will about how much Joey Q sucking, but Marvel is doing pretty well under his “ruinous” reign. I don’t have sale figures on ASM, but I’m betting the 3 times it goes a month sell more than ASM, FNSM and SSM combined. Meanwhile, DiDio’s reign seems to adversely effect DC. Something is seriously wrong over there, and I think this stuff with Dixon is just the tip of the ice berg.
I have trouble believing given his recent history that Grant Morrison already had Final Crisis done. Or that they had any idea when RIP would be finally ready to roll. And I think that might be a big part of the problem here..
June 16th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
DiDio is making DC money. That’s why he’s still working there. He’s not “adversely effecting” anything. Why do people ascribe their PERSONAL PREFERENCE to a dictation of a companies success in the marketplace?
June 16th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
“Don’t look to see them as the #1 publisher any time soon tho, because they haven’t been that since the year 1962, and everybody knows why, and what happened then.”
Well, if you’re hinting at Marvel beating DC in sales you’d be wrong. Marvel didn’t overtake until the beginning of the 1970ies and one of the main reasons beyond content was DC raising prices of their comics before Marvel did.
Here’s a link to John Jackson Miller’s Comics Chronicles site. As you can see DC easily outsold Marvel during the 1960ies.
http://www.comichron.com/YearlyRankings/1960s/tabid/195/Default.aspx
June 16th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Brenticles:”Let’s see the number of people complaining like this about DC? Very few (like two people counting Dixon) and they appear to be disgruntled former employees.
Hmm…Dixon has been blacklisted from Marvel and fired from DC. The problem couldn’t be him could it? Nah, that would be too simple.”
I need a pair of rose colored glasses like that.
Regardless of what Dixon’s beef with DC is, lots of people are complaining. Just a couple examples off the top of my head: Action Comics Annual #11 (written by Geoff Johns and Richard Donner) and Countdown to Final Crisis and all of its tie-ins (and there were a lot, especially for a story that we are now supposed to ignore).
Where was editorial? Why were writers allowed to continue using Chris Kent in stories that took place AFTER Annual #11? How was there almost no communication between Morrison (or his editors) and the rest of DC for Countdown and its slew of tie-ins?
June 16th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
“I need a pair of rose colored glasses like that.
Regardless of what Dixon’s beef with DC is, lots of people are complaining. Just a couple examples off the top of my head: Action Comics Annual #11 (written by Geoff Johns and Richard Donner) and Countdown to Final Crisis and all of its tie-ins (and there were a lot, especially for a story that we are now supposed to ignore).
Where was editorial? Why were writers allowed to continue using Chris Kent in stories that took place AFTER Annual #11? How was there almost no communication between Morrison (or his editors) and the rest of DC for Countdown and its slew of tie-ins?”
Please provide the links where Geoff Johns or Richard Donner complained about DC in any way, let alone that it is run by a tyrant. My comments were aimed at pros saying the things that Dixon has been; you know, insiders with actual knowledge, not fans with endless rumor mongering and baseless speculation.
June 16th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Good he can go put the Final Nail it Marvel because we all know Marvel is like WCW
June 16th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Dixon worked on Alien Legion during Shooter’s tenure. It was under Marvel’s creator-owned Epic banner and was spear-headed by the illustrious Archie Goodwin.
Dixon’s comments appear to me to be “spot on”. I have always believed Shooter got the short end of the stick when it came to his editorial reign. Did he piss people off?–I’m sure he did. His primary concern was the health and well-being of the character, as well as being a proponant of creator’s rights. If you ask me, he was ahead of his time. If he were currently in control at Marvel, they would be faring a lot better, in my opinion. Especially, in light of what they are doing with there film properties. Shooter’s big thing was “accessibility to all”. He wanted every comic to read like it was the reader’s first…Marvel should take more cues from him. There are real problems when Marvel’s best books are NOT set in the traditional Marvel U: newuniversal, Supreme Power/Squadron Supreme, Criminal, Book of Lost Souls, etc.–and of course, none of these can ship on time! It gets much worse when they can’t/won’t keep tpb’s in print that are perennial best-sellers. nor do they make an effort to know when things are going out-of-print; until it’s too late–
I digress–it seems that both Marvel and DC seem to believe that their sustained growth lies in variant covers, earth-shattering company-wide crossovers bogged down in so much continuity that when one ships late it ruins the entire story…Bagh!!!
