<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brevoort on swiping.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/</link>
	<description>Newsarama contributors share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-360285</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-360285</guid>
		<description>Brevoort said:

"There’s more to what a guy like Greg Land brings to his page than his scrap,..."
_____

I think he meant 'crap', not scrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brevoort said:</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s more to what a guy like Greg Land brings to his page than his scrap,&#8230;&#8221;<br />
_____</p>
<p>I think he meant &#8216;crap&#8217;, not scrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greeneclipse</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-360090</link>
		<dc:creator>greeneclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-360090</guid>
		<description>But James, isn't the fact that he keeps getting such big projects a sign that Marvel considers him an MVP? hey wou;dn't be giving him such cushy jobs if they felt he wasn't an asset to the company.

Which, of course, speaks to how bankrupt these people really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But James, isn&#8217;t the fact that he keeps getting such big projects a sign that Marvel considers him an MVP? hey wou;dn&#8217;t be giving him such cushy jobs if they felt he wasn&#8217;t an asset to the company.</p>
<p>Which, of course, speaks to how bankrupt these people really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-359670</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-359670</guid>
		<description>David Uzumeri has an excellent point. Land is placed on books that would probably sell very well regardless of the artist. He did a Phoenix mini-series that "ressurected" Jean Grey (seriously, you think THAT wouldn't sell??), Mark Millar's run on UFF, Jeph Loeb's Ultimate Power (Loeb *is* a very popular writer these days), and now is going to the flagship X-Title, written by two of Marvel's current superstar writers. If he were placed on books who depended EXCLUSIVELY on his art to sell, I bet we'd be hearing a different tune from Marvel.

Also, even without the internet the swiping would be very noticeable, as it's very easy to pinpoint the same poses, facial expressions and combinations of the two everywhere on any given book that's been drawn by him, over and over again.

I really liked his art on Birds of Prey, because it had so much more personality to it, before he started depending so heavily on tracing por magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Uzumeri has an excellent point. Land is placed on books that would probably sell very well regardless of the artist. He did a Phoenix mini-series that &#8220;ressurected&#8221; Jean Grey (seriously, you think THAT wouldn&#8217;t sell??), Mark Millar&#8217;s run on UFF, Jeph Loeb&#8217;s Ultimate Power (Loeb *is* a very popular writer these days), and now is going to the flagship X-Title, written by two of Marvel&#8217;s current superstar writers. If he were placed on books who depended EXCLUSIVELY on his art to sell, I bet we&#8217;d be hearing a different tune from Marvel.</p>
<p>Also, even without the internet the swiping would be very noticeable, as it&#8217;s very easy to pinpoint the same poses, facial expressions and combinations of the two everywhere on any given book that&#8217;s been drawn by him, over and over again.</p>
<p>I really liked his art on Birds of Prey, because it had so much more personality to it, before he started depending so heavily on tracing por magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greeneclipse</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358687</link>
		<dc:creator>greeneclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358687</guid>
		<description>And with this blog post, Brevoort destroys every single shred of credibility he may have had. He's nothing more than a paid shill.

One more reason why Marvel is creatively bankrupt now. Things were never this bad even in the Speculator Era!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with this blog post, Brevoort destroys every single shred of credibility he may have had. He&#8217;s nothing more than a paid shill.</p>
<p>One more reason why Marvel is creatively bankrupt now. Things were never this bad even in the Speculator Era!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358238</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358238</guid>
		<description>I would notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GQ</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358109</link>
		<dc:creator>GQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358109</guid>
		<description>Moan all you want but as long as people keep buying Land's books, he's going to keep getting work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moan all you want but as long as people keep buying Land&#8217;s books, he&#8217;s going to keep getting work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358089</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeitgeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358089</guid>
		<description>"And why does Marvel always boil the opposition to its more controversial policies to a ‘few internet loudmouths’?

Why not just say it? The internet is just a promotional tool to them and they could really care less about what you think. "

How many people on various comics forums could you find that dont like Greg Lands art? 50? 100? 500? How many actual copies is one his comics going to sell? atleast 50.000. I wish people would stop taking it so personal when comics professionals tell the truth, only a small majority of people go on to the net and voice their opinions, that doesnt mean they are ignored but you cant base your business on their opinions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And why does Marvel always boil the opposition to its more controversial policies to a ‘few internet loudmouths’?</p>
<p>Why not just say it? The internet is just a promotional tool to them and they could really care less about what you think. &#8221;</p>
<p>How many people on various comics forums could you find that dont like Greg Lands art? 50? 100? 500? How many actual copies is one his comics going to sell? atleast 50.000. I wish people would stop taking it so personal when comics professionals tell the truth, only a small majority of people go on to the net and voice their opinions, that doesnt mean they are ignored but you cant base your business on their opinions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358086</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeitgeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358086</guid>
		<description>"Yeah, apart from the occasional bad face, bad pose, bad proportions, recycled artwork, and completely innapropriate facial expressions, Land’s art looks fucking awesome."

