Comments on: Making the good duck artist look bad http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/ The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds. Sat, 18 May 2013 18:37:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Ed Brubaker http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-354532 Ed Brubaker Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:16:59 +0000 http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/#comment-354532 You know, looking at the example they posted, it doesn't look so bad. There was a Barks collection in the mid-80s that was MUCH worse, actually. They blue-lined all Barks artwork and had someone famous airbrush all the colors. This looks pretty mild, to get that much complaining. It won't stop me buying the books, that's for sure. I already put my order in for it and the Rosa collection. You know, looking at the example they posted, it doesn’t look so bad. There was a Barks collection in the mid-80s that was MUCH worse, actually. They blue-lined all Barks artwork and had someone famous airbrush all the colors.

This looks pretty mild, to get that much complaining. It won’t stop me buying the books, that’s for sure. I already put my order in for it and the Rosa collection.

]]> By: ejulp http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-354464 ejulp Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:42:15 +0000 http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/#comment-354464 Looks like the same problem Image had with those Kirby reprints. Looks like the same problem Image had with those Kirby reprints.

]]> By: Martin http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-354355 Martin Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:43:18 +0000 http://blog.newsarama.com/2008/03/31/making-the-good-duck-artist-look-bad/#comment-354355 Are the panels down the side of the Danish critique meant to be ‘vandalism’? They don’t look so different, just more vibrant. Are the panels down the side of the Danish critique meant to be ‘vandalism’? They don’t look so different, just more vibrant.

]]>