June 16th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Test post……
June 16th, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Well let’s see Dixon was writing a book during the last few months of Shooter s riegn and the book wasn’t directly under Shooter it was Goodwin.
So Dixon was on his was into marvel the last 3 months Shooter was there.
Not exactly a first hand authority on how Shooter handled himself during the other 108 month that he held the post.
Dixon has really crossed the line here and from the looks of its either did something that directly contradicted his employers wishes or his mouth got him trouble by saying something he shouldn’t have and was dismissed, and as someone said Dc can’t comment due to legal reasons. But Dixon has taken it upon himself to spout half truth and inuendo that leads us to believe he did nothing wrong.
cut he implies that Dc did something wrong without actually coming out and saying it Very sly. Very Crass and VEry Unprofessional.
June 16th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
As much as I dislike some of Quesada’s decisions, his reign at Marvel is infinitely more preferable to Didio’s DC disasters. Under Quesada we have had Civil War, Death of Captain America, Planet/WW Hulk, Secret Invasion - many of which have managed to gain mainstream media and crossover interest, due to their strong, simple concepts. “Hulk banished to a Gladiator planet.” “Alien shape shifters invade Earth.” Seriously, can anyone explain Infinite Crisis, 52 or Countdown in less than several paragraphs? I am a big DC reader and even I was confused. Does Final Crisis even have a core concept beyond “the day evil wins”? Seriously, you got the genius of Grant Morrison for a summer event and you have it focus on the New Gods? Who are possibly the characters proven most unable to sustain a series of any length due to widespread indifference among everyone except hardcore Kirby fans.
June 16th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
On Dixon’s professionalism or lack thereof, I agree that he hasn’t handled it the best way. You either say “no comment” or have the balls to put out a statement noting your dissatisfaction. He needs to take a leaf out of JMS’ book, who left Spider-Man on less than the best terms, but had the balls to make the reasons for his irritation clear, but in a professional, respectful way.
Dixon appears to basically be saying Didio couldnt organize a booze-up in a brewery and has no direction for DC - which I agree seems to be the case. Given Marvels continued publishing success, along with their recent movie hits, I’m surprised there has not been a move at Warners to take DC and make it an entire entertainment division for those characters, rather than just a publishing company - and with the added attention would hopefully come better leadership at the helm…
June 16th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
[QUOTE]DiDio is making DC money. That’s why he’s still working there. He’s not “adversely effecting” anything. Why do people ascribe their PERSONAL PREFERENCE to a dictation of a companies success in the marketplace?[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I know of quite a few hardcore DC fans who are saying the same thing.
I’m actually someone who used to buy 50 percent of each company, but my DC list is shrinking — mainly cause DD is more interested in putting out blah event seris like Rann/Thanagar War - and greenlighting yet another Winnick piece-o-crap like Titans — while he should be getting talented creators to develop new properties — or reinvigorate old properties.
He really comes across as more of a salesman than an editor — and it’s showing in the comics being produced.
June 16th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
This is truly a loss for the fans.
June 16th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
All I’ve got to say is that 6 years ago I got about a 50/50 split between Marvel and DC titles and nowadays I get 4 Marvel titles and about 20 DC titles. I think the last Marvel “event” I cared about was Onslaught. House of M? Civil War? World War Hulk? Secret Invasion? COULDN’T. CARE. LESS.
Identity Crisis? Infinite Crisis? 52? Enjoyed them all. I tried to read Countdown but I decided early on it wasn’t worth my money and so I didn’t buy it. Final Crisis is a slow build but it looks like it’s going to be a great read.
