Last week’s post made me think about what costumes say about characters. I know I had very clear ideas about what personality traits Arisia’s costume indicated, but some of the commenters here and on Comic-Bloc thought it suited her personality.
Very few people clarified how.
This brings me to this week. Normally, every week I go through my impressions of a particular panel, but this week I want to try something different. Below (From Green Lantern Corps #3) is the best shot of Soranik Natu’s costume I could find.
I spent all last week telling you what clothes said to me about a character, now it’s your turn. What does this costume tell you about Soranik? Does it fit what you know about the character? Are there unnecessary elements? Most importantly, do you like it?
September 30th, 2006 at 7:40 am
I know nothing about this character, so I’m not sure how the clothes fit her personality. She does mention med school, but I’m not sure if that indicates anything about her personality.
Pose: What I notice first is how she is posed. I say posed because looks like she is posing and isn’t just naturally standing that way. She seems off balance, but not as if she is walking somewhere, just like she is striking a pose whether for her own reasons or because the artist chose to have her do so.
Cleavage: I also noticed the cleavage. Although upon second (and closer) examination I notice her breasts aren’t pushed together but the shading tends to make it look as if they are. Is it really needed? Probly not.
Collar: I also noticed the collar. Its kind of like the one Iron Fist has, but much shorter. Once again, not really necessary but I like it.
Colors: I like the combination of colors: green, gray and white. Making the top lighter and bottom darker (I guess) draws the eye to her top. But the green nimbus (to a degree) along with the leftward thrust of her hips counters the effects of having the bottom be a darker.
Skin Tight: It almost goes without saying that the outfit is skin tight; which is fairly standard for women in superhero comics. Necessary? Hardly.
Footwear: Too bad we can’t see her feet to see what kind of footwear she has on.
September 30th, 2006 at 8:08 am
I don’t really know anything about the character either, but the costume looks like it’s not there. In other words, it appears that the artist pretty much just drew a nude figure, to all intents and purposes, and the colorist filled it in with green and black and orangey-red. Lots of weaker artists do this with superheroic characters, because wrinkles and folds are much harder to do tha figure drawing.
September 30th, 2006 at 8:57 am
Natu is one of my favourite new characters, and I’ve been reading her as confident and professional in all things. Were she wearing a variation on the standard (it seems) named female GL costume of a thong-swimsuit and thighboots (Boodikka and Larisa), or some other skin-revealing getup (Arisa’s dog’s breakfast), I’d feel her character were being betrayed. She’s a professional adult, a very highly talented brain surgeon, and I’d have considerable difficulty taking her seriously if she was flashing flesh.
I’m lousy at fashion analysis, but to me, it feels like a well-designed costume. It’s simple, and it doesn’t clash with itself. Depending on the artist, the neckline can get stupidly low, and that does affect my view of the character, but for the most part, it seems to stay around reasonable. I’d prefer it if her neckline was higher, as with Hal, Kyle and Jade, but as I’ve got clothes that are cut with a similar neckline (perhaps an inch or so higher), I don’t get to bitch too much.
To me, it says she’s comfortable in herself, and doesn’t feel the need to make people like her by flashing her bits – she’s got the skill as a doctor and a GL that she doesn’t need to play those games. She’s introduced in all GL comics as Dr Soranik Natu, Brilliant Surgeon, not Soranik Natu, tasty bit of ass and somebody’s love interest.
I like it. Far more than the other female GL costumes I’ve come across.
September 30th, 2006 at 10:15 am
One of the things about the GL costumes is that they’re more uniforms than costumes, so it should be difficult to tease personality out of them… kind of like asking what Bettle Baily’s fatigues say about his personality.
The cleavge seems gratuitous given that the uniform is already skin tight. It says something that most of us comics fans are relieved that she’s not wearing a thong or showing mid-riff.
September 30th, 2006 at 10:18 am
Looks like she’s trying to go for the Pat Benetar look. Strong willed? Sexy with an attitude? Although, I have to admit I’m factoring in her hair and body language into the total look of her costume.