If it wasnt for people on the internet activly searching for swipies and pointing them out would you even notice? Bad poses and stupid faces can be found with every artist. Again i dont agree with his work ethics and would rather he do everything himself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, apart from the occasional bad face, bad pose, bad proportions, recycled artwork, and completely innapropriate facial expressions, Land’s art looks fucking awesome.&#8221;</p>
<p>If it wasnt for people on the internet activly searching for swipies and pointing them out would you even notice? Bad poses and stupid faces can be found with every artist. Again i dont agree with his work ethics and would rather he do everything himself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendrix</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358076</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358076</guid>
		<description>“If it looks good, then it IS good.”

And if it looks like crap, what is it then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If it looks good, then it IS good.”</p>
<p>And if it looks like crap, what is it then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358046</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-358046</guid>
		<description>I guess he's made it clear that Marvel has no obligation to even acknowledge the ethics in this situation. He's basically covering his eyes and saying, "Sales are great! I see no problem."

 Over and over again Marvel acts as if it's really run by 12 year olds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess he&#8217;s made it clear that Marvel has no obligation to even acknowledge the ethics in this situation. He&#8217;s basically covering his eyes and saying, &#8220;Sales are great! I see no problem.&#8221;</p>
<p> Over and over again Marvel acts as if it&#8217;s really run by 12 year olds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy Menace</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357900</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357900</guid>
		<description>And why does Marvel always boil the opposition to its more controversial policies to a 'few internet loudmouths'?  

Why not just say it?  The internet is just a promotional tool to them and they could really care less about what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why does Marvel always boil the opposition to its more controversial policies to a &#8216;few internet loudmouths&#8217;?  </p>
<p>Why not just say it?  The internet is just a promotional tool to them and they could really care less about what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy Menace</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357896</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357896</guid>
		<description>So basically if Marvel could just run a bunch of photographs through Photoshop filters and present it as a comic it would be fine as long as it sells?

Sorry, but I'm in the camp where I'd rather see an artist's actual "imperfect" art than see a lot of glorified fumetti and swipes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically if Marvel could just run a bunch of photographs through Photoshop filters and present it as a comic it would be fine as long as it sells?</p>
<p>Sorry, but I&#8217;m in the camp where I&#8217;d rather see an artist&#8217;s actual &#8220;imperfect&#8221; art than see a lot of glorified fumetti and swipes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhay</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357673</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357673</guid>
		<description>When did "stealing Travis Charest" drawings become "using scrap"...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did &#8220;stealing Travis Charest&#8221; drawings become &#8220;using scrap&#8221;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Waters</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357645</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357645</guid>
		<description>Don't forget the inability to have characters look consistent from panel to panel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the inability to have characters look consistent from panel to panel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiTo na Rua</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357638</link>
		<dc:creator>TiTo na Rua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357638</guid>
		<description>Popular = Good = Britney Spears?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular = Good = Britney Spears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Webb</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357637</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357637</guid>
		<description>wow now that's just sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow now that&#8217;s just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357600</guid>
		<description>Yeah, apart from the occasional bad face, bad pose, bad proportions, recycled artwork, and completely innapropriate facial expressions, Land's art looks fucking awesome.

OH WAIT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, apart from the occasional bad face, bad pose, bad proportions, recycled artwork, and completely innapropriate facial expressions, Land&#8217;s art looks fucking awesome.</p>
<p>OH WAIT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Boxleitner, a.k.a. K-Box</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357574</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Boxleitner, a.k.a. K-Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357574</guid>
		<description>By the way, &lt;a href="http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o281/Royd2007/originalartworpolicy200el6.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;HERE'S THE LETTER&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, <a href="http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o281/Royd2007/originalartworpolicy200el6.jpg" rel="nofollow">HERE&#8217;S THE LETTER</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Boxleitner, a.k.a. K-Box</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357573</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Boxleitner, a.k.a. K-Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357573</guid>
		<description>If the only rule here is that "popular = good," THEN WHY DID MARVEL EVEN BOTHER TO DRAW UP A LETTER BANNING SWIPING IN THE FIRST PLACE???

