This week, I’m going to do something a little different, because it’s my column and I can. Also, because I don’t have much choice in the matter this week. There’s a image from last week’s stack of comics that I simply can’t stop thinking about.
Normally, I find an image that stays with me after I’m finished reading, and muse on it for a little while before sitting down to write. Sometimes, this is involuntary. I’ll see an image, and be unable to put it out of my mind. It’s the most natural image to write about. I would prefer to keep this feature celebratory, but sometimes you just have to sit down and criticize (even when you normally like the artist). It’s only healthy.
I was very happy, very happy to see this image at first. You have to understand, they’d recently gone out of their way to bring just about every major Green Lantern character back to active status. Well, every major male Green Lantern character. I was happy to see my favorite guys back in action, but the unevenness was annoying to say the least. Finally, they brought a woman back to life.
She hadn’t started as a favorite, but I’d been reading back issues and she showed up a lot better there than in the flashbacks. In fact, she came off very well in the storyline. I was very thrilled with that.
However, there was the matter of her wardrobe. They’d redone her costume to a sexier, more modern, older version.
It was a bit much.
And by a bit much I mean “a lot less than reasonable.”
I can see exactly why they did it. They’d been pulling this trick with this very character for a while. They needed her to look older. They had just retconned her age from 28 in Earth years to 240 in Earth years. The character had started as a teenaged girl, but due to the path she had taken since then, she couldn’t go back to that status. As things stood, in order to keep the hero heroic, they not only had to retcon those days out of continuity, but wipe every memory of that away as well. She needed to mature, and stay mature. They needed to ensure that no fan would ever look at her and think “little girl” again.
Arisia, pictured here in her first appearance (Tales From the Green Lantern Corps #1), was a teenaged alien. See how cute and small she is? Definite emphasis on her elfin features as indicating youth, so that even in an identical uniform to everyone else in the picture, you know what role she fulfills in the story. She’s The Kid. A child from an alien race.
As time went on, the writers aged Arisia. One writer thought she would make an excellent love interest for Hal Jordan, and so rapid-aged her in a somewhat squicky storyline so she could date him. She got a new outfit that emphasized her elfin as alien (shown here in Green Lantern Corps #201), made then elven features instead, so that she could simply be a race that looks somwhat childish instead of a child from an alien race.
This storyline has tainted Hal ever since. Well, that’s wrong. It has tainted Arisia ever since. A few writers later, they removed her as the love interest, and retconned the story just enough to throw the power in the relationship entirely on Arisia, and then depower her (to be more precise, they merely neglected to repower her, but that is a big deal). Hal never took responsibility for his earlier irresponsibility, and Arisia was shuffled out of the spotlight. As long as we did not see Arisia, Hal’s record was clean.
At least, this is how it seems she ended up in Guy Gardner: Warrior, DC’s Home for Abandoned Characters at the time. That book had a theme to keep up, though. Up until she reached this series, Arsia had had an undercurrent of strength. She’d had enough to explain why she got into the Corps. She was able to play the hero, to save the hero. However, it was secondary to her cuteness, which is why a lot of fans wrote her off.
For Warrior, that had to end. Everyone in that book was badass beyond belief, or they just didn’t fit. Arisia could keep the cute, yes, but it had to be secondary to the strength now. So, even though she’d been aged for nearly a decade real-world by that point, it was time for Arisia to grow up.
I wasn’t fond of the art in Warrior, but I do have to say that Mitch Byrd managed an impressive 90s design here. He goes for a sharp cut, triangular in the top, and square by the thighs. The angles contrast with her previous designs, which were all round, to show a personality change. The neckline gives the outfit a “Glam Badass” appeal, because it mimicks the sort of expensive dress someone would wear to receive an Emmy. This was a mature, sexual, strong woman. Her own woman.
Oh, I can hear the complaints now. “How exploitive!” “Could they show more cleavage?” “A bikini cut?” “Since when is Arisia a D-Cup?”
Ahh, 90s art. It’s good that we’ve grown past those days, right? (From Green Lantern #13)
Right…
September 22nd, 2006 at 1:34 pm
Haha. Well, I must say, I do like that the new costume is largely based on the ‘white costume’ even if it could be a bit more modest.
