Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Quote, Unquote

Friday, February 10

Quote, Unquote

March 8th, 2008
Author Tim O'Shea

What kind of a week has it been? In terms of quotes, a writer who is known for his ear for dialogue found himself explaining that what he had written on his own message board had to be taken within the context of smiley faces. Are you still a serious writer if your major line of defense is a smiley face? :) [note MY smiley face, please]

Oh Lord, will the future generations have to minor in emoticons, rather than semiotics, to be literary scholars? In all seriousness, kudos to Bendis for ultimately posting an apology and doing his best to move on in the most constructive manner. Is the whole dust-up worthy of quoting here? No. But many people were quoting the discussion this week, even after the initial message board thread was deleted. So this week’s collection of quotes may be stuff you missed while noticing the presence or lack thereof of smiley faces…

“A superhero costume is a concept, not a piece of clothing. As soon as you try to translate it into actual garments, no matter how well you do, it’s still a failure because there was nothing there, in a sense, to reproduce.”
- Michael Chabon, clearly thinking far more about superhero costumes than your average fellow, in an audio supplement to his original Secret Skin: An Essay in Unitard Theory essay for the March 8, 2008, issue of the New Yorker. Also worth a listen for Chabon’s admission that he consulted his five- and 10-year-old sons to confirm the Beast is a barefoot character.

“What I had to tell this poor guy – whose only dream was to work in comics – was that his portfolio was not good enough to get work in comics (or at least at DC) and that I suspected that it would probably never be good enough. I asked him how long he had tried to break in, and the answer was ’9 or 10 years.’”
- KC Carlson, imparting the quintessential dos and don’ts for folks looking to get an industry toehold.

“at the time I was kind of nerdy”
- Mike Benson, a witness for the prosecution (under cross-examination) in the trial of murder defendant/comic book store owner Michael George, clarifying how or why he was so cognizant of the store’s comic book inventory.

“I never read Batman, never read Superman, never read Flash. I didn’t read comic books. There was one time my mother was going to have to be gone, so she made me heat up a Swanson’s fried chicken TV dinner. I wanted to read something while I was eating, it was some cartoon, I can’t even tell you what the comic book was.”
- Rush Limbaugh, apologizing indirectly for a caller’s inappropriate characterization left unchallenged by Limbaugh because he had no idea who Curious George was (follow the link for full context). That fact and the above quote give a glimpse into part of little Rushie Limbaugh’s childhood. (Thanks to Chris Mautner for this link)

“The market is … well … I guess it’s the same as it’s always been. It’s up and it’s down. I just got my numbers on the first RASL and they’re like 20,000. … Honestly I cannot tell you if that’s good or bad or normal or anything. That’s one of the reasons why I am just saying what the numbers are, because … I don’t see the point in being secretive about all this stuff. I figure if I just start telling these numbers maybe somebody else will start talking about them, too, and we can kind of figure out together as a community what the hell’s going on. But I imagine 20 [thousand] is decent for a self-published book in this market.”
- Jeff Smith, aiming to foster some discussion with a refreshing level of candor, in an interview on Comixology’s It Came Out on Wednesday

 
13 Responses to “Quote, Unquote”
  1. Von Allan Says:

    Ack! Jeff Smith and I share a brain. I just did an extensive blog post where I reveal all of my stats (with supporting spreadsheets) since I launched my webcomic on GirlAMatic. ‘Course, it’s a vastly different thing, but I agree with him that being secretive is pointless.

    Von

  2. Julio Dvulture Says:

    I still think the only reason Bendis apologized is because he was caught red-handed being unfairly aggressive and both his attempt to “retcon yourself” by claiming emoticons on his posts, and to “erase continuity” by deleting the thread were a wash. Still, at least is better than anything that Quesada would do: caught on the same situation, I bet Quesada would pretend that nothing was happening (even with all the noise) or would give an apology that is not a apology but an accusation that other people don’t have sense of humor and everyone except him is a idiot.

  3. Zeitgeist Says:

    Well comic fans Are known for their lack of humor, especially when it comes to someone controversial like Quesada

  4. plotz Says:

    How the heck did Joe Quesada get involved? What does he have to do with anything?

  5. Morrollan Says:

    Because Joe Q is the bringer of evil that is Bendis, wonder how a once good writer turned so not good? Power changes a person it seems and since The day of Jemas who begot Q who in turn begot Bendis ,see a pattern of stupidity?

  6. nicholas Says:

    did you seriously just type that? “joe q is the bringer of evil that is bendis”? seriously? this. is. about. comic. books. no one becomes evil because they are hired by a comic book company. no one who works for a comic book company actually has any “power.” geez louise.
    i will never for the life of me understand why people get so upset about these things. to call joe quesada “evil”, or brian michael bendis “evil” just because they have written spider-man or avengers stories you don’t like is overreaction of monumental proportions.
    i say again: geez, louise.

  7. Rob S. Says:

    I never though I’d say this… but Poor L’il Rushie…

  8. Dave Says:

    An insight into the average Newsarama poster:
    “ARGH GOD QUESADA IS THE DEVIL BLARGARGARGH QUESADA LIED CAPTAIN AMERICA DIED NO BLOOD FOR SKRULL OIL QUESADA DID 9/11 SO THE GOVERNMENT WOULD PASS THE PATRIOT ACT AND HE COULD MAKE MILLAR WRITE CIVIL WAR”

  9. Alan Coil Says:

    Morrollan,

    Way to pull the strings, Puppeteer!
    _____

    Kinda obvious Limbaugh never read Superman.
    _____

    I tried to read Chabon’s piece. Couldn’t finish. Boring and inconsequential.

  10. Shaun Says:

    Alan, I had just the oppposite reaction. I thought the Chabon piece was thoughtful, heartfelt, and very funny. Then again, I love his writing (whether it be his novels, or his contributions to Spider-Man 2).

    I often wonder why, with all the problems WB’s had getting DC movies made and how (Batman Begins aside) the ones that have been made all pretty much sucked, actual comic book writers aren’t brought in to help with the scripting. Likewise, has WB ever talked to Chabon about writing a movie for a DC character(s)? If not, WHY NOT?? Seems like something he’d be interested in.

  11. Shaun Says:

    Not that I care all that much, but what was the big flap with Bendis and Simone all about anyhow? All I’ve seen are people’s reactions, and now the apology.

    Whatever it’s about, I blame Joephisto. ;-)

  12. Alan Coil Says:

    Well, Shaun, it all started when Bendis realized that Gail has more fans that love her than he does that love him. Jealousy reared its ugly head, Bendis said stuff, Gail rebutted, Bendis cried. I’d link you to it, but Bendis deleted his shame.

    Or something like that. ;)

  13. Shaun Says:

    Thanks Alan… I guess that’s a good a summation as I need. I don’t love or hate Bendis, but I wonder why he felt the need to take a swipe at Gail.

    I don’t love or hate Gail either, but she’s certainly a class act. Odd that someone would feel the need to attack her, even if it was just a joke.

    Quesada or Didio, OTOH, fire away! :-)

Leave a Reply »