Looks like Anakin and the gang are headed back to the big screen.
Variety reports that the Star Wars: The Clone Wars series set to hit the Cartoon Network this fall will kick things off with a big-screen debut:
Lucasfilm has partnered with Warner Bros. Pictures and Turner Broadcasting on “Star Wars: The Clone Wars,” a 3-D toon that will bow in theaters this August before moving to the smallscreen in the fall. The Aug. 15 feature will set the stage for the spinoff skein, which will bow on Cartoon Network, followed by airings on TNT. International release dates for the feature and TV series are still being set.
Multiplatform project is an expansion of the earlier “Clone Wars” microseries that aired on Cartoon Network. However, Fox’s homevid arm released those episodes on DVD, just as it has distributed every “Star Wars” theatrical release since 1977.
Lucasfilm said Warner Bros.’ cable and theatrical resources made it an especially good fit for the project. “We’re trying to do something unprecedented — marrying TV series and theatrical release,” a rep said.
The movie picks up between episodes II and III, before Anakin Skywalker becomes Darth Vader. Besides Anthony Daniels as C3PO and Matthew Wood as General Grievous, the show will feature different voice actors for the returning characters.
EDIT: In our comments section, Nat Gertler points out that this isn’t “unprecedented:”
I hate to say this, but not only is that not unprecedented… it’s something that Battlestar Galactica beat them to, decades ago. (I do find the thought that Star Wars is walking in the footprints of BG to be quite amusing.)
EDIT Strikes Back: You can find the trailer here.

February 12th, 2008 at 6:32 am
What more could they add from the Gendy Tartakovzky series?
February 12th, 2008 at 6:38 am
does anyone want to make a bet that this will finish in the top 5 grossing animated films?
if not for all the PIxar crap, it probably would be #1.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:39 am
“The Aug. 15 feature will set the stage for the spinoff skein*, which will bow* on Cartoon Network”
*What? That’s not how you use these words…
February 12th, 2008 at 7:28 am
Actually, Shrek 2 is the highest grossing animated feature of all times. It’s not a Pixar film.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:39 am
After the belated disappointment of Episodes 1-3 set in, I think I’m just gonna pirate this one…
February 12th, 2008 at 7:40 am
I’m a huge Star Wars fan…and I think I’m now Star Wars’ed Out. All this Expanded Universe thing is killing it for me.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:41 am
….Mind you I’ll still go see this…lol…I’m trapped.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Oh boy, more Clone Wars. Someone convince me that the majority of fans want to hear more about the Clone Wars.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:02 am
I agree with Grumpy that the phrasing is weird in that excerpt. I guess skein could work as “a succession or series of similar or interrelated things”. But if they wanted to use bow in that sense, it should probably be in the idiom “make one’s bow”, which means to “to appear publicly for the first time, as a performer, politician, etc.”
It reads like it was written by a foreigner or someone who just got a dictionary for Christmas.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:03 am
Variety is nutty for calling series “skeins”. NUTTY. I didn’t know they’d added “bow” to their list of creatively repurposed terminology.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:40 am
The Clone Wars cartoon rocked! Both seasons were better than the movies.
The Clone Wars is a ripe period for more stories. That’s why you see so many stories set during that time period. That and the period between A New Hope and the Empire Strikes Back are great places to have tons of adventures, if you can stomach Luke without Jedi powers.
February 12th, 2008 at 8:45 am
Actually, Snow White & the Seven Dwarfs is the highest grossing animated film of all time when adjusted for inflation with total gross of over $730 Million. (It was originally released in 1937 after all)
February 12th, 2008 at 8:54 am
This would have been awesome if it had actually debuted between Episode 2 and 3. I would have been equally as interesting if it had been set between the first and second trilogies. But releasing a whole new Clone Wars project now is awkward franchising.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:09 am
I agree with some of the comments, this would have been great if it did come out around, during, and/or in between episodes 2 & 3. Ultimately I think that all these CLONE WARS stories should have been the real episode 2.
Its sad when fans become more creative than the creator, sorry George.
I mean after researching and reading what George’s intended views were for his franchise, I am convinced that Rick McCallum is the real braintrust for the franchise.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:30 am
“Pixar crap” - Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, Ratatouille - these are all “crap” to you, but something Star Wars-related that wasn’t made 25 years ago isn’t? Wow, to each his owwn, I suppose.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Looks great.