If Chuck Dixon was fired for a stupid reason, that’s too bad. But to be honest I wasn’t reading a single book he was writing at DC. The last book by him I think I read was his run Nightwing.
At the end of the day the behind-the-scenes antics just takes the fun out of comics. I’m more interested in a good story vs. a bad story, and right now I’m finding more good stories at DC.
June 16th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
“At the end of the day the behind-the-scenes antics just takes the fun out of comics. I’m more interested in a good story vs. a bad story, and right now I’m finding more good stories at DC.”
Agreed, I am sorry to see Dixon let go, but it will not stop me from buying DC comics I do enjoy.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:24 am
I’ve gotta believe Chuck in this mess. I’ve read his books and visited the Dixonverse for years, and I have nothing but respect for him. And you can confirm some of what he’s saying just by watching the state of DC Comics.
As for starting a groundswell against Didio, well, I’m already there. I’ve been against him at least since he had Blue Beetle killed.
And whoever posted that Chuck had said ‘half-truths…’ please, show us an example of this, or list his half-lies. I’m really interested in whatever info you have on the situation, that you would know he’s lying.
I’m sorry to see Chuck go, and it will affect my DC buying. I’ll drop Robin, and while I was planning on picking up the BaTO trades, I’ll just skip them now, as I don’t see the point since the story won’t continue. At least for me, as I won’t buy whoever they put on the book next.
It’s a shame I can’t jump ship to Marvel, but I dislike Joe Q. at least as much as I do Didio. Well, since events outside the books themselves irritate me so much, perhaps it’s time to finally grow up and leave comics behind.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:32 am
“He needs to take a leaf out of JMS’ book, who left Spider-Man on less than the best terms, but had the balls to make the reasons for his irritation clear, but in a professional, respectful way.”
I would argue that doing the deed,cashing the check,then letting the howling legion of internet fans screaming for your blood that you were ‘just following orders’ isn’t more professional then saying ‘no comment’.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Dixon has always hit me as the action director Joel Silver of the comic book world…meaning… great at putting action scences together but not on storytelling.
Don’t get me wrong…. i have been getting batman and the outsiders and enjoy it but end of the day it’s fluff and if it gets canceled I won’t really care that much…
I only really dixon when he ends up taking over a title…I don’t hunt down anything else he writes coz its always macho action stuff…and don’t forget that current domestic between dido and dixon has two sides to the story.. so don’t go blaming one or the other completey as we the readership only find out by what they tell us….inless rich johnston is involved
June 17th, 2008 at 12:59 am
Can no one spell anymore? I mean comic readers are supposed to be a semi-literate population but look just at what is on these blog comments alone:
ejulp: It’s “guerilla warfare” not gorilla warfare; no monkeys are involved in this type of fighting; also it’s “Final Crisis” not “Final Crises” and this is not a simple typo since the “e” key and the “i” key are on separate hands/sides of the keyboard.
supermutant2099: Apparently has never seen the English word “Beetle” before despite apparently having read about the hero. May I also suggest the adventures of Bahtman and Wundar Womin.
We all make typos and mistakes and no one uses formal grammar in this setting, but these don’t look like that at all. If you can’t spell a word or don’t know its meaning don’t use it.
On topic: I really enjoy Dixon’s work and don’t know why Didio made this decision. Still I’ll cancel Robin and Outsiders off my pull list and also throw in Teen Titans and Titans which were teetering. Just for sheer revenge I’ll drop Birds of Prey as well which I had decided to keep despite Simone and McKeever leaving. Complaining does little good; not buying the comics does have some small impact. I’ll also let my local comic shop know I won’t be picking them up so they can quit ordering so many of them.
June 17th, 2008 at 1:13 am
_“He needs to take a leaf out of JMS’ book, who left Spider-Man on less than the best terms, but had the balls to make the reasons for his irritation clear, but in a professional, respectful way.”
