Blogs:

Newsarama Blogs Home > Article: Two “One Year Later” Titles, One Year Later

Two “One Year Later” Titles, One Year Later

March 29th, 2007
Author Tom Bondurant



It’s not that I don’t like Hawkgirl, it’s just that I wonder why I keep reading. 

Hawkgirl was one of the One Year Later titles I picked up solely on the basis of its new creative team. Walt Simonson and Howard Chaykin are two of my favorite cartoonists, and together I figured they could do no wrong.

Well, to make a long story short, wrong was done. Aside from the emphasis on Kendra’s sports bras, and the sexually-symbolic monsters, Simonson and Chaykin seemed to be going for a pretty traditional young-hero-in-the-big-city approach. Still, it ended up being Nancy Drew as reimagined by Maxim, and the combination of Simonson’s breathless scripts and Chaykin’s flashy art was, for the most part, overstimulating.

I was ready to drop Hawkgirl when I heard that Chaykin was leaving. That news prompted me to stick with it to see if the artistic change would make an appreciable difference; and it did.  Between Joe Bennett’s two issues and Renato Arlem succeeding Bennett, there’s a lot less sensory overload than the Simonson/Chaykin issues had.  Unfortunately, it also feels rather inconsequential, so that even when issue #61′s cliffhanger involves a Giant Robot Hawkgirl — which really ought to have produced a Godzilla roar like Giant Lard Lad had — it almost doesn’t seem enough to bring me back every month.  The conclusion of Giant Robot Hawkgirl in this week’s issue #62 was goofy at best, although I did think Simonson still had a good handle on the Female Furies from his Orion days.

And yet, with Hawkgirl’s sales declining steadily, it’s tempting to hang on just long enough for this series to end, so that I don’t have to make the choice to drop it.

Likewise, Aquaman: Sword Of Atlantis has gone through some creative changes since its initial One Year Later makeover, but it seems to have found a direction. It was made over originally as Underwater Barbarian, with a looked-older-than-he-should’ve Arthur Curry almost literally falling into the role of Atlantean scion. That sounds like a simple premise, but it was saddled with baggage, particularly the transformed presence of the original Aquaman. The series also couldn’t quite decide how connected it should be to the rest of DC-Earth — would occasional visits with the Sea Devils and guest appearances in Action Comics lead to full-on crossovers? Under writer Kurt Busiek and artist Butch Guice, SoA (which also never quite emphasized that subtitle) was decent, even good; but it never seemed comfortable with its own setup.

Eleven issues in, new writer Tad Williams and artists Shawn McManus and Walden Wong aren’t revamping everything. Instead, they have the advantage of being able to build upon the Busiek/Guice issues and develop what they think is workable. For the most part this includes a more superheroic approach using familiar Aquaman elements (many of which the previous regime reintroduced). This includes bringing back Tempest and creating (a second in this continuity?) Topo, thereby playing the original sidekicks (or forms of them, at least) against the current Aquaman. Generally speaking, although the new team’s lone issue to date throws several characters and ideas at the reader, it seems more focused than the nomadic approach begun with the initial OYL issues. To be fair, a lot of that comes from everyone having to protect Atlantis, something to which Busiek and Guice may well have been building. Thus, I may be crediting Williams, McManus, and Wong for a payoff their predecessors facilitated. Additionally, what I call “focus” could very well be dubbed “simplicity.” Finally, because I can only go by the one issue, there’s nothing preventing the new guys from spreading that focus like their predecessors did.

So what’s the verdict?  Well, according to the February numbers, neither title is selling particularly well, but Hawkgirl‘s figures are pretty dire.  Issue #61 sold 16,575 copies to retailers in February, less than half of its initial OYL level and about two-thirds of its pre-OYL level.  With Giant Robot Hawkgirl out of the way, #62 ends on a decent stopping point, so right now it looks like my last one.  Two issues’ worth of fighting Blackfire turned out to be dull, and next issue’s Batman appearance even feels a little desperate.  I hate to do it, because I still like Simonson and I think the book has potential.  If Giant Robot Hawkgirl — I never get tired of typing that – had shown up earlier, and the book weren’t so dependent on the Kendra/Carter romance, my attitude might be different.