Can’t wait.
The end.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:38 am
I hope they do something that will cover the time period between Eps 3 and 4…
February 12th, 2008 at 9:40 am
The live-action series that starts next year is supposed to cover that period, snikt.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:02 am
is it me or do those graphics look more like for a video game than for a full length feature film…almost looks amateurish to today’s standards
February 12th, 2008 at 10:04 am
“We’re trying to do something unprecedented — marrying TV series and theatrical release”.
I hate to say this, but not only is that not unprecedented… it’s something that Battlestar Galactica beat them to, decades ago. (I do find the thought that Star Wars is walking in the footprints of BG to be quite amusing.)
February 12th, 2008 at 10:24 am
Agreed. The again, I find the fact that I now live in a time when STAR WARS sucks and GALACTICA is great to be more than a little unsettling….
February 12th, 2008 at 10:34 am
They made a mistake not getting Genndy and his friends to do this.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:35 am
Was it Battlestar Galactica that beat them to it or are we talking about the Gil Gerard Buck Rogers series? I definately remember seeing Buck Rogers at the Universal Theater in Warren, Mi way back when (it was the second movie I saw that night following Dawn of the Dead - how’s that for a double feature?). Anyway both BSG and BR were Glen Larson productions so that may be a source of confusion.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:41 am
“Pixar crap?” Geez… The Toy Story movies, Monsters, Inc. & The Incredibles (the latter, one of the best superhero movies ever, easily surpassing most DC and Marvel films) are crap? Really?
Even films that weren’t quite up to the aforementioned ones: A Bug’s Life and Finding Nemo, are still pretty damned great. Cars looked like crap to me, but people tell me it was better than they expected.
Then there’s Ratatouille. Again, I wasn’t interested but I heard nothing but great things about it. I finally saw it a couple of weeks ago. Y’know what? I think it might be the *best* movie released in 2007, or at least right up there. I’d even aruge that the movie got robbed, and might’ve been worthy of a Best Picture nomination. Yes, it’s that good.
I have no idea if Clone Wars will be good or not, but considering how awful the SW prequels are (OK, Ep III has its moments) I can’t even begin to understand where you get off calling Pixar’s incredible body of work “crap.” You’re certainly entitled to that opinion, but I’d suggest you go back and watch some Pixar films again.
At the very least, Pixar’s animation is greatly superior to what CW will be, if the picture shown here is any indication.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:43 am
BSG was released theatrically as well, I remember going to see that as well as Buck Rogers. IIRC, the pilot episode was expanded to feature length. But that was so long ago, that I could have that wrong.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:46 am
I don’t know about Buck being on the big screen, but Battlestar did indeed do it nearly 30 years ago.
Still, it hasn’t been done much since, so Lucasfilm claiming that they are doing something unprecedented isn’t all that wacky.
And saying that Star Wars is following in BG’s footsteps…please. That is rediculous! (and I love the ORIGINAL Battlestar!)
February 12th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Man, why couldn’t they give us more Luke, Leia, and Han if they were going to go the animated route? Carrie and Mark would be up for the voice-overs for sure, and I’m sure they could have thrown enough money at Harrison to bring him on board. They could have brought either “Dark Empire” or the excellent Thrawn trilogy to the big screen. Damn, that would have been sweet.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Not to be super-pedantic or anything, but if memory serves, the BATTLESTAR GALACTICA movie was just the pilot episode with a minimum (if any amount) of extra unaired material. Maybe someone older than me remembers.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:28 am
The edited pilot movie for the real Battlestar Galactica did indeed screen theatrically in many parts of the world (but not the US) prior to airing on television. It did so well for Universal that they followed the same plan with Buck Rogers domestically the following year. After BSG was canceled by ABC, ironically for being too expensive, Universal released the pilot theatrically in this country, and it still provided a nice profit.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:35 am
The Battlestar Galactica movie was indeed shown on TV as the first episode, but its theatrical version was released in various markets prior to the series launching on TV. (And yes, they did the same thing with Buck Rogers, but that was later.)
February 12th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Joel, correct me if I’m wrong, but i think he’s reference to the “pixar crap” was regarding the type of animation and not the fact that Pixar movies themselves were in the top five. If so, I agree it should have been a more traditional animation like the original shorts.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:45 am
The Battlestar Galactica movie aired in theaters in the US some months after it aired on TV. Some people even went to the theater thinking it was a new movie not seen on TV before. The only difference between it and the TV version of the pilot was that Baltar died in the theatrical version whereas that scene had been cut for the TV version so that the character could stick around.
