Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Variations on a Theme

Thursday, November 20

Variations on a Theme

November 3rd, 2007
Author Melissa Krause

So Wizard Magazine’s officially declared itself the “#1 Men’s Pop Culture Magazine!”

In a comment at her livejournal, rachel_edidin explains the problem:

It’s relevant because it’s visible, and because it markets itself as the comics magazine. Also, it owns a huge number of other comics periodicals and many major conventions.

So the fact that it’s now advertising itself as a men’s magazine says a good deal about its attitude toward women in comics and sets the tone for a LOT of affiliated industry coverage and events.

Rob S. finds it hard to care:

So earlier this week a Mildly Amusing Dinosaur of a Comics Magazine has announced (via cover blurb) that it will now be a Mildly Amusing Dinosaur of a “Pop Culture” Magazine for Men. And some fine folks who don’t need that blurb to tell them what they already know–that, blurb or no blurb, it has the sense of humor of a dim Starfleet Academy fratboy–are jawing on and on about it. And I’ve tried to join the conversation a couple of times, but really just can’t get into it.

Because–as Kalinara notes–this book is a Dinosaur. All of its primary functions have gone by the wayside, either through humor and opinion blogs, internet news sites or auction sites like eBay (who needs a price guide?). So it’s left to grope around blindly in the jungle as more specialized mammals scamper out of reach of its tiny, useless arms.

It’s a Dinosaur. It’s closer to being oil than being relevant.

So it’s hard to see what all the fuss is about.*

Cheryl Lynn shares her real source of irritation:

But don’t let me see your reporters at MoCCA (which at this point has evolved into the best damn place to meet cute, smart hipster girls) pretending they’re legitimate comics journalists. What the hell did Wizard have a booth there for if they were only going to bring us gems like Match the Rack? That’s very desirable booth space that could have gone to an independent artist or a news organization that actually gives a damn about something that isn’t WWH, Countdown or tits! And why the hell did Wizard reps approach female fans and ask them to fill out surveys at conventions this summer? Why ask us to participate and then slam the door in our faces? That is so damn irritating. No point in reaching out to women if you don’t have anything to offer. That’s just a waste of time that winds up making everyone cranky. Just stick to making your existing audience happy and the rest of us will go buy Comic Foundry and UVC.

While Ragnell thinks it all makes sense now:

Its not hard to arrive at a working hypothesis here: Sales were falling. They needed a way to bring them up. They could expand beyond comics or try to capture more of the comics-buying community. They explored the option of opening to a wider comics-reading audience and surveyed female convention-goers.

They looked at the results of the surveys and realized they would need to change things they didn’t wish to. Maybe they were just too chickenshit to risk a change, or had no faith that the male audience would be willing to read news and views without round shiny breasts next to every paragraph, or maybe they just didn’t care enough to make the effort.

So what do you think?

14 Responses to “Variations on a Theme”
  1. tralfaz Says:

    people should stop buying wizard cause its a waste of money better suited for buying more comics

  2. Sean Says:

    I talked about basically the same thing a year ago.

    http://swimminginchampaign.blogspot.com/2006/12/if-i-ran-wizard.html

    Buy Comics Foundry instead. Or Geek Monthly. Or more comics.

  3. Sean Says:

    I talked about basically the same thing almost a year ago when they decided to be “The Magazine of Comics, Entertainment and Pop Culture” (http://swimminginchampaign.blogspot.com/2006/12/if-i-ran-wizard.html).

    Wizard is just about dead in the water. Buy Comics Foundry instead. Or Geek Monthly. Or more comics.

  4. Sean Says:

    Whoops.

  5. Papervolcano Says:

    I couldn’t give two tugs of a dead dog’s dangly bits for Wizard-the-magazine. These are the death throes of a periodical that’s rapidly shedding subscriptions and relevance. They won’t be able to compete against Maxim, and I can’t see them clawing much market share away from already-established pop-culture geek magazines such as SFX or Deathray (or whatever the American versions are), which, aside from already having that market, appeal to a wider cross-section of the population.

    What I am concerned about is Wizard-the-organiser-of-Cons. I’m not sure how separate the two are, but is this attitude going to be translated to the various Wizard-Worlds? Are women going to be explicitly unwelcome there too? God knows Cons can be iffy places for women at the best of times, but if the Wizard Worlds are emblazoned with the “Number 1 Men’s pop-culture convention!” banner, that’s going to exacerbate a lot of problems.

    Floundering though they are, they still set a lot of the tone of the industry.

  6. Stopwatch Says:

    Was I the only one that noticed 3 distinct Wizard covers this week, only one of which sported the “Magazine for Men” tag on the top? I suspect it was a joke– they were aping Maxim on one of their covers.

    And I don’t even pick the rag up in the store to thumb through it- I just saw it on the rack and thought “this is what all the controversy is about?”

  7. ubershep Says:

    Buy The Comics Journal, The International Journal of Comics Criticism, or Comic Art. They’re they best places to get your comic commentary, both on and off the web.

  8. Rob S. Says:

    That’s a great point about the cons, Papervolcano.

  9. DK Says:

    I stopped reading Wizard and Toyfare about two months ago when I realized that Wizard was no longer my “guide to comics” and that Toyfare stopped being at the very least fun to read.

    And yay, I’m saving 10 dollars a month as a result.

  10. julius brown Says:

    Ragnell has me really torn because while I do not like Wizard’s shallow articles and narrow focus of comic coverage and their general pandering to Marvel and DC and their total lack of journalistic values, I am a huge fan of round shiny breasts. Fortunately, there are plenty of outlets for coverage of boobs aimed at guys and allied lesbian cohorts and Wizard is not necessary for coverage of this important subject. So Death to Wizard;Viva Breasts!

  11. Joel Says:

    I think Stopwatch is right… it was a joke that backfired on them. Not that it doesn’t contain a kernel of truth. I guess that means I’m it’s target demographic, but I quit buying it years ago.

  12. Martin Gray Says:

    Yeah, I noticed the same thing as Stopwatch and came to the same conclusion.

    Ironically, this issue seems to have more good, readable comics content than any for ages.

  13. Frank Davis Says:

    Wizard wishes it could be Maxim when it grows up. If I want pop culture I’ll go read Geek Monthly. If I want print comic news and interviews of merit, I’ll read Comics Journal. So Wizard being what it is is not a shock.

  14. mike oxbig Says:

    Wizard disappearing would be nothing but beneficial to the comic book industry. The speculator culture they championed nearly destroyed it once already. Good riddance.

Leave a Reply »