I would argue that doing the deed,cashing the check,then letting the howling legion of internet fans screaming for your blood that you were ‘just following orders’ isn’t more professional then saying ‘no comment’._
Maybe…but infinitely more professional than flitting around the ‘net making caustic statements about your ex-employer.
June 17th, 2008 at 1:28 am
glad to see him go. Never read Robin and have hated all his Batman and the outsiders issues. No way operations planned by Batman would get as screwed up as they have in that title thus far.
June 17th, 2008 at 2:38 am
DC has made a few mistakes ???
DC has had more screw ups than an upsidedown corkscrew.
Amazons Attack…. unadulterated failure
Countdown …. no direction… failure
Sinestro Corps…. great story - no editorial support …failure
Wonder Woman/Superman …. stories with no ending ..wtf wheres part 4? failure
And I can go on and on
June 17th, 2008 at 4:53 am
Its amazing how everyone jumps on JQ’s back about what he is doing to the Marvel U but he is helping keep Marvel at # 1 - Between AOL/TW at the helm working those great big budget movies… oh yeah outside of Batman Begins - they are non existent and DiDio running the publishing into the ground - its a bad day for DC fans…. make that a bad decade.
I applaud Dixon for speaking his mind - its what a lot of us fans guessed was going on and now we will see some more creators add to the “get rid of DiDIo” fire.
Hopefully he will be gone before he burys the Black Lanterns under his great new crossover - Teen Titans Go invades the DCU
June 17th, 2008 at 5:11 am
I’m with Chuck 100%. All this coming out after Morrison explained the lack of communication going into Countdown, Death of the New Gods and Final Crisis just makes this more believable. Down with DiDio.
June 17th, 2008 at 5:25 am
One more perfectly viable creator is fired for no apparent reason. Don’t you guys know by now that this is typical behavior for DC and Marvel (not to mention corporations of all types these days)? Doesn’t DC care that they’re putting creators’ families through such unnecessary and undeserved hardships? (Answer: obviously not.)
Is this behavior reflective of the fascists’ economic attitude of “social darwinism” which has polluted the human spirit of our culture?
Is it taboo even to ask such questions now?
June 17th, 2008 at 6:04 am
Does someone remembers who cancelled “Solo” (2 or three times Eisner Ward Winner) ? I guess you’ll find !!
June 17th, 2008 at 6:30 am
Man, it really gets my goat when grammarians start deciding who should and shouldn’t post words based on whether or not they are spelt correctly. Being a non-phonestic language makes English one of the hardest to master, especially for people with learning difficulties. Should dyslexic people be prohibited from posting? See past the spelling mistakes - surely the purpose of communicaiton on a message board is understanding and you, Julius Brown, have clearly understood these people so please keep your keyboard fascism in check.
On topic: only Dixon and DC know the truth, and both parties will ahve their perception of said truth. Dixon is behaving unprofessionally, perhaps DC is unprofessionally run. Dixon is a loss, fact.
June 17th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Chuck Dixon is one of the best superhero writers of all time. DC once had a great universe and used to put out the best books, but that was a while ago, well before Didio, but under his management, not only have the books gotten worse, DC’s treatment of it’s readers has been pretty shoddy to say the least.
Totally with Chuck Dixon on this one, glad he’s said what he’s said, think he was totally justified in doing so, and hope to see him back at DC one day, doing what he does best.
June 17th, 2008 at 7:55 am
Im with Dixon here. He was part of the best era of Batman books and DC has been a house of crappy stories since O’neil left the Batbooks as Editor and Jurgens left Superman.
Yeah, thats 10 years.
June 17th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Here’s the thing, Chuck Dixon has a reputation of being one of the nicest, most professional guys in comics. If Mr. Dixon’s feathers are so ruffled that he’s willing to none-too-subtly bash his old boss, something very bad (at least from his perspective) had to go down.
