Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: The Worlds Are Not Enough

The Worlds Are Not Enough

May 3rd, 2007
Author Tom Bondurant



Grumpy Old Fan

The end of 52 raises two questions: how was it; and now what?

SPOILERS behind the jump.

From the beginning, 52 struck me as more of an immediate concern than a narrative. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t a narrative, but it did have a goal beyond telling the story of Booster, Ralph, Renee, et al.’s year in the spotlight. Specifically, 52 had to set up events in the regular DC titles which had already jumped ahead a year. Sometimes it did this with subtlety and finesse, sometimes not. However, the fact that 52 couldn’t control events affecting those other titles — including real-world concerns like shipping delays — meant that it was always going to be dealing with a moving target. I’m very impressed with DC for managing to keep 52 as cohesive as it was, dropped balls and dangling subplots notwithstanding.

The fact that 52 had to both tell its own story and extend tentacles into the rest of the superhero books also made it feel more like the DC equivalent of Time or Newsweek. Making 52 the main chronicle of the “lost year” (which the rest of us called May 2006-May 2007) meant that every issue had to tell us the most important events on DC-Earth (or “New Earth” now, I guess) that week. In that respect 52 was the first draft of history, as they say, but history doesn’t always lend itself to narratives, especially in the context of 52’s strictly-followed structure. Obviously 52 demands to be revisited, but clearly it was also intended to be experienced in the moment, with that first-draft spontanaiety. That’s why I think 52 couldn’t be perfect either as a narrative or a newsweekly: there was no way to pull meaning, either historically or dramatically, out of every single scene.  As closely plotted as it was, 52 still had to adapt, because ironically, its own timeline remained fluid.

Nevertheless, for a series in service to a status quo that didn’t seem too different One Year Later, 52 turned out to be cheerfully subversive. The Oolong Island scientists, the adventures of Ralph and Doctor Fake, fighting Intergang, and especially the secret of Supernova, personified the appeal of 52 itself. Each of those subplots offered a look into a secret history — a behind-the-scenes struggle with implications occasionally bigger than the primary-colored crossover fights involving the A-listers. I’m now particularly curious about what, if anything, Justice League of America will do with the 52-knowledge that was stored in Red Tornado.

And speaking of the biggest and worst-kept secret … now that it’s back, what gets done with it?

Beats me. I don’t get paid to shepherd these things.

I will say that the new, more finite Multiverse clearly can’t be the bottomless pit of continuity glitches and imaginary stories that the old one (or Hypertime) was. Most of the familiar parallel worlds seem to have returned, even if they have numbers instead of letters, and even if they look just a smidge different. It is rolling back the clock somewhat, but it’s also an admission that DC maybe shouldn’t have completely abandoned those old ideas back at the end of 1985.

The new Multiverse does give DC another opportunity to publish more “traditional” versions of its characters again, especially the characters which weren’t so homegrown. Obviously the main example of this is the Marvel Family, which to me works best when separated from a steadily advancing DC timeline. Indeed, they’re featured prominently in such a setting a couple of times in 52 #52.  If DC starts publishing a Marvel Family book set on Earth-5, and treats the mainline Earth’s Marvels as alternate-universe versions, I think that would be a nice spin on the Multiverse concept and a good way to preserve the classic Marvel Family tone.

Brian Hibbs points out, not incorrectly, that fans won’t take to the new Multiverse because they’ll want to read about the “real” versions of these characters. However, what determines which version is real? Until now, the real version has been the one appearing in the mainline titles. With the Multiverse, though, that’s no longer the case. The Multiverse not only allows an “authentic” version of a character to exist apart from its New Earth counterpart, it lets that version interact with the counterpart and with the rest of the main line. DC can both publish an Earth-5 Captain Marvel series and have that Cap meet Trials Cap — or it can isolate Earth-5 Cap and keep him unsullied. Either way, it lets DC claim that it’s being both true to Cap and moving him forward realistically, and it’s doing both in stories that “count.”