As for Aquaman, it was on the bubble (ho ho) until #50, but I think the change in creative teams has been positive.  Even if it’s cancelled in six months (its current numbers are slightly better than Hawkgirl‘s, but slightly less than the pre-OYL level), at least it’s trying to do something demonstrably different.  I especially like the fact that it aims to try something new within the superhero genre, albeit by moving away from “barbarian” and back towards “superhero.”  Therefore, congratulations, Aquaman:  Sword Of Atlantis — you’ve earned a reprieve.  Make me proud.

 

 
12 Responses to “Two “One Year Later” Titles, One Year Later”
  1. Scott Iskow Says:

    If Kurt Busiek can’t make Aquaman work, I’m not sure anyone can. Of course, it might not really be about whether you can make him “work”–rather about whether you can make him “sell.” Maybe Aquaman needs his own mega-event, just to get everyone’s attention.

  2. Tom Bondurant Says:

    Well, the last Aquaman relaunch (i.e., the one that apparently ended with OYL) was arguably a product of both “Our Worlds At War” and JLA‘s “Obsidian Age.” I know that’s not exactly what you mean, but they were both designed to attract attention. Maybe if Atlantis were to, say, attack something…? :)

  3. Matt D Says:

    Aquaman had some delays which I think really hurt it.

    And i’ve said it all over the internet but it amazes me DC won’t go out of their way and try to get Tad Williams’ sizeable and LOYAL audience interested.

  4. Tom Bondurant Says:

    Yeah, I’m eager to see if there’s a “novelist bounce” for Aquaman #50 and/or Wonder Woman #6. The cover-flap bio for the latest Jodi Picoult novel says she “has written” a few issues of Wonder Woman — nothing to indicate that her first issue just came out yesterday.

  5. H Says:

    The Hawkgirl title was a tremendous disappointment and I dropped it months ago. It would take a sizable amount of buzz to get me to give it another shot.

  6. Mark Engblom Says:

    Some characters just don’t seem to be able to sustain a title in the long term, and Hawkman (Hawkgirl) and Aquaman definitely seem to fit in that category.

    After so many failed or dismally performing titles, you’d think DC would have gotten the message that….well…some characters just aren’t cut out for “the big time”.

  7. Will Says:

    Giant-Robot Hawkgirl was the last issue of Hawkgirl for me. It’s a shame because I loved the book when Johns and Gray/Palmiotti were on it.

    Aquaman 50 was also the last for me too.

  8. JohnnyZito Says:

    I love Aquaman in principle.

    The magic stuff holds it back. When the non-comic reading public think Aquaman they don’t think about sorcery.

    What’s not cool about a guy who can breath underwater and punch through a submarine?

  9. Evan Says:

    Based on the solicit in the Previews that came out this week, Hawkgirl does look like its getting a final issue notice at some point in the next solicit month or two.

    But we’ll see.

    Aquaman……well I haven’t read issue 50 yet but I flipped through it. First reaction is that McNamus seems all wrong for it but I need to see if William’s story is any good.

    I know the guy has great crediblity with novels, but did anyone read The Next?

  10. SONICMAN2 Says:

    Well, I went ahead at OYL and picked up most everything that came out to give them all a chance. Hawkgirl(man), Robin, Green Arrow, Catwoman, and Nightwing all the bit the dust for after 6 or so issues. Sword of Atlantis , for me anyways, has been a good read. I like the new take on things. It is 1 of the few “solo” titles that I keep getting aloong with Batman, Superman, and Green Lantern. So hopefully Kurt Busiek can keep the momentum up.

  11. Mark D. White Says:

    Both of these books are tremendous disappointments to me, because both are revamps of titles I just discovered and came to love months before the OYL relaunches. I picked up “Hawkman” when it featured Dr. Fate in a “Day of Vengeance” crossover (I think), and immediately bought all the trades and back issues – I thought it was fantastic, whether written by Johns or Palmiotti/Gray. Likewise, I started buying “Aquaman” at about the same time (mainly to see Tempest, ironically), and again bought up the rest of the run in back issues – I thought the Sub Diego concept was brilliant. Then they went and radically changed both titles – now Hawkgirl is unreadable (even with the slight improvement with Giant Robot Hawkgirl – hey, that IS fun), and SOA was so dour until #50, which was much better (and featured the return of Tempest, now going for a Spike look, intentionally or not). I’ll stick with SOA for a while, and I agree that Hawkgirl is not long for this world (but the character, at least, will live on in JLA and, probably, Roy Harper’s bed).

  12. l.a.m.b. handbags Says:

    What a superb way to d iscuss

Leave a Reply »