June 17th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Julius Brown said: “…not gorilla warfare; no monkeys are involved…”
Julius, gorillas are apes, not monkeys. As long as we are making corrections…
June 17th, 2008 at 9:34 am
I think we should all wear black armbands until DC hires Dixon back. Also, it’s convention season, so perhaps the conventions could have some charity events to collect money to support Chuck’s family and pay his bills until he gets paying work again.
Whatcha think?
June 17th, 2008 at 10:30 am
I think the black armbands is a fabulous idea Alan. I’d go you one better, and say that we should commit acts of “civil disobedience” and pour oil paint and rubber cement on any issue of Robin or BATO unwritten by Chuck Dixon. It’s about time that DC understood how much power us Dixon-ites really have. It might help if we wore hoods as well.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:44 am
Brenticles - “Please provide the links where Geoff Johns or Richard Donner complained about DC in any way, let alone that it is run by a tyrant. My comments were aimed at pros saying the things that Dixon has been; you know, insiders with actual knowledge, not fans with endless rumor mongering and baseless speculation.”
Fair enough. My comments were aimed at the fans who have been given a bum deal when it comes to DC continuity in the recent past. Marvel’s bad with it too, but some of DC’s gaffs are ridiculous. You don’t have to listen to rumors to know this, just read the books.
Geoff Johns has seemingly been given a lot of clout at DC, which is one of Didio’s better moves in my opinion. Somebody currently working for DC wouldn’t say anything too terrible about Didio. But i don’t know if he’s ever been asked about the Action Annual/Chris Kent situation. Alone, the story was fine. I don’t much care that it was delayed, it was a good story. But it was discontinuous from the rest of Superman’s stories that featured Chris.
As far as JMS goes, his run was hampered by editorial mandates, we know this. The big disagreement on OMD was how much would be changed, not the actual change itself. He still works for Marvel, doing things like Thor and The Twelve. Both he and Quesada have spoken on the record about it. For some reason the same thing couldn’t happen with Dixon, and i’m inclined to believe, considering what’s been going on with DC lately, that Dixon’s not just lying to us to justify himself.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
If you don’t believe a company can be run like ass, look at the way Marvel Films is treating Jon Favre and Robert Downey Jr. after they made MILLIONS for them. As for other creators speaking against Marvel or DC–Why would they lash out at their current employers? This is a very tight industry and for Dixon to be this vocal about the incident it must have been pretty bad.
Let’s not forget either, Chuck Dixon has been writing comic books since most of us were still sperm and has always been professional and delivered the goods on time and in the zone.
June 17th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Durka: what has Dixon really said that we can discuss whether he’s lying or not? That he didn’t quit? That and what his final issues are would be the only concrete statements he made. The rest is so substantively vague and tonally venomous that there’s nothing to debate the veracity of.
June 17th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
DBird- I think you meant Jon Favreau.
You’re on to something though… Maybe we can get Brett Favre, an “Iron Man” himself, to play Tony Stark if things fall through with Favreau and Downey for IM 2. Favre’s got time on his hands now.
Back on topic, I don’t know what to think of the Dixon/DC fiasco. Didio seems like a nice enough guy in interviews and his “chats” with fans at cons, but I haven’t been a fan of his editorial decsions. I don’t like all the confusing mega-events that have driven DC during his reign, I loathed the return of the multiverse (I know, I’m in the minority there), I think bringing Jason Todd back from the dead was one of the worst decisions ever, and Didio’s attempt to retcon the DCU by reviving so many Silver Age concepts falls flat with me.
I’m also unhappy about his letting Morrison basically reshape the DCU in his own fashion. When Morrison’s on, he’s awesome. When he’s not, and I include his Batman run in that category, I find his stuff a confusing, unweidly mess. So it is for Final Crisis, I’m afraid. I’m steering clear of that.
I have to wonder if Morrison’s free reign to rewrite the DCU is what caused Dixon to balk. Morrison’s work is directly affecting two of his titles: B&OUT and Robin. If his work is being undermined, I can’t blame him for being pissed off.
