Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Nothing but ‘Trouble’ for Frank Miller

Nothing but ‘Trouble’ for Frank Miller

June 20th, 2007
Author JK Parkin

Trouble is my Business

Looks like Frank Miller may be too busy to get to that Batman vs. terrorism project we’ve all been hearing about. In addition to his work on the Spirit film and Sin City 2, Variety reports he’s been tapped to direct an adaptation of the Raymond Chandler novella “Trouble Is My Business.”

Miller will work again with Clive Owen, who appeared in the first Sin City film:

“Sin City” was Miller’s first collaboration with Owen. “Trouble Is My Business” was chosen partly because it provides the actor with a similar chance to frame the narrative with a compelling voiceover, using Chandler’s hardboiled prose as hard-drinking private eye Philip Marlowe cracks cases, busts heads and romances femme fatales in 1940s Los Angeles.

While many of Chandler’s novels have been turned into films, “Trouble Is My Business” is virgin territory.

“Frank Miller knows more about noir than anyone I have ever met, and clearly the writing of Raymond Chandler has been an enormous influence on his life and his work,” Owen said. “Miller adapting Chandler seemed like a perfect match.”

You can read more about the book here.

 
25 Responses to “Nothing but ‘Trouble’ for Frank Miller”
  1. Matt D Says:

    You know, I’m not a big fan of the guy’s work over the last ten years, but I feel a bit more secure with him doing Marlowe than I do a lot of people trying it.

  2. Scratchie Says:

    How depressing. Sin City demonstrated that Miller doesn’t know the first thing about film noir except what it looks like.

  3. Jimmy Palmiotti Says:

    Awesome news. perfect match.

  4. Russ Burlingame Says:

    Interesting. Maybe giving him a field where he’s not so in-control-of-everything is just what Miller needs to start creating truly good material again. Maybe cinema is the prescription for what’s been ailing him lately.

  5. Steven Ekstrom Says:

    W O W.

    I am so excited by this news–Miller is really getting his due. I think his move to cinema has really brought out his creative side again.

    I’m proud and excited for my idol.

  6. Kevin T. Brown Says:

    Being a huge Chandler fan, I’m definitely looking forward to this pairing. I think Miller may have found his niche. And have Clive Owen attached? I’m very excited by this news.

  7. Roy Says:

    Scratchie, you telling us a man who’s read the works of Chandler, Hammett, McDonald and Spillane doesn’t know what film noir is? I would like to know the name of the mental institution that let you out last Christmas?

    Even though this is a lot of work on his schedule, I say good for Frank.

  8. Cooker Says:

    Miller and Chandler seems like the perfect fit. I’d much rather Miller do this than more Batman comics.

  9. Kyle Says:

    It would appear some people are confused in regards to what book shave to do with film. the fact Miller has READ Hammett, Chandler, MacDonald, Spillane (which a more than heapinghelping of Sin City is lifted from ), Cain, et al. has absolutely nothing to do with film. Roman noir which is commonly referred to as ‘hard-boiled’ fiction, has little to do with film noir. Had Miller continually referenced the works of Huston, Aldrich, Welles, Siodmak, Fuller, et al, then i might have some confidence. Rodriguez was the director, miller makes comics. HOw does that suddenly qualify him as a director???

  10. Vincenzo Says:

    Kyle,
    That is the same as saying that Clint Eastwood shouldn’t be a director because he’s an actor…actually what Miller does in comics is very much closer to directing then acting would be. The bottom line is both are amazing.

  11. Cliffy Says:

    Doesn’t seem like a good match to me — Miller might be good on a Hammet adaptation. In fact, as I think about it, Red Harvest would be right up his alley. But the archetypal Miller hero is exactly the opposite of Philip Marlowe, the man who goes down those mean streets who is not himself mean. Whereas Miller’s protagonists have largely triumphed over the mean streets by being even meaner and more ruthless than those around them.

    That’s not to say Miller couldn’t get this right. But those that think he’s a perfect fit because he can do the atmosphere, IMHO, are missing that the core of the Marlowe novels is that Phil himself is a tragic fish out of water in that world, and that’s very different than the kind of character Miller’s shown us in the past.

    –Cliffy

  12. Sluggo Says:

    This is pretty cool news, and I’m happy that Miller has found a new vocation that interests him. However, I feel he should complete his in-progress comics commitments before embarking on so many film projects. Obviously, this is going to further delay his current comics projects, and might even lead to them not being completed at all. This will almost inevitably cause some to accuse him of forgetting where he comes from.