September 30th, 2006 at 12:01 pm
I really like Soranik, and I’m so glad that they didn’t put her in the kind of outfit that Boodika and Laira are wearing. It is basically a variation on the standard MALE
Green Lantern outfit, long sleeves and gloves and it covers her pretty much except for a little cleavage. We must give the fanboys SOMEthing. In a way it isn’t much different from the white operating outfit that she was originally wearing, which was also all-covering and skin-tight. I love the collar by the way.
In that particular scene,she’s tossed away the device that she used to trick the bad guy and is now advancing upon said bad guy, preparing to whup his ass. Shoulders cocked one way, hips the other, her weight is on her right leg, and she’s raising her left. As she subsequently does a little dance on his head, I don’t think that her stance is out of line.
September 30th, 2006 at 1:10 pm
I agree that it looks like somebody fell back on a personal “standard sexy chick” pose in this panel.
She certainly seems to be proud of her crimson cleavage, or at least the artist seems to be proud of his ability to draw same. Not having been a Green Lantern reader since I was in grade school (a LOT longer ago than I care to discuss, thanks), I have no idea whether this suits the character or not.
As Green Lantern unis go, it’s OK I guess- the only way it seems to deviate from the norm is the little collar and of course the cleavage-baring v front. I’ve seen worse deviations here and there- this at least makes an attempt to be true to the spirit of a “uniform”.
September 30th, 2006 at 1:52 pm
I don’t know anything really about the green lanterns, but here are my thoughts regarding the costume.
It’s pretty spare, pretty angular, and the green is used to emphasize some pretty muscular shoulders. All of these say to me that the character is probably “the serious one” and can probably kick some butt.
The cleavage, though in real life it would be a lot of cleavage, is not over the top by comic standards. It is a signal that sexuality/femininity is still a part of the character.
I would expect her character to be similar to Gina Torres’ character on Firefly
I expect her
September 30th, 2006 at 5:48 pm
In the case like this, it would interesting to see the script.
Or, for an exercise like this, it would be nice to dissect the costume of a more known character.
For example, the PAD incarnation of Aquaman had the character Dolphin, who (at least in a great number of her early appearances) IIRC walked around in Daisy Dukes…
Anyways, back to this art piece, the character is written as someone who is more than a “pretty face”. But it is feasible to be highly intelligent, accomplished and proud of your body. Odds are in the real world (where Green Lanterns don’t exist, it might be good to note) this character would find herself saying: “My eyes are up here.” to staring chest guys.
That being said, and while my standards may be too low, I’m just happy the air conditioning ain’t on high in this scene and I don’t have to endure the “headlights” look on the character (a look perfected to my horror, by Paul Gulacy).
September 30th, 2006 at 6:38 pm
This particular image doesnt do much for me, but I generally like Natu’s uniform. Looks kinda uniformy. I wouldn’t draw the neckline going so low, but I like the collar and the off-center lantern emblem.
September 30th, 2006 at 7:02 pm
Tim — Actually, I picked this one because she’s not a very well-known character. Less people know anything beyond the single panel, so we get a real test of “fits the character” here.
September 30th, 2006 at 11:14 pm
The color scheme and insignia tell me she is a Green Lantern. I notice the insignia has been moved to the side in order to accomodate, as I have heard it called, “showing off the goodies”. I like when Lanterns have non-standard uniforms, but in this case it would seem the changes made are only to accomodate the exposure of her cleavage. Maybe she is part plant and trying to maximize her exposure to sunlight in order to facillitate photo-synthesis?
On second look, that skin tone in GL colors makes me think of Sinestro. Any relation?