I certainly don’t care for Mr. Dixon’s politics, but I didn’t know anything about that until reading it here on the ‘Rama, not all that long ago. But, in spite of that, I respect him as a writer and I’ve generally enjoyed his work over the years. Despite his public words about sexuality in comics, he seems to have handled the female couple on B&OUT with class. At least, I haven’t found his writing of the characters to be cliched or mistreated in any way. Kudos to him.
I could do without Dixon’s vague comments about the leadership at DC. If you have a beef with Didio, come right out and say what the problem was. Unless there’s some kind of settlement that precludes Chuck from saying anything. In which case, perhaps it’s best not to say anything.
I’ll wait and see where B&OUT goes before I drop it. The book was starting to drag for me recently anyhow, but I want to see where the story is going before I make any decisions. If I do end up dropping it though, it’ll be one of just many DC books that have fallen off my list in recent months. I only got back into comics a little more than two years ago, but Didio’s run at DC has been slowly turning me off again. Month by month, it seems.
With the economy in the crapper and other costs rising all the time, it’s not really hard to drop titles that just aren’t enjoyable. I’m not enjoying all that many DC titles these days.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Tim Drake becomes the next Dead Robin in ten, nine, eight….
June 17th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
basically it seems to be that the older writers are less inclined to accept editorial mandate than the younger crop. (johns, bendis, etc.)
June 18th, 2008 at 12:38 am
<>
Oh cri me a rivr. I find nuthin saddur than somewon correctin spellin on a messedge bord.
June 18th, 2008 at 1:47 am
I will have to say I am glad to see that Didio’s screwing with the DC continuity and bringing back crap from the pre-crisis era and just basically ostracizing those of us that have read their titles for decades, is unacceptable. I mean they make J’onn J’onzz interesting and well rounded, and what do they do, kill him off, I think thye need to boot Didio out before there’s nothing left of the DC family. I dumped all my books from DC and will not be picking up final crisis, and they lost a long time Superman and Legion fan, possibly for good.
to Chuck, I do not know if you’ll be reading this, but I am glad that you are standing up for the fans, and your ideals.
June 18th, 2008 at 1:48 am
also, the owner of this blog needs to enable Firefox support, having to use IE to comment on here shows the gblog owner is a narrow sighted as Didio is.
June 18th, 2008 at 3:25 am
No special insight into the mess. Just amused that in the post complaining about the misspelling of “guerrilla” it was spelled with one r: “guerilla”. Alanis Morissette would find it amusing.
Happens to the best of us!
June 18th, 2008 at 7:55 am
“also, the owner of this blog needs to enable Firefox support, having to use IE to comment on here shows the gblog owner is a narrow sighted as Didio is.”
Robert, the problem may be on your end. I (and a lot of others) use Firefox, and I’ve not experienced problems with commenting.
June 18th, 2008 at 10:08 am
and just a little off topic here the Irony in the song Ironic is that NONE of the examples of Irony that she listed are actually ironic
June 18th, 2008 at 10:46 am
I find this to be slightly amusing. A gentleman with great talent got fire. Not to be rude. Suck it up. This is how life goes; nobody said life was fair or that you would always get your way. In terms of how the company is being run. Sure there are things I would do different, but I find with almost every artist I have had to deal with in my life there is often a misconception that they would run it better. The career is hard and it is a business. Now with his talent and ability there are plenty of work opportunities. With his attitude and mouth; that may be a different story. Remember there is a reason that new employers ask for your previous employers phone numbers.
June 18th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
It IS ironic that Dixon is being replaced by Fabian Nicieza since Nicieza was given the same unceremonious boot off Gambit by Marvel a few years back.
June 18th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
I am sorry to hear Mr.Dixon lost his job, but his complaints about the direction of DC is what I want to comment on. I have spent to much money on junk from them lately. Sorry but it’s true, countdown was the biggest waste of money for me. I have never ever been pissed at or even remotely annoyed by a company if a series didn’t end the way I want, but that thing had no point and I was sucked in at 30 yrs of age, (pathetic ,I know) to keep buying all the issues to get the whole story. What I got was a stack of toilet paper, cause I wanted to wipe my a– with the whole thing. 155$ bucks down the drain, oh well.