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the only rule here is that &#8220;popular = good,&#8221; THEN WHY DID MARVEL EVEN BOTHER TO DRAW UP A LETTER BANNING SWIPING IN THE FIRST PLACE???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357552</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeitgeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357552</guid>
		<description>The obvious point you are missing is that his art looks great (apart from the occasional bad face, although it is nowhere near as bad as people like to think), i dont like all the swiping but it is hard to pass up on great art and great writing because of a minor moral issue. Also consider that the vast majority of people who buy his work have no idea about that he doesnt do it all himself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious point you are missing is that his art looks great (apart from the occasional bad face, although it is nowhere near as bad as people like to think), i dont like all the swiping but it is hard to pass up on great art and great writing because of a minor moral issue. Also consider that the vast majority of people who buy his work have no idea about that he doesnt do it all himself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357482</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357482</guid>
		<description>I don't mind the swiping so much.  What bothers me is that he seems to swipe from the same things over and over and over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the swiping so much.  What bothers me is that he seems to swipe from the same things over and over and over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357481</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357481</guid>
		<description>Popular = Good.

Wait, someone check my math; that doesn't quite look right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular = Good.</p>
<p>Wait, someone check my math; that doesn&#8217;t quite look right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejulp</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357473</link>
		<dc:creator>ejulp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357473</guid>
		<description>But yeah, I agree with David as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But yeah, I agree with David as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejulp</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357472</link>
		<dc:creator>ejulp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357472</guid>
		<description>Brevoort, once again with the cool and calm, mind numbingly obvious answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brevoort, once again with the cool and calm, mind numbingly obvious answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Uzumeri</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357463</link>
		<dc:creator>David Uzumeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357463</guid>
		<description>Can we stop blaming "nerdy males" for everything? I mean, either nerdy males are the ones causing a tempest in a teapot over Greg Land swiping, or nerdy males are trying to defend Greg Land, depending on who you talk to. Greg Land sells not only because some people like his work but because he is placed on major books with talented writers that many people like to buy. Blaming this on a "nerdy male readership" is a flip, easy comment to make and counterproductive to any kind of constructive discussion. And I don't even *like* Greg Land. But the problem isn't dudes jerking off to his stuff, it's people who don't want to drop Ed Brubaker's Uncanny X-Men and are willing to overlook his art to get the story, a group of which I am part of. So hey, I'm the "problem", why not yell at me instead of a convenient, cheap straw man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we stop blaming &#8220;nerdy males&#8221; for everything? I mean, either nerdy males are the ones causing a tempest in a teapot over Greg Land swiping, or nerdy males are trying to defend Greg Land, depending on who you talk to. Greg Land sells not only because some people like his work but because he is placed on major books with talented writers that many people like to buy. Blaming this on a &#8220;nerdy male readership&#8221; is a flip, easy comment to make and counterproductive to any kind of constructive discussion. And I don&#8217;t even *like* Greg Land. But the problem isn&#8217;t dudes jerking off to his stuff, it&#8217;s people who don&#8217;t want to drop Ed Brubaker&#8217;s Uncanny X-Men and are willing to overlook his art to get the story, a group of which I am part of. So hey, I&#8217;m the &#8220;problem&#8221;, why not yell at me instead of a convenient, cheap straw man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david brothers</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357459</link>
		<dc:creator>david brothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357459</guid>
		<description>How is that a logical error? I'm hosting the one GIF and I kind of agree with T-voort.

I don't like the swipes. I don't like the porn face. However-- plenty of people like it, or don't dislike it, to the point where sales are fine on books that he's on.

It makes perfect sense. Marvel is a business, and if you aren't adjusting their bottom line up or down, what reason do they have to care? Talk is cheap.

&lt;i&gt;nerdy male readership&lt;/i&gt;

Can we let this ridiculous self-loathing garbage die, already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that a logical error? I&#8217;m hosting the one GIF and I kind of agree with T-voort.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the swipes. I don&#8217;t like the porn face. However&#8211; plenty of people like it, or don&#8217;t dislike it, to the point where sales are fine on books that he&#8217;s on.</p>
<p>It makes perfect sense. Marvel is a business, and if you aren&#8217;t adjusting their bottom line up or down, what reason do they have to care? Talk is cheap.</p>
<p><i>nerdy male readership</i></p>
<p>Can we let this ridiculous self-loathing garbage die, already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Trippe</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Trippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357445</guid>
		<description>The glaring logical error there is the 'as evidence by the sales.' Greg Land relying on Pornface (and Pornbody) swipes gets good sales from nerdy male readership? GETOUTTAHERE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The glaring logical error there is the &#8216;as evidence by the sales.&#8217; Greg Land relying on Pornface (and Pornbody) swipes gets good sales from nerdy male readership? GETOUTTAHERE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357419</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357419</guid>
		<description>GO DIEGO, GO DIEGO! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO DIEGO, GO DIEGO! <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357407</link>
		<dc:creator>Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357407</guid>
		<description>I'm so depressed that I get that "swiper no swiping" remark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so depressed that I get that &#8220;swiper no swiping&#8221; remark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357291</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/04/02/brevoort-on-swiping/#comment-357291</guid>
		<description>Swiper, NO SWIPING! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swiper, NO SWIPING! <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
