<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FF Gets New Branding for Millar/Hitch Run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pron pronvideos pronvideos</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-807799</link>
		<dc:creator>pron pronvideos pronvideos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-807799</guid>
		<description>Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your website quite a bit up very fast!
What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate link 
in your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as 
yours lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your website quite a bit up very fast!<br />
What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate link<br />
in your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as<br />
yours lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Muller</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-226228</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-226228</guid>
		<description>The main problem is that it looks like an ad, rather than a cover.
Or the cover for a tabloid newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem is that it looks like an ad, rather than a cover.<br />
Or the cover for a tabloid newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason "CodeGuy" Bryant</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason "CodeGuy" Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225380</guid>
		<description>&quot;On a typical rack the bottom half of the cover isn’t going to be visible to someone browsing the shelves, which means the larger logo identifying the title of the book won’t be visible.&quot;

Is that really a problem, though? 

If someone is looking for Fantastic Four, they&#039;re going to find it. If someone isn&#039;t looking for Fantastic Four, isn&#039;t it the art or the story blurb that&#039;s going to get them interested? It might make sense to put those things where people can see them better, instead of the same logo that they saw last month and the month before. It might just get their attention because it looks different from everything else on the stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On a typical rack the bottom half of the cover isn’t going to be visible to someone browsing the shelves, which means the larger logo identifying the title of the book won’t be visible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that really a problem, though? </p>
<p>If someone is looking for Fantastic Four, they&#8217;re going to find it. If someone isn&#8217;t looking for Fantastic Four, isn&#8217;t it the art or the story blurb that&#8217;s going to get them interested? It might make sense to put those things where people can see them better, instead of the same logo that they saw last month and the month before. It might just get their attention because it looks different from everything else on the stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225366</guid>
		<description>What the hell is Reed doing with his hand?  Does he want the reader to pull his rubber fingers or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell is Reed doing with his hand?  Does he want the reader to pull his rubber fingers or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Engblom</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225328</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Engblom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225328</guid>
		<description>LOL!  The F.F. are many things, but they&#039;ve never, ever been &quot;hip&quot; in the context Brevoort is suggesting.

Mark my words (not that you actually will), this Millar/Hitch F.F. will become just another late book within four months of the first issue.  Bryan Hitch simply cannot complete a monthly book...which he&#039;s proven time and time again.  So all of this pre-publication flutter over trade design and the rest of Millar&#039;s smoke and mirror show will all amount to nothing.

Happy Friday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  The F.F. are many things, but they&#8217;ve never, ever been &#8220;hip&#8221; in the context Brevoort is suggesting.</p>
<p>Mark my words (not that you actually will), this Millar/Hitch F.F. will become just another late book within four months of the first issue.  Bryan Hitch simply cannot complete a monthly book&#8230;which he&#8217;s proven time and time again.  So all of this pre-publication flutter over trade design and the rest of Millar&#8217;s smoke and mirror show will all amount to nothing.</p>
<p>Happy Friday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sluggo</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225308</link>
		<dc:creator>sluggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225308</guid>
		<description>Marvel seems to want their books to look like anything but comic books, unless they&#039;re going for ironic/retro like the One More Day covers.

I don&#039;t really care too much, I&#039;m more interested in the interiors.

Look at it this way, at least it&#039;s an end to the Michael Turner covers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvel seems to want their books to look like anything but comic books, unless they&#8217;re going for ironic/retro like the One More Day covers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really care too much, I&#8217;m more interested in the interiors.</p>
<p>Look at it this way, at least it&#8217;s an end to the Michael Turner covers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Gray</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225296</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225296</guid>
		<description>Oh I so do not like that redesign - it&#039;s not so much cutting edge as drab. Give me the original logo or the Seventies curved number, at least they work with super-hero artwork.

What&#039;s wrong with an unapologetic superhero comic look?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I so do not like that redesign &#8211; it&#8217;s not so much cutting edge as drab. Give me the original logo or the Seventies curved number, at least they work with super-hero artwork.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with an unapologetic superhero comic look?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy Menace</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225292</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225292</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there&#039;s a reason why ALL of the other comics, magazines, and newspapers put their titles at the top, y&#039;know, where you can read them. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s a reason why ALL of the other comics, magazines, and newspapers put their titles at the top, y&#8217;know, where you can read them. <img src='http://blog.newsarama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matches</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/comment-page-1/#comment-225280</link>
		<dc:creator>matches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/11/30/ff-gets-new-branding-for-millarhitch-run/#comment-225280</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not bad-looking, but it&#039;s IMO a poor choice for a comic book.  On a typical rack the bottom half of the cover isn&#039;t going to be visible to someone browsing the shelves, which means the larger logo identifying the title of the book won&#039;t be visible.  A browser will only have the smaller logo in the left corner to pick out the book.  Maybe not a big deal for someone who&#039;s already looking for the book, but it discourages casual browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not bad-looking, but it&#8217;s IMO a poor choice for a comic book.  On a typical rack the bottom half of the cover isn&#8217;t going to be visible to someone browsing the shelves, which means the larger logo identifying the title of the book won&#8217;t be visible.  A browser will only have the smaller logo in the left corner to pick out the book.  Maybe not a big deal for someone who&#8217;s already looking for the book, but it discourages casual browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