June 19th, 2008 at 5:10 pm
The way he talks about Shooter, maybe they should give ol’ Jim a shot at the top EIC title. I’d be down for that. Although after all the crap that followed him after his run at Marvel, I doubt HE would be.
Also - after all the interviews and stories I’ve read about Jim Shooter’s rise and fall at Marvel, I see him as the good guy in the whole mess.
June 26th, 2008 at 5:19 am
No Dixon didn’t quit, he walked out. Well stormed out would be more accurate I guess. And he made the current situation which led to editorial having no other choice really than to let him go. And as to why, well lets just say that even though he’s a talented writer, at times Dixon doesn’t play very well with others. Especially where planned crossovers and events are concerned, at least as far as ones in which he didn’t personally have a hand in designing goes.
He’s a writer that I respect, but he’s very much a “my way or the highway” kind of guy, and not someone who tolerates lightly having his own storylines interupted or changed, even slightly, or who plays along with story and character changes or repurcussions that he doesn’t agree with or like.
And it’s not just differences of opinion we’re talking about here, it’s not just saying “I don’t like this” or “I don’t agree with this” or “I don’t think this is a good idea”, creative differences are a common thing in this industry, but at the end of the day a professional sucks it up and moves forward and learns to work within the system, and do the best work they can under whatever limitations may be imposed.
No, it’s more a case of not agreeing with current direction, and just not being able to let the fact go and move on. It’s constantly and deliberately going against the grain, and even trying to ignore editorial outright and trying to do what you personally want regardless. It’s about having problems with characters of a certain orientation and not agreeing with them having any place in a regular DC Universe. And it’s very much about not being one of those at the big table crafting DC’s future directions and biggest storylines. Sooner or later something has to give. And it did.
Chuck Dixon has written some great DC comics, and hopefully one day he’ll return and write some more, but in the meantime I wish him well with his future and wherever it may take him.
July 27th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Ooooh, the Shadow knows! Yah. How are we to evaluate your claims if you don’t even have the guts to reveal your identity?
July 27th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Unfortunately, TheShadow’s words ring true to at least one person who’s been in a production bullpen before.
There are many different kinds of writers: on another board, Damon Lindelof is getting all kinds of grief for (finally) turning in the script for Ultimate Hulk vs Wolverine #6. Mr Lindelof is a professional, but he has a different way of approaching writing than Mr Dixon.
As I understand it, Mr Dixon works quickly, has his plots and story beats laid out far in advance. And like other writers, he has earned a reasonable amount of autonomy when it comes to his domain. After all, he did an awesome job in his earlier stint with Robin, and when he came back, it was as if he had never left.
Unfortunately, the nature of the business is changing. I would submit that Mr Shooter is a bit like Mr Dixon - very much a professional, has a firm grasp of the “big picture”, works far faster than his peers - and like Mr Dixon, had some challenges when some of his advance work ran into the buzzsaw of the DCU post-Final Crisis, etc.
As a creative, it is tremendously disappointing to see something close to you taken in a different direction. It can be perceived as a loss of face and worse, it can appear that senior executives don’t value what has been accomplished.
I think the fans and his peers have spoken loud and clear. They love what Mr Dixon has done with Robin and other DCU publications. Yet TheShadow’s comments are completely in the same spirit. I myself wish we were back in the day of the done-in-one, but darnit, the business just doesn’t work that way anymore.
I too wish Mr Dixon well with his future and wherever it may take him. I am one fan who hopes that he finds it in his heart to move on and create the wonderful stories that he does so well, even if it is with people with whom some bitter words were once shared.
July 28th, 2008 at 11:04 am
But that doesn’t answer my question: who is the gutless “Shadow”?