February 12th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
I don’t like the character renderings.
Despite this, I probably will see this in the theatres because the Clones Wars were the best aspect of the prequels.
February 12th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Looks like James is right, if the IMDB is to be believed … it shows the TV show debuting in September of 1978, with the movie being released in May of 1979:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077215/releaseinfo
It didn’t make any references to Buck Rogers being released in theaters first, but I do remember seeing it at the local dollar theater before it hit TV … so it might be the better example.
February 12th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
I’ll go see Pixar “crap” anyday over more of this drek Lucas puts out. Pixar has had excellent stories and animation in all of their endevors.
Any interest I had in Star Wars was killed by Episodes 1-3; now those were crap.
February 12th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Old news. Buck Rogers & Battlestar Galactica did this in 1978 and 1980 respectively. And IIRC, BSG did it all “In SENSURROUND!”…
February 12th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
the pict reminds me of the character renderings from the MTV Spiderman show, having big heads/eyes and all…
February 12th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Turns out Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker’s father.
Man, that blows my mind!!!
February 12th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
The “skein”/”homevid”/”bow” jargon and awkward grammar are Variety’s standard too-cool-for-school house style. Tiresome as it is, we’re stuck with it.
February 12th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
The style looks a little off for Star Wars, but the Cartoon Network ones did too at first. And those were FAR better than the films proper!
So I’ll probably go see it in the theatre because it’s more fun that way.
February 12th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
As wikipedia points out, the Battlestar Galactica movie was showing -in other markets- (apparently including Canada) before it was rolled out as a TV series in the US.
February 12th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
It’s a TRAP!
Our fanboy minds can’t repell animated lightsaber action of that magnitude!
February 12th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
now bring out Star Wars Episode VII please
February 12th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
The really odd thing about Variety-grammar is that they really talk like that for some mad reason. I once had cause to phone Variety’s offices when I was working at the college paper and the girl I got on the phone went to check something for me. “Yeah, that vehicle preems in week 36,” she said when she picked my call back up.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:01 pm
(notices the lack of A Bug’s Life and Cars in the defenses of PIXAR)
But yeah . . . I don’t know what it could possibly add to the Emmy-award-winning Clone Wars miniseries. Except, maybe, the side-stories not completely focused on Anakin, Obi-Wan, and the other “main” characters. Perhaps they’ll go into how General Grevious came into being or even Boba Fett’s training sessions or something like that.
Wonder if Warner/CN and Lucasfilms would finally release the series as one complete, uninterrupted movie form with both halves making one complete story, especially since they’re all chummy and all now.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Oh, there’s a better excample than Battlestar Galactica: BATMAN from 1966 had a theatrical release between seasons 1 and 2.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Jeff, I actually did mention A Bug’s Life in my defense of Pixar. I put it a notch below most of their fare but that would’ve been like saying that (since Buck Rogers was brought up in this thread) Erin Gray wasn’t quite as hot as Lynda Carter. Most people would probably agree with that statement, but few would’ve kicked her out of bed for eating crackers. I know I wouldn’t have!
A Bug’s Life is an excellent movie, but it was also one of the earliest Pixar features and they’ve just gotten better and better over the years. Cars, OTOH… I can’t say, since I never saw it. It didn’t interest me, and the people I know who saw it said it was “OK,” just not a must-see like most of their stuff.
Likewise, I’m not sold on Wall*E yet, but Pixar’s exceeded my expectations before so we’ll see. I’m defintely looking forward to Toy Story 3 though, and I hope they’ll do an Incredibles sequel one day. We need that much more than we need Spider-Man 4, another Fantastic Four movie, or that “Justice League 90210″ WB’s so intent on making.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Jeff, I mentioned A Bug’s Life in my post and would have mentioned Cars had I thought of it. A Bug’s Life is as good as anything Pixar has done in my opinion and Cars was certainly enjoyable, but indeed one of their lesser efforts. However, most companies would love to have a “strong” effort that matches the “lesser” quality of Cars.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
That was a little scary, Shaun.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Kim, good point about the 1966 Batman. Same is true for The X-Files (although I didn’t care much for their movie) and (just this past year) The Simpsons.