September 22nd, 2006 at 1:45 pm
See, I thought the re-design made complete sense in keeping with Arisia’s character. I can understand how you say it seems exploitive and demeaning, but from the very first image you show down to the last one the writers/artists had been having her show more skin anyway.
It was almost like the more she grew up, the more she [b]matured[/b], Arisia wanted to show more of herself rather than hide behind restrictions.
Then again…I personally loved every single bit of her resurrection, from the clothes down to the dialogue so I may just be biased.
September 22nd, 2006 at 2:15 pm
Zeb — Except that’s not a sign of Maturity, Zeb. That’s something teenaged girls do to make themselves seem older. They wear less to make themselves look older. The artists have been doing this, drawing her with less to make her look older, using a young girl’s logic, without adding any mature woman logic to balance out the costume.
Look, I’m not saying that a mature woman wouldn’t dress revealingly. But a mature woman would dress appropriately for the work she does. That’s a miniskirt she’s wearing to fight evil.
And a mature woman would dress to emphasize certain personal characteristics, but not to the detriment of the rest of her body. That costume emphasizes the breasts, and makes the rest of her body into an afterthought. The combination of light-colored, front-loaded top and dark, short, tight miniskirt imply that she is not comfortable with her shape, particularly her hips and breast size. Again, teenaged girl characteristics. These are tricks to compensate for a small bust and large hips. I know these tricks because we tried them in High School (though, within the dress code standards). There was another set for girls who felt they were top-heavy, broad-shouldered with skinny hips. A whole list of ways to make your waist smaller. Teenaged girl tricks.
This is not a grown-up costume. This is something a teenager thinks is a grown-up costume. Honestly, if they were going by your train of thought, a bikini would have been a more suitable choice (though still eye-rollingly exploitive). Freedom of movement and complete comfort with body image.
September 22nd, 2006 at 2:31 pm
The first time I ever saw the character was in a comic Alan Davis drew. I don’t know if it was THE NAIL or that SUPERBOY/LEGION Prestige Format thing he drew a few years back. But it was beautiful. And she had her classic uniform on. Looks a lot better than that thing. . .
And from everything I’ve learned on WHAT NOT TO WEAR, if you go for the revealing top, then you have to cover more up on the bottom, and vice versa. But the mini AND the — I don’t know the word for it. Bustier? It’s a bit much.
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:45 pm
Ah, a What Not To Wear reference. Hats off to Augie!
As for the costume – yeah, the miniskirt is a bit much. How does she move? You see women wearing those things who can barely walk, and she’s supposed to be fighting?
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:48 am
I don’t know. I’m torn between wanting to agree with your sensible critique of the miniskirt as a viable crime fighting clothing article and my own opinion of how awesome they look.
You make the point on GRC that you don’t see guys in costumes as ridiculous as miniskirts, but seriously, how sensible are semitransparent tights for dudes battling evil?
I think you have a point about over-sexualization of female costumes, but I’m not ready to take the miniskirt off the shelves at the super-boutique just yet.
September 23rd, 2006 at 3:16 am
Dean — You realize you’ve probably earned the eternal wrath of Karen Healey for mixing us up, right?
September 23rd, 2006 at 3:59 am
Ah. I see your point more clearly now.
Not being a teenage girl, I don’t really know what tricks they have to appear older or whatnot, but yeah, I can see what you’re going for.
I do agree that the mini-skirt is quite impractical, but was the flowing skirt really that much better? I think her Warrior phase costume was probably the most practical, but that doesn’t really work with DC’s current modus operandi. Ideally, she would wear a costume that had the Lantern-pants (like Sorranik (sp?)Natu wears in GLC) and the revealing top (which let’s face it…is never going away).
I also agree with Dean up there. It isn’t exactly comfortable or easy to fight in skin-tight clothing for males either…yet it is a pretty standard technique. I think Reis was just trying to make her look sexy. She is like 10 times Hal’s age now…
September 23rd, 2006 at 4:00 am
Dang it! This is what I get for reading so many feminist comics blogs.