October 1st, 2006 at 12:30 am
I agree with Michael; variations are fun, but this looks to me just like the regular male version of the costume + cleavage (because we wouldn’t know she was a woman without two big arrows pointing at her vagina?). I don’t like that the insignia is off-center and smaller than the guys’; I know boobs interfere with costume design in that aspect (guys have big flat chests that lend themselves nicely to giant symbols, which don’t look quite the same over folds and distortion due to boobage), but for a superhero, the insignia should be the first place where your eyes go. I do like the stand-up collar, though. It’s…businessy? The costume’s not awful on the whole (no heels, no midriff, pants–how sad is it that I have to say, ‘thank god, she has pants’?–, and it’s not a ridiculous amount of cleavage), but it seems lazy and it could be better.
I really don’t like the new GL costume in general (where the green part extends just to the waist instead of being leotard-shaped), I think it looks too top-heavy and too much like a waistcoat or vest. Also too generic; it’s pretty much just a green triange on a black bodysuit. Boring!
October 1st, 2006 at 11:30 am
For example, the PAD incarnation of Aquaman had the character Dolphin, who (at least in a great number of her early appearances) IIRC walked around in Daisy Dukes…
That’s the way the character was first depicted in her one and only solo appearance, in Showcase #79.
October 1st, 2006 at 2:26 pm
Disclaimer: I know nothing about the character, or even much about the Green Lanterns in general, so this is pretty much completely going off the panel.
1. I do know enough about the Green Lanterns (from appearances in other DC comics, seeing cover art in the shops, and from the Justice League/JLU cartoon) to recognise her outfit as similar in style, color scheme, and insignia to those worn by other Green Lanterns. So, I identify her as a Green Lantern, and one who respects her membership in the organization enough to wear a “standard” uniform. That is, her identity (how she sees herself) is bound to her membership in the Green Lanterns. She doesn’t want to stand out from her peers as “special,” she wants to be an integrated part of the group.
Speculating from there, I might guess that she is the sort of person who wants to be recognised for her competence and contributions to the Green Lantern team, rather than for any particular personality quirks she might have.
2. And yet: the cleavage. If I didn’t know that superhero comic book art was All About the Boobies, I’d say that she was verging on the unprofessional by hanging out like that. Either her overt desire to be a functional member of the team is subverted by a subconscious desire to get laid OR she is naive and doesn’t understand that wearing her uniform open to breast-level undercuts her authority as a law-enforcement professional. Note that her head-tilted, hip-jutting-out sexy pose does a lot to reinforce these impressions. I can easily imagine that if she were posed in a power-projecting way (e.g. standing up straight, arms akimbo, or in a fighting stance), I would not be so distracted by her chest.
October 6th, 2006 at 4:47 am
I’d purposefully avoided most other front-facing full body shots because they featured her chest struck forward as she flew, or, in the case of GLC #4 (which had a different penciller) loving, detailed attention to the cleavage. I thought this would be the best one to avoid being distracted by her chest. I guess not.
It seems that her chest is so distracting no one else noticed the similarity between the costume and a zipped down Star Trek uniform (collar, placement of the insignia), which is a definite way to send clues using our cultural to the reader about the character’s personality and the type of alien culture she hails from.
Oh, and an unscruptulous Green Lantern writer could use Michael Nicolai’s comment to justify a plant-lady in a Bikini.
October 6th, 2006 at 3:26 pm
I haven’t read all the comments, so I apologize if someone has already addressed this, but Soranik Natu is a surgeon. It seems to me like that should inform her costume choices, which would mean something tight, utilitarian, and something that covers most of her skin, particularly her hands.
This costume, with its unnecessarily plunging neckline, clearly doesn’t fit all those criteria. I suppose there might be a greater reason for this; Natu began as a very reluctant recruit, and the more casual costume might be a symbol of her opening up and easing into the role. But, somehow I doubt it.
March 30th, 2007 at 10:52 am
I honestly don’t think it says much at all about her personality. As previously noted, the basic design and color scheme of the GL costumes are uniform, which some (but not all) of the Corps members alter with their own flourishes. The only real difference between her uniform and the standard issue GL uniform is the V-neck collar which, in and of itself, isn’t much of a statement. If you want to parse the meaning of the changes the GLs make to their costumes, Guy Gardner or Kyle Rayner (esp. the “dog collar” costume) would provide more grist for the mill.