Heck, we can even include Star Trek, since TNG was on the air and the original cast films continued (ST 6 even paving the way for TNG’s move to the big screen). Then, once Next Gen was doing movies DS9 and Voyager were in production (and ST: First Contact had a brief DS9 crossover).
February 12th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Wow, Sluggo… You’re right! Eerie.
February 12th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
Come to think of it, First Contact also had a brief Voyager cameo as well (the holodoc). I just tend to not think of Voyager much.
I do miss my DS9 though…
I should really get some work done today. What are these people paying me for anyway?
February 12th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
FTR, Cars is one of my top 3 Pixar movies. The story, like many Pixar ones, is serviceable, but it’s animation…the vehicles, but more over the scenery is just incredible (not, I’m a sucker for Route 66 stories.)
February 12th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
I’ve heard the story in Cars is actually pretty good… “Touching,” even.
My biggest problem with it, aside from just not caring about talking cars… I refuse to give money to anything featuring a moron like Larry the Cable Guy. I guess the greatness of Paul Newman sort of balances the scales there, but I still couldn’t bring myself to see it.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
strange looking CG video? Can’t wait to see 5 episodes dedicated to telling the story of how Anakin stubbed his toe on Tatooine.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
…And even Nat Gertler’s wrong about BSG beating Star Wars to the punch. Between seasons one and two of the Batman TV series, there was this really neat movie that, 40 years later, is still better than the last three done before the Bale relaunch.
Bottom Line: If Lucasfilms claims they’ve done it first, it’s only so they can try to sue whoever really did it before they did.
February 12th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
They really should do something with Buck Rogers. It could be neat. I saw a minute of that horrible looking Flash Gordon on the Sci Fi Network and boy how do you go from people flying around on rocket packs in the 1920s(?) movie serials and smashing into Ming’s palace in the 1980s to whatever the hell that was?
Oy.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Phillip said
“After the belated disappointment of Episodes 1-3 set in, I think I’m just gonna pirate this one…”
Personally, I’d rank Episode III with the original trilogy.
Yes, Episodes 1 and 2 were lame. Still, Revenge of the Sith is a more entertaining and even compelling sci-fi film than people give it credit.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
“Between seasons one and two of the Batman TV series, there was this really neat movie…”
And the Munsters had a movie spin-off as well. Then the various movies to inspire television shows (MASH, Buffy, etc.) and the reverse of shows inspiring movies (Brady Bunch, Dukes of Hazzard, etc.) I don’t think a movie/television conjunction is really all that original or innovative. It’s really more about everyone involved with this series knowing they can grab a quick load of cash and press by launching this in theaters first.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:11 pm
Brenticles is a toolbox.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:40 am
Gendy Tartakosky already put in work on THE CLONE WARS. I guess Lucas had some backstory that Gendy left out.
As far as INDIANA JONES & THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL goes, let’s hope Lucas, Speilberg and Harrison Ford brought back the magic, and once again cause Shia LeBouf to blow up.
February 13th, 2008 at 4:33 am
I love STAR WARS, but have zero interest in this, we’re all really waiting for the missing 20 years between EPS III and IV.
The Clone Wars have been done to death.
February 14th, 2008 at 11:04 am
There is a decent trailer for the Clone Wars movie up at starwars.com. I think the animation looks fantastic.
Not EVEN close to what Pixar does in terms of quality tho.
February 22nd, 2008 at 1:56 am
I hope I’m not the only one who see’s this movie is total and under s…or trash, for a better word. this loox like something i’d consider taking my little girls to see. i’m sorry, but if all you remember in the very first star wars movie, luke’s famly (what was left of them) was layed to waste. i doubt we’ll see anything like smoking skull corpses in this new installment.
and please someone tell me how the hell anakin can have a padawan under him? last i checked he was still calling obie 1 master in the finally. i’ve come to realize star wars’ weakest link is george lucas. if the nimrod was going to have an art company do this movie, he should have got the guys that did beowulf or the cg final fantasy flics or some anime company, but samurai jack?! why not samurai champloo or afro samurai?
man, enough with windu, enough with anakin, lucas needs to move on and create what he was destined to create…….SMURFS VS THE SNORKS……..THE MOVIE….IN CG……yeah, i think that’s it.
peace yall