<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote, Unquote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:49:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strannik</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201965</link>
		<dc:creator>Strannik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201965</guid>
		<description>Mike O&#039;Brien - a Byrne avatar or merely a loyal follower? Who knows... And more importantly, should anyone this belligerent be taken seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike O&#8217;Brien &#8211; a Byrne avatar or merely a loyal follower? Who knows&#8230; And more importantly, should anyone this belligerent be taken seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201897</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201897</guid>
		<description>Way to go Bendis, more pornographic filth from your disturbed little mind. I hope you have the Wasp brutalized next so you can show us all how great of a writer you think you are. Make sure you find more movies and books to swipe from, too. Hack!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Bendis, more pornographic filth from your disturbed little mind. I hope you have the Wasp brutalized next so you can show us all how great of a writer you think you are. Make sure you find more movies and books to swipe from, too. Hack!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201616</guid>
		<description>Dweeze, thanks for the link to OED. Oh wait there was none. Now I can&#039;t afford a subscription to the OED, and I don&#039;t have the hard copy of the OED at my disposal--so I&#039;ll go with the m-w.com

http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalist

Main Entry:
    jour·nal·ist Listen to the pronunciation of journalist
Pronunciation:
    \-nə-list\ 
Function:
    noun 
Date:
    1693

1 a: a person engaged in journalism; especially : a writer or editor for a news medium b: a writer who aims at a mass audience
2: a person who keeps a journal


http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalism

Main Entry:
    jour·nal·ism Listen to the pronunciation of journalism
Pronunciation:
    \ˈjər-nə-ˌli-zəm\ 
Function:
    noun 
Date:
    1828

1 a: the collection and editing of news for presentation through the media b: the public press c: an academic study concerned with the collection and editing of news or the management of a news medium

2 a: writing designed for publication in a newspaper or magazine b: writing characterized by a direct presentation of facts or description of events without an attempt at interpretation c: writing designed to appeal to current popular taste or public interest

So, considering the fact that the term journalist has been around since 1693 (which predates the 1828 usage of journalism and predates the development of  radio or TV) to try to counter Keller&#039;s quote with your post is a failed and poorly documented effort. Journalists and journalism are aspects of general information exchange that continually evolve, as do the respective definitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dweeze, thanks for the link to OED. Oh wait there was none. Now I can&#8217;t afford a subscription to the OED, and I don&#8217;t have the hard copy of the OED at my disposal&#8211;so I&#8217;ll go with the m-w.com</p>
<p><a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalist" rel="nofollow">http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalist</a></p>
<p>Main Entry:<br />
    jour·nal·ist Listen to the pronunciation of journalist<br />
Pronunciation:<br />
    \-nə-list\<br />
Function:<br />
    noun<br />
Date:<br />
    1693</p>
<p>1 a: a person engaged in journalism; especially : a writer or editor for a news medium b: a writer who aims at a mass audience<br />
2: a person who keeps a journal</p>
<p><a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalism" rel="nofollow">http://m-w.com/dictionary/journalism</a></p>
<p>Main Entry:<br />
    jour·nal·ism Listen to the pronunciation of journalism<br />
Pronunciation:<br />
    \ˈjər-nə-ˌli-zəm\<br />
Function:<br />
    noun<br />
Date:<br />
    1828</p>
<p>1 a: the collection and editing of news for presentation through the media b: the public press c: an academic study concerned with the collection and editing of news or the management of a news medium</p>
<p>2 a: writing designed for publication in a newspaper or magazine b: writing characterized by a direct presentation of facts or description of events without an attempt at interpretation c: writing designed to appeal to current popular taste or public interest</p>
<p>So, considering the fact that the term journalist has been around since 1693 (which predates the 1828 usage of journalism and predates the development of  radio or TV) to try to counter Keller&#8217;s quote with your post is a failed and poorly documented effort. Journalists and journalism are aspects of general information exchange that continually evolve, as do the respective definitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dweeze</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dweeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201559</guid>
		<description>From the OED:

Journalist:  &lt;b&gt;noun&lt;/b&gt; a person who writes for newspapers or magazines or prepares news or features to be broadcast on radio or television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the OED:</p>
<p>Journalist:  <b>noun</b> a person who writes for newspapers or magazines or prepares news or features to be broadcast on radio or television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prem</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201477</link>
		<dc:creator>Prem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201477</guid>
		<description>great quotes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great quotes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/comment-page-1/#comment-201423</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/10/21/quote-unquote-33/#comment-201423</guid>
		<description>i love these quote/unquote dealies.

bendis is completely right about the tigra scene. if this was Powers the readers would say &quot;that&#039;s #*&amp;$ed up! what an awful character!&quot; but its in avengers so its &quot;that&#039;s #*&amp;$ed up! what a horrible writer! he condones hitting women!&quot; 
i&#039;m not sure if the scene was extremely appropriate for a book like avengers that is tailored to more of an all ages crowd, but i think people have blown it out of proportion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love these quote/unquote dealies.</p>
<p>bendis is completely right about the tigra scene. if this was Powers the readers would say &#8220;that&#8217;s #*&amp;$ed up! what an awful character!&#8221; but its in avengers so its &#8220;that&#8217;s #*&amp;$ed up! what a horrible writer! he condones hitting women!&#8221;<br />
i&#8217;m not sure if the scene was extremely appropriate for a book like avengers that is tailored to more of an all ages crowd, but i think people have blown it out of proportion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
