<!-- <h2>Error establishing a connection to the <em>Coppermine</em> database.</h2>
<p>Most probably the database is offline, or the settings are incorrect.</p>--> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creator interview: Mark Millar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/</link>
	<description>The Blog@ Team and prominent comics personalities share what’s on their minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/comment-page-1/#comment-93116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/#comment-93116</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling this movie&#039;s not going to be so good.  I like Jolie, but she really hasn&#039;t made any good genre movies (except for Sky Captain) and very few of her movies have done very well (except Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith).  Couple that with the fact they&#039;ve sliced out a good portion of the stuff that made the book any good (there are no mentions of super-heroes anymore) and the fact that as the budget rises, the more off-putting aspects of the characters will be stripped away.  So, essentially this is going to end up being just some random action picture.  I wonder who Millar will blame to movie sucking on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling this movie&#8217;s not going to be so good.  I like Jolie, but she really hasn&#8217;t made any good genre movies (except for Sky Captain) and very few of her movies have done very well (except Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith).  Couple that with the fact they&#8217;ve sliced out a good portion of the stuff that made the book any good (there are no mentions of super-heroes anymore) and the fact that as the budget rises, the more off-putting aspects of the characters will be stripped away.  So, essentially this is going to end up being just some random action picture.  I wonder who Millar will blame to movie sucking on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/comment-page-1/#comment-93112</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/#comment-93112</guid>
		<description>I dunno, Matt, perhaps? I seem to recall that the &#039;Millarworld&#039; comics were supposed to be interlinked in some kind of Gerberesque way, but g_d knows if I can actually figure out how? There&#039;s some kind of reference to repressing knowledge of the (not really) Second Coming in Wanted, isn&#039;t there? And, hrm, yes. I didn&#039;t read Unfunnies.

The difference between Squadron and Wanted is, of course, that one is going to be a film starring Angelina Jolie (really, though?! the Eminem thing still gots me wary) and make loads of money, while the other thing is going to remain a crutch for Joe Quesada to make terrible and inaccurate Watchmen analogies with. I don&#039;t even know if it&#039;s another TW subsidiary that&#039;s making the film, so could be hosing dogpoo out of type-fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, Matt, perhaps? I seem to recall that the &#8216;Millarworld&#8217; comics were supposed to be interlinked in some kind of Gerberesque way, but g_d knows if I can actually figure out how? There&#8217;s some kind of reference to repressing knowledge of the (not really) Second Coming in Wanted, isn&#8217;t there? And, hrm, yes. I didn&#8217;t read Unfunnies.</p>
<p>The difference between Squadron and Wanted is, of course, that one is going to be a film starring Angelina Jolie (really, though?! the Eminem thing still gots me wary) and make loads of money, while the other thing is going to remain a crutch for Joe Quesada to make terrible and inaccurate Watchmen analogies with. I don&#8217;t even know if it&#8217;s another TW subsidiary that&#8217;s making the film, so could be hosing dogpoo out of type-fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/comment-page-1/#comment-92810</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/#comment-92810</guid>
		<description>If DC aren&#039;t going to stamp down on Squadron Supreme, then they sure aren&#039;t going to touch Wanted.

And the &quot;sequel&quot; thing...could it just be a mutated reference to CHOSEN?

//\Oo/\\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If DC aren&#8217;t going to stamp down on Squadron Supreme, then they sure aren&#8217;t going to touch Wanted.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;sequel&#8221; thing&#8230;could it just be a mutated reference to CHOSEN?</p>
<p>//\Oo/\\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/comment-page-1/#comment-92801</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/#comment-92801</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;d been wanting to mention to someone somewhere, but I bought SFX this month at the hospital - little else to do, you know how it is - and they&#039;d a big feature on how Millar is doing a version of the &#039;lost&#039; Kirby FF #102, along with Stan Lee. I&#039;ve not seen this mentioned anywhere on the comicsinternet at all.

Anyway, huh, much as the comic, in it&#039;s conclusion, grated I&#039;m kind of interested in the big screen version (which will almost certainly make Millar a bajillionaire, I&#039;m sure; and to think, only recently, he was roundin&#039; up a posse to hate on a mere &#039;rama blogger) and how it translates. Also interested to see if anyone at DC is ever going to notice how obviously a reworked SSoSV pitch it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;d been wanting to mention to someone somewhere, but I bought SFX this month at the hospital &#8211; little else to do, you know how it is &#8211; and they&#8217;d a big feature on how Millar is doing a version of the &#8216;lost&#8217; Kirby FF #102, along with Stan Lee. I&#8217;ve not seen this mentioned anywhere on the comicsinternet at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, huh, much as the comic, in it&#8217;s conclusion, grated I&#8217;m kind of interested in the big screen version (which will almost certainly make Millar a bajillionaire, I&#8217;m sure; and to think, only recently, he was roundin&#8217; up a posse to hate on a mere &#8216;rama blogger) and how it translates. Also interested to see if anyone at DC is ever going to notice how obviously a reworked SSoSV pitch it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake W</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/comment-page-1/#comment-92784</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsarama.com/2007/03/23/creator-interview-mark-millar/#comment-92784</guid>
		<description>&quot;Millar has two other films in development, and his ultimate aim is to inspire a dozen in the next 10 years. He has already written a sequel to Wanted, although he has no ambition to be a director or a screen writer.&quot;

Wait.... a SEQUEL to Wanted?  Will there be another THIS IS MY FACE page for an ending?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Millar has two other films in development, and his ultimate aim is to inspire a dozen in the next 10 years. He has already written a sequel to Wanted, although he has no ambition to be a director or a screen writer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait&#8230;. a SEQUEL to Wanted?  Will there be another THIS IS MY FACE page for an ending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