September 23rd, 2006 at 4:15 am
Ah…and for clarification. By maturity I actually meant that artists and writers have had her her be more revealing as part of the plot to attract Hal. As she matured in to a woman (physically atleast) she wanted to show more and thus entrance him I guess (Englehart’s females have never exactly been 3 or 2 dimensional so forgive me for generalizing)
Even in Warrior she was still not over Hal. I was just trying to say that she probably wanted to express her sexuality more openly as she grew older so that Hal would see her more as a woman than a little girl. Keeping that in mind, the new costume isn’t so out there. Still, your points are valid and I stand by the costume I would like to see that I pointed out in the above post.
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:44 pm
My 15 year old daughter saw Arisia’s outfit and thought that it was extremely practical. You see, when she leans or bends over, her top will fall off completely, and who in their right mind would want to fight her then? I admit reluctantly, that she has a point.
I’m not so sure that she feels she has to dress seductively in order to attract Hal. I love Hal, but let’s face it, he’d hump a rock pile if he thought there was a snake under it. Haw!
September 23rd, 2006 at 7:28 pm
Don’t be silly, SallyP. Arisia’s top won’t fall off. It’s obviously been painted on with nonflaking, high-gloss permenant pigment.
September 23rd, 2006 at 7:41 pm
I also agree with Dean up there. It isn’t exactly comfortable or easy to fight in skin-tight clothing for males either…
Eh? Skin-tight clothing, providing it isn’t cutting into you, or makes you feel vulnerable and exposed, is extremely comfortable and easy to fight in. Leggings and leotards are standard for female gymnasts and aerobics dancers. Male gymnasts wear bikeshorts and leotards or unitards. Most Olympic level swimmers wear those one piece suits with the legs these days.
Here’s an experiment. If you’ve never worn one before, buy a skirt – it doesn’t matter what style. Put it on, with nothing but your standard underwear underneath.
Now run an obstacle course. For extra credit you can wear heels!
If skirts have any volume or length, they catch on things. They tug you out of balance. Extra material is a pain in the ass (sometimes literally) when clambering over things or jumping. If they’re tight and short, like Arisia’s, they’re less likely to catch, but they’ll restrict your leg motion, making it much harder to jump or kick.
I have done some crazy stuff in skirts and heels and got away with it, but I’ve also turned my ankle and torn the skirt half off my body more than once. I’ve never done that in sneakers and the tight singlets and shorts I run in.
Skin-tight, supportive clothing? Practical for crime-fighting. Skirts? Not.
September 23rd, 2006 at 10:20 pm
Can we get out of this fashion/function quagmire by claiming special anti-problematic properties of hardlight-based clothing?
It’s…you know…like…magic?
September 23rd, 2006 at 10:28 pm
Dean — If we have to gritty realism in comic book plots, then no BS explanations for cheap T&A moments.
September 30th, 2006 at 6:47 pm
Dang it. Well I’ll definitely forfeit the point if we can get rid of the dark realism in comics plots.
I would like to point out that Karen’s analysis of spandex as a functional material for crime-fighting garb missed the point a bit. I mean, first off, Batman and Superman predate spandex, so let’s be real here. We’re talking about men dressed up in blue and grey TIGHTS, like circus performers wore.
Also, it can be really cold on rooftops. Unless Bruce’s cape was made from a repurposed electric blanket running on utility belt batteries, I’m not buying it. I myself have considered fighting crime MANY times and I have always intended on wearing PANTS. With pockets.
Male costumes leave nothing to the imagination either, though I will concede that in a male dominated society, what we dress our fictional female characters in does reflect on us, often poorly. But I still don’t think skirts are any less practical than blue pantyhose.
October 1st, 2006 at 7:24 pm
It wasn’t just that the writers aged her. It was that Arisia somehow used her ring to transform her body, and age herself prematurely. She kept having dizzy spells and feeling ill, and nobody knew what was going on. And by the time the other Lanterns figured out what was going on, she’d already turned herself into a grown woman. And then Hal agreed to go out with her, even though she was in many ways still a child in an adult woman’s body. I have all of those issues somewhere (from the Englehart run) if you want to borrow them.
March 14th, 2010 at 8:29 am
Good post mate. Can I add your site into Spurl? I couldnt find it marked there.
March 18th, 2012 at 8:10 am
HOT question of the day: Freshbooks or Quickbooks (online versions)