It doesn’t have to return to the exact pre-Crisis On Infinite Earths status quo either, as Nu-Earth-2 and Nu-Earth-10 show.  As much as I appreciate the attempts to update those worlds (including a new spelling for “innocence,” he said smugly), they look like the most obvious examples of fan entitlement.  I’m pretty positive we’ll see one or both, most likely in future JLA/JSA team-ups (we know where the “missing Kryptonians” went, right?), so I’ll find out soon enough.

But I digress.  The point of Hypertime is that every story “counts,” in one way or another, and it’s just our need to organize that draws the distinctions. Back in February I wrote that DC’s housecleaning never involves actually expanding the house — well, now it has. With its Charlton-Earth and Fawcett-Earth, 52’s Multiverse acknowledges that there’s now more than one way to tell its characters’ stories. In fact, 52’s Multiverse allows those visions to compete.  Alternate versions of characters have been influencing the “real” versions, and vice versa, probably since before the Superman radio series introduced Kryptonite.  It makes a certain kind of sense for these corporate-owned characters’ fates to be determined, in the long run, by the proverbial marketplace of ideas.  Personally, I’d hope that particular marketplace expands beyond guys my age, so that the overall market for superhero comics starts to grow again.  Basically, I agree with Hibbs that just using Earth-10 and Earth-3 for periodic fights with evil Supermen would be pretty shortsighted. 

Overall, 52 was a daring, ambitious experiment that had to be significant without giving its secrets away. The future it helped construct couldn’t contain any outward clues to its ultimate resolution. It was successful not because it connected Infinite Crisis with One Year Later, but because it made good on the promise of the former without doing any harm to the latter. We will not see another series like 52, and we can never experience it again like we have over the past year. Like its protagonists, it did the best it could with what it had, and it left DC’s superhero books a little richer without them even knowing it.

 
11 Responses to “The Worlds Are Not Enough”
  1. Henry Says:

    I have to admit, that’s one of the best arguements I’ve read for the return of the Multiverse.

  2. Mark Engblom Says:

    Hey, great piece, Tom. As a fellow “grumpy old fan”, I’m feeling somewhat vindicated with the official return of the Multiverse or (as they described it in 52) the “Megaverse”.

    I also find it a little ironic that the Multiverse not only returns as a viable storytelling device, but it’s apparently more confusing than ever before for those who’ve always gotten migranes from the alternate reality concept.

    Me? I love alternate earth stories….in fact, that’s probably what cemented me to superhero comics for all time and eternity way back when…..but even for guys like me, 52 earths will require some sort of flow-chart.

    The only thing I’m leery about is having the the whole thing trundled off to a closet somewhere and forgotten about….much like “Hypertime” before it. In fact, Rip Hunter’s line of “anything is possible” echos a similar comment made by a character in “The Kingdom”, which officially launched the Hypertime “doctrine”. As we all know, Hypertime lasted about two months and then was never mentioned again.

    Hopefully the Multiverse won’t suffer a similar behind the scenes “unplugging” by warring editorial factions. We’ve seen hints of rifts and tiffs from within the ranks of DC editorial and its “elite writer/editors”, so the exact scope and clarity of the Multiverse remains to be seen.

  3. Tom Bondurant Says:

    The thing about Hypertime, at least as far as I understand it, is that the current 52-Earth Multiverse could still be part of a larger cosmology that includes whatever you want it to include.

    I don’t think this Multiverse will be forgotten anytime soon — those Earth-10 and Earth-2 panels just scream “Geoff Johns” to me. And speaking of whom, this is yet another bit of continuity gymnastics, engineered at least in part by Mr. Johns, which brings back a beloved part of the Silver Age through the use of a giant evil bug.

  4. Dan Billings Says:

    Part of me just wishes that the clue in that DC Nation column wasn’t ever there. Especially since it seems that the writers were unaware of this clue being distributed.