  13. Garth Says:

    Hey, I say let him at it. I’ll take a John Dahl neo-noir over anything with the name Frank Miller on it any old day.

  14. MoS Says:

    I’d hope it would be a reasonable adaptation of the “feel” of Chandler, rather than just a Miller-ized version of Chandler’s novel. At this point in his ego/career, I rather doubt it, though.

  15. Court Says:

    Actually Scratchie, I’m pretty sure you’re the one who doesn’t know the first thing about noir or at the very least, seem to know only one thing about noir and have assumed that it’s all exactly the same.

  16. Scratchie Says:

    Thanks for the insults, Roy and Court. You’ve really raised my opinion of Miller fans.

    Nice to see that some (other) people understand that (a) reading something is not the same as understanding it and (b) there’s more to film noir (or Chandler’s writing) than atmosphere.

    I’ve never seen any characters in any of Miller’s work who aren’t stereotypes (the hyper-violent tough guy, the whore with a heart of gold, the 100% evil villain); I can’t imagine what he’ll attempt to make out of the understated, human characters in Chandler’s writing.

  17. michael j norton Says:

    So you have to understand “noir” but I guess knowing storytelling doesn’t mean anything if you don’t know “noir”. The man knows his business. Just cuz people are jealous that he’s getting work and they’re working at McDonald’s and he working because he knows what he’s doing…that’s just sad. You naysayers are probably the same types cheering the death of Bart Allen.

  18. Scott Says:

    Why must Frank Miller jump into everything I love?

    I was worrying that he would mess up the Spirit, now I’m worried that he’ll mess up Marlowe for an entire generation.

  19. crunch-o-matic Says:

    I’m not getting excited about anything Miller does, he has a long way to go to regain any industry credibility with me. I’m quite tired of his phoned-in garbage, masquerading as funny books.

  20. Mike Cruz Says:

    I wish Miller would get the hell out of comics; his stuff’s getting old anyway.

  21. Joe Bennet Says:

    Frank Miller needs to stop writing All Star Batman and Robin.

  22. TheAncient1 Says:

    Ever since I read Blue Belle, I’ve wanted Frank Miller to adapt Andrew Vachss’ Burke stuff into something graphic, but I LOVE this Miller/Chandler thing too. Gotta think there’ll be a GN/screenplay tpb, eh?

  23. ebrey Says:

    I’m not a Miller-hater, but it’s logical to have some serious doubts about this:

    1. Why is Miller getting a second solo-directing job before anyone has seen his first?
    2. Can Miller do a serious film noir? Sin City is much closer to noir-parody than actual noir. Hopefully he doesn’t take the success of Sin City to mean that all his movies should be like that.

    Frank Miller isn’t nearly a safe of a bet as Rian Johnson would be. He did the fantastic neonoir Brick two years ago.

  24. aNDRWgREGORY Says:

    Frank miller is one of our heavyweights. His worst works are better then any of your bests. The man has virtually taken us all to school over and over again. Why must the fan boys doubt? How many times must he prove that he’s capable? He is a master. He will do fine.

    Think about this when you’re waiting in line to see it.

    ag

  25. Wesley Says:

    I have to agree with aNDRWgREGORY. Frank Miller’s worst stuff is way better than your best. The man is an idol to the depth of comics today. Then to say that he doesn’t know Nor because a movie was made a decade after the comic book was released. Are you F”in kidding me?

    Think about comics before Miller, How about Batman in the 60’s, when Adam West’s was an accurate portrait of the caped crusader, and not a cheese pop culture side note. I am sure you can provide me with a laundry list of indy comics that no one has ever heared of. But show me one “commercially” successful artist, besides Stan “Fin” Lee, who changed the face of a whole industry?

    And as a director, have you ever taken a look at Sin City the movie and Sin City the comic book? When ever a comic book movie is released, the fan boys have to jump up and scream that the movie is nothing like the comic book. Then a movie comes out and is the most exact comic book movie ever made, and now the fan boys move on to how the story line does not jump into the stringent guidelines of Mcjobers definition of style.

    You are never going to be happy, and cyanide pills might be the perfect condiment for your morning wheaties. Do the rat race a favor and off yourself, so industrious illegal aliens might take your place at the grill and get a stab at Horatio Alger’s dream.

Leave a Reply »