    I have never read one multiverse story as I entered comics in ‘97. So I look forward to seeing how it works out. I don’t know the ramifications yet, but I think it’s great that DC is at least trying different things.

    Now, do we know how Countdown will address the multiverse? I don’t remember reading anything about that yet. Though I haven’t read 52 #52 yet…I’ll get it this weekend.

  5. matchesmalone Says:

    I don’t see how you can write that much about 52 without mentioning the largely subpar art.

    If I never read another comic drawn by Eddy Barrows or Shawn Moll… I’ll be happier than if I do.

    There’s no reason DC couldn’t have gotten better artists for this.

    And they really brought out the mediocre-at-best for “World War III” - enough so that I, who bought every issue of 52, Infinite Crisis, etc., couldn’t be bothered with this $10 expense.

    Hmm… a high-profile event: let’s get the guy who has inked a few Joe Bennett jobs (Jack Jadson) to do an issue of it.

    Maybe 30 years ago it would have been “who’s in the office?” to do this last-minute job… I guess now it’s “Who would do it the cheapest?”

  6. Mark Engblom Says:

    Some have observed that Giffen’s breakdowns sometimes looked better than the finished art!

    Yeah, I was consistantly disappointed with the artwork. It had a cheap “whattaya expect for $2.50?” look to it.

    As for Tom’s “giant evil bug” comment, I thought those scenes were pretty crazy. Other villains have spent a lifetime trying to change ONE time-space continuum….this guy made it look easy by metaphysically sucking up a bunch of hero mug shots.

  7. Matt Says:

    Well, if we can’t complain about the book being late or the story being bad, at least we can complain about the art! Way to go, fans!

  8. c. towns Says:

    i liked the majority of art in 52. especially eddy barrows. i was quite taken with his art. it was simple, worked well with the atmosphere, and i liked it. shawn moll, not so much. but i loved 52s artist for the most part.

  9. Mark Engblom Says:

    Hey, Matt…relax. It’s a valid criticism. Plus, I paid admission for all 52 weeks, so I’m entitled to an opinion. I guess I wasn’t aware the immense achievement that is 52 bars it from all negativity.

  10. matchesmalone Says:

    You know, Crisis on Infinite Earths wasn’t pencilled by, say, Paris Cullins, Don Heck, Ron Randall, and Rafael Kayanan.

    It was pencilled by George Perez, who was certainly considered in the top 5 pencillers at the time.

    That’s the difference. The pencillers ranged (in my opinion) from sub-par (Moll, Barrows) to above-average (Bennett, Batista, Drew Johnson), and by the end, it got pretty disparate and random. (What’s that? You’ve got 20 pages left on your contract? Here, draw an issue of 52.)

  11. Filipe Says:

    As for the art, 52 was what I would call a TV-comic, it pretty much ask you to accept that it’s a writers medium and that the direction/art will be just ok. I do agree they could have more weeks by the better guys like Bennett and Batista. And at the second half editorial often drop the ball in trying to give specific important weeks to better art teams.

    As for the multiverse I can see many possibilitiesand doubt it ill be dropped soon (for starters the Booster Gold series is about it). I can see in the future someone wanting to try to do something with the Earth-10 Freedom Fighters, and let’s be honest Earth-1 FF is just another superteam, while Earth-10 version has an original concept/set-up that if DC knows how to handle marketing-wise is actually easier to sell. Smith’s Marvel is already outselling Winick’s which shows that classic Marvel family is possibility. There’s of course different situations, Earth-2 is likely to be used just to the ocasional alternate story and in Earth-Charlton is pretty obvious there’s nothing much one could do with Cap. Atom and Blue Bettle - carachters that are by now very much a part of the main earth and whose appeal has a lot o with the bagagge they bring -, but I can see down the line an Earth-4 Question crime series.

Leave a Reply »